UNDAP Tanzania An Overview of the UN/GoT Programme of Cooperation

Improve the coherence, development effectiveness and efficiency of its operations in Tanzania; improve the transparency of the UN’s work in Tanzania and thereby enhancing its accountability to the Government and Development Partners. The UN in Tanzania’s experience in developing and using the previous and current UNDAFs to guide the UN’s work. Key constraints included: lack of prioritisation, broadly defined similar outcomes which were overly ambitious for the timeframe, lack of specificity about what the UN would contribute, and lack of monitoring and evaluation. The UNCMT’s decision to develop a single UN country plan for Tanzania; moving from a strategic framework (UNDAF) to a single country programme. The UN resolution A/RES/64/289 on system wide coherence allowed for submission and approval of common country programmes on a voluntary basis UNDAP: The Rationale

UNDAP: What is different? UNDAF UNDAP A framework for the UN agencies to operate within Tanzania 1. A business plan for the UN agencies in Tanzania 2. Echoes Tanzania’s development priorities to which the UN would contribute 2. Articulates the contribution of the UN system to the national priorities 3. Agencies developed individual plans using UNDAF as the overarching framework (out of these, 9 Joint Programmes developed) 3. UNDAP is the plan for all UN agencies in Tanzania 4. Only Joint Programme reviewed annually (performance based fund allocations) 4. Entire UN Programme reviewed annually (performance based fund allocations) CCA Specialised Agency Country Plans Standard process UNDAP process Prioritisation UNDAF Specialised Agency Country Plans CPAPs CPD Common CPD UNDAP Prioritisation MKUKUTA/ MKUZA Review

UNDAP: Results and Accountability 8 MDGs & IADGs 16 MKUKUTA + 14 MKUZA 58 UNDAP Outcomes 182 UNDAP Outputs 369 UNDAP Key Actions of 19 UN agencies Individual agency Agency(s) and Implementing Partners UN and Implementing Partners GoT and Development Partners Member states Collective Accountability

UNDAP: Prioritising Capacity Development Capacity of Who? (Of Outcomes) Capacity to do What? (Of Outputs)

UNDAP: Budgetary Framework UNDAP Budget Outlay: $ 773m (inclusive of programme costs

UNDAP: Resource Mobilisation Plan (mill USD)

Cluster I: Growth for reduction of income poverty (Budget: $ 180 million, 23%) Cluster I: Growth for reduction of income poverty (Budget: $ 180 million, 23%) Advance fulfillment of Tanzania’s international treaty obligations Providing Durable solutions Basic services and protection for refugees Providing Durable solutions Basic services and protection for refugees Strengthening National emergency preparedness and response Justice system responsive to children & women Cluster II: Improvement of Quality of Life and Social Well-being (Budget: $ 323m, 42%) Advancing good governance, national oversight and accountability Deepening democracy and further community dialogue Health, Nutrition and HIV / AIDS Strengthening development management capacity Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Protection services, Social Protection Education, Vocational Training, School feeding Agriculture productivity & food security Trade promotion and Labour standards Environmental mainstreaming & climate change adaptation SME capacity and entrepreneurial skills Cluster III: Governance and Accountability (Budget: $ 270 m, 35%) Cluster III: Governance and Accountability (Budget: $ 270 m, 35%) Enabling Environment Sectoral capacities National Development Outcomes Supporting Basic Social Services Reducing income poverty Fulfilment of human rights in Tanzania UNDAP: Areas of cooperation

UNDAP Management Structure JSC CMT OMT WG on HACTWG on ICT WG on HR WG on Procurement WG on Common Premises WG on Finance IAPC IAGG PWG on Economic Growth Human Rights Group PWG on Environment PME Group PWG on Education PWG on Emergencies PWG on Health PWG on Social Protection PWG on HIV/AIDS PWG on WASH PWG on Governance PWG on Refugees Com’G Cluster I Cluster II Cluster III JSC: Joint Steering Committee CMT: Country Management Team SMT: Security Management Team OMT: Operations Management Team IAPC: Inter-Agency Programme Committee Com’G: Communications Group ECG: Emergency Coordination Group IAGG: Inter-Agency Gender Group HRG: Human Rights Group PME Group: Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Group PWG: Programme Working Group Znz CG: Zanzibar Coordination Group Znz CG

Proposed planning, monitoring & reporting UNDAP WG Annual Workplans UN will sign 10 AWPs with GoT Country Programme Planning Annual Work Planning Common Review process Mid Year / Annual Reviews Agency reporting as necessary One UN report Annual report Economic Growth Environ- ment Education Health HIV/AIDS Social Protection WASH Governance Emergencies Refugees

UNDAP: Results and Accountability 8 MDGs & IADGs 16 MKUKUTA + 14 MKUZA 58 UNDAP Outcomes 182 UNDAP Outputs 369 UNDAP Key Actions of 19 UN agencies Individual agency Agency(s) and Implementing Partners UN and Implementing Partners GoT and Development Partners Member states Collective Accountability

CUT OFF

Key National Policy Documen ts Problem IdentificationCausality Analysis Duty Bearers Role & Capacity Assessment Possible Areas of UN InterventionOutcome Statements Programme Results MatrixProgramme M&E MatrixDelivering as One Matrix UNDAP: the Process Stakeholder Participation  Government of Tanzania  UN Agencies  Civil Society  Development Partners Stakeholder Participation  Government of Tanzania  UN Agencies  Civil Society  Development Partners Cross Cutting Considerations –Human Rights –Gender Equality –Environmental Sustainability –Capacity Development –RBM Cross Cutting Considerations –Human Rights –Gender Equality –Environmental Sustainability –Capacity Development –RBM

COMMUNICATION CONVENER (Strengthening Inclusive Decision- Making) FUNCTIONAL CAPACITIES How will the UN build this capacity? (Of Key Actions) UNDAP: Prioritising Capacity Development

UN’s Vision 2015 for DaO in Tanzania The United Nations in Tanzania: Is an accountable, honest and trusted broker and partner to the Government and people of Tanzania and its Development Partners. Contributes to sustainable poverty reduction and the realization of human rights in line with Tanzania’s national development vision. To support this vision, the UN will: Operate within the framework of national leadership, ownership and accountability through the systematic use of national systems; Build and maintain partnerships with development partners, non-state actors and the private sector in line with the Joint Assistance Strategy for Tanzania; Promote the integration of principles of human rights and equity, gender equality, culture and environmental sustainability in national policies, strategies, plans and budgets; Build sustainable national capacity; and Provide humanitarian assistance to people in need and support the transition from humanitarian assistance to sustainable development.

UNDAP: the Process UNDAP is results-based and mainstreams UN programming principles and cross-cutting issues: UN priorities were identified using a Human Rights Based Approach to Programming (HRBA) Gender equality was mainstreamed in prioritization and programming phases, supported with Quality Assurance mechanisms Capacity Development was an important consideration in the formulation of Outcomes and deciding on the choice of interventions Specific outcomes relating Environmental Sustainability are planned in UNDAP, and have been mainstreamed as cross-cutting considerations with planned key actions Cross-cutting issues on HIV/AIDS, Conflict prevention, Disaster risk reduction (DRR), Food security, Indigenous peoples’ issues, Volunteerism and Employment & decent work have also been considered in light of planned key actions More than 300 persons participated in the development of UNDAP NSAs include CSOs, FBOs, INGOs, Private Sector and DPs.

Cluster I: $ 180 m (23%) Growth for reduction of income poverty [MKUKUTA*] / Growth and reduction of income poverty [MKUZA] About: Supporting national achievement of economic growth, wealth creation, productivity enhancement and broad based pro-poor development Working Groups: Two working groups –Economic Growth ($ 69 m - 39%) –Environment and Climate Change($ 110 m - 61%) Agency Roles: –FAO (Improve agriculture, forestry and fisheries) –ILO (Decent and productive work –UNFPA (Using population data for policies and programmes) –ITC (Small business export) –UNCTAD (Trade promotion) –UNCDF (Microfinance & local economic development) –UNDP (Economic Governance, Growth and Environment) –UNEP (Environment & climate change) –UNESCO (Science, Technology & Innovation; Conservation, Entrepreneurship) –UNIDO (Industrial development) –UNIFEM (Enhancing women’s economic security and rights) –WFP (Food Security)

Cluster II: $ 323 m (42%) Improvement of quality of life and social well-being [MKUKUTA*] / Well being and social services [MKUZA] About: Supporting national coverage and quality of basic services, including protection for the most vulnerable Working Groups: Five working groups –Education ($ 104m - 32%) –Health ($ 129 m - 40%) –WASH ($ 19 m - 6%) –Social Protection ($ 30 m - 9%), and –HIV/AIDS ($ 41 m - 13%) Agency Roles: –FAO (HIV/AIDS mainstreaming) –ILO (HIV/AIDS mainstreaming & social protection) –IOM (Human Trafficking) –UNAIDS (HIV/AIDS) –UNDP (HIV/AIDS) –UNESCO (Education and HIV/AIDS mainstreaming) –UNFPA (Maternal Health, HIV/AIDS, Protection) –UN-HABITAT (WASH) –UNICEF (Child/maternal health, Basic Education, Children and HIV/AIDS, Child Protection, Social Protection, WASH) –UNIFEM (GBV and Gender mainstreaming) –WFP (School Feeding, Nutrition, HIV/AIDS, Safety nets) –WHO (Health, HIV/AIDS, Social Protection, WASH)

Cluster III: $ 270 m (35%) Governance and accountability [MKUKUTA*] / Good governance and national unity [MKUZA] About: Good government, the rule of law, respect for human rights, protecting the weak and assisting those rendered vulnerable in disaster and emergency Working Groups: Three working groups –Governance ($ 69 m - 26%) –Emergencies ($ 15 m - 6%), and –Refugees ($ 186 m - 68%) Agency Roles: –FAO (EPR in agriculture, forestry and fisheries) –ILO (Labour related conventions) –IOM (Asylum and Migration) –OHCHR (Human Rights reporting) –UNCDF (LGA financing) –UNDP (Good Governance, Democracy, Development Management) –UNESCO (Culture Conventions, Community Dialogue) –UNFPA (Gender discrimination, CEDAW reporting, SRH and GBV in emergencies) –UNHCR (Refugee services and durable solutions) –UNICEF (Child Justice, EPR, Children in Refugee Camps, Development Management for children, CRC reporting) –UNIFEM (Gender Budgeting, GBV and gender equity) –WFP (EPR, Refugee services) –WHO (Health Emergency Preparedness)

Allocations from the One Fund (OF) – Principles The One Fund is the mechanism through which donors finance the un-funded portion of the UNDAP budget for which UN agencies have indicated that resources need to be mobilized locally in Tanzania Year 1: Programmes have to meet eligibility Criteria in order to access funding from the One Fund – Funding will then be decided on a pro rata basis or will be prioritized depending on funding available in the OF Year 2 and following: Allocations are going to be decided on the basis of a performance review (both at Programme and PUN level) All allocations have to be agreed by the Joint Steering Committee

FAQ 1: Does the UNDAP reflect UN’s competitive/ comparative advantage? Global knowledge and capacities: UNDAP targets ‘fit to purpose’ global expertise (advisory, convening and provider) to the strategic ‘core’ of government – Ministries tasked with Public Service Management, Good Governance, Policy, Planning and Political Affairs, Regional Administration and Local Governance etc; in line with local capacities and needs National alignment and partnership empowerment: UNDAP focuses UN capacity/technical development on key national goals and targets in support of international (DP) financial commitments to the country Strategic approach: UNDAP positions the country to deliver on the MDGs in the Short to Medium term through targeted technical/capacity development, until the duty bearers have the capacity to run their affairs successfully Trusted partner role: UNDAP delivers UN capacity, networks and convening power on the country’s behalf in working with DPs, CSO’s, Private Sector, the Tanzanian people, other local, multilateral and global partners Humanitarian assistance: Provide humanitarian assistance to people in need and support the transition from humanitarian assistance to sustainable development

FAQ 2: Does the UNDAP mainstream gender, human rights and other cross-cutting considerations? As part of the UNDAP planning process, Key Actions have been developed to outline the broad sets of interventions that will be made by an agency to achieve the output. The applicability of the programming principles and cross-cutting issues has been considered along with key actions as relevant and pragmatic, depending on the type of action that will be carried out This provides the opportunity for a more realistic and meaningful basis for translation of these into Annual Work Plans at a later stage. The agency responsible for the key action will be responsible for the application of the cross cutting considerations when carrying out the related interventions The M&E matrix (under development) will include indicators and targets to monitor progress on significant cross cutting considerations Quality Assurance teams, where possible, have been involved in the review of the plans to suggest the cross-cutting considerations that might apply As a rule, blanket inclusion of cross-cutting considerations in the outcome and output formulation has been discouraged, unless the cross-cutting consideration is the primary objective of the underlying key actions

FAQ 3: How will the UNDAP help achieve the MDGs? UNDAP supports the national priorities in MKUKUTA and MKUZA, that are geared towards the realization of MDGs UNDAP articulates UN’s contribution and accountability – Continue to do what the UN does best (Strengthening national systems by responding to priority capacity gaps for sustainable achievement of MDGs) – Develops capacities for scale up of basic services in vulnerable areas – Leverage for the people of Tanzania in priority areas (e.g. Sanitation and Health, Nutrition, Protection), by working with DPs and IP’s to respond to specific MDG challenges – Monitor the realization of Human Rights, convene relevant stakeholders and hold partners to their commitments