IL Step 4: Evaluating Search Results Information Literacy 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Researching Physics Web-based Research. Learning objectives Evaluate websites for reliability, level and bias. Reference websites to allow another person.
Advertisements

Six Steps to Effective Library Research
Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers. All rights reserved. Professional Communication: Strategies for College.
Internet Research Evaluating Information. People are seeking information Statistics show steady increases each year in the number of people using the.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Internet Research Three Browsing Subject Guides.
Information Literacy for MOS ECS November 2010.
PPAS 3190: Introduction to Library Research Timothy Bristow – Scott Library Political Science & Public Policy Librarian.
Information Literacy Jen Earl: Academic Support Librarian- HuLSS.
SOURCES finding & evaluating them. Evaluating the AUTHORITY of a source – what questions should we ask? Is the author or organization identified? What.
Library Research Skills Arts Library Services Team | University Library Karen Chilcott | Faculty Liaison Librarian.
Evaluating Search Results Fundamentals of Research Capital Community College Spring Semester 2013.
Websites vs. Databases Glenforest Secondary School Library Resource Centre Primary Source: M. Rosettis, St. Augustine.
LEDDY LIBRARY Managing Employees Help Is Always Available! You can , phone, or just drop by and see me: Katharine Ball Business Librarian.
Evaluating Sources This presentation was created using information from Teaching Information Literacy: 35 Practical, Standards-Based Exercises for College.
Information Lecture 2 – Evaluating Information Sources CSC Introduction to Computers and Their Applications.
Information Formats And Their Characteristics Questions about this activity? Contact Kimberley Stephenson at
IL Step 1: Sources of Information Information Literacy 1.
RESEARCH Checking Reliable Sources. Why do I need to check if a website is reliable? Unlike most traditional written information, no one has to approve.
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
Databases Indexes & Abstracts. Indexes & Abstracts = Serials When most librarians think about science and technology they think about serials and the:
Lesson 2: Planning Research Topics Results of Good Research Planning Elements of a Research Plan.
RESEARCHING & EVALUATING Summer 2008 Melanie Wilson Academic Success Center MSC 207.
EVALUATING SOURCES. THE NEED FOR EFFECTIVE SOURCES Lend credibility to your arguments Support your points with researched information A source is only.
Primary and Secondary Literature Finding good sources for research.
University of Antwerp Library TEW & HI UA library offers... books, journals, internet catalogue -UA catalogue, e-info catalogue databases -e.g.
Librarian pre-selected a variety of scholarly and popular journal articles.
Finding Credible Sources
Finding and Evaluating Sources.  Online Catalog: Search ALL the resources of the library; access through library computers or remotely through Internet.
 Remember, it is important that you should not believe everything you read.  Moreover, you should be able to reject or accept information based on the.
How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
Objectives: Create effective search queries. Use criteria to evaluate sources. Find materials from catalog in the library.
Research 2013.
EVALUATING ONLINE SOURCES. GOAL Identify criteria to evaluate websites. Evaluate websites to determine their usefulness for research & your own personal.
WEBSITE CRITIQUE On Scientific News Websites. IFLSCIENCE.com.
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter Four Reading Research: To Boldly Go Where Others Have Gone Before.
Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites.
Evaluating Sources. Evaluation During Reading After you have asked yourself some questions about the source and determined that it's worth your time to.
La recherche Un guide. Une bonne source? ACCURACY: There are no regulations, standards, or systems in place to ensure that information on the web is correct.
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
Chapter 7 Researching Your Speech. Researching your speech: Introduction Researching your topic and providing strong evidence for your claims can make.
Evaluating Online Health Information. Using the internet to find health information is alike going on a treasure hunt… You could find some real gems…
Evaluating Internet Resources Mike Burgmeier Coordinator of Library Instruction Olson Library, Northern Michigan University Kevin McDonough Reference and.
Chapter 20 Asking Questions, Finding Sources. Characteristics of a Good Research Paper Poses an interesting question and significant problem Responds.
CAPE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Information Literacy Program Critically Evaluating
Evaluating Sources.
Evaluating of Information
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
Writing the Research Paper
Evaluating Web Sites February 2012.
Do Now Look over your notes from last class and write a summary at the bottom of your Cornell notes.
Are my Sources Reliable?
Evaluating Sources.
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Sources.
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
Web Evaluation The C. R. A. A. P. Test.
Evaluating Information
Evaluating Internet Resources
Conducting a STEM Literature Review
Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources
Questioning and evaluating information
CAPE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Analyzing and Organizing Information
Evaluating Internet Resources
How do you find relevant and reliable information?
Evaluating Websites The CRAAP Test: Don’t Surf the Net Without It! CRAAP Test: Meriam Library  California State University, Chico.
CRAAP.
Presentation transcript:

IL Step 4: Evaluating Search Results Information Literacy 1

Evaluating Information: Overview Why evaluate search results? ► Search results often contain irrelevant, inaccurate, and unreliable information ► Before expending the effort to obtain the full content, read, and analyze information each search result represents, we should filter the search results to select a set of results most likely to be useful. ► Evaluating information is an essential part of research Information Literacy 2 Key Questions ► Is the information accurate? ► Is it credible? ► Is it appropriate for what I need? ► Approach to information evaluation ► Evaluate information sources ► Consider information content ► Analyze citations

Information Evaluation: Basic Criteria 1.Type of Document ► The type of document can give an indication of the scope and content Textbook → a good introduction to a subject Conference Proceedings → Overview of the state of the art (most current) research findings Books usually give a broader coverage than journal articles, but the latter tend to be more up to date Information Literacy 3 Journal articles (Conference Papers) Books Book Chapters (Conference Proceedings)

Information Evaluation: Basic Criteria 2.Subject & Scope ► Examine title, keywords, subject headings, abstract ► Scan the preface, table of contents, index, bibliography ↓ ► Does the document cover the right topic? ► What is the breadth of the publication? ► Does the document provide an overview of the topic or is it focused on a specialized aspect of the topic? ↑ ► Is the document a primary research? Original research that presents new findings and theories ► Or a secondary research? Compilation or evaluation of previously presented material  e.g., review article, textbook Information Literacy 4

Information Evaluation: Basic Criteria 3.Intended Audience ► What type of audience is the author addressing? Scientist, professionals, general audience? ► Is the document Too elementary or basic Too advanced Too technical or applied Just right for your needs? ↓ ► Start with the right type of information source Information Literacy 5 4.Date of Publication ► Publication date should be appropriate for your project Do you need the most current information? –e.g., life science research Do you need the most established (validated) information? –e.g., information science research Do you need information from different time periods? –e.g., historical research

Internet Information: Overview Caveat Emptor - “let the buyers beware” ► Characteristics of information on the Internet Many document types  From blogs (personal opinion) to scholarly publications Diversity of authorship & purpose  Anyone can create Web content for any purpose Wide range of quality and trustworthiness  Information is typically not validated or peer-reviewed  Information could be inaccurate, incomplete, or biased. Mixture of dynamic and static information  Some Web contents change daily, some are never updated What the Internet lacks but libraries have ► Process of selection and quality control (editorial or refereed) Review process by the publisher Selection process by the librarian Information Literacy 6

Internet Information: Evaluation Criteria 1. Coverage 적용 범위 ► Is the information relevant to research topic? Subject & scope, intended audience 2. Accuracy 정확성 ► Can information be verified ? Citations & reference list available? Can information be cross-checked with other sources? ► Are there (grammatical, spelling, typographical) errors? → no quality control 3. Authorship/Authority 저자 / 권위성 ► Is it clear who wrote the document? ► Are author’s qualifications available and appropriate? ► Is there a sponsoring organization (or affiliation) for the author? ► Who published the information? Check the URL → university, company? 4. Objectivity 객관성 ► What is the purpose of the publication? Why was this written for whom? ► Is there a sponsoring organization for the author? ► Is the information opinion, fact, or propaganda? 5. Currency 현재성 ► When was the document created (& updated)? ► Look for broken links and outdated information ← Do not trust the date stamp Information Literacy 7

Information Evaluation: Exercise Project: “Relationship between human activity and the temperature of the earth” 1.Use documents written by a.An atmospheric physicist at Stanford University and founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project b.A Washington Post reporter who has written articles such as "Arctic Ice Shelf Crumbles Into Sea," and “Perils of the Greenhouse Effects.“ c.The president of an Environmental club and publisher of a Web site that discusses the major causes of global warming in the last 100 years. Project: “The current use of primates in scientific laboratories” 2.Which document will be most useful? a."Monkeys in our Labs," by Scott Gottieber, a USA Today staff writer. Published in USA Today Dec 15, Includes chart, "Number of Test Primates in the US, " b.Laboratory Primate Advocacy Group website. LPAG is a nonprofit organization. Website last updated in "LPAG believes that the laboratory is no place for monkeys and nonhuman great apes.“ c."Better numbers on primate research," by Constance Holden. Published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Appeared in Science, a scholarly publication, on March 30, Information Literacy 8

Information Evaluation: Exercise Project: “Social benefits & liabilities for tribes developing casinos on Indian reservations” 3.Select the source more likely to be current a.Book published in 1998 about gaming on American Indian lands b.Pechanga.net, Indian gaming news on the Internet 4.Select the database more likely to be relevant a.Sociological Abstracts b.Biological Abstracts 5.Select the source more likely to be authoritative a.Peer-reviewed article published in UNLV Gaming Research & Review b.Article published in Sports Illustrated 6.Select the source more likely to be accurate a.Employment statistics from a newsletter published by a grassroots organization opposed to gambling b.Employment statistics from the U.S. Department of Labor web site 7.Select the source more likely to suit the purpose of the report a.Pechanga.net, Indian gaming news on the Internet b.Peer-reviewed article published in UNLV Gaming Research & Review Information Literacy 9