Nissim Silanikove Department of Animal Physiology, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Israel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrogen Peroxide-Dependent Conversion of Nitrite to Nitrate as an Essential Feature of Bovine Milk Catalase, Agricultural Research Organization, Institute.
Advertisements

Dr. Hurley’s Magical Milk Show
FACTORS AFFECTING COMPOSITION AND QUALITY OF GOAT MILK
MASTITIS CONTROL, PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT IN SHEEP Leo Timms Iowa State University Dairy Science Extension.
Mastitis Inflammation of the mammary gland infection or injury Important reduced milk yield increased culling treatment cost & un-salable milk lower milk.
Mastitis Simon Kenyon.
Milk Hygiene & Farm Management Dept. Veterinary Public Health Fac. Veterinary Medicine University Of Kufa Dr. Akram Motlak.
Unit Food Science. Problem Area Processing Animal Products.
Milk Products and Alternatives Milk Milk  Complete protein source  Colloidal dispersion—large proteins in aqueous serum  Lactose, minerals, fat dispersed.
Automated Mastitis Detection for Dairy Farms Amanda Sterrett & Jeffrey Bewley University of Kentucky Dairy Systems Management.
Farmer Brown’s Dilemma. Risks of Overcrowding Increased SCC (Somatic Cell Count) This is an indicator of Mastitis Somatic Cells = White Blood Cells =
Integrated immunological and metabolic responses of the mammary gland to LPS challenge in bovine Nissim Silanikove 1*, Adi Rauch-Cohen 1 and Gabriel Leitner.
Dry Cow Therapy, Mastitis and Milk - Enhancement, Agricultural Research Organization, Institute of Animal Science, Israel. Nissim Silanikove, Agricultural.
THE BIOCHEMISTRY OF MILK
Nissim Silanikove, Fira Shapiro, Adi Rauch & Gabriel Leitner
How is goat milk produced?
Physiological roles of milk enzymes: an evolving picture.
The bacterial ecology of the ruminant udder with particular reference to ewes Emma Monaghan.
Role of the milk-born negative regulatory system in control of milk secretion, milk composition and induction of mammary gland involution Nissim Silanikove,
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
D. Belay 1, J. Verbeke 2, K. Yisehak1, D. Solomon 1, S. Belew1, S. Devliegher 3, G.P.J. Janssens 2 1 Department of Animal Science, Jimma University, Jimma,
J. B. Cole 1, P. D. Miller 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2 Department.
MILK COMPOSITION: PROTEINS Leo Timms Iowa State University.
On effects of stage of lactation and subclinical mastitis on milk quality in goats.
Use of cow culling to help meet compliance for somatic cell standards H. D. Norman and J. R. Wright * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Unit Food Science. Problem Area Processing Animal Products.
Major causes affecting raw milk composition and its procession into curd in sheep and goats.
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN MANUFACTURING CHEESE. What is Biotechnology? Biotechnological process is one that uses microorganisms in various branches of industry,
Mastitis.
What is in Milk? Fat Protein Lactose Minerals Vitamins, etc. Water.
Reducing the incidence of Clinical Mastitis Possible Mastitis Targets per 100 cows per year -No. cases; 30 cases from 20 cows, max 3 ill. -Tube use: -
During spring, reproductive mice experienced declines in innate immunity (F = 21.23, P < 0.01). Non-reproductive mice experienced increases in innate immunity.
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MILK
MASTITIS CONTROL, PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT IN GOATS
MILK COMPOSITION Leo Timms Iowa State University.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #23.
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Genetic Base and Trait Definition Update.
2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
MAMMARY IMMUNE SYSTEM Lactation Biology Animal Science 337 Leo Timms Iowa State University.
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
Chapter 7: Unit Conversions (Proportion method) If a student weighs 80 kg, how much does he weigh in pounds? Step 1. Find a conversion factor that relates.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
ONE STEP AHEAD – TO PREVENT MASTITIS IN DAIRY ANIMALS
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
CHO Metabolism.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
Milking & Hygine.  Suspended under the Cow. Divided into quarters. Can weigh up to 50kg.  Milk produced by groups of Alveolus tissue cells  Ducts carry.
Characteristics of milk ELISA results for Johne’s disease in US dairy cows Byrem, T. M. 1 *, H. D. Norman 2 and J. R. Wright 2 1 Antel BioSystems, Lansing,
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Ja’Nesia Akers Animal Breeding and Genetics November 23, 2011 Dr. Johnson.
Genetics of Mastitis Susceptibility By Riyashna Rampersadh.
Lab of Food Microbiology Jeong, Ji Hee
Walloon Agricultural Research Center Genetic Variability of Lactoferrin Content Predicted by MIR Spectrometry : MIR Spectrometry + Quantitative Models.
Dairy Cattle Production (95314)
Bovine Mastitis.
TYPES OF MILK USED FOR CHEESEMAKING
Innovative Analytical Solutions for the Dairy Industry
CHARACTERIZATION OF MILK COAGULATION ABILITY IN BULK MILK SAMPLES
Loss in milk yield and related composition changes resulting from different levels of somatic cell count in Valle del Belice dairy sheep A. M. Sutera,
Invited review: Genetics and modeling of milk coagulation properties
Bioconversion of Whey to Lactic Acid Using Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB)
Dry Cow Therapy, Mastitis and Milk - Enhancement, Agricultural Research Organization, Institute of Animal Science, Israel. Nissim Silanikove, Agricultural.
Making Cheese To make cheese you need milk, milk clotting enzyme (rennet), bacterial cultures and salt. Rennet causes the milk proteins (caseins) to clump.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Factors Affecting Milk Quality and Quantity
How to understand and use dairy goat performance data
Presentation transcript:

Nissim Silanikove Department of Animal Physiology, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Israel

Interactions between bacteria type, caseinolysis and physico-chemical properties in caprine, ovine and bovine milk Cork 2005

Milk quantity: Yield of milk, fat, total proteins, casein and curd. Milk quality: Internal bacterial contamination, somatic cell count, secreted enzymes. Cork 2005

Bacterial infection may affect caseinolysis and micelle properties by three main routes: 1. directly, by secreting extracellular enzymes different bacteria will cause different "type" of physico-chemical damage to the milk Cork 2005

3. a combination of 1 and 2 2. activate the host innate immune system milk from different type of bacteria with similar SCC will result in similar damage to the milk Cork 2005

Hypothesis: Healthy gland ~ 20,000 Cows ~ 800,000 goats and sheep Infected gland ~ 3,000,000 CASEINOLYSIS INDEX Cell depended Bacteria and Cells depended Cork 2005

Somatic cell count and gross composition as bases for grading milk quality in sheep and goats

Aim: to calculate the losses of milk and cheese loss as related to the level of subclinical udder infection in a herd. Elucidated the major factors that influence milk yield and, consequently, curd yield in Assaf sheep and Saanen and Shami × Anglo-Nubian goats,

Log SCCCMTLog SCCCMT 5.51 b 0.91 b 5.33 b 0.65 b Uninfected 6.12 a 1.59 a 6.38 a 2.23 a Infected P [F] GoatsSheepBacteriological Status The LS Means of CMT and log SCC in uninfected and infected udders and their different significance level (P [F]).

GoatsSheepBacteriological Status The LS Means of fat, protein and lactose in uninfected and infected udders and their different significance level (P [F]). LactoseProteinFatLactoseProteinFat 45.9 a a 49.4 a 49.0 b 55.9 Uninfected 44.0 b b 42.9 b 50.3 a 56.9 Infected NS NS P [F]

Quantifying the damage caused by IMI with CNS From data collected in the present study and those published recently two equations could be developed to calculate milk yield loss and total curd yield loss. These equations combine milk loss and reduction in curd yield per litre of milk in sheep or goats with sub clinical IMI: Milk yield loss (%) = [C × (100-C) × IUY]/100 Total curd yield loss (%) = [C × (100-C) × (IUY-ICY × D)]/100 where: C = % uninfected udders; IUY = percentage to which milk production is reduced by sub clinical udder infection; ICY = percentage of curd lost because of sub clinical udder infection; D = litres of milk needed to produce 1 kg of cheese (30 %moister)

Calculated percent milk and curd loss in sheep and goats herd due to rate of infection with CNS according to the equations Sheep , ,300, ,100,00075 Goat , , ,300,00075 HerdHalf-udder model HerdHalf-udder model Total curd loss (%)Milk loss (%)Projected SCC Infection rate

+ - The model: Each goat, sheep or cow tested had at least one uninfected quarter (NBF) and one of the other quarters infected with one of the following bacteria: NumberBacteria 33 NBF 23 Streptococci 11 CNS 8 E. Coli 9 S. aureus Cork 2005

Lactose, g/L Lactose concentration: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep %, P < Goat %, P < 0.004

Milk yield (half) of sheep or goat infected with CNS specie in one gland and the contra-lateral being free. Open bars – S; Hatched bars – G

The ratio in the reduction in milk yield between goats and sheep in comparison to the ratio of reduction in lactose concentration

Conclusion The greater reduction in lactose concentration in infected glands of sheep than in goats, explains the higher loss of milk yield in sheep

fat, g/L Fat concentration: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep - 5%, NS Goat %, NS

protein, g/L Protein concentration: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep - 9%, P < Goat + 2.3%, P <0.07

casein, g/L Casein concentration: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep - 12%, P < Goat %, NS

Whey, g/L Whey concentration: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep + 7.5%, P < 0.07 Goat +11.5%, P <

CONCLUSIONS In goats the increase in total protein concentration relates to increase in total whey concentration In sheep the reduction in total protein concentration relates to a decrease in casein concentration, which overweighs the increase in whey concentration

P-p, g/L Proteose-peptone concentration: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep + 247%, P < Goat +151%, P <

Ca, mmol Ca activity: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep %, P < Goat -14.2%, P < 0.002

Conclusions In both goats and sheep, infection is associated with increased casein degradation The increase in casein degradation is greater in sheep then in goats Measurement of Ca activity is potentially a convenient and cheap method to track casein degradation

PA activity, units/mL Plasminogen activator activity: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep + 239%, P < Goat +128%, P < 0.05

PL activity, units/mL Plasminogen activity: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep %, P < Goat 0%, NS

Conclusions Plasminogen activator activity in goats is unusually high and consequently all the plasminogen in the gland is converted to plasmin

PL activity, units/mL Plasmin activity: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep %, P < Goat + 195%, P <

Conclusions The basal level of PL activity is higher in sheep than in goats, which explains the higher basal level of proteose-peptones PL activity in infected glands is higher in sheep than in goats, which explain the higher increase in proteose-peptones In sheep, the source of increased PL activity in the infected gland is accelerated conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, whereas in goats the source is external

Question: How comes that in goats accelerated degradation of casein is not reflected in casein concentration, whereas in sheep it does? Answer: In goats the reduction in casein output (30%) is essentially similar to the reduction in milk yield, whereas in sheep the reduction in casein output (60%) is higher than in milk volume (53%). Thus, both in goats and sheep part of the increased loss in casein yield is related to increased degradation of casein

Effect of subclinical mastitis on curd yield Yc, and clotting time Tc, in milk of infected vs. uninfected udder halves of sheep.

Effect of subclinical mastitis on curd yield, Yc (a) and clotting time, Tc (b), in milk of infected vs. uninfected udder halves of goats. Open bars – uninfected; Hatched bars – infected

CD14+ (%) CD8+ (%) PMN (%) SCC (x1000) NumberBacteria 5.0± ±0.8 b 32±3.3 c 116±20 c 33NBF 9.4±1.68.9±1.6 ab 58±5.2 ab 3379±350 a 23Strep. 11.3± ±3.6 a 54±8.5 ab 543±129 b 11CNS 10.3±7.29.3±7.5 ab 63±20.1 a 4333±443 a 9E. coli 5.8±0.61.3±0.1 c 82±1.7 a 1148±163 b 9S. aureus SCC and cell differentiation according to bacteria isolates in the milk Cork 2005

No significant differences were fund among the different bacteria in fat, protein and casein Lactose concentrations was significantly Lower in milk from all infected quarters compared to milk from uninfected quarters, regardless of type of bacteria Cork 2005

Clotting time (in seconds) Curd firmness (volts) 30 min after coagulating enzyme additions Two parameters were tested using the Optigraph © (Alliance Instruments) according to bacteria isolates in the quarter milk Cork 2005

1 2 3 Curd firmness (volts) Clotting time (sec) Cork 2005

Clotting time and Curd firmness Curd firmness (V) Clotting time (sec) Bacteria 6.58± ±63 NBF 1.02± ±340 Strep. 3.80± ±468 CNS E. coli 3.28± ±193 S. aureus Cork 2005

Effects of mammary gland infection on plasminogen (PLG), plasminogen activator (PA) and plasmin (PL) PA (unit/mL) PLG (unit/mL) Bacteria NBF Strep CNS E. coli S. aureus 1 unit is the amount of PLG, PA or PL that produces a Change of 0.1 in absorbance at 405 nm in 60 min Cork 2005 Plasmin (unit/mL) a a a a b

Correlation matrix Curd firmness (V) Clotting time (sec) ; P = ; P = 0.020log SCC 0.61; P = ; P = 0.002Lactose ; P = ; P = 0.001Whey ; P = ; P = 0.005pp ; P = ; P = 0.001Plasmin 0.08; NS0.01; NSCasein Cork 2005

Protein, r - NS Whey, r = 0.83 Casein, r - NS Cork 2005

SCC, r = 0.46 Cork 2005

CURD FROM HELTHY GLANDS

CURD FROM INFECTED GLAND

AFTER ONE DAY OF MATURATION HEALTHY INFECTED

HEALTHY INFECTED AFTER 3 MONTH OF MATURATION

SDS PAGE Tricine 0% 50% 100%

FPLC ה'ד'ג'ב' א'

OPTYGRAPH EFFECT OF ADDING VARIOUS P-P FRACTIONS (O.5 MG/ML) TO BACTERIAL FREE MILK CONTROL

Hypothesis: Healthy gland ~ 20,000 Infected glands ~ 200,000 Bacteria depended Cork 2005

The results suggest that different bacteria affects caseinolysis in a different manner directly or indirectly, influencing the quantity and quality of milk products Cork 2005

The main conclusions from this study are: 2. Casein has low value for predicting milk quality for cheese production 3. Whey is a convenient 4. This study shows that in order to understand milk quality it will be important to study the interactions among specific bacteria the innate immune system and caeinolysis Cork 2005

Thank you: I hope that this lecture will contribute to our ability to raise healthier cows and produce better dairy products BOLFA 2006