MONITORING of SCHOOLS of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY Presented by: Dr. Annie Pring-Valdez CHED-TCME – member PASMETH – Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Advertisements

The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Format for Promotion Review Portfolio KCTCS Faculty Hired 2004 and thereafter; all other full-time faculty who select this criteria.
WHERE BUSINESS MEETS FASHION Standard 10: Successful Strategies for Adjunct and Non-Traditional Faculty.
The Leading Public University Measures of Excellence Robert N. Shelton Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Presentation to the General Alumni Association.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Department of Counseling and Human Services. For more than 130 years, the Johns Hopkins University has been a world leader in both teaching and research.
Faculty Workload Policy Reference: Teaching Load Credits These are credits assigned for teaching resident-credit courses. Credits are reported for persons.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
1Confidential The K-12 Value Chain Curriculum Development Non-academic Supplemental Programs Professional Development Core Academic Instruction Counseling,
Analysis of States’ Use of Student Enrollments and Performance Criteria in Higher Education Funding May 2012 R EPORT FOR THE N EVADA L EGISLATURE ’ S C.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
The Advisory Council of Faculty (ACF) “ Creating a Culture for Student Success” Marcello R. Napolitano, Benjamin M. Statler, College of Engineering and.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
LOGO Odessa State Environmental University. Odessa State Environmental University Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 363-r of 9 August, 2001.
Teaching Psychology in Turkey Nebi Sumer & Mine Misirlisoy Middle East Technical University Currently, there are 38 Psychology Departments; half in private.
Training for Instructors in Polytechnic Universities Vocational Training Management Seminar in 2004 Employment and Human Resources Development Organization.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Staff Development Approaches at The University of Georgia: Philosophy, Models, and Financial Support University of Georgia Institute of Higher Education.
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
TIME LINE FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS. BASIC MAP OF PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESSES.
Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COE and COD for Health Related Education Programs.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
STARKVILLE, MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY An Overview by: Dara Meyers Georgia Southern University.
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
2012 Edition Based primarily on data from the academic year and fall 2011.
Proposed Bylaws Revisions Faculty Senate – June 12, 2014.
Academic Advancement for Clinician-Educators: Secrets from the Dean’s Office 2/26/13 Renee Binder, M.D. Elena Fuentes-Afflick, M.D., M.P.H. SOM Academic.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
BRANDING IN PHILIPPINE HIGHER EDUCATION: ROOTS AND MODELS Dr. Ethel Agnes P. Valenzuela SEAMEO INNOTECH (Philippines) and Member of the Technical Panel.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY &TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION POWERS, DUTIES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advancing graduate education. Enhancing the graduate student experience. GRADUATE EDUCATION THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Presentation to: Finnish Higher.
1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Assoc.Prof.Dr. Osman YILMAZ April 20, 2004 University Curriculum Committee.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
POSITION ON ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES VIABILITY, ACCOMMODATION, CLASSROOM, ACCREDITATION, EXAMINATION RESULT PROCESSING, CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD TO PROPEL.
CERN Study Abroad Initiative S. Goldfarb – Draft 1.0 (6 Nov 2010)
Two categories: Academic, Professional Issues: Level and nature of programs consistent with mission Well defined, differ from undergraduate programs Doctoral.
Quality assurance and graduate student support Fred L Hall Former Dean of Graduate Studies at University of Calgary, McMaster University,
SOAR, Five-Year Strategic Plan School Year 2013 – 2014 Mid-Year Review College of X.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former UK Personnel System or prior to 2004 in a Community College Grandfathered under Format.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former Kentucky Tech System or Prior to 2004 in a Technical College grandfathered under Format.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
HOUSE RULES PARTICIPANTS ARE REQUESTED TO SIT AT THEIR ASSIGNED AREAS WRITE DOWN ALL AREAS OF CONCERN QUESTIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED AFTER ALL PRESENTORS.
REPUBLIC ACT NO AN ACT MODERNIZING THE PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COMMISSION, REPEALING FOR THE PURPOSE PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NUMBERED TWO HUNDRED AND.
8th International Conference on Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Africa Windhoek, Namibia (19 – 23 September 2016) Practicum on African Quality.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW
Coordinator Course Managing Satellite Locations,
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
TEACERS SERVICE COMMISSION DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF INSTITUTIONAL ADMINISTRATORS PRESENTATION DURING KATTI WORKSHOP MOMBASA.
Ranking Parameters of Universities in Pakistan HEC Perspective
2018 ACHA Annual Meeting Washington, DC
Time Line for Program Reviews
Explore – Engage - Evaluate
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Time Line for Program Reviews
Istanbul University, Department of Economics BEYAZIT-FATIH ISTANBUL
Review of 2013 and new 2019 criteria
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Review Summary 29 elements achieved by courses
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Assumption University
Presentation transcript:

MONITORING of SCHOOLS of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY Presented by: Dr. Annie Pring-Valdez CHED-TCME – member PASMETH – Vice President

REPUBLIC ACT 7722 HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1994 Sec 8. Powers & Functions of the Commission e) Monitor & evaluate the performance of programs & institutions of higher learning for appropriate incentives as well as the imposition of sanctions such as, but not limited to, diminution or withdrawal of subsidy, recommendation on the down- grading or withdrawal of accreditation, program termination or school closure

REPUBLIC ACT 7722 HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1994 See 12. The Technical Panels The Commission shall reconstitute and/or organize technical panels for different disciplines/program areas. They shall assist the Commission in setting standards and in program and institution monitoring and evaluation. The technical panels shall be composed of senior specialists or academicians to be appointed by the Commission.

AREAS OF EVALUATION I.ADMINISTRATION 1.1. Vision and Mission 1.2. Organizational Structure II. DEAN 2.1. Appropriate undergraduate degree 2.2. Appropriate graduate degree 2.3. Appropriate license 2.4. Appropriate teaching/administrative experience 2.5. Full-time with contract

AREAS OF EVALUATION III. FACULTY 3.1. Appropriate bachelor’s degree 3.2. Appropriate postgraduate degree 3.3. Appropriate professional license 3.4. Appropriate Teaching experience Training experience Working experience 3.5. Faculty load 3.6. Faculty development program 3.7. Full-time to part-time ratio 3.8. Faculty-student ratio 3.9. Faculty manual Faculty salary rating scale 3.11.Faculty ranking scale

IV.CURRICULUM 4.1. Conformity with policies & standards AREAS OF EVALUATION V. INSTRUCTIONAL STANDARDS 5.1. Course syllabi 5.2.Instructional Materials/aids 5.3. Internship/Externship Program/ RLE/Practicum

AREAS OF EVALUATION VI. STUDENTS & ALUMNI 6.1. Student Manual 6.2.Admission and Retention Policies 6.3. Student Services 6.4. Health services 6.5.Guidance Counseling Services 6.6. Student Organizations related to discipline 6.7. Student Alumni 6.8. Linkages 6.9. Job fair/Placement

AREAS OF EVALUATION VII. LABORATORY FACILITIES and EQUIPMENT 7.1. Basic Laboratory 7.2. Supplies 7.3.Reagents 7.4.Waste Disposal System 7.5.Ventilation 7.6.Safety Measures

AREAS OF EVALUATION VIII. LIBRARY 8.1. Licensed librarian 8.2.General Courses 8.3.Major Courses 8.4.Journals 8.5.IT Facilities

IX.PHYSICAL PLANT & FACILITIES 9.1. Location and Floor plan 9.2.Building 9.3.Classrooms/Laboratory Rooms 9.4.AV Rooms and facilities 9.5.Recreational Areas 9.6.Health facilities (infirmary or clinic) 9.7.Restrooms 9.8.Student and Faculty canteens 9.9.Student and faculty lounge AREAS OF EVALUATION

X. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 10.1.Facilities 10.2.On-going research 10.3.Completed research 10.4.Published research XI.COMMUNITY OUTREACH/LINKAGES Current Program/Output

AREAS OF EVALUATION XII. BOARD PERFORMANCE Percentage of passing for the past three years  1-25 examinees  examinees  101 and above

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AREAS OF EVALUATIONCOMPLIANCEREMARKS 1.Administration 2.Dean 3.Faculty 4.Curriculum 5.Instructional Standards 6.Students & Alumni 7.Laboratory Facilities 8.Library 9.Physical Plant & Facilities 10. Research & Development 11. Community Outreach/Linkages 12. Board Performance

OVERALL RECOMMENDATION: EVALUATOR: DATE EVALUATED: CONFORME: