Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Service Transportation Plan UPDATE Illinois Department of Transportations Division of Public and Intermodal Transportation: Downstate (Rural) Area.
Advertisements

What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
Health and Social Impact Assessment of the South East Queensland Regional Plan NSW HIA Colloquium Sydney, 9 December 2006 Kate Copeland, Director, Statewide.
3 August 2010 Contraceptive Market Analysis in Nicaragua A Tool to develop Alliances and Improve Commodity Security.
Last Gasp John Baker the potential of spatial planning to contribute to air quality.
Historical Information “Long Term Care & Medicaid” has been a priority of the South Dakota Health Care Commission Bill passed and signed by Governor Rounds.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
1 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview General Overview of Key Elements of an Analytical Model to support subsidized deployment.
Transportation Development How do we get rubber on the road? …..and other burning questions.
National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Transportation October 21, 2008.
Census 2001 Your window to Census information. What is a Census? The Census of population and housing is undertaken every 5 years by the ABS. It aims.
The Effects of Different Land Uses in Missouri on Local Fiscal Conditions – Cost of Community Services Project Update – 4/12/02.
[Local] Workforce Investment Board New Member Orientation.
Economic Impact of Medical Education Expansion in Nevada & Recommended Approach FUTURE 1.
The Connecticut Allied Health Workforce Policy Board (AHWPB) was created as a result of P.A (An Act Concerning Allied Health Needs) to conduct.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Region IV Introduction to FTA Grant Programs.
ORC TA: Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant Program HRSA U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources & Services Administration.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
White House Conference on Aging Transportation Policy Committee Testimony January 8, 2005 Looking Forward… Growing Older Public Transportation: Providing.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
The Hilltop Institute was formerly the Center for Health Program Development and Management. Maryland Medicaid Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Study.
Transportation Coordination & Federal Transportation Administration Programs Marianne Freed, MSW/LSW Office of Transit Ohio Department of Transportation.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
Addressing The Boom Trends in Aging and Long-Term Care Florida Conference on AgingAugust 31, 2004.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Webinar on WIOA and Independent Living for CILs
What is HST Coordination? Human Services Transportation Transportation for three distinct population groups: older adults, individuals with disabilities,
Developing A Short Range Transit Plan AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2014 John Andoh, Transit Director, Yuma County Intergovernmental Public Transportation.
May 30, 2008 Community Integration Commission 1 DRPT Initiatives on Transportation Services For Older Adults, People With Disabilities.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
Transit Coordination Plan 2012 Southwest Missouri Council of Governments.
SAFETEA-LU The Transportation Reauthorization Bill passed in 2005 Added New Federal Transit Administration Programs Revised some existing programs Final.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
The White Paper on Post School Education and Training A SETA Perspective.
Land Use and Economic Development in Rural Areas Supplemental Module.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan TAC November 17, 2010.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
On the Right Track Meeting Greater Boston’s Transit and Land Use Challenges May 17, 2006.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Housing Element Update 2009 Update of the 2001 Berkeley Housing Element for the: – Planning Period – Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
2008 National Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Nebraska Statewide Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Toward a New Federal Framework for Aboriginal Economic Development: A Case Study Presentation to Public Sector Management Workshop 2009.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
BUTLER COUNTY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT BUDGET PROJECT UPDATE REPORT APRIL 23, 2013 SOURCING OFFICE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho Workforce Development Council February 24, 2010.
Dawn Ganje, Marketing Management and Colleen MacRae, Polk County Collaborative – MACMH September 2006 Challenge and Opportunity:
1 Advancing Arizona’s Economy Transportation is the Road to Prosperity Kathy Boyle Public Affairs Manager Arizona Department of Transportation.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
QUALITY OF THE PROJECT DESIGN 15 Points (recommend 5 pages)
T H E P O R T L A N D P L A N A Comprehensive Plan for Portland in 2040 September 2007.
Challenge Grant Funding And SB  The Challenge Grant program is authorized by section (4), Florida Statutes, to provide grant funding to.
CS/SB 1534 – Housing Assistance Affecting Florida Housing’s State Rental Program Funding Allocation: Mandates Florida Housing reserve a minimum of 5 percent.
Public Transit & Transportation Network Companies
Presentation transcript:

Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007

1 Study Purpose Develop regionally based needs and solutions for rural transit service in Arizona: Collect and analyze relevant data Identify national trends Obtain general public, Tribal and key stakeholder input Develop projections for future transit demand Identify and quantify potential solutions Develop final report identifying statewide rural transit needs Intended to provide an objective, analytical basis for establishing Arizona’s long-term direction of rural transit service provision

2 Key Questions Key study questions: Geographic Diversity: What is rural Arizona, what are its characteristics, and how will it evolve in the near future? Elderly and Persons with Disabilities: How will the population of elderly and persons with disabilities change? Title VI Requirements: Where are low-income populations located? Transit Needs and Gaps: How much rural transit demand is currently being met? Where are the unmet needs? Roles and Responsibilities: Which agencies will be responsible for carrying out this plan?

3 Methodology Rural Arizona excludes five shaded urbanized areas: Phoenix Tucson Flagstaff Prescott Yuma Source: ADOT and Cambridge Systematics.

4 Methodology Transit Demand Analysis: Five analytical methods for determining rural transit needs and gaps for the state were considered. Most appropriate methodology for Arizona was the Arkansas Public Transportation Needs Assessment (APTNA) method to define transit service needs for each system and for future systems. Utilized several data sets to produce future demographic trends. Demographics included elderly population (over 60 years of age), low income population, and employment. Demographic data used in report is based on a horizon. The APTNA analysis used a horizon.

5 Geographic Diversity Summary 23.2% of rural Arizona residents are elderly; 9.7% are persons with disabilities; 14.9% are of low-income The elderly population will grow the most rapidly over time

6 Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Summary Elderly population in rural Arizona will grow by 51.3% from 349,000 in 2005 to 527,000 in 2015 Growth will be highest in Pinal County (+152.9%) By 2015, 27.7% of rural Arizona residents will be elderly (up from 23.2% in 2005)

7 Title VI Requirements Summary Low income population in rural Arizona will grow by 27.4% from 223,000 in 2005 to 285,000 in 2015 Growth will be highest in Pinal County (+112.3%)

8 Key Findings Transit Demand: Transit demand in rural Arizona is projected to grow from 7.8 million passenger trips in 2007 to 10.5 million in 2016, an increase of 34% Unmet Need: Estimated year 2007 rural transit ridership: 1.4 million Only 18 percent of estimated demand is currently being met Only 13 percent of demand will be met in 2016 if no additional services are introduced Counties with Most Demand (year 2016): Pinal (2.5 million trips), Mohave (1.3 million), Navajo (1.0 million), Cochise (0.9 million)

9 Transit Needs and Gaps Summary Annual Ridership (in Millions) Ridership Without Additional Service Ridership Demand Strategy to Meet Need 1.4 mil 7.8 mil 10.5 mil Ridership demand in rural Arizona will grow from 7.8 million in 2007 to 10.5 million in Existing services only meet 18% of current need (will decline to 13% in 2016 if no changes are made) Strategy to meet need: ramp up service provision over time to fully meet need in 2016 (ridership from 1.4 mil in 2007 to 10.5 mil in 2016)

10 Strategy to Meet Need No Changes to Existing Service (No-Build Scenario) Strategy to Fully Meet Need in 2016 (Build- Out Scenario) Average Annual Capital Cost, $4,960,000$28,580,000 Average Annual Net Operating Cost, $12,100,000$54,710,000 Average Annual Total Cost, $17,060,000$83,290,000 Comparison of no-build and build-out scenarios: Source: ADOT, CS, and TranSystems. Costs are given in year 2007 dollars.

11 Moving Forward The following vision and goals were established on the basis of data analysis results and stake- holder input: Vision: Rural transit service provision should be expanded significantly through the year 2016 to address the rapidly growing transportation demands and needs of rural residents statewide Goals: #1: Provide services in multiple geographic areas; #2: Address needs of particular market segments; #3: Serve a variety of trip purposes Customers: Key customers for new and expanded services should be elderly persons, persons with disabilities, and persons of low income. There are also substantial unmet needs for general public service Specified agencies should carry out defined roles and responsibilities to ensure further development and improvement of service

12 Roles & Responsibilities Summary AgencyRoles and Responsibilities State - Claim and obligate Federal funds - Develop statewide rural transit capital program - Consider performance-based funding criteria Councils of Government - Oversee detailed service planning and cost estimation - Provide regional funding support - Collect data and coordinate services within region Local and Tribal Governments - Generate support at local level - Actively monitor and plan for demographic changes - Streamline and coordinate service provision Transit Operators - Operate high quality service tailored to rider needs - Monitor service performance on an ongoing basis

13 Summary Conclusions Rural transit plays an important role in Arizona’s transportation system. Further development and improvement of rural transit services is critical to address needs stemming from rapid population growth Given only 18% of rural Arizona’s public transportation needs are being met today, it is clear that significant improvement is necessary: Future Need: Only 13% of transit service need will be met in 2016 if no service changes are mad Strategy to Meet Need: Increase ridership from 1.4 million in 2007 to 10.5 million in 2016 Proposed Build-Out Cost: Average of $83.3 million annually from 2007 to 2016

14 Summary Next Steps Next steps to ensure further development and improvement of service: Add rural public transit service within cities, towns, and Tribal Reservations to assure service needs of the elderly, persons with disabilities, and general public are met Connect rural and urban communities, which represents a growing Arizona need Increase funding at all levels of government to support these services, with cooperation from private & non-profit sectors Establish clearly defined roles and responsibilities between the State, councils of governments, local governments, Tribal Governments, and transit operators

15 Thank you! Matt Carpenter Arizona Department of Transportation (602)