Several Fun Research Projects at NAOJ for the Future GW Detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
CLIO Current Status of Japanese Detectors Daisuke Tatsumi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
11-15 September Civic Auditorium TAUP2007 (Sendai) Displacement noise free interferometory for gravitational wave detection National Astronomical.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
Current progress of developing Inter-satellite laser interferometry for Space Advanced Gravity Measurements Hsien-Chi Yeh School of Physics Huazhong University.
Japanese Gravitational Wave Detectors: LCGT and DECIGO Frontiers in Optics 2009 Laser Science XXV Oct. 13, 2009 San Jose, USA Seiji Kawamura (NAOJ), LCGT.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
Status of LCGT and CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and LCGT, CLIO collaborators TAUP2007 Sendai, Japan 2007/9/12.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
LIGO-G R Aspen Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype Seiji Kawamura 2004 Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves Gravitational.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (Sept. 11, 2007, Sendai, Japan ) DECIGO Pathfinder Masaki Ando (Department.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
The Big Bang Observer: High Laser Power for Gravitational- wave Astrophysics Gregory Harry, Peter Fritschel LIGO Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Quantum noise observation and control A. HeidmannM. PinardJ.-M. Courty P.-F. CohadonT. Briant O. Arcizet T. CaniardJ. Le Bars Laboratoire Kastler Brossel,
Bridging the Gap between Terrestrial Detectors and LISA Elba 2002 May 24, 2002 Seiji Kawamura National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
RSE Experiment in Japan Feb. 20 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting LIGO-G Z K.Somiya, O.Miyakawa, P.Beyersdorf, and S.Kawamura.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
Isola d’Elba, Italy 2006GWADW-VESF meeting Diagonalizing sensing matrix of RSE interferometer Shuichi Sato TAMA project National Astronomical Observatory.
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research Univ. of Tokyo Development of an RSE Interferometer Using the Third Harmonic Demodulation LIGO-G Z Osamu Miyakawa,
MOTIVATION OF THIS PROJECT Testing the control scheme with a prototype interferometer to demonstrate the control of the tuned RSE for LCGT is necessary.
Deci-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (DECIGO) 7th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop December 17, International Institute.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
Opening our eyes to QND technical issues (workshop and open forum) “It’ll be the blind leading the blind” - Stan Whitcomb “You can see a lot by looking”
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
Optomechanics Experiments
The cancelation of displacement- and frequency- noise using four mach-zehnder interferometer Keiko Kokeyama Ochanomizu University / NAOJ.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
DECIGO Pathfinder Masaki Ando
Overview of quantum noise suppression techniques
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Interferometric speed meter as a low-frequency gravitational-wave detector Helge Müller-Ebhardt Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (AEI) and Leibniz.
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Several Fun Research Projects at NAOJ for the Future GW Detectors Picture: Sora Kawamura Several Fun Research Projects at NAOJ for the Future GW Detectors LIGO Seminar @ Caltech Aug. 8, 2006 Seiji Kawamura National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ) NAOJ is located in Tokyo. TAMA300 is located on the NAOJ campus.

Other research projects at NAOJ Displacement-noise free Interferometer RSE DECIGO MHz GW detection QND

Displacement-noise free Interferometer

Motivation Displacement noise: seismic Noise, thermal noise, radiation pressure noise Cancel displacement noise  shot noise limited sensitivity Increase laser power  sensitivity improved indefinitely Diplacement noise Displacement noise Cancel displacement noise Shot noise Sensitivity Increase laser power PD Laser Frequency

Principle 1: GW and mirror motion interact with light differently On reflection On propagation Light Mirror motion Mirror motion Difference outstanding for GW wavelength  distance between masses

Principle 2: Mirror motion can be cancelled by combining interferometer outputs Laser Increase # of mirrors Implement many interferometers Take combination outputs  cancel mirror motion Mirror motion PD Laser PD Mirror motion Bi-directional MZ

Example of DFI Two 3-d bi-directional MZ Take combination of 4 outputs Mirror motion completely cancelled GW signal remains (f 2)

Experiment (Ideal) One bi-directional MZ GW Laser Mirror motion PD Extract GW  Mirror motion

Experiment (Practical) EOM used for GW and mirror motion Simulated mirror motion Simulated GW Mirror motion GW ~ ~ Laser Laser PD PD Ideal                Practical

Results Mirror motion cancels out GW signal remains Mirror motion to output GW signal to output Difference Difference Mirror motion        GW signal

Next step Implement cavity to reduce the effective frequency Demonstrate the cancellation of the BS motion using two bi-directional MZ References Kawamura and Chen, PRL, 93, (2004) 211103 Chen and Kawamura, PRL, 96 (2006) 231102 Chen, Pai, Somiya, Kawamura, Sato, Kokeyama, Ward, submitted to PRL (gr-qc/0603054) Sato, Kawamura, Kokeyama, Ward, Chen, Pai, and Somiya, to be submitted to PRL

RSE

4m RSE Supended mass RSE Miniature suspension system

Previous Accomplishments Tuned RSE (w/o PRM) locked Detuned RSE (w/o PRM) locked Optical spring effect observed Miyakawa, Somiya, Heinzel, and Kawamura, Class. and Quantum Grav., 19 (2002) p.1555-1560 Somiya, Beyersdorf, Arai, Sato, Kawamura, Miyakawa, Kawazoe, Sakata, Sekido, Mio, Appl. Opt. 44 (2005) pp. 3179-3191

Current Activity Try new signal extraction method Lock RSE (w/ PRM) Backup for Advanced LIGO Baseline for LCGT Lock RSE (w/ PRM)

New Signal Extraction Method

Signal Matrix Baseline Design for LCGT Black: Analytic results Red: Numerical simulation using “FINESSE” lp ls diagonal ls orthogonal Baseline Design for LCGT lp

Delocation Option for LCGT - Could have potential advantages

Current Status MZ locked only w/ PM FP Michelson locked Suspension system improved

DECIGO

What is DECIGO? Deci-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory - bridges the gap between LISA and terrestrial detectors. - could attain high sensitivity because of lower confusion noise. 10-18 10-24 10-22 10-20 LISA Terrestrial Detectors Strain [Hz-1/2] DECIGO Confusion Noise 10-4 10-2 100 102 104 Frequency [Hz]

Pre-conceptual Design FP-Michelson interferometer Arm length: 1000 km Laser power: 10 W Laser wavelength: 532 nm Mirror diameter: 1 m Mirror mass: 100 kg Finesse: 10 Orbit and constellation: TBD Drag-free satellite Arm cavity PD Laser Arm cavity Kawamura, et al., CQG 23 (2006) S125-S131 PD Drag-free satellite Drag-free satellite

Drag-free and FP Cavity Displacement Signal between S/C and Mirror Local Sensor Mirror Thruster Thruster Actuator Displacement signal between the two Mirrors

Requirements [Practical force noise] 4x10-17 N/Hz per mirror [Frequency Noise] @ 1 Hz First-stage stabilization: 1 Hz/Hz Stabilization gain by common-mode arm length: 105 Common-mode rejection ratio: 105

Science by DECIGO BH+BH(1000Msun) @z=1 NS+NS@z=1 Correlation for 3 years NS-NS (1.4+1.4Msun) z<1 (SN>26: 7200/yr) z<3 (SN>12: 32000/yr) z<5 (SN>9: 47000/yr) IMBH (1000+1000Msun) z<1 (SN>6000)

Acceleration of Expansion of the Universe Expansion +Acceleration? DECIGO GW NS-NS (z~1) Output Template (No Acceleration) Strain Real Signal ? Phase Delay~1sec (10 years) Time Seto, Kawamura, Nakamura, PRL 87, 221103 (2001)

Roadmap for DECIGO R&D Advanced R&D PF1 PF2 DECIGO 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 R&D Advanced R&D PF1 Design & Fabrication Observation PF2 Design & Fabrication Observation DECIGO 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

DECIGO Pathfinder1 Objectives Drag-free system Cavity locking in space Modest sensitivity at 0.1 – 1 Hz Local Sensor Actuator Thruster

DECIGO Pathfinder2 Objectives DECIGO with modest specification Cavity locking between two satellites Meaningful sensitivity Drag-free satellite Arm cavity PD Laser Arm cavity PD Drag-free satellite Drag-free satellite

DECIGO Simulator Objectives Continual free-fall environment Clamp release Modest sensitivity down to 0.1Hz Possibility of long arm Clamp 2m Vertical Position 1 sec Release Hold Release Hold Release Hold Time

DECIGO Demonstrator Air-hockey table Objectives Lock acquisition Thruster Thruster Satellite A Satellite B Mirror A Mirror B Actuator Local sensor Local sensor Air-hockey table Objectives Lock acquisition

Budget and Working Group Will submit a budget request ($18M for 6 years) this fall R&D for DECIGO PF1 w/ Pulsar Timing DECIGO-WG: 120 members currently

MHz GW detection

Objectives and Scope GW Sources at MHz Detect GW at MHz Develop technologies for synchronous recycling GW Sources at MHz Inspiral of mini black holes GW from inflation period

Synchronous Recycling Recycling Mirror Laser BS Drever, 1983 Dark Fringe Photo detector

Response of Synchronous Recycling x h t y y x GW l Laser GW  4 l BS Photo detector GW effect synchronously enhanced!

Plan for Table-top Experiment Integration for 1 year h  10-26 Hz-1/2 F  105 h  10-21 Hz-1/2 l  75 cm fGW  100 MHz

Current Status Locked w/ low Finesse Noise Spectrum taken F  100 f 1 Non 50:50 Beam splitter 1 DOF to control EOM f 1 f GW - f 1 - BW Output

First Noise Spectrum

QND

Objectives and Scope Plan Beat SQL using ponderomotive squeezing Use FP Michelson w/ super light mirrors Plan Observe radiation pressure noise Reduce radiation pressure noise w/ homodyne detection Beat SQL Expand the effective frequency range

Ponderomotive Squeezing Squeezed by phase change caused by reflection by free mass Squeezing: frequency dependent Cannot beat SQL w/ RF method Laser Noise Signal Vacuum Caves, Walls & Milburn, Braginsky & Khalili, ...

Homodyne Detection Local light Laser Homodyne phase Signal Noise S/N can be improved by choosing appropriate homodyne phase!

Quantum Noise Radiation pressure noise can be completely cancelled at one frequency The frequency depends on homodyne phase

Strategy Use super-light mirror Use high finesse Increase radiation pressure noise Easier to detect Use tuned IFO (no optical spring)

Design Parameter and Noise Estimate Laser power 200 mW Injected power into the interferometer 120 mW Finesse 7500 Front mirror mass 200 g End mirror mass 23 mg Diameter of the end mirror 3 mm Thickness of the end mirror 1.5 mm Beam radius on the end mirror 500 mm Q factor of substrate 105 Loss angle of coating 4×10-4 Temperature 300 K Length of the fiber 1 cm Thickness of silica fiber 10 mm

Current Status Homodyne detection method verified Vacuum tank ready Design of set-up complete Fiber of 10 m drawn successfully

The End