2015 NOAA Satellite Conference Greenbelt, MD April 27, 2015 NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Dr. Al Powell, Director Dr. Michael.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space-based Architecture for Climate Mary Kicza NOAA’s Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services May 19, 2011.
Advertisements

© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Meteorological Service of Canada – Update Meteorological Service of Canada – Update NOAA Satellite Proving Ground/User-Readiness June 2, 2014 David Bradley.
February High Impact Weather Workshop 1 JCSDA-HFIP and -ECMWF Workshop Recommendations Lars Peter Riishojgaard and Sid Boukabara Joint Center for.
1 WRF Development Test Center A NOAA Perspective WRF ExOB Meeting U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 28 April 2006 Fred Toepfer NOAA Environmental.
1 Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) NOAA Contributions to Satellite Calibration and the need for a National and International Framework.
CREST TECHNICAL REVIEW NCWCP in College Park, MD May 7, 2015 NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Dr. Michael Kalb, Acting Director.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Sensor Calibration/Validation.
Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) Data Access NOAA Satellite Conference April 8-12, 2013 Kevin Berberich NESDIS/OSD NDE Project Photographs.
Science Mission Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies The SPoRT Center – Infusing.
Mary E. Kicza Assistant Administrator for NOAA Satellite and Information Services Responsible for Responsible for providing timely access to global environmental.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
NOAA Satellite Conference April 8-12, 2013 Mary Kicza Assistant Administrator for Satellite & Information Services.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Science Support for NASA-NOAA Research to Operations (R2O) and GPM Ralph.
EUM/SIR/VWG/12/0375, v1, 10 July 2012 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS EUM/SIR/VWG/12/0375, v1, 10 July 2012 Coordination Group.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.
ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE IS POWER Protect Life and Property Promote Economic Vitality Environmental Stewardship Promote Fundamental Understanding.
Reginald Lawrence, NOAA/NESDIS/OSD NOAA Direct Readout Conference
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 MAP (Maximum A Posteriori) x is reduced state vector [SST(x), TCWV(w)]
GHRSST, V1, CGMS 41 July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in the slide master) Coordination Group.
3rd NSTWS, Vienna VA, July Research to Operations in the Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation Lars Peter Riishojgaard Director, JCSDA.
GOES-R Support to Future Climate Monitoring Needs Mitch Goldberg Chief, Satellite Meteorology and Climatology Division Office of Research and Applications.
GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1-3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 1 GOES USERS’ CONFERENCE IV: Discussion Highlights Algorithm.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Precipitation and Flash Flood.
GOES Users’ Conference III May 10-13, 2004 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC GOES USERS’ CONFERENCE III: Discussion Highlights.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES Microwave Products Presented.
US BENEFITS. It Addresses Priorities The US and Canada have common scientific, economic and strategic interests in arctic observing: marine and air transportation.
Xiangqian Wu and Mitch Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) P1.16 GLOBAL SPACE-BASED INTER-CALIBRATION SYSTEM (GSICS)
Diane E. Wickland NPP Program Scientist NPP Science: HQ Perspective on VIIRS May 18, 2011.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
111/27/2015 User Education & Training End-to-End Cycle for NOAA's Satellite Program Anthony Mostek NOAA - NWS – OCWWS - Training Division Anthony Mostek.
GOES-R Recommendations from past GOES Users’ Conference: Jim Gurka Tim Schmit Tom Renkevens NOAA/ NESDIS Tony Mostek NOAA/ NWS Dick Reynolds Short and.
1 Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (NASA, NCEP, NESDIS, OAR) Louis W. Uccellini Director, NCEP November 29, 2001.
Session 2: Improved Situational Awareness Sixth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee 28 February – 1 March 2012 Future Activities National Space Science.
Gary Jedlovec Roadmap to Success transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations.
5-6 June 2008CEOS Precipitation Constellation Workshop – Tokyo, Japan NOAA Status Report to the CEOS Precipitation Constellation Ralph Ferraro Center for.
Future Integrated Satellite Architecture Brief to Third GOES-R Users Workshop Broomfield, Colorado Michael Crison NOAA Satellites and Information Service.
Summary of GOES-R Activities at CIMSS/ASPB and Recommendations for the Future Steven Ackerman, Tom Achtor GOES-R Algorithm Working Group GOES-R Algorithm.
NOAA Satellite Direct Readout Conference Welcome! – to the 2011 NOAA Direct Readout Conference! Kathleen Kelly Director, Office of Satellite Products and.
Global Space-based Inter- Calibration System (GSICS) Progress Report Mitch Goldberg, NOAA/NESDIS GSICS Executive Panel chair.
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
Role of Technical Agencies Responsible for Hazard Assessment, Monitoring, Observations, Data and Analysis Dr. David Green National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
NOAA Plenary Agenda Item th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6 November 2015 NOAA Satellite and Information Service.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO Jérôme Lafeuille WMO Space Programme Geneva.
Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Project Future Directions.
Use of GPM GMI at the Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation.
Fifty years of innovation and cooperation in satellite meteorology Jérôme Lafeuille World Meteorological Organization.
Session 2 Conclusion: Future Product Development Activities Science Advisory Committee Meeting 26 – 28 August, 2014 National Space Science and Technology.
Towards an Architecture for Operational Monitoring for Climate Change from Space: NOAA’s Contribution Charles S. Baker Deputy Assistant Administrator NOAA.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Weather & Water Synthesis.
Overview of Climate Observational Requirements for GOES-R Herbert Jacobowitz Short & Associates, Inc.
Canada-U.S. Workshop on the Polar Communications and Weather (PCW) Mission ‘Extending GOES-R to the Arctic’
User Readiness Issues for GOES-R Jim Gurka Tim Schmit (NOAA/ NESDIS) Dick Reynolds (Short and Associates) 4 th GOES Users’ Conference May 2, 2006 Broomfield.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
NOAA, May 2015 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in the slide master) Coordination Group for Meteorological.
QA4EO in 10 Minutes! A presentation to the 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting.
NOAA, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Activities toward Transitioning Mature R&D Missions to an Operational Status.
Agency xxx, version xx, Date xx 2016 [update in the slide master] Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Introduction to GSICS Presented.
Sustained Coordinated Processing of Environmental Satellite Data for Climate Monitoring SCOPE-CM Sustained, Co-Ordinated Processing of Environmental Satellite.
Band 14 (11um) Winds Low-Level >700 mb Mid-Level mb High-Level mb   NPP VIIRS Polar Winds Products The GOES-R AWG Derived Motion Winds.
GSICS Coordination Center Report Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Fred Wu and George Ohring NOAA/Center for Satellite Applications and Research 8 April, 2013.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
NOAA Report on Ocean Parameters - SST Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 9 Author: Sasha Ignatov.
User Preparation for new Satellite generations
Enterprise Algorithm Change Process
WMO Space Programme Update
NOAA Agency Update Steve Volz, SIT Vice Chair
CIOSS Executive Board Al Powell Acting Director 30 August 2005
Presentation transcript:

2015 NOAA Satellite Conference Greenbelt, MD April 27, 2015 NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Dr. Al Powell, Director Dr. Michael Kalb, Deputy

Wrap-up Remind Ourselves: Why do we build satellites? –A) because we can? –B) because they are really cool? –C) because they are important? D) because they provide environmental information & products that enable important environmental decisions at many space and time scales. Many uses: From enabling Near Real Time situational awareness, to building multi-decadal Climate Data Records and trends; value to NWP They are very expensive to build and operate, they involve risk; they involve infrastructure, and long term commitment of sustaining resources The benefits outweigh the costs …… (That is why we are here). But will this always be true? 2

Sustaining the Cost / Benefit Larger International community of satellite operators; More sophisticated satellites, More sophisticated sensors, More sophisticated uses and users, more sophisticated processing, Higher expectations …What are collective sustainable costs? All operational weather satellites and capabilities have evolved from Research Missions, MODIS  VIIRS; AIRS  CrIS, e.g. Research: pushes technology and science, higher risk, investments, potential payoff Operations: utilize best research tempered by TRL, and cost / benefit; Design for sustainability, Plan for continuity, Enable interoperability among satellites, generations past, present and future. There is significant growing dependency and overlap between research and operational satellites --- urgently demonstrated when NASA NPP satellite was pressed into operational service. There is increased leveraging of NASA and International research and capabilities and partnerships for data sharing and operations: AMSR-2, METOP, IASI, GPM, Environmental Satellite Observing has very nearly become a Global Enterprise. Coordination & Communication are key to sustainable cost / benefit (<<1) 3

Center for Satellite Applications & Research Delivers leadership for NESDIS research, development, validation and maintenance of satellite derived products and applications from NOAA’s operational geostationary and polar-orbiting satellites and from non-NOAA research and international satellites. Develops new environmental applications, techniques and algorithms for transforming raw satellite observations into scientifically meaningful, quality assured and calibrated environmental measurements and products, and develops the pre-operational computer codes to implement them. Supports the calibration and validation of all satellite sensors used in NOAA’s satellite operations, and develops methods and maintains systems for inter-calibrating NOAA satellite data with other satellites in the international constellation of research and operational satellites. Collaborates with other NESDIS and NOAA offices, universities, NASA and other U.S. agencies, and with international organizations on exchange and evaluation of operational and research satellite data and products.

Major STAR Activities GOES-R Algorithm Working Group (AWG) GOES-R Calibration/Validation Working Group (CWG) JPSS Algorithm and Data Products Program, Cal/Val Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA) Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) Calibration / Validation (ICVS, NCC, GSICS) Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry support to JASON Program

Calibration & Validation (1) Satellite sensors do not measure anything directly. They count photons of different energies and register these as voltages transmitted to the ground. Scientific algorithms (such as what STAR creates) convert these into actual geophysical measurements (i.e. cloud images, winds, ocean currents, temperature, precipitation) that can be used by forecasters and in computer forecast models. Cal / Val involves use of specialized physical models and mathematical and statistical methods to determine the accuracy and reliability of the derived environmental measurements. Accuracy and reliability change over time as orbits and sensors degrade, measurements may not meet accuracy requirements needed for them to be useful. When that happens …… 6

Calibration & Validation (2) We modify the product algorithms; compute new calibration coefficients that allow sensor data, and geophysical variables derived from them, to regain as much accuracy, performance reliability, and forecast utility as possible. We monitor many sensors on many satellites. No two sensors of even the same type are exactly alike. Part of our responsibility is to inter-calibrate every sensor / satellite against every other sensor / satellite (including NASA research and international satellites) so that all of them work together as a single constellation (WMO Global Satellite Inter-Calibration System, i.e. GSICS). By themselves Satellites don't do much of anything useful. The Scientific Algorithms and Calibration / Validation is where the value goes in This is what STAR does. 7

Backup 8

STAR Provides Life Cycle Mission Science Support 9 Requirements Instrument Build and Design Pre-LaunchPost-Launch Operations and Sustainment Requirements Definition Design Requirements Research to Operations (R2O) Acceptance TestingLifecycle R2O Product Research, Test, and EvaluationScience Maintenance Instrument Calibration Calibration / Validation Instrument and System Checkout Product Improvements TIME

Satellite Strategies in Transition 10 PASTFUTURE Calibrate individual instrumentsInter-calibrate multiple instruments globally Develop algorithms for GEO & LEO instruments independently Develop common algorithms for GEO and LEO instruments Develop individual productsDevelop product suites and blended products Transfer algorithms to NESDIS/OSPOTransfer algorithms to NESDIS/OSPO & International and non-government partners Address internal NOAA requirementsParticipate in multiple US and international collaborations Study climate using single instrumentsStudy climate using chains of instrument data Assimilate data from individual satellitesAssimilate data from suites of satellites Manage projects for Principal InvestigatorsManage algorithm deliveries to entire acquisition programs PRESENT

STAR Science Services Science 4.1 Science & Product Systems Development 4.1.1Scientific algorithm & product systems development 4.1.2Calibration / validation systems development 4.1.3Software and Algorithm Integration 4.1.4Configuration control and change management 4.1.5Quality Assurance 4.2 Science and Product Services 4.2.1Requirements development and analysis Scientific algorithm & applications research, prototype development, testing, and validation 4.2.3Risk Reduction & Proving Grounds 4.2.4User Readiness 4.2.5Product Improvement 4.3 Instrument & Product Calibration /Validation Development, coordination and execution of instrument and product Calibration / Validation techniques, technologies and activities; Interagency and international cal / val program coordination activities 4.3.3Cal/Val campaigns 4.4 Science Project & Program Management Program and Project level mission science leadership and coordination 4.4.2Science Team Management & Support Organization and coordination of internal and / or external science community working groups, review boards, and advisory services 4.5 Post Launch Science Maintenance 4.5.1Science algorithm and instrument performance monitoring Satellite / instrument performance issues mitigation services Calibration updates and algorithm changes necessary to ensure product quality or correct for unanticipated anomalies or artifacts Long Term Monitoring Product Monitoring and long term error assessment Reprocessing of long term data to ensure highest quality