Bologna 2007 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benasque 2012 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg in collaboration with Martin Kunz, Mariele Motta, Ippocratis Saltas, Ignacy Sawicki Horndeski Lagrangian:
Advertisements

L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Light Bending as a probe of Geometric Dark Energy modelsEDEN, Paris December 8,2005 Light Bending as a probe for Geometric Dark Energy Alessandro Gruppuso.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page S. Fay, S. Nesseris, L.P. gr-qc/
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
CMB but also Dark Energy Carlo Baccigalupi, Francesca Perrotta.
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Venice 2013 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg The next ten years of dark energy research Raphael, The School of Athens, Rome.
University of Texas at San Antonio Arthur Lue Dark Energy or Modified Gravity?
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
SAIT 2008 Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side of gravity.
Modified Gravity Takeshi Chiba Nihon University. Why?
Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz Theoretical Physics Department Complutense University of Madrid in collaboration with Antonio L. Maroto & Antonio Dobado Different.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark energy II : Models of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
CMB as a physics laboratory
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Portsmouth 2008 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side.
COSMO 2006, Lake Tahoe 9/28/2006 Cuscuton Cosmology: Cuscuton Cosmology: Dark Energy meets Modified Gravity Niayesh Afshordi Institute for Theory and Computation.
1 L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Near-Horizon Solution to DGP Perturbations Ignacy Sawicki, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu University of Chicago astro-ph/ astro-ph/
Gravity and Extra Dimensions José Santiago Theory Group (Fermilab) APS April meeting, Session Y4 (Gravity and Cosmology) Jacksonville (FL) April 14-17,
1 f(R) Gravity and its relation to the interaction between DE and DM Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Effective field theory approach to modified gravity with applications to inflation and dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa Hot Topics in General Relativity And.
Chaplygin gas in decelerating DGP gravity Matts Roos University of Helsinki Department of Physics and and Department of Astronomy 43rd Rencontres de Moriond,
Structure formation in dark energy cosmology La Magia, April 2005.
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Munich 2008 Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side of gravity.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity IGC Penn State May 2008 Roy Maartens ICG Portsmouth R Caldwell.
Cosmology: recent developments Luca Amendola INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma INFN/Spazio.
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
Jochen Weller Benasque August, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, , 2006.
Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy from the solution of the strong CP problem Roberto Mainini, L. Colombo & S.A. Bonometto Universita’ di Milano Bicocca Mainini.
Lecture 3: Modified matter models of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) 1 [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine,
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
ISAPP 2011 Observations are converging… …to an unexpected universe.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Shinji Tsujikawa (Gunma National College of Technology ) Collaborations with L. Amendola, S. Capozziello, R. Gannouji,
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Heidelberg, May 31, 2005.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity collaborated with Elcio Abdalla.
From Dark Energy to Dark Force Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Madrid, November 15, 2005.
ERE 2008September 15-19, Spanish Relativity Meeting 2008, Salamanca, September (2008) Avoiding the DARK ENERGY coincidence problem with a COSMIC.
(cosmological) tests of acceleration: why and what Martin Kunz University of Geneva.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Investigating dark energy with CMB lensing Viviana Acquaviva, SISSA, Trieste Lensing collaborators in SISSA: C. Baccigalupi, S. Leach, F. Perrotta, F.
@ 2012 Miniworkshop for String theory and Cosmology Dec. 01st Seokcheon Lee (KIAS)
Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models with Gong-bo Zhao (Portsmouth), Baojiu Li (Durham)
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
J. Tang, J. Weller, A. Zablocki
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA
a viable candidate for dark energy?
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Dark Sector
Presentation transcript:

Bologna 2007 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side

Bologna 2007 Observations are converging… …to an unexpected universe

Bologna 2007 The dark energy problem gravity matter Solution: modify either the Matter sector or the Gravity sector...but remember : DE MG

Bologna 2007 Modified matter Problem: All the matter particles we know possess an effective interaction range that is much smaller the cosmological ones the effective pressure is always positive ! Solution: add new forms of matter with strong interaction/self-interaction the effective pressure can be large and negative Dark Energy=scalar fields, generalized perfect fluids etc

Bologna 2007 Can we detect traces of modified gravity at background linear level ? non-linear { } Modified gravity

Bologna 2007 What is gravity ? A universal force in 4D mediated by a massless tensor field What is modified gravity ? What is modified gravity ? A non-universal force in nD mediated by (possibly massive) tensor, vector and scalar fields

Bologna 2007 Cosmology and modified gravity in laboratory in the solar system at astrophysical scales at cosmological scales } very limited time/space/energy scales; only baryons complicated by non-linear/non- gravitational effects unlimited scales; mostly linear processes; baryons, dark matter, dark energy !

Bologna 2007 L = crossover scale: 5D gravity dominates at low energy/late times/large scales 4D gravity recovered at high energy/early times/small scales 5D Minkowski bulk: infinite volume extra dimension gravity leakage brane Simplest MG (I): DGP (Dvali, Gabadadze, Porrati 2000)

Bologna 2007 f(R) models are simple and self-contained (no need of potentials) easy to produce acceleration (first inflationary model) high-energy corrections to gravity likely to introduce higher- order terms particular case of scalar-tensor and extra-dimensional theory eg higher order corrections Let’s start with one of the simplest MG model: f(R) Simplest MG (II): f(R)

Bologna 2007 f(R) is popular....

Bologna 2007 Is this already ruled out by local gravity? is a scalar-tensor theory with Brans-Dicke parameter ω=0 or a coupled dark energy model with coupling β=1/2 (on a local minimum) α λ

Bologna 2007 Dark Fog The trouble with f(R): it’s Fourth Order Gravity (FOG) ! Higher order equations introduce: new solutions (acceleration ?) new instabilities (is the universe stable?)

Bologna 2007 The simplest case In Einstein Frame Turner, Carroll, Capozziello etc. 2003

Bologna 2007 R-1/R model : the φ MDE R-1/R model : the φ MDE rad mat field rad mat field  MDE today Caution: Plots in the Einstein frame! instead of !! In Jordan frame:

Bologna 2007 Sound horizon in R+R n model...and by the way L.A., D. Polarski, S. Tsujikawa, PRL 98, , astro-ph/

Bologna 2007  cl) WMAP and the coupling  Planck:  L.A., C. Quercellini et al. 2003

Bologna 2007 Classification of f(R) solutions deSitter acceleration, w = -1 General acceleration, any w For all f(R) theories, define the characteristic curve: The problem is: can we go from matter to acceleration? wrong matter era (t 1/2 ) good matter era (t 2/3 ) for m≥0

Bologna 2007 The m,r plane The dynamics becomes 1-dimensional ! The qualitative behavior of any f(R) model can be understood by looking at the geometrical properties of the m,r plot m(r) curve crit. line acceleration matter era deSitter L.A., D. Polarski, S. Tsujikawa, PRD, astro-ph/

Bologna 2007 The power of the m(r) method REJECTED

Bologna 2007 The triangle of viable trajectories There exist only two kinds of cosmologically viable trajectories Notice that in the triangle m>0

Bologna 2007 Constraints on viable trajectories Cosmological constraints Constraint from the matter expansion: CMB peak requires m(past)<0.1 Constraint from accelerated expansion: SN require m(present)<0.1

Bologna 2007 Viable trajectories are cool ! Viable trajectories have a very peculiar effective equation of state Define w DE implicitely as We find Theorem: diverges if grows in the past, i.e. if Corollary: all viable f(R) cosmologies possess a divergent L.A., S. Tsujikawa, 2007

Bologna 2007 Phantom crossing Conclusions: for all viable f(R) models  there is a phantom crossing of  there is a singularity of  both occur typically at low z when phantom DE standard DE

Bologna 2007 Crossing/singularity as signatures of modified gravity The same phenomenon occurs for  DGP (Alam et al 2005)  Scalar,Vector, Tensor models (Libanov et al. 2007)  and in the Riess et al. (2004) dataset !! Nesseris Perivolaropoulos 2005

Bologna but don’t forget the Local Gravity Constraints... However, if we apply naively the LGC at the present epoch.

Bologna 2007 relaxing the Local Gravity Constraints ? However, the mass depends on the local field configuration depending on the experiment: laboratory, solar system, galaxy see eg. Nojiri & Odintsov 2003; Brookfield et al Navarro & Van Acoyelen 2006; Faraoni 2006; Bean et al. 2006; Chiba et al. 2006; Hu, Sawicky 2007;....

Bologna 2007 LGC+Cosmology Take for instance the ΛCDM clone Applying the criteria of LGC and Cosmology i.e. ΛCDM to an incredible precision

Bologna 2007 However... perturbations

Bologna 2007 MG at the linear level At the linear perturbation level and sub-horizon scales, a modified gravity model will  modify Poisson’s equation  induce an anisotropic stress  modify the growth of perturbations

Bologna 2007 MG at the linear level  scalar-tensor models  standard gravity  DGP  f(R) Lue et al. 2004; Koyama et al Bean et al Hu et al Tsujikawa 2007  coupled Gauss-Bonnet see L. A., C. Charmousis, S. Davis 2006 Boisseau et al Acquaviva et al Schimd et al. 2004

Bologna 2007 Observer Dark matter halos Background sources Radial distances depend on geometry of Universe Probing gravity with weak lensing Statistical measure of shear pattern, ~1% distortion Foreground mass distribution depends on growth/distribution of structure

Bologna 2007 Probing gravity with weak lensing In General Relativity, lensing is caused by the “lensing potential” and this is related to the matter perturbations via Poisson’s equation. Therefore the lensing signal depends on the two modified gravity functions and in the growth function in the WL power spectrum

Bologna 2007 Growth of fluctuations A good fit to the linear growth of fluctuations is where LCDM DE DGP ST we parametrize Instead of Peebles 1980 Lahav et al Wang et al Bernardeau et al L.A Linder 2006

Bologna 2007 Weak lensing measures Dark Gravity DGPPhenomenological DE Weak lensing tomography over half sky LCDM DGP L.A., M. Kunz, D. Sapone arXiv:

Bologna 2007 Weak lensing measures Dark Gravity scalar-tensor model Weak lensing tomography over half sky V. Acquaviva, L.A., C. Baccigalupi, in prep.

Bologna 2007 Weak lensing measures Dark Gravity Marginalizing over modified gravity parameters FOM

Bologna 2007 Non-linearity N-Body simulations Higher-order perturbation theory Maccio’ et al Jain et al Kamionkowski et al Gaztanaga et al Freese et al Makler et al Lue et al L.A. & C. Quercellini

Bologna 2007 N-body simulations in MG Two effects: DM mass is varying, G is different for baryons and DM mbmb mcmc Dark energy/dark matter coupling

Bologna 2007 N-body simulations A. Maccio’, L.A.,C. Quercellini, S. Bonometto, R. Mainini 2004 Λ β=0.15 β=0.25

Bologna 2007 N-body simulations β=0.15 β=0.25

Bologna 2007 N-body simulations: halo profiles β-dependent behaviour towards the halo center. Higher β: smaller r c

Bologna 2007 Conclusions: the teachings of DE  There is much more than meets the eyes in the Universe  Two solutions to the DE mismatch: either add “dark energy” or “dark gravity”  The high precision data of present and near-future observations allow to test for dark energy/gravity  It is crucial to combine background and perturbations  Weak Lensing is a good bet...(to be continued)

Bologna 2007

An ultra-light scalar field Abundance Mass L.A. & R. Barbieri 2005 Adopting a PNGB potential Hubble size Galactic size

Bologna 2007 Dark energy as scalar gravity Einstein frame Jordan frame

Bologna 2007 An extra gravity Newtonian limit: the scalar interaction generates an attractive extra-gravity Yukawa term in real space

Bologna 2007 Understanding dark energy Let him who seeks continue seeking until he finds. When he finds, he will become troubled. When he becomes troubled, he will be astonished Coptic Gospel of Thomas

Bologna 2007

An ultra-light scalar field Abundance Mass L.A. & R. Barbieri 2005 Adopting a PGB potential Hubble size Galactic size