Class 6 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Class 9 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Fraudulent Transfers Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Advertisements

Assignment and Delegation The Freedom to Assign a Creditor’s Right and its Limitation The Delegation for Contractual Duty and Security Interest.
Insolvency Law and Practices in Korea Business Law Asia & In-House Summit June 2009 Sang-goo Han.
Bankruptcy. What is Bankruptcy? Bankruptcy is a legal proceeding in which a person who cannot pay his or her bills can get a fresh start by canceling.
TENANT BANKRUPTCY Presented by GARY S. KESSLER KESSLER & COLLINS, PC 5950 SHERRY LANE, SUITE 222 DALLAS, TX
Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited CANADIAN BUSINESS AND THE LAW Second Edition by Dorothy Duplessis Steven Enman Shannon.
Chapter Thirteen Accounting for Legal Reorganizations and Liquidations
Article XXXVI – Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession 1. – This Protocol shall be open for signature in Berlin on 9 March 2012 by.
Now What? Evaluating Your Position Upon a Counterparty’s Bankruptcy Brandy A. Sargent November 9, 2009.
LEASE CLAUSES Presented by: Anthony J. Interrante.
Class 21 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 The Fresh Start Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 8 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Trustee as Hypothetical Lien Creditor Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University.
Class 12 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Pre-Confirmation Distributions Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of.
Chapter Six. Useful Definitions—Section 101 After reading this chapter, you will be able to: List what is included in Section 101 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Class 3 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Claims Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 12 Operation Of Contracts McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Class 13 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Sales of Assets Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Secured Transactions Assignment 27
Class 19 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Absolute Priority Rule Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago.
Fall 2013 Select Issues With Respect to the Filing of Chapter 9 Bankruptcy by the City of Detroit J. Robert Stoll Mayer Brown LLP Visiting Professor University.
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Class 15 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Administrative Expenses Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago.
Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Bankruptcy ABCs For Healthy Companies Morris S. Bauer, Esq. The material provided herein is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal.
Class 18 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Disclosure, Solicitation and Voting Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 34 Secured Transactions In Personal Property Twomey Jennings.
Class 14 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 DIP Financing Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Chapter Eighteen. Use, Sale, or Lease of Property After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Describe the details of the actual liquidation process.
©2013 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris – Firm and.
Class 1 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Case Initiation & Property of the Estate Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University.
Class 5 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2000 Secured Claims Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Chapter Three. Filing a Petition After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Describe the “gatekeeper” provisions in individual bankruptcy cases Understand.
Class 17 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Overview of Plan Process Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago.
Chapter Fifteen. Avoiding Powers-- Introduction After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Describe the concept and purpose of the trustee’s avoiding.
Class 20 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Interest Rates Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Chapter 4 Slide 1 Copyright – David A. McGowan All rights reserved. Revised Chapter 4 REAL ESTATE AGENCY Law of Agency The rights and duties of.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
CHAPTER 25 SECURED TRANSACTIONS: ATTACHMENT AND PERFECTION DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8.
Class 11 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Adequate Protection Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 4 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Allowance and Disallowance of Claims Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University.
Santa Clara County Bar Association “What Every Business Lawyer Needs To Know About Bankruptcy” or “What the Frog Needs to Know About the Scorpion at the.
Chapter Nineteen. Executory Contracts and Leases After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Define the term “executory contract” as a specialized.
Dealing with Counterparty/Bankruptcy Risk in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry Bruce Ruzinsky Jackson Walker L.L.P Monica.
Other amendments. Automatic stay scope 11 U.S.C. § 362(a): Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition...operates as a stay, applicable.
EXECUTORY CONTRACTS - 11 U.S.C. §365 OVERVIEW n DEFINITION OF EXECUTORY CONTRACT- UNDEFINED n REJECTION - 11 U.S.C. §365(a) u DAMAGES - 11 U.S.C. §§365(g)
Class 17 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Overview of Plan Process
Financial Institution bankruptcy act
Chapter 14 Operation of Contracts
Bruce Ruzinsky Jackson Walker L.L.P. • Monica Blacker •
Real Estate Loan Workouts: What Lenders and Borrowers Both Want and Need ABA Section of Business Law (Real Estate Financing Subcommittee) 2009 Spring.
Class 12 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Pre-Confirmation Distributions
Class 5 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2000 Secured Claims
Class 15 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Administrative Expenses
Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order
Class 4 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Allowance and Disallowance of Claims
Class 3 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Claims
Class 13 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Sales of Assets
Class 6 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts
Class 14 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 DIP Financing
Class 18 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Disclosure, Solicitation and Voting
Class 21 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 The Fresh Start
Class 8 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Trustee as Hypothetical Lien Creditor
(Hopefully) Helpful Hints for Chapter 13 Plans
The University of Chicago
Class 19 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Absolute Priority Rule
Class 10 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2000 Preferences
Class 4 Secured Transactions, Fall, 2018 Rights in the Collateral
Class 11 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Adequate Protection
Presentation transcript:

Class 6 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago Copyright © Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker2 Executory Contracts n Mixed Asset and Liability u Asset: Debtor has rights to performance from non-debtor u Liability: Debtor has duty to perform owed to non-debtor n Key Choices u Assume/Reject/Assign u What does that mean?

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker3 365 n Executory contracts and unexpired leases u (a) Except as provided in sections 765 and 766 of this title and in subsections (b), (c), and (d) of this section, the trustee, subject to the court’s approval, may assume or reject any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker4 What is an Executory Contract n Not defined in the Code n Standard Definition u Material performance owed by both sides

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker5 Assumption n Meaning u Estate has choice about whether to perform debtor’s prepetition contract u Assumption means estate accepts obligation to perform under contract

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker6 Mechanics n To assume a contract (365(b)) u Trustee must cure—fix—most prepetition defaults; u Compensate for actual pecuniary losses from the default; and u Provide adequate assurance of future performance

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker7 Mechanics n Timing of decision addressed under 365(d) u Ch 7: 60-day window subject to extension u Ch 11: up to confirmation, subject to reduction

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker8 Pre-Assumption/Pre- Rejection Status n Murky n Consider u 365(b)(4) u 365(d)(3) u 365(d)(5)

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker9 365 (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (b)(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if there has been a default in an unexpired lease of the debtor, other than a default of a kind specified in paragraph (2) of this subsection, the trustee may not require a lessor to provide services or supplies incidental to such lease before assumption of such lease unless the lessor is compensated under the terms of such lease for any services and supplies provided under such lease before assumption of such lease.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (d)(5) The trustee shall timely perform all of the obligations of the debtor, except those specified in section 365(b)(2), first arising from or after 60 days after the order for relief in a case under chapter 11 of this title under an unexpired lease of personal property (other than personal property leased to an individual primarily for personal, family, or household purposes), until such lease is assumed or rejected notwithstanding section 503(b)(1) of this title, unless the court, after notice and a hearing and based on the equities of the case, orders otherwise with respect to the obligations or timely performance thereof. This subsection shall not be deemed to affect the trustee’s obligations under the provisions of subsection (b) or (f). Acceptance of any such performance does not constitute waiver or relinquishment of the lessor’s rights under such lease or under this title.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (d)(3) The trustee shall timely perform all the obligations of the debtor, except those specified in section 365(b)(2), arising from and after the order for relief under any unexpired lease of nonresidential real property, until such lease is assumed or rejected, notwithstanding section 503(b)(1) of this title. The court may extend, for cause, the time for performance of any such obligation that arises within 60 days after the date of the order for relief, but the time for performance shall not be extended beyond such 60-day period. This subsection shall not be deemed to affect the trustee’s obligations under the provisions of subsection (b) or (f) of this section. Acceptance of any such performance does not constitute waiver or relinquishment of the lessor’s rights under such lease or under this title.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker12 Rejection n What does it mean to reject an executory contract? u Rescind the contract? u Breach the contract? u Something else? n Consult 365(g)

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (g) Except as provided in subsections (h)(2) and (i)(2) of this section, the rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor constitutes a breach of such contract or lease - w (1) if such contract or lease has not been assumed under this section or under a plan confirmed under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this title, immediately before the date of the filing of the petition; or

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (g)(2) if such contract or lease has been assumed under this section or under a plan confirmed under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this title - w (A) if before such rejection the case has not been converted under section 1112, 1208, or 1307 of this title, at the time of such rejection; or w (B) if before such rejection the case has been converted under section 1112, 1208, or 1307 of this title - (i) immediately before the date of such conversion, if such contract or lease was assumed before such conversion; or (ii) at the time of such rejection, if such contract or lease was assumed after such conversion.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker15 Assignment of Executory Contracts n Vision u The debtor can’t really use the contract, but the contract is valuable u Sell—assign—the contract to a third party

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (f)(1) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, notwithstanding a provision in an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor, or in applicable law, that prohibits, restricts, or conditions the assignment of such contract or lease, the trustee may assign such contract or lease under paragraph (2) of this subsection; except that the trustee may not assign an unexpired lease of nonresidential real property under which the debtor is an affected air carrier that is the lessee of an aircraft terminal or aircraft gate if there has occurred a termination event.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (f)(2) The trustee may assign an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor only if - w (A) the trustee assumes such contract or lease in accordance with the provisions of this section; and w (B) adequate assurance of future performance by the assignee of such contract or lease is provided, whether or not there has been a default in such contract or lease.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (f)(3) Notwithstanding a provision in an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor, or in applicable law that terminates or modifies, or permits a party other than the debtor to terminate or modify, such contract or lease or a right or obligation under such contract or lease on account of an assignment of such contract or lease, such contract, lease, right, or obligation may not be terminated or modified under such provision because of the assumption or assignment of such contract or lease by the trustee.

The Transition into Bankruptcy n What happens to a contract when the debtor files for bankruptcy? n Does it matter whether the contract itself says something about it? u “This contract terminates automatically if either party files a bankruptcy petition.” n What role should nonbankruptcy law play in that process? October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker19

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker20 365(c): Key Limit on Assumption n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (c) The trustee may not assume or assign any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor, whether or not such contract or lease prohibits or restricts assignment of rights or delegation of duties, if - w (1)(A) applicable law excuses a party, other than the debtor, to such contract or lease from accepting performance from or rendering performance to an entity other than the debtor or the debtor in possession, whether or not such contract or lease prohibits or restricts assignment of rights or delegation of duties; and w (B) such party does not consent to such assumption or assignment; or

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (2) such contract is a contract to make a loan, or extend other debt financing or financial accommodations, to or for the benefit of the debtor, or to issue a security of the debtor; or u (3) such lease is of nonresidential real property and has been terminated under applicable nonbankruptcy law prior to the order for relief.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker22 365: Protecting the Debtor from Ipso Facto Clauses n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (e)(1) Notwithstanding a provision in an executory contract or unexpired lease, or in applicable law, an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor may not be terminated or modified, and any right or obligation under such contract or lease may not be terminated or modified, at any time after the commencement of the case solely because of a provision in such contract or lease that is conditioned on - w (A) the insolvency or financial condition of the debtor at any time before the closing of the case; w (B) the commencement of a case under this title; or w (C) the appointment of or taking possession by a trustee in a case under this title or a custodian before such commencement.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker (cont.) n Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) u (e)(2) Paragraph (1) of this subsection does not apply to an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor, whether or not such contract or lease prohibits or restricts assignment of rights or delegation of duties, if - w (A)(i) applicable law excuses a party, other than the debtor, to such contract or lease from accepting performance from or rendering performance to the trustee or to an assignee of such contract or lease, whether or not such contract or lease prohibits or restricts assignment of rights or delegation of duties; and (ii) such party does not consent to such assumption or assignment; or w (B) such contract is a contract to make a loan, or extend other debt financing or financial accommodations, to or for the benefit of the debtor, or to issue a security of the debtor.

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker24 Cases for Today n The 365(c) Limit on Assumption u Perlman v. Catapult w Adopts “hypothetical test” reading of 365(c), which results in debtor forfeiture of valuable executory contracts u Institut Pasteur w Adopts “actual test” approach to 365(c), to avoid forfeiture

Perlman n Core Facts u Perlman held patents and licensed those patents to Catapult u Catapult planned to file for bankruptcy and do a merger in which it would be the surviving entity u It also planned to assume the patent licenses under 365 October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker25

Perlman n IP Licenses and Sec. 365 u Note that special rules apply in 365(n), but those are cases in which the debtor is the licensor, not when the debtor is the licensee n Perlman is just ordinary case then n Also we should ignore the merger (see fn 1) n Can Catapult assume the patent license? October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker26

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker27 Perlman v. Catapult n The Hypothetical Test Approach u Don’t ask is the debtor trying to have a third party perform the contract u Ask instead whether the debtor could assign the contract to a third party, even though the debtor isn’t trying to do that

October 1, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker28 Institut Pasteur n Wrinkles u Should we think of sale of debtor’s stock as de facto assignment of its executory contracts? n The Actual Test Approach u “Contemplate a case-by-case inquiry into whether the nondebtor party (viz., Pasteur) was being ‘forced to accept performance under its executory contract from someone other than the debtor party with whom it originally contracted.’”