The Balanced Scorecard and Collection Management Jim Self University of Virginia Library www.lib.virginia.edu/bsc 27 June 2004.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Meeting of the OECD Short-term Economic Statistics Expert Group June 2002 FUTURE OF SHORT-TERM ECONOMIC STATISTICS DISSEMINATED BY THE OECD.

Advertisements

The View through the Public Portal Brenda Bailey-Hainer Colorado State Library NISO Metasearch Initiatives Meeting May 7, 2003.

Unit Name Goes Here Data This, Data That Using ISO to Develop Performance Indicators for Library Wide Planning & Data Comparison Presentation for.

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 19, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.

Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.

Monday, May 18, 2015 INFORMING AND GUIDING REVIEW AND LEARNING PROCESS UNDER CAADP THROUGH RESAKSS OUSMANE BADIANE Director for Africa International Food.

BC Integration of Systems and Resources MetaLib at Boston College Theresa Lyman Digital Resources Reference Librarian Boston College Libraries.

. The Balanced Scorecard and MIS— Strategy Development and Evolution Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library 20 th Pan.

GRAPPLING WITH CHANGING REALITIES John Stratton, Lea Currie, Monica Claassen-Wilson, and Frances Devlin University of Kansas Charleston Conference November.

CONTEXT Evaluation of Information Services. Topics of Day Mission Vision Goals and Objectives Standards Types of Metrics  Input  Output  Performance.

of Research Libraries Next Generation Statistics for Libraries: CAUL Forum 20 January 2003 Sydney, NSW The ARL E-Metrics Project.

Effective, Sustainable and Practical Library Assessment

Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.

Library integrated system -Aleph Fang Peng Stony Brook University.

The Balanced Scorecard and Collection Management Jim Self University of Virginia Library June 17, 2002.

Balanced Scorecard as a Performance Management Tool

WEB BASED LIBRARY SERVICES A CASE STUDY: CENTRAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY LIBRARY NESRIN INCE REFERENCE LIBRARIAN Olympia London March 2002.

ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training Session 1: Financial Management Overview.

The Library Balanced Scorecard: The Results Please! Joe Matthews American Library Association June 2007.

P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 4 Performance Methodology: The Balanced Scorecard.

November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education Quarterly Special Education Meeting American Recovery and Reinvestment Act November.

Chapter 6 Measuring Indicators

The ARL E-Metrics Project Measures for Electronic Resources ACRL/NEC Information Technology Interest Group May 17, 2002 Brinley Franklin Director, University.

E-Resources in Your Library MnPALS User Group Meeting October 23, 2012.

Technical Services & Cataloging and Classification Jennifer Anielski and Christina Tracy IS 554 Public Library Management.

The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee

Measures that matter: Designing and developing your own Balanced Scorecard Karin de Jager & Jim Self 7th Northumbria International Conference on Performance.

Jacqui Dowd SCONUL Workshop University of Westminster 17 th November 2009 Performance Measures & Metrics at University of Glasgow Library.

FY 2006 Budget Process W. Frank Steely Library Arne J. Almquist, Assoc. Provost for Library Services.

Five Years of Keeping Score What are the Results? Jim Self Donna Tolson University of Virginia Library ALA Annual Conference Washington DC June 23, 2007.

VIVA Forum Examples from University of Virginia Presented by Allison M. Sleeman Serials Cataloging Coordinator.

Creating Synergies for Success February 12, 2013.

Making Library Assessment Work ARL 4th Human Resources Management Symposium Washington, D.C. November 9, 2004 Steve Hiller and Jim Self University.

Embracing Change Oliver Pesch Chief Strategist, E-Resources EBSCO Information Services.

Overview – Indistar® SSOS Online Web Tool in comparison to the publication “ Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” Assessment Process Planning Process.

2011-Sept Monitoring Economic Development of Qatar Presentation By Hamad Bin Jabor Al Thani President of Qatar Statistics Authority Monitoring Economic.

WHAT IS IT? Balanced Scorecard A framework that sets visual strategies for the co-workers to translate them into actions to improve the main perspectives.

E-Metrics Project Update American Library Assocation Orlando June 27, 2002 Sherrie Schmidt Dean of University Libraries Arizona State.

1 Seminar on 2008 SNA Implementation June 2010, Saint John’s, Antigua and Barbuda GULAB SINGH UN Statistics Division Diagnostic Framework: National.

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator September, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.

By SAWSAN HABRE LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY AMICAL Meeting #2 June 1-3, 2005 DDS/ILL

Every library and librarian supports development LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT Prepared by: Hala Marzouka.

SU Counting what matters To measure what counts Karin de Jager University of Cape Town October 2004.

Project Counter in brief Jim Self University of Virginia Library ARL Survey Coordinators Meeting Chicago, Illinois June 24, 2005.

NCSU Libraries Collections Budget Presentation University Library Committee November 6, 2014 Greg Raschke Associate Director for Collections and Scholarly.

Library Updates August 22, Agenda UCB/LBNL partnership Journal access Other possible services Reports Submission System Cataloging Update Online.

Measuring Business Impact National Fund for Workforce Solutions June 11, 2013.

The New Metrics at U.Va. Jim Self University of Virginia Library ARL Survey Coordinators Meeting Orlando, Florida June 25, 2004.

National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability NCCCSIA Webinar #2 Conducting the Error Rate Review Process using the Revised Data.

1. GUIDE TO USE THE SAIGONTECH LIBRARY WEBSITE I. Log in and Search engine II. Current semester textbooks III. Favorite books,

The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries - What Libraries Are Doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee

Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.

10 Key Findings from the Survey of Academic Library Streaming Video National Media Market - November 9, 2014 deg farrelly - Arizona State University Jane.

of Research Libraries Where's the Money Libraries … Going, Going, … Martha Kyrillidou SSP 25th Annual Meeting, May 28-30, 2003,

Michigan Association of Charter School Boards MACSB.org.

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Budget Monitoring and Evaluation

Balanced Scorecard “Puyallup Public Library, as an innovative information center, provides excellent service to all in their pursuit of information, knowledge,

Data Collection and Beyond Assessment at the U.Va. Library

Assessing Library Performance:

Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Templates for Presentation

Penn State New Faculty Orientation August 17, 2017

Le développement des collections: l’impact du numérique et les pratiques en émergence Development of Collections: The Impact of Electronic Resources.

Search Term Usage Analysis

Penn State New Faculty Orientation August 15, 2018

A Statistical Profile of LTS and Aspirational Goals for 2015-

How to Request Books from Other Libraries Using the Library Catalog

A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)

MONOGRAPHS’ ACQUISITION: RETURN ON INVESTMENT

Penn State New Faculty Orientation August 20, 2019

Presentation transcript:

The Balanced Scorecard and Collection Management Jim Self University of Virginia Library 27 June 2004

Managing the data The Balanced Scorecard is a layered and categorized instrument that Identifies the important statistics Ensures a proper balance Organizes multiple statistics into an intelligible framework

The scorecard measures are “balanced” into four areas The user perspective The finance perspective The internal process perspective The future (learning and growth) perspective

Metrics Specific targets indicating full success, partial success, and failure At the end of the year we know if we have met our target for each metric The metric may be a complex measure encompassing several elements

The scorecard at Virginia Implemented in 2001 Reports for FY2002 and FY2003 Preparing metrics for FY2005 A work in progress

Our Guiding Principles Collections and Services Providing access to great collections that are easy to find, easy to use, and that inspire learning and scholarship. Providing great service that meets our users’ needs and surpasses their expectations.

Metric VI: Circulation of new monographs Target1: 60% of newly cataloged monographs should circulate within two years. Target2: 50% of new monographs should circulate within two years.

Metric VII: Turnaround time for user requests Target1: 90% of user requests for new books should be filled within 7 days. Target2: 80% of user requests for new books should be filled within 7 days.

Metric VIII: Processing Time for Routine Acquisitions Target1: 90% of in-print books from North America should be processed within one month. Target2: 80% of in-print books from North America should be processed within one month.

Metric XVI: Unit Cost of Serial Use Target1: There should be no increase in unit cost each year. Target2: Less than 5% annual increase in unit cost.

Metric XVII: Unit Cost of Online Databases Target1: There should be no increase in unit cost each year. Target2: Less than 5% annual increase in unit cost.

Metric XXIV: Expenditures for Digital Materials Target1: U.Va. should be in the top 25% of ARL libraries in percentage of collections dollars expended on digital materials. Target2: U.Va. should be in the top third of ARL libraries.

Impact of the Scorecard Acquisition of materials that are likely to be used Prompt response to user requests Control of unit costs Acquisition of more digital materials