Etta Hollins & Jamy Stillman Rossier School of Education University of Southern California PACT Implementation Conference November 13-14, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

Building capacity for assessment leadership via professional development and mentoring of course coordinators Merrilyn Goos.
The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
© Scordias & Morris, 2005 Virtual Classroom Visits: Using Video Conferencing Technology to Enhance Teacher Education Dr. Margaret Scordias Pamela B. Morris,
What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
Centinela Valley UHSD BTSA Induction Overview September 16, 2013.
February 2005Transition Services Preparation & Training Developing NCATE Assessment Rubrics: Modeling Best Practice For Our Students Pamela Luft Kent State.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
E-portfolio in TaskStream (DRF) Signature Assignments Signature Assignments Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd semesters) Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd.
Working Together to Prepare Urban Teachers Barbara Charness, Principal Sepulveda Middle School Los Angeles Unified Schools Nancy Prosenjak, Professor California.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Ed.S/Ed.D in Special Education Course Update and Revision *Change in Program Submitted by: Leena Her, Program Coordinator of Ed.S/Ed.D in SPED Revision.
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
WHAT’s A STATE TO DO? TO BUILD SCHOOL/EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CAPACITY Betty Hale.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Rose Asera, Ph.D Rethinking Pre-college Math Summer Institute Aug 22, 2012.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Conceptual Framework Salisbury University working draft 8/15/05.
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 2009 PROJECT DIRECTOR’S CONFERENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. DONNA M. SOBEL, PH.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Critical Friends: Building a Professional Learning Community Stefanie D. Livers College of Education and Human Development University of Louisville SUMMARYPROJECT.
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
TEACHING FOR CIVIC CAPACITY AND ENGAGEMENT : How Faculty Align Teaching and Purpose IARSLCE 2011 | CHICAGO Jennifer M. Domagal-Goldman | November 3, 2011.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Navigating Murky Waters The Challenge of Assessing Preservice Teacher Dispositions Dr. Anne B. Bucalos and Dr. Christine G. Price Bellarmine University.
“Instructing English Language Learners in the Context of Political Change: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’ Beliefs About Effective Teaching Strategies”
INDICATORS OF SUCCESS IN TEACHER EDUCATION
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
Issues for Researchers Allan Feldman, UMass Amherst Jodie Galosy, Michigan State U Carole Mitchener, U of Illinois Chicago STEM Alternative Certification.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
ENGAGING FACULTY IN REFORM / MARCH 4, COMMUNITY COLLEGE RESEARCH CENTER MARCH 4, 2014 Building Buy-in, Supporting Instructional Improvement Susan.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Chapter 6 Redesigning Instruction ENGAGING STUDENTS IN LEARNING © 2015 Etta R. Hollins.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Graduate School of Education Assessment Update 2009 State of the School September 23, 2009.
College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Empowering Individuals to Lead and Serve Our Dynamic World Overview Video Welcome – Dr. Evans New Literacy.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Common Standards August 19, :30 am-3:00 pm.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 42 Emerging Theories Debra Tupe.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Stimulating Research and Innovation for Preservice Education of STEM Teachers in High-Need Schools W. James Lewis Deputy Assistant Director, Education.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Why Consider Becoming a Teacher?
Perspectives on TR Education Chapter 7
Writing a Teaching Philosophy Statement
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Foundations of Special Education
Presentation transcript:

Etta Hollins & Jamy Stillman Rossier School of Education University of Southern California PACT Implementation Conference November 13-14, 2008

 The persistent underperformance of students in K-12 schools and the shortage of highly skilled professionals in certain areas call attention to the need for re-examining initial teacher certification programs, new teacher induction programs, and inservice teacher professional development.  Authors in the report of the AERA panel on teacher education, Studying Teacher Education, pointed out that there are few studies that provide thick descriptions of teacher preparation programs. The majority of studies in teacher education describe a single course or field experience in isolation from the program context.

 As presently conceptualized, this study will address three aspects of the teacher preparation program: ◦ The experiences that support candidates in learning to contextualize teaching practices for diverse and underserved students. ◦ The theoretical perspective on learning that provides the framework for the design of courses and field experiences in the program. ◦ The internal and external problems of practice associated with teaching and learning to teach addressed in the teacher preparation program.

 What sequence of learning experiences are used to enable candidates to contextualize their professional practice to facilitate learning for different groups of students in a variety of school and classroom settings?  What is the evidence that candidates are able to contextualize their professional practice for different groups of students in a variety of school and classroom settings?  What interventions are employed when candidates are unable to contextualize their professional practice for different groups of students in a variety of settings?

 What theoretical perspective on learning serves as a framework for the courses and field experiences in your program?  What assignments or experiences in courses and field experiences provide evidence of the adopted theoretical perspective on learning?  How are assignments or experiences linked across courses and field experiences to provide program coherence?

 Internal—There are many internal problems of practice in preservice teacher preparation including the demographic discrepancy in the teacher candidate pool and the students they are being prepared to teach, the academic preparation and background experiences of faculty in preservice teacher preparation, coherence within the teacher preparation program, etc.  What internal problems of practice have the faculty in your program identified that conflict with candidates’ learning to contextualize practice for diverse students and how are they being addressed?

 There are many external problems of practice that influence the quality of the teacher preparation program and that influence new teacher socialization into the profession.  What external problems of practice have faculty in your teacher preparation program identified that conflict with candidates’ learning to contextualize practice for diverse students and how are they being addressed?

 Analysis of video segments and other data collected for PACT.  Existing program documents, reports, and course syllabi.  Observations and interviews with candidates during student teaching.  K-12 student work samples collected during student teaching.  Interviews with student teaching supervisors.

 The initial research design will be reviewed and revised by collaborators.  Individual collaborators will be responsible for collecting data in their local teacher preparation program and for the local IRB approval for the study.

 Initiate a conversation about the infrastructure of teacher preparation programs that goes beyond state and NCATE mandated assessments and data collection, and surface organization of courses and field experiences.  Provide thick descriptions of critical aspects of the infrastructure of teacher preparation programs that can serve as exemplars for rethinking and redesigning program practices to better prepare teachers for facilitating learning for underserved students.

 March 2009 –Collaborators meet to refine research design and establish benchmarks for conducting the study.  September 2009—begin data collection.

 How problems of practice are addressed in the re-designed program at Rossier School of Education ◦ Identified and responded to program-wide and course-specific problems of practice  Program-wide problem of practice: Many teacher preparation programs do not draw on the literature about teacher learning in their program design  Program-wide response: Came to consensus on a conceptual model of teacher learning to serve as foundation for program development

◦ Course-specific problems of practice: Understanding the Social Context for Urban Schools  Many candidates enter teacher education programs having had little contact with those from cultural and experiential backgrounds different from their own and with little knowledge of urban communities.  Many candidates enter teacher preparation programs with stereotypical views of students from diverse and low income backgrounds and of the schools they attend.  Many candidates leave their teacher preparation programs with little knowledge of how to build relationships with the students they teach or their parents, or how to build a supportive learning community.