Panel 6 IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solvency ii: an overview Lloyds May © LloydsSolvency II May Contents Solvency II: key features Legislative process Solvency II implementation.
Advertisements

Risk Management Practices in Solvency II
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Overview and Purpose of Market.
Own Risk & Solvency Assessment (ORSA): The heart of Risk & Capital Management John Spencer Director, Ultimate Risk Solutions.
Session 8 IFRS and Solvency Requirements Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL-FIDES 25 November 2009, Lima Peru Takao Miyamoto, IAIS Secretariat.
Risk Management and Internal Controls ASSAL 20 November 2014 Annick Teubner Chair, IAIS Governance Working Group.
1 ICP 18 to 23 Presented in One day Workshop on Financial Sector Assessment Program N. Srinivasa Rao & S. P. Chakraborty Hyderabad, 29 th December, 2010.
The Development of Enterprise Risk Management and Supervision for Insurance Companies in Taiwan Dr. Huang, Tien-Mu Director General, Insurance Bureau Financial.
The ROLE of the ACTUARY in INSURANCE PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION Yangon, Myanmar 14 July 2014 Chi Cheng Hock, FFA.
Investments Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (IIRM) Hyderabad, India 15 November 2005 Arup Chatterjee – Advisor International Association of.
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
Risk & Capital Management A Regulator’s Perspective Stuart Wason Senior Director Actuarial Division, OSFI June 16, 2008.
Solvency II Alberto Corinti
1 Solvency II Part 1: Background Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Chile Insurance Solvency Reform Guillermo Larrain Superintendent Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros April 2009.
ICP 14 Valuation Christina Urias Managing Director, International Insurance Regulatory Affairs National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
IAIS Recent Developments Hyderabad, 16 November 2005 Yoshi Kawai – Secretary General International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Website:
IAIS guidance paper on investment risk management Insurance Training Seminar IAIS - ASSAL Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1-4 November 2005 Makoto Okubo – Member.
Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test
1 Solvency II Part 3: Other pillars Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence – Lessons from Basel II Mary Frances Monroe Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation Board of Governors.
IAIS Standards Setting Activities and the Insurance Core Principles Washington – 4 May 2004 Luc Cardinal – Member of Secretariat International Association.
Financial Services Board INSURANCE LAWS AMENDMENT BILL Jonathan Dixon Deputy Executive Officer: Insurance Financial Services Board Page 1.
OECD Guidelines on Insurer Governance
INSTRUCTIONS Guidance on formatting the beam is available in the notes pages of this document. 21March, 2012 Solvency II Main requirements.
Session 9: Panel on Assets Jeffery Yong IAIS Secretariat Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL San Salvador, 24 November 2010.
Workshop on the Insurance Core Principles IV Conference on Insurance Regulation and Supervision in Latin America Punta Cana, May Makoto Okubo,
FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORTING Ioana Abrahams 13 November 2009.
System of Governance Articles 41 to 49 of Directive 2009/138/EC 11 th May 2010 Eamonn Henry.
IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar Ixtapa, Mexico, April 2009 Shinichi Kishi – Principal Administrator International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS)
Impact of the Financial Crisis and Lessons Learnt Impact of the Financial Crisis and Lessons Learnt Rob Curtis Regional Information Session, Cape Town.
1 IFRS in the Banking Sector A supervisor’s perspective REPARIS Workshop Marc Pickeur Vienna CBFA March 2006 Belgium.
Case Study on Asset-Liability Management Jeffery Yong IAIS Secretariat Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL San Salvador, 24 November 2010.
Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai Secretary General, IAIS IAIS-ASSAL Regional Seminar Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 2011 PUBLIC.
Solvency II Open Forum 4 th March 2008 Michael Aitchison.
Overview and Activities related to Accounting IAIS Overview and Activities related to Accounting1 GDNL Program – Module 25 (1) 16 May 2006 Dynamics in.
Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) Mutual Insurance and Takāful in a Changing World November 2012 | Zulhijjah 1433 Ceylan.
International Actuarial Association Page1 ASSOCIATION ACTUARIELLE INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION IASB Board Meeting June 22, 2006 Presented.
Session 3 Solvency Capital Requirements Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL San Salvador, El Salvador, November 2010 Takao Miyamoto, IAIS Secretariat.
IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS)
PD-34: Capital Models OSFI Guidance Canadian Institute of Actuaries General Meeting Ottawa November 2009.
Recent developments in the IAIS Solvency and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee 20 April 2009 Rob Curtis - Chair, Solvency & Actuarial Issues Subcommittee.
Presentation on second IAIS Liabilities Paper1 Technical Committee 31 May 2006 IAIS Second Liabilities Paper Presentation to Technical Committee Rob Esson.
Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission
Mr. Edward Rivera, Esq. Deputy Commissioner of Insurance of Puerto Rico How to Present Financial Information/ The Role of Disclosure Brasil, Rio de Janeiro.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 of Solvency II Kathryn Morgan The Association of Financial Mutuals 4 April 2011.
Solvency II Andrew Mawdsley. Overview The challenges in preparing for Solvency II Adequate financial resources Supervisory Review Process Disclosure Timeline.
Credit risk in banks - importance of appraisal and monitoring PRESENTED BY : KRATI VERMA (09bshyd0390)
Mini Case Study on Insurance Core Principles - ICP23 Capital Adequacy and Solvency - Insurance Training Seminar IAIS - ASSAL Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1-4.
Developing an Investment Governance Framework
December 29, 2010 Satyan Jambunathan Prudential requirements A Life industry perspective.
1 Larry J. Bruning FSA, MAAA, CLU International Life Actuary, NAIC USA 6 September 2011 Capital Adequacy and Supervisory Assessment of Solvency Positions.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
© Copyright Allianz IIS Redefining the industry: Regulation, Risk & Global Strategy July 9, 2007 Berlin Helmut Perlet, Allianz SE The Emergence of Solvency.
Andreas Rauter, UNIQA REPARIS Workshop, Vienna March 15, 2006 Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance Sector.
The Use of Actuaries as Part of a Supervisory Model Michael Hafeman – Consultant World Bank May 2004.
CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA June 29 & 30, 2006  Les 29 et 30 juin 2006 Ottawa, Ontario International Actuarial Accounting and Regulatory.
Page 1 Own Solvency and Risk Assessment Jarl Kure Malta 9 April 2010.
Ukraine (nr 46514): Expert Mission on Supervision of Investment Funds` Activities - TAIEX Risk management under UCITS IV. Organizational requirements.
Consultation on Guidance for (Re)Insurance undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role (CP 103) Presentation to Society of Actuaries in Ireland.
1 Use test Izabela Sabała Insurance and Pension Inspection Department KNF O ffi ce TAIEX Workshop on Solvency II Requirements Baku, December 17 ‒ 18, 2013.
Panel 6 IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation
Solvency II The first year of implementation José Almaça
Energy Risk Management Credit Rating Perspective
The Supervisor’s Perspective
IAIS – ASSAL Training Seminar April 28, 2009 David Oakden
11May 2007 Yoshi Kawai – Secretary General
The Supervisor’s Perspective
Assessing compliance with ICPs ICP 17
Presentation transcript:

Panel 6 IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS)

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation2November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview IAIS Framework for Insurance Supervision Adopted standards and guidance papers –Structure of regulatory capital requirements(2008) –Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes(2008) –Enterprise risk management for capital adequacy and solvency purposes(2008) –Structure of capital resources for solvency purposes(2009) Current work in progress –Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes(2010) –Investments(2010) Future work

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation3November 2009 Jason Park Basic concept (1) Insurer solvency is central to risk management by insurers and to the supervision of insurers Regulatory capital requirements are a fundamental part of a solvency regime Capital functions as a shock absorber against unforeseen losses Sufficient capital is critical to ensure the fulfilment of insurers’ obligations to policyholders A solvency regime comprises interdependent quantitative (financial) and qualitative (governance and market conduct) components

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation4November 2009 Jason Park Basic concept (2) Assessment of an insurer’s financial position for supervision purposes addresses the insurer’s technical provisions, regulatory capital requirements and available capital resources –Technical provisions represent the amount that an insurer requires to settle all commitments to policyholders arising over the lifetime of the portfolio –Regulatory capital requirements refers to the financial requirements set as part of the solvency regime that determine the amounts of capital that an insurer must hold in addition to its technical provisions –Technical provisions and regulatory capital requirements should be covered by adequate and appropriate assets – need to consider asset quality –Capital resources may be very broadly regarded as the amount of the amount of assets in excess of the amount of liabilities

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation5November 2009 Jason Park Solvency requirements are integral in the Framework for insurance supervision Preconditions Regulatory requirements Supervisory assessment LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Supervisory assessment and intervention Basic conditions for the effective functioning of the insurance supervisory authority the insurance sector and insurance supervision Financial Governance Market conduct Common Solvency Structure and Standards Framework for Insurance Supervision

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation6November 2009 Jason Park ISRs: a comprehensive and cohesive set of solvency assessment documentation International Solvency Requirements (ISRs) ISR 1 Capital requirements (adopted) ISR 2 Capital resources (adopted in 2009) ISR 3 Valuation of assets & liabilities (due Oct 2010) ISR 4 Investments (due Oct 2010) ISR 5 Enterprise risk management (adopted) ISR 6 Internal models (adopted) STANDARDS ISR 1 Capital requirements (adopted) ISR 2 Capital resources (adopted in 2009) ISR 3 Valuation of assets & liabilities (due Oct 2010) ISR 4 Investments (due Oct 2010) ISR 5 Enterprise risk management (adopted) ISR 6 Internal models (adopted) GUIDANCE PAPER

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation7November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview IAIS Framework for Insurance Supervision Adopted standards and guidance papers –Structure of regulatory capital requirements(2008) –Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes(2008) –Enterprise risk management for capital adequacy and solvency purposes(2008) –Structure of capital resources for solvency purposes(2009) Current work in progress –Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes(2010) –Investments(2010) Future work

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation8November 2009 Jason Park Standard and Guidance on the structure of regulatory capital requirements (1) Standard on the Structure of Regulatory Capital Requirements –outlines 15 principles-based requirements for a solvency regime in relation to regulatory capital requirements Guidance Paper on the Structure of Regulatory Capital Requirements –provides additional guidance on these principles-based requirements

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation9November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the structure of regulatory capital requirements (2) Requirement 1 A total balance sheet should be used to recognise interdependence between assets, liabilities, regulatory capital requirements and capital resources. Requirement 2 Regulatory capital requirements should be at a level such that policyholders obligations continue to be met as they fall due. Requirement 3 & 4 The solvency regime should include a range of solvency control levels which should be coherent with the associated corrective actions. Requirement 5 & 6 Prescribed capital requirement (PCR) is the solvency control level above which no action to increase capital or reduce risk will be required. PCR should exceed technical provisions and other liabilities at a specified safety level over a defined time horizon.

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation10November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the structure of regulatory capital requirements (3) Requirement 7 & 8 Minimum capital requirement (MCR) is the solvency control level at which the strongest action is invoked if no further capital is made available. The MCR should have a minimum bound below which no insurer is regarded to be viable. Requirement 9 The solvency regime should be open and transparent on the objectives of the regulatory capital requirements and the bases on which they are determined. Requirement 10 The solvency regime should allow a set of standardised and if appropriate other approved more tailored approaches such as the use of partial or full internal models. Requirement 11 The solvency regime should be explicit as to where risks are addressed (split between technical provisions and regulatory capital requirements) as well as how risks and their aggregation are reflected.

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation11November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the structure of regulatory capital requirements (4) Requirement 12 The solvency regime should set appropriate target criteria for the calculation of regulatory capital requirements which should underlie the calibration of the standardised approach. Requirement 13 For more tailored approaches, the target criteria should also apply to ensure broad consistency among insurers. Requirement 14 Any variations to the regulatory capital requirements imposed by the supervisors should be transparent and proportionate according to the target criteria. Requirement 15 The solvency regime should be supported by appropriate public disclosure and additional confidential reporting to the supervisor.

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation12November 2009 Jason Park Total balance sheet approach to recognise interdependencies Supervisory assessment of the financial position AssetsLiabilities and capital requirement Financial position AssetsLiabilities Technical provisions Best estimate policy obligations Risk margin Value of assets for supervisory purposes Capital requirement Liabilities Available capital Public financial reporting Liabilities Capital

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation13November 2009 Jason Park Solvency control levels to trigger timely supervisory interventions Technical provisions & other liabilities Capital resources Current estimate Risk margin Insurer’s financial position Regulatory capital requirements Required capital Prescribed capital requirement (PCR) Minimum capital requirement (MCR)

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation14November 2009 Jason Park Progressive intervention levels to ensure timely corrective measures – an example Prescribed capital requirement (PCR) level Supervisory intervention not required Capital Adequacy Ratio = Capital Available Capital Required 190% 160% 100% 130% Submission of business plan to improve capital buffers Increased on-site supervision Additional stress and scenario testing Limit shareholder dividends Restrict new business acquisition Delay approval of new products Minimum capital requirement (MCR) level Winding-up of operation

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation15November 2009 Jason Park Internal models: a more tailored approach to determine regulatory capital What are internal models? –A risk management system developed by an insurer to analyse and quantify its risk position and to determine the commensurate economic capital The internal model approach is suitable only if certain preconditions are met –Level of sophistication of insurers / markets –Corporate governance structures –Competent / accountable insurance professionals and management –Supervisory resources and expertise Standards and guidance paper apply only in jurisdictions where internal models are recognised for regulatory capital purposes

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation16November 2009 Jason Park General provisions on the use of internal models for regulatory capital requirements Roles of supervisors Establish modelling criteria – ensure consistency among all insurers. Set eligible levels of regulatory capital requirements (including MCR and PCR) for which IM are accepted – extra care if this includes MCR. Review and approve the use of IM. Roles of insurers Ensure risk modelling techniques are appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of risks. Demonstrate ongoing compliance with the three tests – statistical quality, calibration and use (next slide). Notify supervisor of any material changes to the IM. Ensure proper documentation of the IM. Provide supervisory reporting and public disclosure.

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation17November 2009 Jason Park Initial and ongoing validation and approval essential to ensure model remains fit for purpose Statistical quality test Calibration test Use test Appropriateness of quantitative methodology- model inputs, parameters, assumptions Model addresses overall risk position Data accurate and complete Demonstrate that the regulatory capital computed using the model satisfies the specified modelling criteria The internal model is fully embedded into the risk strategy and operational processes Board and management have control over construction and use of the internal model Adequate governance and internal controls (documentation and disclosure)

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation18November 2009 Jason Park ERM framework underpins robust solvency assessment (1) – What is Enterprise Risk Management ? Process of identifying, assessing, measuring, controlling and mitigating risk in respect of the insurance enterprise as a whole –Sound governance is a pre-requisite for solvency regime to operate effectively –Enterprise risk management underpins effective solvency assessment and capital management

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation19November 2009 Jason Park ERM framework underpins robust solvency assessment (2) Key Requirements The overall governance structure should include an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework which is integrated with business operations and culture. Appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of the business and risks. Addresses all reasonably foreseeable and relevant material risks. Led and overseen by board and senior management. Supported by accurate and appropriately detailed documentation of risks. Risk management policy, risk tolerance statement, and own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) including continuity analysis.

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation20November 2009 Jason Park Draft standard and guidance on capital resources for solvency purposes Key Requirements Capital resources should exceed capital requirements. Capital resources should be defined and should be consistent with total balance sheet approach with due regard to quality of capital resources. Solvency regime should establish criteria for assessing suitability of capital resources – due regard to loss absorbency on going-concern and wind-up basis. Solvency regime should require the insurer to assess the quality and adequacy of its capital resources to meet regulatory capital requirements and any additional capital needs. - Adopted in Oct 2009

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation21November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview IAIS Framework for Insurance Supervision Adopted standards and guidance papers –Structure of regulatory capital requirements –Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes –Enterprise risk management for capital adequacy and solvency purposes –Structure of capital resources for solvency purposes Current work in progress –Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes –Investments Future work

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation22November 2009 Jason Park Draft standard and guidance on valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes Joint working group between Solvency & Actuarial Issues Subcommittee and Insurance Contracts Subcommittee developing draft paper. Work will take into account developments in the IASB Phase II Insurance Contracts project. Key principle is: The IAIS believes that it is most desirable that the methodologies for calculating items in general purpose financial reports can be used for, or are substantially consistent with, the methodologies used for regulatory reporting purposes, with as few changes as possible to satisfy regulatory requirements. Due for adoption in October 2010.

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation23November 2009 Jason Park Draft standard and guidance on investments Review of current standard on ALM and guidance on investment risk management. Adoption delayed to October 2010 to incorporate observations from the financial crisis such as: –Liquidity risk, concentration risk, SPVs, structured products. Some concepts currently being considered: –Regulatory investment requirements to ensure sufficiency, liquidity and security of investments –Role of ALM under the broader ERM and IM frameworks –Diversification of investment portfolios –Risk measurement –Role of stress/scenario testing

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation24November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview IAIS Framework for Insurance Supervision Adopted standards and guidance papers –Structure of regulatory capital requirements –Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes –Enterprise risk management for capital adequacy and solvency purposes –Structure of capital resources for solvency purposes Current work in progress –Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes –Investments Future work

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation25November 2009 Jason Park Further work Establishing a Group Supervisory Framework Reform of the ICPs by 2011 Extending the solo level ISRs to groups Updating the existing Standards and Guidance to take account of the Global Financial Crisis New Standards and Guidance on Supervisory Review and Reporting Common Assessment Framework –New working group formed to take forward research

IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation26November 2009 Jason Park Thank you for your attention. Any questions/ comments? Note : The adopted standards and guidance papers can be downloaded from