INDICATORS OF SUCCESS IN TEACHER EDUCATION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.
Transforming Teacher Education through Clinical Practice: A National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers - Dr. Dwight C. Watson - University of Northern.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Competencies for beginning teachers
SCALING UP: Reform Lessons for Urban Comprehensive High Schools Celine Coggins, Ph.D.
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
Education For Social Work
The Quality Educator Initiative PI 34
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Quality Systems for Quality Teachers:
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Pasco School District Common Grade-Level Vocabulary Project Pasco School District Strategic Plan Goal 1 – Teaching & Learning June 10, 2015 Pasco School.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Teacher Education Redesign Initiative (TERI). Executive Summary Core of Redesign  Partnerships  Adaptive Expertise  Performance driven curriculum 
TEN Challenges Facing the Mathematics Education Community
Certification, Teacher Education, and Professional Development Marcia Harmon Rosenbusch National K-12 Foreign Language Resource Center Iowa State University.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
RPM Summer Institute 2012: Exploring Key Themes to Build a Model for Pre- College Math.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Transforming Teacher Education The Debate on Teacher Education and Teacher Quality “There is little evidence that education school course work leads.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
Developing as a Professional Is teaching a reality for you???
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Etta Hollins & Jamy Stillman Rossier School of Education University of Southern California PACT Implementation Conference November 13-14, 2008.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
TEACHER EDUCATION FOR INCLUSION A project conducted by the European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
What makes great teaching? An overview of the CEM/Durham University/The Sutton Trust paper (published October 2014)......making... Capturing... promoting...
Corinne H. Lardy Cheryl L. Mason San Diego State University The Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE) January 14-16, 2010 Sacramento, California.
An Overview of Educational Leadership Course # 1048 OISE/UT Dr. Lyn Sharratt Winter, 2002.
ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Qualitative State Research Team Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and A&M College Value-Added.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Induction and Mentoring: Evidence From the Teacher Graduate Assessment Project Charles Rohn, Dean, Eastern Illinois University Andrew F. Wall, Project.
The Importance of Equitable Access to Effective Educators.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
ACTIVE RESEARCH Group 1 – Assignment 2 Chloe Weaver Narelle Webb Bec Wheldon, Dallas Wolf Emily Weight.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
“TEACHER EDUCATION FOR 21ST CENTURY TEACHERS ” Reforming Teacher Preparation: Meeting the Challenges of the 21 st Century Dr. Adriane E. L. Dorrington.
Los Angeles Unified School District Human Resources Division Teacher and Administrator Development Branch Teacher Leadership Certification Program.
SACE Leadership and Quality Learning Forums Australian Professional Standards for Teachers: building professional capacities in educational assessment.
Board on science education
Delivering outstanding professional development for teaching
Partnership for Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Pasco School District Common Grade-Level Vocabulary Project
Teacher Education for Inclusion TE4I project
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Welcome Journey to Excellence.
NJCU College of Education
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Becoming a High-Quality Teacher in a Changing World
Competencies for beginning teachers
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS IN TEACHER EDUCATION Tom Russell, Queen’s University Suzin McPherson, Limestone District School Board, Kingston

FOUR MAJOR THEMES QUALITY OF TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL INFLUENCES ON TEACHER EDUCATION HOW QUALIFICATIONS AFFECT STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IMPACT OF OUT-OF-FIELD TEACHING

QUALITY OF TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS Reform movements have not reduced the criticisms of pre-service teacher education programs. The transition from preparation to first year of teaching is often so traumatic that the quality of preparation is assumed to be low.

QUALITY OF TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS “Exposure does not constitute experience.” (McPherson, 2000) The importance of experience and the limited value of pre-service courses perpetuate the gap between theory and practice, between schools and university.

REFORM MOVEMENTS HAVE NOT MADE A DIFFERENCE “The simple model of learning . . . is that knowledge goes in during teacher education and professional development and comes out to be used in classrooms.” (N.A.E., 1999) Tinkering without examining program foundations does not change program quality.

FEATURES OF SUCCESSFUL PROGRAMS Make explicit what teachers think and do. Take candidates’ experiences and concerns as central. Create collaborative environments between schools and faculty.

EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL INFLUENCES Structural divisions between theory and practice. Lack of consensus within programs on fundamental premises. Demands for external assessments and accountability generate more tension than quality.

FEATURES OF SUCCESSFUL RESTRUCTURE PROGRAMS Unified perspective and purpose Research-supported conceptions of teaching and learning Address the realities of uncertainty, unpredictability, and instability associated with change

INDUCTION PROGRAMS FOR CAREER-LONG DEVELOPMENT Regardless of quality of preservice programs, the new teacher is still a beginner. Successful induction programs assign teaching responsibilities collaboratively. Teachers who are mentored report smoother entrance into profession.

EVIDENCE FROM SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION PROGRAMS Lower rates of attrition from profession. Foster development of proactive practitioners. Help teachers develop high expectations for student achievement and personal professional growth.

HOW QUALIFICATIONS AFFECT STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Student achievement levels are positively affected by teachers who are satisfied, motivated, experienced, and knowledgeable.

HOW QUALIFICATIONS AFFECT STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT In the USA, states leading in student achievement and making greatest achievement gains have the most highly qualified teachers and make consistent investments in teachers’ professional development.

FACTORS THAT INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Smaller school size Small class size Higher teacher ability Fewer unqualified teachers

SUCCESS IS OBVIOUS YET ELUSIVE Successful pre-service and induction programs have features similar to successful programs of professional development. Teachers have direct access to experts, influence over substance and process, and opportunities to experiment and reflect.

IMPACT OF OUT-OF-FIELD TEACHING Out-of-field teaching significantly downgrades the quality of instruction. Out-of-field placements may be the cause of significant teacher departure. Teachers should not be viewed as mere “facilitators” able to teach any subject.

CONCLUSIONS Reform of pre-service teacher education is widely sought and rarely achieved. Researchers call for reforms and policies they have not achieved in their own institutions. External accountability threatens internal standards of quality.

CONCLUSIONS COLLABORATION and COOPERATION between schools and universities are essential to successful change. COHERENCE across and within program elements is an essential indicator of quality.