Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch pour TDF/FTC/RPV  Etude SPIRIT. Etude SPIRIT: switch IP/r + 2 INTI pour TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Critère.
Advertisements

Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV - SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV STR  Design TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  SWIFT Study. SWIFT Study: Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  Design Campo R, CID 2013, Jan 29 (epub ahead of print) LPV/rATV/rFPV.
Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC  STRIIVING Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients maintaining HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E, snapshot)
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to MVC MARCH Study 1.
Switch ABC/3TC to TAF/FTC
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study

SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint N = 317 N = 159 PI/r + 2 NRTIs TDF/FTC/RPV STR  Design Randomisation 2 : 1 Open-label 24 weeks Primary Endpoint 48 weeks Secondary Endpoint  Objective –Primary Endpoint : Non-inferiority in the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at W24 (FDA snapshot analysis) ; upper limit of the 95% CI for the difference = 12% –Secondary Endpoints: Proportion of HIV1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at W48 ; Change in fasting lipid and CD4 cell count at W24 and W48 ; Safety and tolerability SPIRIT Palella F, AIDS 2014;28: HIV+ adults Stable PI + RTV + 2 NRTI ≥ 6 months with HIV RNA < 50 c/mL On 1 st or 2 nd regimen No prior NNRTI use No known resistance to study agents W24W48

Baseline characteristics and disposition TDF/FTC/RPV N = NRTI + PI/r N = 317 Female14%9% Baseline CD4/mm 3 (mean) Time since first ART, years (median) Discontinued before W24N = 20N = 7 Adverse event / Lack of efficacy7 / 10 / 0 Discontinued between W24 and W48N = 7N = 9 Adverse event / Lack of efficacy0 / 15 / 1 NRTIPI/r TDF/FTC 81% ATV/r 37% ABC/3TC 13% DRV/r 20% ZDV/3TC 3.4% FPV/r 33% LPV/r 33% ART at screening SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV SPIRIT Palella F, AIDS 2014;28:335-44

HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W24 and W48 (ITT, snapshot) 2 NRTI + PI/r (D1 to W24)TDF/FTC/RPV (D1 to W24) ≠ (95%CI) 3.8 (- 1.6 ; 9.1) : non inferiority ≠ (95%CI) : 3.2 (- 4.8 ; 11.3) ≠ (95%CI) : 5.8 (- 1.4 ; 12.9) HIV RNA < 50 c/mL, ITT, M = excluded RPV = 99.7% vs PI/r = 94.7% Non inferiority HIV RNA, pre-ART (23 patients TDF/FTC/RPV and 14 PI/r excluded from analysis [data not avalaible]) > c/ml < c/ml 152/ / 93 48/ / 134 % % SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV SPIRIT TDF/FTC/RPV (delayed switch, W24 to W48) 3/3178/1592/152 Virologic failure % TDF/FTC/RPV (immediate switch, D1 to W48) 89.3 HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W24 according to pre-ART HIV RNA 2.5 8/317 Palella F, AIDS 2014;28:335-44

 Among the 24 patients with the K103N mutation on historical genotype –18 in the immediate switch arm All maintain HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W24 1 virologic failure at W48 (pre-existing mutations : K103N + V179I, emergence : M184V, E138K and V108V/I) –6 in the delayed switch arm 5 maintain HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (24 weeks after switch) 1 without data at W48 (HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at last study visit)  Virologic failure on TDF/FTC/RPV, N = 7 (1.5%) –3 without emergence of resistance mutations –4 with emergence of resistance mutations K103N + L100I + M184I M184I E138E/K + M184M/V E138K + V108V/I + M184V SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV SPIRIT Palella F, AIDS 2014;28:335-44

Mean change from baseline at W P < for all comparisons 2 NRTI + PI/r Total-chol (mg/dl) LDL-c (mg/dl) TG (mg/dl) HDL-c (mg/dl) Ratio total-c HDL-c dL TDF/FTC/RPV Discontinuation for adverse event (W24) –TDF/FTC/RPV, N = 6 tubulopathy, N = 1 neuro-psychiatric events, N = 4 (depression, headache, insomnia, psychiatric event) –2 NRTI + PI/r, N = 0 GFR decrease significantly more important with RPV SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV SPIRIT Grade 3-4 Adverse events and laboratoratory abnormalities to W48 Palella F, AIDS 2014;28: RPV Immediate switch (at W48) PI/r (at W24) Adverse events 5.7 %6.9 %7.9% Laboratory abnormalities 8.8 %11.3 %15.2% RPV Delayed switch (at W24)

 Conclusion – Switching to the STR TDF/FTC/RPV from a PI/r regimen in virologically suppressed, HIV-1-infected participants maintained virologic suppression with a low risk of virologic failure, while improving total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides Participants had been virologically suppressed on a PI/r regimen for at least 6 months prior to study entry and had no previous ART failure Pretreatment HIV-1 RNA levels (while still ARV-naive) did not affect maintenance of viral suppression after switch to TDF/FTC/RPV –Historical K103 resistance mutation (probably transmitted) did not affect efficacy of switch to TDF/FTC/RPV in participants of the study SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV SPIRIT Palella F, AIDS 2014;28:335-44