Overview of Standard Setting Leslie Wilson Assistant State Superintendent Accountability and Assessment August 26, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Gateway and End of Course 2007.
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
Advanced Topics in Standard Setting. Methodology Implementation Validity of standard setting.
1 New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Setting Performance Standards.
MCAS Standards Validation: High School Introductory Physics Sheraton Hotel Braintree, MA September 17-18, 2007.
Preparing for New Test Scores  Smarter Balanced assessments measure the full range of the Common Core State Standards. They are designed to let teachers.
Setting Performance Standards Grades 5-7 NJ ASK NJDOE Riverside Publishing May 17, 2006.
Modified High School Assessment (Mod-HSA) Maryland State Board of Education August 26, 2008.
Alternative Maryland School Assessment (Alt-MSA)
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Standard Setting Inclusive Assessment Seminar Marianne.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Exam Setting Performance Standards With The Modified Angoff Procedure.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
Critical Information SAGE Critical Information 1 Judy Park, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Utah State Office of Education.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
SB 149: Update and FAQ May 20, “While it is critical that the state appropriately holds public schools and districts accountable for delivering.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
Setting Performance Standards for the Hawaii State Alternate Assessments: Reading, Mathematics, and Science Presentation for the Hawaii State Board of.
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
1 New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Setting Performance Standards.
Who in the World Develops and Writes the MI-Access Items? OEAA Conference 2007 – Day 2 MI-Access Coordinators.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
An Overview of Virginia Standards of Learning Item and Test Development.
Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase II: Revised Draft Recommendations Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) April 14, 2009.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Adopt New Math Cut Scores and Final Math Achievement Level Descriptors and Policy Definitions Adopt High School Math Achievement.
Setting Cut Scores on Alaska Measures of Progress Presentation to Alaska Superintendents Marianne Perie, AAI July 27, 2015.
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
Secondary Science Curriculum Council April 19, 2010.
Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions 1 Peggy G. Carr National Center for Education Statistics November 17, 2007.
0 PARCC Performance Level Setting Place your logo here.
School Improvement Plan (SIP) Accreditation Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Office Of Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner For Standards, Assessment and Reporting S/CDN September 23, 2004.
Oregon Standards: An Update 2009 Superintendent’s Summer Institute Oregon Department of Education August 3, 2009.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Laurene Christensen and Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational Outcomes April 4, 2009 ACTIVITIES THAT WORK: SELECTING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION.
Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, and Math Achievement Standards.
Office of Service Quality
Vertical Articulation Reality Orientation (Achieving Coherence in a Less-Than-Coherent World) NCSA June 25, 2014 Deb Lindsey, Director of State Assessment.
So What is Going to be Happening with State Assessment for Students with Disabilities for 2007/2008? Peggy Dutcher Fall 2007 Assessment and Accountability.
Common Core Standards Overview. The Common Core Standards (CCS) were developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
A Presentation to the USDOE January 13, 2010 Mary Ann Snider Chief of Educator Excellence and Instructional Effectiveness Race to the Top- Assessment Programs.
How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.
January 11, Presentation on the Impact of Raising MEAP and MME Cut Scores to be Consistent with College and Career Readiness PRESENTED FOR DISCUSSION.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
V: Maryland’s High School Assessments (HSAs) & the Bridge Plan for Academic Validation Overview.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting: March 15, 2005 Testing.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
High School Proficiency Exam Nevada Department of Education.
Next-Generation MCAS: Update and review of standard setting
The University of Texas System Assessment of
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Advisory Council of Instruction
Standard Setting for NGSS
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Test Administrators.
Student Assessment Updates
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
District and School Accountability System: Proposed Modifications
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Standard Setting Leslie Wilson Assistant State Superintendent Accountability and Assessment August 26, 2008

Purpose of Presentation To present the standard setting process To provide background information to the Board in preparation for setting standards for – Modified High School Assessments – Alternative Maryland School Assessments

Setting Performance Standards Content Standards Voluntary State Curriculum The Tests Expertise: Student Knowledge/ Subject Matter Setting Performance Standards Cut Scores that match students to their appropriate Performance Categories

The Threshold Student A borderline or minimally qualified student – In terms of performance The least qualified of the Proficient or Advanced students

Mod-HSA Test Performance Standards Basic Recommended Standards threshold students ProficientAdvanced

Standard Setting Work Flow Content Groups Psychometric Council Review & Articulation Committee State Superintendent State Board of Education Set Standards

Step 1: Content Groups Participants all have appropriate content and grade-level expertise Include representatives from local Central Offices as well as school level staff Participate in separate content and grade level discussions

Responsibilities of Content Group Review Assessment Discuss what barely proficient and advanced students know and can do Propose cut scores and discuss Make recommendations to Review and Articulation group

Content Group Process: Round 1 Break into small groups to encourage independent decision-making Read, discuss ordered-item booklets Individuals vote (privately) for a cut score Small group discussion of votes

The Process: Round 2 Individuals vote (privately) for a cut score Small group discussion of votes Examine, discuss impact data

The Process: Round 3 Small groups converge Individuals vote (privately) for a cut score Discussion Individuals vote (privately) for a cut score The median cut score is the committee’s recommendation.

Bookmark Standard-Setting Procedure Test items students must know and be able to do to be considered Proficient Test items students must know and be able to do to be considered Advanced A P Ordered Item Booklet

Standard-Setting Process Individual Analysis Items most students get correct Items fewer students get correct Content every student should know

Review test; vote Round 1 Discuss data and distribution Median Standard-Setting Process Round 2 View impact data and discuss Vote Median

Standard-Setting Process Small groups join; vote Round 3 Median cut score is committee’s recommendation Median

Step 2: Psychometric Council Nationally-recognized experts Trained in measurement and psychometrics Independent Familiar with Maryland tests Similar to Technical Advisory Panels in other states

Psychometric Council Responsibilities Reviews work of all groups Ensures quality controls were followed Ensures standard-setting process technically sound Does not make judgments on whether standard is “good” or “bad” Forwards comments and recommendations to Review & Articulation Committee

Step 3: Review and Articulation Superintendents Assistant Superintendents Local Accountability Coordinators Advocates for students with special needs (special education and ELL) Parents Local Boards of Education Teachers Union representatives Business Community members MSDE

Review & Articulation Committee Responsibilities include: – Reviewing work of all groups and Psychometric Council – Ensuring rigor is equivalent among grades – Reviewing articulation among grades – Forwarding recommendations to the State Superintendent

Step 4: State Superintendent of Schools Reviews work of all groups, Psychometric Council, and Review & Articulation Committee Makes recommendation to the State Board of Education

Step 5: State Board Approval Reviews proposed standards Approves standards for implementation

Next Steps 1.Review and approve proposed standards to be used to determine proficient and advanced performance on the modified HSAs. The scores will be used to determine AYP for Maryland high schools next year. 2.Review and approve proposed standards for the Alt-MSA. Science will be reported this fall for the first time.

Overview of Standard Setting Questions and Discussion