IDINFO EXPO 2006 Westin Crown Center, Kansas City, MO. National Animal Identification System Cattle Industry Work Group Report John Adams Gary Wilson Members.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Swine Identification Update
Advertisements

Scrapie FAQs. Q: What is scrapie? A: Scrapie is a fatal, degenerative disease affecting the central nervous system of sheep and goats. It is in the same.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Global Animal Management, Inc.
Animal Tracking Component Private and State Animal Tracking Databases (ATD) Animal Trace Processing System (ATPS) National Animal Identification System.
Cervidae Industry Implementation. Implementation Guidelines Producers data/information will be kept confidential/exempt from current Freedom of Information.
Equine Species Working Group Update: Equine Identification in the U.S. Amy Mann American Horse Council August, 2006 ID INFO EXPO.
Bird Industry Identifcation Working Group Update and Recommendations.
A Division of ScoringSystem, Inc. Site-Specific Recordkeeping Point-to-Point Traceback Developed by ScoringSystem, Inc. Copyright ScoringSystem,
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT JUNE 25, 2008 New Mexico Livestock Board Animal Identification Project.
Principles of Standards and Measures
MICHIGAN MOTORCYCLE RIDER AND SAFETY EDUCATION PROGRAM Ron Wilson, State Coordinator Motorcycle Rider and Safety Education Program Michigan Department.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
The National Animal Identification System: Basics, Blueprint, Timelines, and Processes Prepared by: C. Wilson Gray District Extension Economist, Agricultural.
Animal identification and traceability
 NAFTA Verification Audit Highlights  Mexican Foreign Trade Rule Changes Customs Highlights.
Reorganization of APHIS Veterinary Services U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services November 2013.
Age Verification for Japan: What is involved and is it right for me? Prepared by: John D. Lawrence Iowa State University Western Center for Risk Management.
Dr. Patrick Webb Pre-Harvest Traceability in the Pork Industry.
National Animal Identification Working Together to Address Implementation Challenges Chelsea Good, LMA VP of Government and Industry Affairs NIAA Annual.
Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory ADT-Animal Disease.
YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES Youth Livestock.
MFRPS Lesson Learned North Carolina
PED Building on the Lessons Learned Liz Wagstrom, DVM, MS, DACVPM Chief Veterinarian.
Public and Private Interests in Animal Research LAT Chapter 1.
National Traceability NAIS-Update “Protecting Animal Agriculture”
Certificate of Veterinary Inspection: A Disease Management Tool Kentucky Department of Agriculture Richie Farmer, Commissioner Robert C. Stout, DVM State.
Wisconsin Technical Service Providers (TSP) Plan.
1 Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) April Full Traceability (Pre-harvest) Birth Premises Slaughter Full Traceability All Production and Points.
Effects Of Animal Identification On Cattle Market Structure Prepared by: Darrell R. Mark, Ph.D. Asst. Professor & Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist.
Structured Transaction Overview. FDIC serves as an equity partner in its Receivership capacity for a single or multiple institution transaction. Joint.
Greater Yellowstone Area Brucellosis Situation Myles Watts Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Montana State University November 14, 2008.
District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
NCBFAA WEBINAR ADVANCE TRADE DATA ELEMENTS March 1, 2007 Moderated by Mary Jo Muoio and Alan R. Klestadt.
1 Animal ID: Costs and Benefits. Gary Brester and Vince Smith MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics FPCC May 21, 2009 Poplar, MT.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
GlobalVetLink eHealth Certificates for Animal Health Regulatory Management Kevin Maher and J Amelita Facchiano GSA Contract # GS-35F-0838N.
Indispensible Partners Industry Perspective G. Donald Ritter,DVM,ACPV Director of Health Services Mountaire Farms Inc. Millsboro, DE 19966
Early detection/rapid response to foreign animal and zoonotic diseases through a County Animal Security and Health Network Kelly J. Matthews, Dr. Shannon.
Title Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation systemEuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN TRACEABILITY Food safety - a step forward FOOD CHAIN-MEAT.
Why are Food Safety Regulations Needed? $ billion per year in food trade Increase export partners Increase ease of exporting Minimize financial.
Finding Real World Solutions for Animal ID. NWPP Major Milestones March 2004: Cattle associations visit with Bill Hawks and Keith Collins of the USDA.
Animal ID Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas Cooperative Extension
USAHA Resolution 26 The United States Animal Health Association (USAHA) requests the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health.
Principles of Business, Marketing, and Finance Wholesalers in a Private Enterprise System Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Farm Foundation Traceability and Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003.
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
System of Reinspection NACMPI August 27, 2008 Mary Stanley Office of International Affairs Food Safety and Inspection Service.
NATIONAL ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (NAIS) 1.Why is identification important? 2.Why is speed and accuracy crucial? 3.What is current status? 4.What is.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 USDA APHIS Authorities and Activities Under the National Animal Identification System Advisory Committee on Biotechnology.
APHIS READINESS UPDATE Automated Commercial Environment US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
2009 PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND INITIATIVES. MISSION – AND WORK 2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2009 PLANS.
VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs September.
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop AMS FMLPP Grant Program Overview These workshops are funded by the USDA’s Agricultural.
REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Ministry of Agriculture, Trade Forestry and Water Management VETERINARY DIRECTORATE Department for Anima Health, Welfare and Traceability.
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine Hardwood MOU Memorandum of Understanding.
Alternative Enterprises; Oklahoma Regulations for Slaughter Facilities, Packing Plants and other Food Production Enterprises Includes meat, eggs, and.
QUALITATIVE RISK ASSESSMET
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
International Market Entry Modes
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points on Animal Production Food Safety Importance of collaboration between the Veterinary Services and industry.
USDA IT Infra-Structure Seminar
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
National Animal Identification System
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
Presentation transcript:

IDINFO EXPO 2006 Westin Crown Center, Kansas City, MO. National Animal Identification System Cattle Industry Work Group Report John Adams Gary Wilson Members NAIS Advisory Subcommittee Co-Chairmen, NAIS Cattle Industry Work Group

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Guiding Principles: The USAIP is endorsed as the uniform national animal identification plan that will be implemented as the National Animal identification System (NAIS). The NAIS will be conducted through cooperative agreements involving USDA/APHIS, State Animal Health Authorities, Tribal Nations and the U.S. cattle industry. RFID ear tags will be the technology used to individually identify cattle.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Guiding Principles Producers data/information must be kept confidential and exempt from current Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requirements including a FOIA exemption to block data from passing among varied governmental agencies. Only approved animal health authorities at the federal and state level will have access to the NAIS information system. Only information essential to the enhancement of animal disease surveillance and monitoring shall be stored in any state or federally managed database under the NAIS.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Guiding Principles Events that will trigger access to the data system must be characterized as a regulatory need to accommodate disease traceback / traceforward under any one of the following: A confirmed positive test for List A diseases. The declaration of an animal disease emergency by the Secretary of Agriculture. Program diseases (Brucellosis, TB, etc.) traceback to determine the origin of infection.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Guiding Principles Producers will not bear the full cost of establishing or maintaining the national animal identification system. USDA/ APHIS is encouraged to thoroughly investigate opportunities for integrating State Brand Inspection with the NAIS. Implementation of the NIAS will be directed by the establishment of Uniform Methods and Rules. An extensive industry education effort must be jointly organized and implemented by State, Tribal and Federal health authorities, livestock organizations, industrys quality assurance programs, allied industry, university extension, etc.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Premises Allocation System: All premises that manage and/or hold cattle are to be identified through the State animal health authority to achieve a standard national premises system. USDA Standardized Premises Registration System State Compliant System

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Individual Animal Identification Three basic events trigger the need for official individual animal identification: Change of ownership Interstate movement Multiple owners commingling their cattle.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Individual Animal Identification When individual identification is required, the owner / seller is the person ultimately responsible for applying the official RFID tag TO THE LEFT EAR of all animals. This responsibility may be accomplished prior to commingling with other owners cattle: Where cattle reside prior to change of ownership. Intermediate tagging station. First point of concentration.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Individual Animal Identification Tag Distribution: Official RFID ear tags may become available through any qualified person, group or organization that becomes certified by USDA to meet the requirements established for official USAIN Managers or USAIN Tag Distributors. (US Animal Identification Number) Producers should be able to purchase tags through the retail sector, phone-in or online ordering with direct drop shipments to farm / ranch.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Individual Animal Identification Producers are encouraged to identify calves at birth or at the earliest date possible. Reported birth dates to a NAIS database will support animal disease issues when the age of an animal is needed. When the precise date of birth is not known, the approximate birth date within 2 to 3 months is recommended.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Individual Animal Identification Producers are encouraged to utilize and record a second visible tag as a matter of best management practices". This additional visible tag could enhance day-to- day management needs and could serve as a cross reference in the event of a lost official tag. Animals of origin destined for custom slaughter for personal use need not be officially identified.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Individual Animal Identification The Cattle Working Group encourages USDA / APHIS to expand the current field trial with the Kansas Animal Health Department / KSU Animal Identification Knowledge Laboratory to: Provide opportunity to all animal identification technology (RFID) manufacturers to submit RFID readers and EID devices for performance evaluation. Objectively evaluate current reader and RFID tag technologies in various environments reflective of market-chain industry conditions.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements Three basic events trigger the need for reporting cattle movements to a NAIS Database: Change of ownership Interstate movement Multiple owners commingling their cattle.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements Reportable commingling includes, but is not limited to: commercial trucks or trailers joint grazing agreements livestock markets exhibitions rodeos etc.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements Forms of reporting may include: Electronic Interstate Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (ICVI), (where available). Electronic or hardcopy invoice. Other methods as deemed appropriate by State animal health authorities.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements Private enterprise providers are expected to have a role in supporting the data collection and information system infrastructure. However, the ultimate oversight authority and responsibility for the tracking capabilities of the NAIS information system, remains vested with: USDA/APHIS Tribal Nations State animal health authorities State animal identification agencies Other entities authorized by State law.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements Shall be the sole responsibility of the receiving premises or person responsible for the animals at the receiving premises. Required movement events are to be reported within 24 hours or the close of the next business day. Confirmation shall be available to both the seller and buyer involved that the reported movement has been entered into a National Animal Identification Database.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements In private treaty transactions, where a marketing agent may not exist, the seller is encouraged to also report such movement events under the NAIS. If the receiving premises fail to report, this self- policing crosscheck will: help maintain the integrity of the NAIS. protect against liability of not knowing the final destination premises when cattle are sold. verify that the reports are accurate and complete.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements Officially identified animals that die on-farm or ranch must be reported. Officially identified farm or ranch deads that go to rendering must be reported. The render, being the receiving premises is responsible for reporting. Producers may anticipate animals of origin moved direct to rendering may be required to be officially identified as a condition of acceptance.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Reporting Cattle Movements Slaughter inspection condemnations of officially identified animals moved to rendering need to be reported. It is the responsibility of the slaughter plant and FSIS inspectors to maintain the official ID of the animal. It is the responsibility of the render to report the movement. Packing plant managers, FSIS personnel, and rendering plant managers will need to be made aware of their respective responsibilities.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Import / Export Identification and Reporting All cattle exported from the U.S. must be identified with an official NAIS RFID tag prior to being loaded for export, with the following information reported to a NAIS Database: The official tag number Current farm / ranch premises number The premises number of the export facility Final destination

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Import/Export Identification and Reporting All cattle imported into the U.S. must: Be identified with an official individual number of the country of origin and/or official RFID tag of the country of origin. Be accompanied by a USDA/APHIS approved International Certificate of Identification. Reported to a NAIS Database.

CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT Import / Export Identification and Reporting If an animal or group of cattle do not contain any official individual RFID from the country of origin, the animal(s) shall : Be off-loaded at the U.S. border, or final destination location, and be individually identified with an official NAIS RFID tag. Be reported to a NAIS Database.

Phase III Phase I Introduction Establish Premises ID Systems Education and Outreach Conduct test strategies Target: 200???? Phase I Infrastructure Establish IT infrastructure Establish RFID reader infrastructure Implement tag distribution system ID Cattle/Report movements Target: 200???? Phase I Implementation Test analysis and validation of overall program Determine critical mass to achieve goal Required participation with government funding Target: 201??? Strategies and Timelines: CATTLE INDUSTRY WORKING GROUP REPORT