Math Models progression in the early grades Becky Paslay 2015 IEA Summer Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.
Discourse and Mathematical Argumentation in the Classroom Wednesday, June 6, 2012.
Building Foundations for Mathematics Defining Numerical Fluency.
Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: RTI for Elementary Schools.
CCSSM in the Second Grade
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Teaching Mathematics for Elementary Teachers through Problem Solving Martha VanCleave MathFest 2000 UCLA August 5, 2000.
Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities Background Information Number Experiences Quantifying the World Math Anxiety and Myths about math The.
Rethinking Multiplication and Division
The Empty Number Line: A Model For Thinking Math Alliance DeAnn Huinker & Beth Schefelker April 27, 2010.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Gabr’l Stackhouse April 25,  To strengthen the teaching and learning of addition and subtraction word problems in kindergarten, first, and second.
Helping Children Develop Number Sense Dr. Laura McLaughlin Taddei.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Dates:Tuesdays, Jan 7 – Feb 11
Eagle Ridge and GCSU. 4 elementary teachers from Eagle Ridge Elementary involved in the YES 2 mathematics education professors Weekly meetings for 4 months.
Learning About Student Mathematical Discourse: Case Study of a Middle-School Lesson Study Group Betsy Elizabeth King Mills College Aki.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
Teaching Middle School Mathematics Fractions, decimals and percentages Ratios, rates and proportions Work out the problem on your card, then find 3 other.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
Mathematical Processes. 2 What We are Learning Today Mathematical Processes What are they? How do we teach through these processes? How do students learn.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
GMU COMPLETE Center Candy Dilemma A VDOE SPONSORED MSP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY THROUGH GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Cyndi Madden Mona SamahaPatricia.
Concept Mapping Through the Conceptual Levels of Understanding Presented by Michael Sanchez Weslaco Independent School District The University of Texas.
Welcome to EP210—Unit 1! Thanks for coming to my seminar! Seminar participation makes a difference. Please take a few minutes to visit with your classmates.
This module was developed by Carrie Ziegler, Nathan Auck, and Steve Jackson. They are the three principle designers of the course, Principles to Actions,
High Quality Math Instruction
Math Fact Fluency What Teachers Need to Know. Components of Fluency in a Mathematics Setting  Research states that “computational fluency is composed.
Module 4 Shift of Application Sunnyside School District.
Setting the Focus of TAL.  We are learning to… ◦ Develop a common understanding of the word intervention.  We will be successful when we… ◦ Make connections.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Kindergarten Research Presentation Brianne Ciarlo Karly Millar Amanda Todd.
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
From Skip Counting to Linearity: How Do We Get There? Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public Schools Astrid Fossum,
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
SW1 FOS Networking Session Dec. 16, 2011 David Hornell Junior School.
PROBLEM AREAS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION By C.K. Chamasese.
BUILDING NUMBER SENSE THROUGH MAPPING DEVICES – 1 ST GRADE K-2 CCSS MNPS District Training June 10 – 14, 2013 Kari McLaughlin, Tameka Gordon-Sneed & Keri.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Eureka Math Parent Workshop Kindergarten Presented By: Ms. Vereen Instructional Lead Teacher.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
1. An Overview of the Number and Operations Standard for School Mathematics? 2.
The Empty Number Line: A Model For Thinking Math Alliance Originally: April 27, 2010.
The Inclusive Classroom: Strategies for Effective Differentiated Instruction, 4th Edition © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
INSTITUTE for LEARNING This module was developed by DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute.
4.2:EARLY NUMERACY AND BASIC FACTS Mathematical Thinking for Instruction K-3.
MATH BY MEAGHAN, ROWEN, ELSIE. CONTENT LIST ▪ INTRODUCTION : Past vs Present ▪ SELECTING APPROPRIATE MATH : Math Standards ▪ RESEARCH ON MATH INSTRUCTION.
1.1 TEACHING FOR UNDERSTANDING Mathematical Thinking for Instruction K-2 ©CDMT 2008.
EdTPA Task 4 Boot Camp Spring What is required for students to be mathematically proficient? According to The National Research Council (2001),
2.1 PROBLEM TYPES: ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION Mathematical Thinking for Instruction K-3.
CHAPTER 16 Developing Fraction Operations
Vacaville USD December 8, 2014
Mathematics Chapter 14.
Strong Start Math Project
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
CHAPTER 8 Developing Early Number Concepts and Number Sense
Presentation transcript:

Math Models progression in the early grades Becky Paslay 2015 IEA Summer Institute

Session 1 Focus ●Why Use Models?--The Research ●Models for: o counting and cardinality o adding / subtracting ● K-2 model progression ●Enactive, Iconic and Symbolic Trajectory

Session 2 Focus ●Sample Student Work ●Practice Categorizing ●Rubric Rough Draft

Session 1 Becky Paslay 2015 IEA Summer Institute 4

DMT Framework

Encouraging Multiple Models and Strategies A Review of the Literature

Bruner (1964) Amplifiers of Sensory Capacities (Iconic) Amplifiers of Motor Capacities (Enactive) Amplifiers of Ratiocinative Capacities (Symbolic)

Encouraging Multiple Models and Strategies “The most important thing about memory is not storage of past experience, but rather the retrieval of what is relevant in some usable form. This depends upon how past experience is coded and processed so that it may indeed be relevant and usable in the present when needed.” (Bruner, 1964)

Mapping Instruction Generalized Modeling Gravemeijer & van Galen (2003)

Encouraging Multiple Models and Strategies ● Sociomathematical norms for explanations o different o sophisticated o efficient o acceptable Cobb,

Encouraging Multiple Models and Strategies ● Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) o Theory by Cobb, 2000 o student’s models can evolve into the abstract ● DMT Framework o Enactive - Iconic - Symbolic o Brenerfur et al, 2015 ● Model to “concretize expert knowledge o Gravemeijer & van Galen, 2003

Encouraging Multiple Models and Strategies ● longer-term memory ● better understanding of concepts ● “mapping instruction” versus generalized modeling o step by step process with ready made manipulatives o elaborate from own ideas, self-developed and reflect number sense understandings (Brenderfur, Thiede, Strother and Carney, 2015; Gravemeijer & van Galen, 2003; Resnick & Omanson, 1987)

Romberg & Kaput (1999) mathematics is more like a banyan rather than a palm tree

Shift from traditional math towards human mathematical activity Topics = Same Approach Changing Math Worth Teaching ➔ model building ➔ explore patterns ➔ powerful analytical problem solving ➔ relevant ➔ invite exploration ➔ inquire ➔ justification ➔ flexible technology use ➔ creative attitudes, habits & imagination ➔ enjoyment and confidence

Modeling Stages Fosnot 1 - Realistic Situation 2 -Computational strategies as students explain

3 - Tools to THINK with…...

Go Noodle!

Encouraging Multiple Models and Strategies Different contexts generate different models which allow teachers to take student ideas seriously, press students conceptually, focus on the structure of mathematics and address misconceptions.

Addition & Subtraction Problem Types JRU Join Result Unknown JCU Join Change Unknown JSU Join Start Unknown SRU Separate Result Unknown SCU Separate Change Unknown SSU Separate Start Unknown PPW:WU Part-Part-Whole: Whole Unknown PPW:PU Part-Part-Whole: Part Unknown CDU Compare Difference Unknown CSU Compare Set Unknown CQU Compare Quantity Unknown CRU Compare Referent Unknown

Counting Forward and Backwards by 10s & *an exercise presented by Brenderfur

Counting Forward

Counting Forward 24 1 ten 10 ten ones

Counting Forward ten What is staying the same? What is changing? 11 ten ones

Counting Forward ten What is staying the same? What is changing? 12 ten ones

Counting Forward ten What is staying the same? What is changing? 13 ten ones

Counting Forward ten ones 1 ten What is staying the same? What is changing?

Counting Forward ten ones 1 ten What is staying the same? What is changing?

Counting Forward ten ones 1 ten What is staying the same? What is changing?

Counting Forward ten ones 1 ten What is staying the same? What is changing?

Counting Forward ten ones 1 ten What is staying the same? What is changing?

Counting Forward What is staying the same? What is changing? 19 ten ones 1 ten

Counting Forward What is staying the same? What is changing? 20 tens ones 1 ten

Counting Forward 35 1 ten 2 tens 20 tens ones 10 ten ones

Counting Forward tens ones 21 1 ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Forward tens ones ten 2 tens 10 ten ones 20 tens ones

Counting Forward tens ones 3 tens 1 ten 2 tens 20 tens ones 10 ten ones

Counting Backward 47 3 tens 1 ten 2 tens 20 tens ones 10 ten ones 30 tens ones

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones ten 2 tens

Counting Backward tens ones 21 1 ten 2 tens

Counting Backward 57 1 ten 2 tens 20 tens ones 10 ten ones

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ten ones 1 ten

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward ones

Counting Backward 77 0 zero

Go Noodle!

Addition & Subtraction Problem Types JRU Join Result Unknown JCU Join Change Unknown JSU Join Start Unknown SRU Separate Result Unknown SCU Separate Change Unknown SSU Separate Start Unknown PPW:WU Part-Part-Whole: Whole Unknown PPW:PU Part-Part-Whole: Part Unknown CDU Compare Difference Unknown CSU Compare Set Unknown CQU Compare Quantity Unknown CRU Compare Referent Unknown

Sample Problem Ellie has 22 apples. She gives 13 to Mark. How many apples does she have left? -How should your students model this problem? -Write them on index cards.

Models *Bar/Tape Model *Number Line Pictures Ten Frame Venn Diagram Tree Diagram Graphs Tools *Unifix Cubes Rekenrek Dice, Cards, Dominoes Base Ten Blocks Geoboard *Graph Paper Misc. Manipulatives

Identify whether the model is enactive, iconic, or symbolic and how you know. - Include the models you created on the index cards.

Modes of Representation Enactive Physical or action-based representations Iconic Visual image(s) of a situation that is relatively proportionally accurate Symbolic Abstract representations where the meaning of the symbols must be learned Bruner, J. (1964)

Enactive Iconic Symbolic

Enactive concrete, physical, manipulatives, cubes, fingers (objects) Iconic visual, picture, drawing, diagram, bar model, number line, graph Symbolic numbers, symbols, table, equation, algorithm, notations, abstract, words What words are used to connect to the enactive, iconic and symbolic representations? What words do the CCSS use?

Using the E-I-S Trajectory to Diagnose Student Understanding Enactive Iconic Symbolic One potential trajectory for how students may come to represent their understanding of subtraction. - How is this similar or different to how you sequenced the models?

DMT Framework

Greg Tang

Session 2 Focus ●Discuss Strategies vs. Models ●Practice Categorizing sample student work ●Work to develop a very rough draft rubric ●Rate various models and tools

ENACTIVE-ICONIC-SYMBOLIC Model TRAJECTORY Discussion To Analyze Student Thinking

Stategies vs. Models strategy = the mental process we use to solve model = the method of notation used to explain our strategy

Solve Multiple Ways a b c

Discuss a b c Compare within your group. We will return to discuss whole group later.

1. How would you sequence these student solutions from informal to formal (include your index card examples also)? 2. If time allows, identify how the student thinking is similar or different among models?

Using the E-I-S Trajectory to Diagnose Student Understanding Enactive Iconic Symbolic One potential trajectory for how students may come to represent their understanding of subtraction. - How is this similar or different to how you sequenced the models?

THE ENACTIVE-ICONIC-SYMBOLIC TRAJECTORY As Instructional Scaffolding

E-I-S as Instructional Scaffolding How do you take a student who is here to here? Ellie has 22 apples, she gives 13 to Mark, how many apples does she have left?

Line up the ‘cubes’ horizontally so the ‘drawing’ looks like the following. Set up as a bar model. Draw the number line off the bar model. Represent jumps on bar model/number line combination

E-I-S as Instructional Scaffolding One instructional progression from an informal iconic drawing to a more formal iconic drawing

E-I-S as Instructional Scaffolding How do you take a student who is here to here? Ellie has 22 apples, she gives 13 to Mark, how many apples does she have left? or here?

E-I-S as Instructional Scaffolding One potential instructional progression from an informal iconic drawing to a more formal iconic drawing

E-I-S as Instructional Scaffolding What is the mismatch between taking a student who is here to here? Ellie has 22 apples, she gives 13 to Mark, how many apples does she have left?

More Practice Sorting Samples from Idaho State Department Web ath/mtiWebinarsArchived.htm

Discuss ● Bar model with and without individual numbers and number line ● Base Ten Blocks - number line (enactive) ● Base Ten Blocks - number tree (iconic) *Listen to student thinking

Big Ideas for Take Away ● There isn’t a perfect addition progression. ● We can have general ideas but models and strategies may fit in different places based on the students, the task or the number set.

Creating a Math Rubric

Copyright ©2001, revised 2015 by Exemplars, Inc. All rights reserved. Four Point Rubric from Exemplars Inc.

1 Point: Little Accomplishment 2 Points: Marginal Accomplishment 3 Points: Substantial Accomplishment 4 Points: Full Accomplishment ●No attempt is made to construct representations (Exemplar S) ●No evidence of a strategy, or uses a strategy that does not help solve the problem(Exemplar C) ●Applies procedures incorrectly (Exemplar C) ●No evidence of mathematical reasoning (Exemplar C) ●An attempt is made to construct representations (Exemplar S) ●A partially correct strategy is chosen, leading some way toward a solution but not to a full solution of the problem (Exemplar C, S) ●Could not completely carry out procedures (Exemplar C) ●Some evidence of mathematical reasoning (Exemplar C) ●Appropriate and mostly accurate mathematical representations (Exemplar S) ●A correct strategy is chosen based on the mathematical situation in the task (Exemplar S) ●Applies procedures with minor error(s) (Exemplar C, Van de Walle, 2006) ●Uses effective mathematical reasoning (Exemplar C) ●Appropriate and accurate mathematical representations (Exemplar S) ●Uses an efficient strategy leading directly to a solution (Exemplar C) ●Applies procedures accurately to correctly solve the problem (Exemplar C) ●Employs refined and complex reasoning (Exemplar C) Adapted from Van de Walle, J. (2004) Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. Boston: Pearson Education. pages Adapted from Exemplars Classic Exemplars Rubric. Retrieved from: (Exemplar C) Adapted from Exemplars Standards-Based Math Rubric. Retrieved from: (Exemplar S)

Three Point Rubric that evolved from the previous attempts and adapted from Van de Walle and Exemplars.

Go Noodle

Rate the Model and Tools

Which statement are you leaving with? 1.“I need to teach the models that are appropriate for my grade level.” 1.“I need to find contextual problems that will encourage students to use the models that are appropriate for my grade level.”

Which statement are you leaving with? 1.“I need to teach the models that are appropriate for my grade level.” 1.“I need to find contextual problems that will encourage students to use the models that are appropriate for my grade level.”

DMT Framework

References Brendefur, J., Thiede, K., Strother, S., and Carney, M. (2015). DMT Framework and Classroom Structure. Department of Education, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho. Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American psychologist,19(1), 1. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In R. Lesh & A. Kelly (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Imm, K. L., Fosnot, C. T., & Uittenbogaard, W. (2007). Minilessons for operations with fractions, decimals, and percents: A yearlong resource. firsthand/Heinemann. Dolk, M., & Fosnot, C,T, (2002). Young Mathematicians at Work: Constructing Fractions, Decimals and Percents: Heinemann, Gravemeijer, K., & van Galen, F. (2003). Facts and algorithms as products of students’ own mathematical activity. A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics,

References Romberg, T. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics worth teaching, mathematics worth understanding. Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding, Smith, M.S., & Stein, M.K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: NCTM. Thurston, W.P. (1990, January). Letters from the editors. Quantum, Go Noodle

FOR COPIES

GRAPHICS