AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory 1997 - 2011 % Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To Total Number of Samples Tested.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soybean Iron Chlorosis Project 2001 Summary Report AGVISE Laboratories Benson, MN & Northwood, ND.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
1. Name the salt made when these react… Magnesium + sulfuric acid 
Agronomic Value of Nutrients in Biosolids Randall Warden A & L Great Lakes Laboratories Fort Wayne, IN Quality Analyses for Informed Decisions.
PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE BY SILAGE CORN IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Amber Moore, Steve Hines, Brad Brown, Mario de Haro Marti, Christi Falen, Mireille Chahine, Tianna Fife,
Benefits of Compost Use David Allen MBS Environmental.
Soil Amendment Estimator
Micronutrient Deficiencies in Wheat Kurt Steinke, Ph.D. Soil Fertility & Nutrient Mgmt. Dept. of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University.
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
Sorghum Fertility Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences.
Amber Moore, Ph.D. University of Idaho. Collected to represent Conservation Management Unit Time allowed between sampling and planting (Code 590) Within.
Alfalfa Fertility Brian Arnall Soil Ferity Extension OSU.
Soil Testing Procedures for Biologically Based Systems Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, Nebraska
C3 Chemicals in Our Lives – Risks & Benefits Lesson 6: Reacting Alkalis.
Micronutrient Deficiencies in Wheat
Soil Testing and Analysis Nutrient Management Basics
The Purpose of a Fertilizer is to Supply Nutrients.
Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations Soil Education Short Course.
BIOENGINEER ANALYSIS WATER. GOALS Students learn how to collect water samples. Then, they will aseptically collect a water sample and use a microscope.
Secondary and Micronutrient Management
Unit 5 Lesson 7 Plant and Soil Sciences Macronutrients.
Correlations of Soil and Hay Micronutrients Purpose: Is there a correlation between soil micronutrients and those in the hay crop?
Acids… Learning objectives: Know that salts are formed from reactions with acids. Know how to write correct word equations. Know what salts are formed.
Introduction Proper nutrition at nursery stage is important for desired growth and berry production in grapevine. There are 13 mineral nutrients found.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county of the sample. This data.
Calderglen High School
T12-1 Soil Science & Management, 4E Chapter 12 Plant Nutrition.
West Hills College Farm of the Future The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturalists Chapter Four Soil Sampling and Analysis.
The investigated parameters of the soil samples Rough sand ( 2,0 - 0,2 mm) Fine sand ( 0,2 –0,02 mm ) Dust ( 0,02 – 0,002 mm ) Colloid clay ( sub 0,002.
Managing Micronutrients with Soil (Plant) Testing and Fertilizer.
AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county of the sample. This data.
J OURNAL #72 How many moles of compound are there in 6.00g of ammonium sulfate? How many molecules are there in 20.0g sulfuric acid?
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Understanding Soil Test Results and Fertilizer Recommendations
Challenge #9 Image made with T. Trimpe 2008
Micronutrients Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin Zhang Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin.
What is the chemical symbol of Hydrogen? H. What is the chemical symbol of Carbon? C.
Soil Fertility Impacting Soil Health Ray Ward Ward Laboratories Inc. Kearney, NE “Guiding Producers.
SOIL SAMPLING Dr. Dave Franzen Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Essential for Plants) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Soil Fertility in Muskogee County
Grid Soil sampling.
Soil Testing and Fertiliser Application
Dilution and Reactions of Acids
Thank you for choosing AGVISE Laboratories
1. How many grams are in 0.32 moles of lead (II) chloride?
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2017
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016
Balancing Word Equations
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Thank you for choosing AGVISE Laboratories
Annual SCN Summary for 2015 AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county.
Annual SCN Summary for 2018 AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2014
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Predicting precipitation problems
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Grid Sampling: Point vs. Random
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016
Annual SCN Summary for 2016 AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county.
Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences
Nutritional Issues in Caneberries
Presentation transcript:

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory % Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To Total Number of Samples Tested

AGVISE Laboratories % Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Total Number of Samples Tested in 2011

Fall 2011 samples Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2011 (lb/a 0-24” samples) 36

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “WHEAT” in Montana

Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2011 Fall 2011 Samples (lb/a 0-24” samples) MB ND SD MN

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Fallow” in Montana

% Soil Samples with Phosphorus less than 10 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 70% 58% 41% 46% 45% (Olsen P test) 32%

65% 60% 77% 53% 74% 59% 83% 77% 71% 72% 34% 29% 21% 53% 50% 28% 60% % Soil Samples with Phosphorus less than 10 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 43% (Olsen P test) 38% 64% 36% 37% 36% 46% 43% 63% 55%46% 66% 29%

% Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 7% 21% 2% 1% 7%

24% 15% 5% 6% 3% 2% 51% 35% 15% 23% 28% 13% 3% % Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 29% 8% 54% 29% 7% 43% 40% 32% 28% 5%1% 0% 79% 74% 20%

% Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 69% 53% 79% 89% 55% 45%

64% 52% 74% 52% 72% 85% 88% 80% 65% 72% 37% 31% 33% 28% 55% 53% 48% 66% % Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 38% 32% 36 64% 22% 40% 55% 47% 72% 82% 22% 49%

% Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 58% 25% 49% 48% 25% 52%

12% 25% 34% 66% 43% 63% 31% 23% 13% 8% 14% 9% 14% 3% 14% 18% 26% 11% % Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 17% 55% 49% 75% 37% 53% 40% 51% 32% 22% 67% 63%

% Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm Fall 2010 samples (0-6”) 3% 2% 1%

12% 17% 7% 17% 10% 2% 3% 2% 5% 20% 27% 21% 4% 0% 1% 7% 12% 3% 22% 15% 8% 3% % Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 13% 2% 9% 4% 11% 45% 30% 8%

% Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 5% 6% 4% 2%

4% 8% 5% 3% 17% 13% 3% 42% 5% 1% 2% 4% 1% 10% 0% % Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 0% 20% 58% 88% 26% 19%21% 15% 30% 7%

% Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 82% 81% 82% 80% 60% 69%

67% 47% 73% 78% 94% 92% 96% 82% 89% 57% 32% 81% 69% 48% 51% 44% 43% 21% 66% 61% 64% 79% % Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a Fall 2011 Samples (0-24” samples) MB ND SD MN 59% 89% 92% 46%

% Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0% Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 19% 14% 20% 3% 54% 11%

8% 22% 9% 5% 6% 3% 10% 32% 25% 24% 5% 6% 1% 13% 43% 18% 38% 13% 8% % Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0% Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 22% 1% 5% 25% 35%

% Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0 mmhos/cm Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 3% 5% 4% 8% 4%

24% 36% 15% 7% 1% 3% 2% 7% 1% 4% 18% 20% 1% 9% 2% 22% 21% 14% 19% 18% 7% 11% % Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0 Fall 2011 Samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 11% 1% 4% 3% 0% 4% 21% 33%

% Soil Samples with soil pH greater than 7.3 Fall 2010 samples (0-6”) 78% 86% 78% 69% 93% 73%

69% 80% 75% 38% 40% 42% 75% 56% 26% 58% 82% 96% 64% 33% 20% 23% 76% 73% 63% 82% 68% 80% % Soil Samples with Soil pH greater than 7.3 Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 74% 30% 21% 25% 17% 5% 65% 96%

% Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0% Fall 2011 samples (0-6”) 81% 73% 94% 88% 58%

22% 19% 31% 21% 32% 53% 67% 37% 25% 19% 22% 8% 35% 6% 13% 30% 9% % Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0% Fall 2011 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 6% 5% 8% 82% 29% 14% 8% 28% 26% 20% 50% 10% 31% 8%

Zip codes for Montana