International Semantic Web Doctoral Symposium Research Topic: Representing Discrete-Event Simulation Process-Interaction Models using the Web Ontology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geographic Digital Content Components André Santanchè Advisor: Dr. Claudia Bauzer Medeiros Database Group Unicamp - Brazil.
Advertisements

OMV Ontology Metadata Vocabulary April 10, 2008 Peter Haase.
Oyster, Edinburgh, May 2006 AIFB OYSTER - Sharing and Re-using Ontologies in a Peer-to-Peer Community Raul Palma 2, Peter Haase 1 1) Institute AIFB, University.
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
The Semantic Web – WEEK 4: RDF
ISO TC184/SC4 Future architecture Rotterdam Progress on the Future SC4 Architecture PWI Friday 13 th November 2009.
Interoperability of Distributed Component Systems Bryan Bentz, Jason Hayden, Upsorn Praphamontripong, Paul Vandal.
Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
1 Introduction to XML. XML eXtensible implies that users define tag content Markup implies it is a coded document Language implies it is a metalanguage.
Modeling Process-Oriented Integration of Services Using Patterns and Pattern Primitives Uwe Zdun and Schahram Dustdar Distributed Systems Group Institute.
Funded by: European Commission – 6th Framework Project Reference: IST TAO Bootstrapping Methodology Hai Wang University of Southampton.
ModelicaXML A Modelica XML representation with Applications Adrian Pop, Peter Fritzson Programming Environments Laboratory Linköping University.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 metadata considerations for digital libraries.
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Instructor/Organizer: Dejing Dou Week 1 (Sept. 28)
COMP 6703 eScience Project Semantic Web for Museums Student : Lei Junran Client/Technical Supervisor : Tom Worthington Academic Supervisor : Peter Strazdins.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Learning Resource iNterchange
The Re-engineering and Reuse of Software
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
WP.5 - DDI-SDMX Integration
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
Final Search Terms: Archiving (digital or data) Authentication (data) Conservation (digital or data) Curation (digital or data) Cyberinfrastructure Data.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Towards Translating between XML and WSML based on mappings between.
Practical RDF Chapter 1. RDF: An Introduction
Compositional IS Development Framework Application Domain Application Domain Pre-existing components, legacy systems Extended for CD (ontologies) OAD Methods.
Chapter 8 Architecture Analysis. 8 – Architecture Analysis 8.1 Analysis Techniques 8.2 Quantitative Analysis  Performance Views  Performance.
Integrating Business Process Models with Ontologies Peter De Baer, Pieter De Leenheer, Gang Zhao, Robert Meersman {Peter.De.Baer, Pieter.De.Leenheer,
Introduction to MDA (Model Driven Architecture) CYT.
School of Computing FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Developing a methodology for building small scale domain ontologies: HISO case study Ilaria Corda PhD student.
PLANSERVE - overview of an EU proposal for the “Future and Emerging Technologies” Program Lee McCluskey Artform Research.
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis -- Issues Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
1 MFI-5: Metamodel for Process models registration HE Keqing, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering, Wuhan University
Model-Driven Analysis Frameworks for Embedded Systems George Edwards USC Center for Systems and Software Engineering
Semantic Web - an introduction By Daniel Wu (danielwujr)
BAA - Big Mechanism using SIRA Technology Chuck Rehberg CTO at Trigent Software and Chief Scientist at Semantic Insights™
Dr. Darius Silingas | No Magic, Inc. Domain-Specific Profiles for Your UML Tool Building DSL Environments with MagicDraw UML.
GREGORY SILVER KUSHEL RIA BELLPADY JOHN MILLER KRYS KOCHUT WILLIAM YORK Supporting Interoperability Using the Discrete-event Modeling Ontology (DeMO)
THE SUPPORTING ROLE OF ONTOLOGY IN A SIMULATION SYSTEM FOR COUNTERMEASURE EVALUATION Nelia Lombard DPSS, CSIR.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
From Domain Ontologies to Modeling Ontologies to Executable Simulation Models Gregory A. Silver Osama M. Al-Haj Hassan John A. Miller University of Georgia.
The future of the Web: Semantic Web 9/30/2004 Xiangming Mu.
OWL Representing Information Using the Web Ontology Language.
Mining the Biomedical Research Literature Ken Baclawski.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
Eurostat SDMX and Global Standardisation Marco Pellegrino Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Union Bangkok,
6 Dec Rev. 14 Dec CmpE 583 Fall 2008OWL Intro 1 OWL Intro Notes off Lacy Ch. 4 Atilla Elçi.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. An Overview of XML Ellen Pearlman Eileen Mullin Programming the Web Using.
1 Technical & Business Writing (ENG-715) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
The International RuleML Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications Orlando, Florida: October 30-31, 2008 Orlando, Florida A RuleML Study on Integrating.
Slide 1 Service-centric Software Engineering. Slide 2 Objectives To explain the notion of a reusable service, based on web service standards, that provides.
RE-ENGINEERING AND DOMAIN ANALYSIS BY- NISHANTH TIRUVAIPATI.
©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan10.1Database System Concepts W3C - The World Wide Web Consortium W3C - The World Wide Web Consortium.
NeOn Components for Ontology Sharing and Reuse Mathieu d’Aquin (and the NeOn Consortium) KMi, the Open Univeristy, UK
Semantic Data Extraction for B2B Integration Syntactic-to-Semantic Middleware Bruno Silva 1, Jorge Cardoso 2 1 2
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP2: Tools Raphael Volz Universität.
Ontologies for the Semantic Web Prepared By: Tseliso Molukanele Rapelang Rabana Supervisor: Associate Professor Sonia Burman 20 July 2005.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
Ontologies Reasoning Components Agents Simulations An Overview of Model-Driven Engineering and Architecture Jacques Robin.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
ResearchEHR Use of semantic web technologies and archetypes for the description of EHRs Montserrat Robles, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis, Jose Alberto.
Rinke Hoekstra Use of OWL in the Legal Domain Statement of Interest OWLED 2008 DC, Gaithersburg.
Metadata Driven Aspect Specification Ricardo Ferreira, Ricardo Raminhos Uninova, Portugal Ana Moreira Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal 7th International.
Panel: OWL Leaves the Nest Knowledge Integration for Ubiquitous Agents Harry Chen Image Matters LLC First International.
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
MDR for the Semantic Web: Supporting Ontology Concept
Model-Driven Analysis Frameworks for Embedded Systems
World Wide Web Consortium W3C
Service-enabling in Financial Domain
Presentation transcript:

International Semantic Web Doctoral Symposium Research Topic: Representing Discrete-Event Simulation Process-Interaction Models using the Web Ontology Language - OWL November 7, 2005 Lee W. Lacy PhD Candidate University of Central Florida

2 PIMODES Research Overview Discrete-event simulation models support operations research and other applications These models have historically been represented in vendor-specific file formats that have made sharing/interchange difficult Research is being performed to develop an OWL ontology that will provide a neutral interchange description of these types of models. The ontology is being scoped to a particular type of discrete event simulation model descriptions – those that adhere to the process- interaction world view The interchange of simulation models using the ontology will be demonstrated using web-based software

3 Presentation Outline Purpose Description Goal Statement Methodology Evaluation Summary

4 Purpose Description Simulation Model Interchange Challenges Scoping the Problem Subject Domain Benefits of Interchange

5 Why Interchange Models? Leverage investment in model development through reuse –Higher quality through reuse of validated models –Speed development lifecycle –Reduce development costs Enable competition of model development environments and compliant execution engines –Potential software manufacturer push-back if not presented correctly –Need to sell the HTML and XML business models Shift model development emphasis from programming to model quality

6 Scoping the Proposed Research Simulation data interchange topic broad Various types of simulation data Emphasis shifting from code to data Simulation models represent one type of data in newer “data-driven” systems Model is problem-specific while execution engine is problem-independent Discrete-event simulations represent one type of simulation Further scoped by “world view”

7 Subject Domain

8 Benefits of Model Interchange Better –Reuse of validated models Faster –Quicker to create new models by leveraging existing models Cheaper –Lower cost due to reuse instead of creation

9 Goal Statement Develop an ontology to support Discrete Event simulation model interchange Ontology becomes a “de facto” language New ontology/language harmonizes the most important aspects of legacy languages Legacy models can then be converted to/from the new “lingua franca” – enabling interchange

10 Methodology Use of OWL Ontologies Research Activities Research Plan Feedback Opportunities Anticipated Results

11 Simulation Ontology Representations Proposed by Lacy (2004) and Miller & Fishwick (2004) Provides advantages over traditional (e.g., XML) approaches Requires the development of a meta-model Existing modeling languages have implicit ontologies New explicit ontologies in effect describes a new modeling language Mappings required from legacy languages to the new ontology

12 Web Ontology Language - OWL OWL became a World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Standard in February 2004 OWL will be used to define a Process-Interaction Modeling Ontology for Discrete-Event Simulations (PIMODES) Compliant instance files are represented using RDF/XML

13 OWL’s Layered Architecture

14 Research Plan

15 A0 View

16 A2 – Literature Search (¶2) Activities Formalize domain semantics (¶2.1) Survey existing discrete-event process-interaction (¶2.2) –Software packages (¶2.2.2) –Modeling languages (¶2.2.3) –Formalisms/Representation methods (¶2.2.4) Review related simulation information interchange research (¶2.3) Describe Semantic Web technology (¶2.4)

17 Evaluation Develop sample model in ProcessModel and Arena Convert legacy model representations to DEPIM Convert DEPIM representation to legacy formats Compare converted models to original models

18 Demonstration Data Flow

19 Summary Simulation data is interchanged in a variety of ways Interchange is best performed with open standards OWL can be used to define an ontology for Discrete-Event Process-Interaction models Use of such an ontology can be demonstrated by converting legacy simulation model formats