The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California’s Teaching Force 2004 Key Issues and Trends Research conducted by SRI International California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

Teaching and Californias Future SRI International February 2, 2005.
Assess supply and demand for science and math teachers Describe math and science teacher production system Current recruitment strategies Preparation pathways.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
The Status of the Teaching Profession 2009 Copyright All rights reserved. The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Research conducted by.
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
Teacher Education & Induction in the US Johnny Lott & John Carter.
1 No Child Left Behind “Highly Qualified” September 2006 As of Subject to Change.
No Child Left Behind Highly Qualified Teacher Update
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Jack O’Connell State Superintendent No Child Left Behind Act.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Has NCLB Improved Teacher and Teaching Quality for Disadvantaged Students? Laura M. Desimone Thomas M. Smith Vanderbilt University David Frisvold University.
A “Best Fit” Approach to Improving Teacher Resources Jennifer King Rice University of Maryland.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Early Childhood Education Cost Analysis & Recommendations New Mexico Early Childhood Development Partnership December 2013 New Mexico Early Childhood Development.
The Status of the Teaching Profession 2003 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
Teacher Quality, Distribution, and Turnover in El Paso Ed Fuller The University of Texas at Austin El Paso, Tx June28, 2006.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
The Need for Certified Teachers in New York State The New York State Education Department Office of Higher Education May
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
Recruiting Mathematics and Science Teachers Through Partnerships MODERATOR Dave Jolly – Director California Academic Partnership Program FACILITATOR Edward.
Highly Qualified Teachers Lori L. Buchanan Federal Programs & Monitoring Certification Coordinator Office of Professional Preparation WVDE.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
1 Highly Qualified Teachers New Results for
Current Issues. Vocabulary No Child Left Behind (NCLB)Curriculum AccountabilitySilent Epidemic Standardized TestMagnet School Charter SchoolCapitalism.
Motivation, Preparation, and Conditions for the Entering Teacher
Teaching Credentials. What is a Teaching Credential? A credential is an authorization to teach a subject or subjects in a school setting grades K-12.
BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE MARCH 2, 2004.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
Research conducted by SRI International California State University, Office of the Chancellor | Policy Analysis for California Education | University of.
Ensuring a Highly Qualified Teacher for Every Classroom With Support From the Pew Charitable Trusts Q U A L I T Y C O U N T S “If I can’t learn.
Transition to Teaching Recruiting, Preparing, and Retaining Science Teachers through TTT Beatriz Ceja, Gillian Cohen-Boyer and Thelma Leenhouts U.S. Department.
CSU Math and Science Teacher Initiative California Mathematics Council-South November 7, 2009 Joan Bissell, Director Mathematics and Science Teacher Initiative.
STAR Tests How they affect student and school. What are the STAR Tests?  STAR stands for Standardized Testing and Reporting.  These tests are mandated.
© 2010 THE EDUCATION TRUST Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups: Roles for Federal Policy.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees Thursday – Oct. 9, 2008 Dr. Dennis.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
HEAD OF THE CLASS A Quality Teacher in Every Pennsylvania Classroom.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Research conducted by SRI International California State University University of California, Office.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Profile of Virginia’s Instructional School Personnel Presented to the Special Education Advisory Committee on September 29, 2011 Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
CSU Math and Science Teacher Initiative and STEM CAP: Making it Work September 26, 2009 Dr. Joan Bissell Director, Teacher Education and Public School.
California State University CSU Math and Science Teacher Initiative: The Fundamental Role of Collaboration and Partnerships Beverly Young, Ph.D. Assistant.
1 Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher.
Copyright ©2010. All rights reserved. California’s Teaching Force 2010: Key Issues & Trends Key Themes Changing conditions, fewer prospects Increased.
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS No Child Left Behind 11/23/09.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
Understanding and Communicating About New Performance Standards on New Performance Standards on Michigan’s Standardized Tests RAISING EXPECTATIONS.
P-20 in Action – Michigan’s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Success through Cross- Agency Collaboration 2012 MIS Conference February 16, 2012.
California State University, Office of the Chancellor University of California, Office of the President WestEd The Center for the Future of Teaching and.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
What Works And Is Hopeful Grover J. (Russ) Whitehurst, Ph.D. Director Institute of Education Sciences United States Department of Education About High.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Teacher Supply Issues National Shortage of Math, Science, Special Education Teachers Teacher Attrition Retirement Projections.
Conexión Américas Education Summit Dr. Candice McQueen, Commissioner of Education Equity and Excellence in Tennessee.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS)
Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
No Child Left Behind.
California State University Math and Science Teacher Initiative
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Presentation transcript:

The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California’s Teaching Force 2004 Key Issues and Trends Research conducted by SRI International California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy Analysis for California Education University of California, Office of the President WestEd

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Context Students and schools face ever higher standards of achievement, with short timelines for demonstrating improvement. The deadline for all teachers to be “highly qualified” under the federal No Child Left Behind Act is fast-approaching: The Williams settlement requires every child to have access to a highly qualified teacher, yet no resources have been earmarked for this purpose.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Overview of 2004 Key Research Findings The number of underprepared teachers has declined from 37,311 in to 28,000 in A large retirement wave is expected to cause a shortage of 100,000 teachers in the next decade. NCLB has prompted an increase in intern certificates, not preliminary teaching credentials. The maldistribution of underprepared teachers persists: Economically disadvantaged students are up to five times more likely to have an underprepared teacher than their more advantaged peers. In middle and high schools, critical subject areas, including mathematics and science, are being taught by large numbers of out-of-field and underprepared teachers. Funds for teacher recruitment and professional development have been cut drastically.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Fewer Underprepared Teachers, But… The number of underprepared teachers has dropped significantly from 42,427 in to 28,139 in Still, this number signifies that 1 out of every 11 teachers in the state is underprepared.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning More Underprepared Teachers on the Way 1.Declining number of credentials issued 2.An increase in student enrollment at the middle and high school levels 3.Impending baby boom retirement bulge Our projections indicate that there will be a substantial teacher shortage for three reasons:

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning More Underprepared Teachers on the Way For the first time since , the number of preliminary teaching credentials issued by California institutions has dropped from the previous year. Participation in regular (fifth year) credential programs in the California State University system, the state’s largest producer of teachers, declined by nearly 1,900 from the previous year. Budget cuts have eliminated $150 million that California was spending to recruit new teachers.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Impending Retirement Bulge One in five teachers will be eligible for retirement in the next five years. One in three will be eligible in the next decade. By 2014, we anticipate the state will have to replace 100,000 teachers due to retirement alone.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Dependence on Emergency Permits 40,58742,42741,739 37,309 28,139 Number of Underprepared Teachers by Credential Type, to Of the state’s 28,139 underprepared teachers, 17,914 hold emergency permits (64%). Under the No Child Left Behind mandate these teachers will not be allowed to teach next school year ( ).

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Expansion of Intern Programs Because of the way California chose to define “highly qualified” teachers, NCLB has contributed to a substantial increase in intern credentials. Interns comprised about 30% of all underprepared teachers in , compared with 10% in New University and Intern Credentials, to

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Maldistribution of Least-Prepared Teachers Schools with the highest percentages of minority students also have the highest percentages of underprepared teachers.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Maldistribution of Least-Prepared Teachers Underprepared Teachers in Schools in the Highest and Lowest API Achievement Quartiles, to Schools with the highest percentages of underprepared teachers perform lowest on the API, the state’s measure of academic achievement.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Persistent Crisis in Special Education Percentage of underprepared special education teachers has remained relatively constant despite an overall reduction in the number of underprepared teachers in general. 54% of 1 st and 2 nd year special education teachers are underprepared. Percentage of Underprepared Teachers by Authorization, to

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Persistent Crisis in Special Education The crisis in special education is even more pronounced in high minority schools, where one out of every four special education teachers is underprepared. In schools with high numbers of minority students, 25% of special education teachers are underprepared compared to just 7% in schools with few minority students. Distribution of Underprepared Special Education Teachers by School-Level Percentage of Minority Students, to

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning High Stakes in Middle and High School Just 59% of fully prepared middle school teachers assigned to teach Algebra I have the authorization in mathematics to do so. In English, math, social science, and life science, about one out of every five teachers are either underprepared or teaching out of their field of expertise. About one out of every three physical science teachers are teaching out-of- field or are underprepared.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning High Stakes in High School Schools with the lowest passing rates on the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) have, on average, far more underprepared teachers than schools with high passing rates. Students in schools with low passing rates on the CAHSEE are three times as likely to be taught by underprepared teachers as are students in schools with the highest passing rates.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Raising the Stakes, Reducing Support Four of the five major professional development programs realized a collective budget reduction from $222 million in to $63 million in California’s curriculum-based programs have not expanded beyond reading and mathematics in the early grades. With the expected increase in the number of secondary students and the augmented accountability requirements, high school teachers may be less prepared to help students achieve their immediate and future academic goals.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning 2004 Policy Recommendations Immediately address the current and future demand for truly qualified and effective teachers resulting from impending retirements by developing and implementing a plan for the recruitment of teachers in hard-to-staff schools and in critical subject matter areas. End the disproportionate assignment of underprepared teachers to decile 1-3 schools. Strengthen the teacher pipeline to ensure that community college students are provided an entry point to a clear and unimpeded pathway into the teaching profession.

California’s Teaching Force 2004 — Key Issues and Trends Copyright © 2004 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning 2004 Policy Recommendations Address the persistent inconsistency between the implementation of intern preparation programs and the Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment induction programs. Provide, on a consistent and timely basis, data on the state’s teacher workforce so that California’s education policy-makers can better gauge critical employment trends as well as the impact of specific initiatives and investments.