C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
TRUMANSBURG CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT’S ENTRY PLAN
PORTFOLIO.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP The Philadelphia Story The School District of Philadelphia’s CEO Region Gregory Shannon, Regional Superintendent Malika A.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
Planning Time & Florida’s K-12 Comprehensive Reading Program Contractual Provisions.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
The goal of CALI is to provide a model of state support to districts and schools to support the process of continuous school and district.
TITLE ONE PLAN Forts Pond Elementary School A Title One School Title One Plan.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Sequoyah Elementary School August 7, 2014.
Team Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.Need for a District Leadership Implementation Team.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
School Based Teams. Basic Assumptions  All teachers have responsibility for students with special learning needs  All students can be helped by regular.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
The School Counseling Program
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
SACS Governance & Leadership Committee September 26, 2012.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Local Control Accountability Plan
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
WCHS Title I Parent Meeting
Mountain Park Elementary School
School-Wide Title I Plan
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Roles and Responsibilities
Mountain Park Elementary School
State of the School “PINE CREST…A Caring and Collaborative Community!”
Schoolwide Programs.
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence

What is C.O.R.E.? C.O.R.E. stands for Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence. This initiative is a collaborative venture by the Duval County Public Schools, Duval Teachers United, and business partners to assist in turning around schools not meeting state academic expectations through the empowerment and support of school based academic and leadership teams.

Why Is the C.O.R.E. Initiative Necessary?  Stable, highly qualified staffs are needed in all schools but most of all in academically challenged schools. Over the years, it has been difficult to place and retain high quality staffs at academically challenged schools. This initiative provides the opportunity and incentives for instructional and leadership teams to voluntarily transfer to schools where they are most needed.  Provisions in Florida’s A+ plan as well as the new federal government’s ESEA “No Child Left Behind Act” address educational accountability. Both pieces of legislation allow for public school sanctions and state take over where students are not meeting acceptable levels of performance. C.O.R.E. Is an effort to prevent such negative consequences in Duval county.

C.O.R.E. Mission Statement: Our mission is to recruit and retain the best instructional and leadership teams in order to improve student performance in challenged schools.

C.O.R.E. Vision Statement Within four years, the academic performance of students in seven select elementary schools will meet or exceed the average district performance on key academic indicators. This will be accomplished through the creation of individual school communities where all stakeholders are competent, committed, caring, and held to a higher standard.

C.O.R.E. Program Highlights Rigorous screening procedures for selection of instructional and leadership teams for schools Teachers and leaders will agree to teach in identified challenged schools for four years Yearly leadership and instructional staff performance assessments with staffing adjustments made as necessary

Program Highlights (cont.) Coalitions with community stakeholders to encourage parental and community participation in the educational process. Higher performance standards for leadership and instructional personnel Intensive training in team–building and best instructional practices Collegial, culturally sensitive school environment nurtured to facilitate student achievement

Program Highlights (cont.) Contract waivers for initiatives that may interfere with objectives Close monitoring of schools including feedback from stakeholders on what is and isn’t working Single DTU staff consultant assigned to address needs and concerns of all C.O.R.E. Schools Wellness checks for staff

Program Highlights (cont.) Monetary incentives of up to $2500 yearly for teacher and leadership personnel who demonstrate their contribution toward improving student achievement Technological support for teachers Additional perks as available through vendors

Selection of C.O.R.E. Schools Criteria for selection: Past and projected school performance (school grade) Level of difficulty in maintaining quality staff Educational load factors (free and reduced lunch percentages)

Criteria for Teacher Selection Preferred background experience: Prior experience in urban setting or teaching low performing students National Board Certification Professional services contract or tenure Formal training in literacy, math, or possess other special certifications

Additional Teacher Criteria Required teacher criteria: Certified in area of instruction Four- year commitment Acceptance that continued placement at the CORE School is contingent upon outstanding performance in the annual teacher assessment and annual progress of student achievement

Additional Teacher Criteria Show measurable academic student gains each year Document evidence of student growth in academics through use of portfolios. Integrate subject areas Utilize current research, implement standards based instruction, and best instructional practices effectively

Additional Teacher Criteria Effectively manage student discipline in the classroom Effectively involve parents and volunteers to assist students in the educational setting Demonstrate sensitivity to cultural differences Committed to problem solving resulting in win-win solutions

Additional Teacher Criteria Experience in participating in the shared decision making process Willing to waive identified contractual language Willing to attend meetings and participate in training beyond contractual limitations

Criteria for Principal Selection Proven evidence of leadership in instruction Knowledge of best instructional practices, current research, and effective implementation of standards Able to effectively use data, assess student progress and teacher effectiveness

Additional Principal Criteria Team builder – able to create an effective and professional learning community Able to effectively use the shared decision making process for school governance, building consensus, school improvement planning, and the change process Committed to problem solving resulting in “win win” solutions

Additional Principal Criteria Able to organize and manage an effective school wide discipline plan Able to involve all stakeholders, especially parents, community organizations, and businesses in the school improvement process Acceptance that continued placement at the C.O.R.E. School will depend on annual progress in student achievement and maintaining a positive school climate

Selection of Staff A memorandum of understanding will be in place to allow for transfers beyond the regular transfer process deadline Instructional and leadership staff will be selected through the interview process using the criteria set forth Principals will be selected first by the Superintendent with input from the Regionals and DTU. Interview teams for instructional personnel will include DCPS, DTU, and selected C.O.R.E. School Principals

Commitments to C.O.R.E. Schools Commitments to C.O.R.E. Schools: In order to ensure C.O.R.E. Schools are effectively meeting the requirements of the program and the needs of the students, we will review the budget and program of each school for adequacy in the following areas:

Commitments (cont.) Guidance counseling and /or behavioral intervention staff to assist students who are not complying with school conduct expectations Administrative and/or professional development personnel to support teacher training and coaching (TIS, Vice-Principal, or lead teacher)

Commitments (cont.) Paraprofessionals to work in self-contained exceptional education classrooms to help students meet academic and behavioral expectations and to help in the cafeteria and other general supervision of students Class sizes to ensure that teachers can effectively assist all students in meeting high standards.

Commitments (cont.) School-wide discipline plan for effectiveness to ensure the behavior of students meets high expectations Testing and placement procedures for students being considered for special programs to ensure that the process receives priority status