“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Cadre 8 Training, October 9, 2012 DIETS & Drivers.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Purpose of Instruction
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
Welcome Coaching Competency Driver Thanks to State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence Based Practices Oregon.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase III: Design AEA 267 SINA Process Se.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
Implementation Science 101 Vestena Robbins, PhD Kentucky Dept for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Critical Elements Effective teaching Alignment of curriculum and instruction to standards Instructional program coherence Fidelity of implementation Evaluation.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Putting it all together: How Facilitative Administrations can use Performance Assessment and a Comprehensive Assessment System to support Staff Competency.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
: The National Center at EDC
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. &
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
State Implementation and Scaling up of Evidence-based Practices U.S. Department of Education July 2010 Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. Michelle.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Understanding Implementation and Leadership in School Mental Health.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Coaching as a Process Not a Person
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Presentation transcript:

“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.” Dean Fixsen

Text Rendering Silently read the introduction to the article, “Teaching the Teachers” With a partner, consider and discuss the following question With the shifts of the Common Core, how is your district responding to the idea that, “quality, effective professional development is the lynchpin to reform.”

© Fixsen & Blase, 2007 Integrated & Compensatory Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Staff Competence Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Organization Supports Technical Leadership Adaptive Reliable Benefits for Students Consistent uses of Innovations

Know HOW EffectiveNOT Effective Effective NOT Effective IMPLEMENTATION INTERVENTION Student Benefits Highly variable, often ineffective, sometimes harmful to students, families, and adults (Institute of Medicine, 2000; 2001; New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003; National Commission on Excellence in Education,1983; Department of Health and Human Services, 1999) Poor Outcomes

OUTCOMES (% of Participants who Demonstrate Knowledge, Demonstrate new Skills in a Training Setting, and Use new Skills in the Classroom) TRAINING COMPONENTS Knowledge Skill Demonstration Use in the Classroom Theory and Discussion 10% 5%0%..+Demonstration in Training 30% 20% 0% …+ Practice & Feedback in Training 60% 5% …+ Coaching in Classroom 95% Joyce and Showers, 2002 Staff Coaching

Know – Do GAP With a partner, discuss how your district has responded (or not) to what we know about Coaching as high quality, effective professional development. Also, discuss the implementation of Coaching in your districts and its impact on student achievement.

Coaching Service Delivery Plan Districts must have a clear, communicated plan for implementing coaching How will we select? How will we train and coach our coaches? What will we expect of all coaches? Teachers? Administrators? How will we know our coaches are effective? How will we communicate with Stakeholders the importance of hiring and maintaining coaches?

David Douglas School District Coaching Service Delivery Plan Purpose: 1.Improve student outcomes by committing to implement evidence based practices through coaching 2.To provide equitable coaching delivery across schools 3.Provide a transparent Coaching Service Delivery plan to all stakeholders, i.e., School Board, Parents, Teacher Union, Administrators, Teachers, and Coaches 4.To ensure that district systems are aligned within and across classrooms, grade levels, and buildings

Role and Responsibilities of Coaches: Role 1.Coaching in David Douglas is a non-evaluative position designed to increase both teacher effectiveness in adopted evidence based practices and student outcomes 2.Coaches will be in classrooms on a consistent basis to support teachers with implementation of evidence based practices 3.Coaches will observe teaching, provide feedback, model lessons, engage in goal setting conversations, assist with peer observations, and collect implementation data to support teachers in the evidence based practices Responsibilities 1.Coaches are expected to be content experts in the innovation in which they are coaching 2.Coaches are expected to increase their effectiveness by participating in district required Coaching Classes 3.Coaches are expected to be experts in data analysis and linking data to instructional improvement within the innovation 4.Coaches are expected to establish feedback loops with teachers on specific goals 5.Coaches are expected to establish feedback loops regarding general implementation status with administrators and district office to inform building and district systems 6.Coaches are expected to train newly hired staff on the innovation they support

With Your Team… Consider the Possibilities… Quick Write: Reasons TO change the system and how CAN we? Discuss Share out Consider the Barriers… Quick Write: Reasons that may get in the way of changing the system. Discuss Share out