Sheep Working Group Update June 2006 August 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Swine Identification Update
Advertisements

Scrapie FAQs. Q: What is scrapie? A: Scrapie is a fatal, degenerative disease affecting the central nervous system of sheep and goats. It is in the same.
Capturing Value From RFID Presented by: David L. Knupp.
HIPAA Security Presentation to The American Hospital Association Dianne Faup Office of HIPAA Standards November 5, 2003.
The OIE’s approach to zones and compartments
Global Animal Management, Inc.
IDINFO EXPO 2006 Westin Crown Center, Kansas City, MO. National Animal Identification System Cattle Industry Work Group Report John Adams Gary Wilson Members.
Animal Tracking Component Private and State Animal Tracking Databases (ATD) Animal Trace Processing System (ATPS) National Animal Identification System.
Cervidae Industry Implementation. Implementation Guidelines Producers data/information will be kept confidential/exempt from current Freedom of Information.
Equine Species Working Group Update: Equine Identification in the U.S. Amy Mann American Horse Council August, 2006 ID INFO EXPO.
Bird Industry Identifcation Working Group Update and Recommendations.
A Division of ScoringSystem, Inc. Site-Specific Recordkeeping Point-to-Point Traceback Developed by ScoringSystem, Inc. Copyright ScoringSystem,
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Compensation for Livestock Diseases in the United States Steve Weber.
EURIM Personal Identity Group Data Sharing Model for Public Services 13 th January 2005 Jim Lound © Experian Ltd 2005.
Trace concepts & EMRS Fred Bourgeois EMRS National Coordinator Mark Schoenbaum Regional EPI.
Bovine Tuberculosis Dr. Rick Smith Assistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant Programs Bovine TB Program Coordinator MDARD.
The National Animal Identification System: Basics, Blueprint, Timelines, and Processes Prepared by: C. Wilson Gray District Extension Economist, Agricultural.
Ag Fact! 5/1 More beef is consumed on ______________ than any other day of the year (___________ and _____________ tie for second)!
Lesson 4 Good Production Practice #4 Identify and Track All Treated Animals.
Animal identification and traceability
MAIN IDEA: What are the measures of reproductive, production and financial efficiency in the sheep industry?
Age Verification for Japan: What is involved and is it right for me? Prepared by: John D. Lawrence Iowa State University Western Center for Risk Management.
Dr. Patrick Webb Pre-Harvest Traceability in the Pork Industry.
Branding Review. Issue #1: NAIS National Animal Identification System Animal Science Principles of Industry Issues in Animal Agriculture.
National Animal Identification Working Together to Address Implementation Challenges Chelsea Good, LMA VP of Government and Industry Affairs NIAA Annual.
Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory ADT-Animal Disease.
YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES Youth Livestock.
AEMB Board meeting – 28th November 2011 Ennis, Ireland EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADEING UNION UECBV.
Continuity of Business Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Continuity of Business (2013)
National Traceability NAIS-Update “Protecting Animal Agriculture”
Update on NAIS and the Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) What is COOL? – Food Labeling Program/Law – Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling – Introduced.
Certificate of Veterinary Inspection: A Disease Management Tool Kentucky Department of Agriculture Richie Farmer, Commissioner Robert C. Stout, DVM State.
National Animal Identification
1 Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) April Full Traceability (Pre-harvest) Birth Premises Slaughter Full Traceability All Production and Points.
Effects Of Animal Identification On Cattle Market Structure Prepared by: Darrell R. Mark, Ph.D. Asst. Professor & Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist.
Greater Yellowstone Area Brucellosis Situation Myles Watts Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Montana State University November 14, 2008.
RFID Policy Update 1/23/08 Dan Caprio President DC Strategies, LLC.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
1 Animal ID: Costs and Benefits. Gary Brester and Vince Smith MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics FPCC May 21, 2009 Poplar, MT.
Improving traceability of sheep in Western Australia Biosecurity & Agriculture Management (Identification & Movement of Stock & Apiaries) Regulations 2013.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
Authentication, Access Control, and Authorization (1 of 2) 0 NPRM Request (for 2017) ONC is requesting comment on two-factor authentication in reference.
National Scrapie Eradication Program Proposed Updates to 9 CFR 54 and 79 Sheep and Goat Health U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection.
GlobalVetLink eHealth Certificates for Animal Health Regulatory Management Kevin Maher and J Amelita Facchiano GSA Contract # GS-35F-0838N.
CANADIAN BISON Traceability – 2011 Requirements November 2009 Terry Kremeniuk Terry Kremeniuk Executive Director Executive Director Canadian Bison Association.
BC Poultry Premise Identification Initiative Solvej Patschke M.Sc. P.Ag. Ministry of Agriculture and Lands April 11, 2006.
Finding Real World Solutions for Animal ID. NWPP Major Milestones March 2004: Cattle associations visit with Bill Hawks and Keith Collins of the USDA.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Animal ID Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas Cooperative Extension
USAHA Resolution 26 The United States Animal Health Association (USAHA) requests the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health.
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) and the Beef Industry March 13, 2003.
Electronic Identification EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADES UNION UECBV.
Farm Foundation Traceability and Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003.
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
NATIONAL ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (NAIS) 1.Why is identification important? 2.Why is speed and accuracy crucial? 3.What is current status? 4.What is.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 USDA APHIS Authorities and Activities Under the National Animal Identification System Advisory Committee on Biotechnology.
Livestock Identification. Match up the ID tags to its name A. Chalk Raddle B. Spray marker C. Electronic tag D. Brass tag E. Ear notch marking F. Strip.
American Goat Federation Cooperative Agreement with USDA/APHIS National Scrapie Eradication Program SOURCES OF INFORMATION FOR GOAT OWNERS About Scrapie.
Brought to you through a Cooperative Agreement with USDA/APHIS Goat Producers are the Key To Eradicating Scrapie in the U.S. Scrapie is a fatal, degenerative.
Update: Animal iD and Traceability. Progress update Double-tagging - preparations and staff training done - distribution of new ear tags commenced Funding.
What we have covered Background of Scrapie: History & Distribution Basics of the Disease Summary of the National Accelerated Scrapie Eradication Program.
Connecticut Department of Agriculture
Sheep – NLIS database – MBM requires
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
USDA IT Infra-Structure Seminar
«Data exchange in bovine identification database BOVEX»
National Animal Identification System
SHEEP and GOAT Identification:
Possible solutions at the EU level within the Animal Health Law
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
Presentation transcript:

Sheep Working Group Update June 2006 August 2006

Species Working Group (SWG) Formed as a result of 2004 USAHA meeting Charge: To provide species-specific input into USAIP/NAIS Broad industry-wide representation Actively considering your grassroots realities and representing YOU! Wrestled with many topics, consensus re: build on existing scrapie program, G/L ID, costs, cuss and discuss

Recommendations made by SWG in 2004 regarding NAIS Continue with the existing mandatory ID requirements of the National Scrapie Eradication Program – Evolve from this program rather than starting over is key for producer participation. – Most complete federal ID system in existence for any species. – Recognize no purely visual ID system will achieve final tracking goal (48 hours). – BUT no proven Electronic ID & tracking system for sheep yet exists in the world.

Stats-USDA Scrapie Flock Numbers 114,907 sheep and goat premises have flock/herd numbers in the SNGB as of 6/30/06. Approx. 67,000 are sheep. Official eartags have been issued to 84,154 s/g premises. Market tagging capability encourages compliance. Recommendation: tie current Scrapie Flock ID (SFID) number to NAIS PIN in computer database(s) only.

Current Voluntary and Mandatory Scrapie ID programs These are ID programs and They provide flock of origin data on the tag. They are NOT perfect sheep or goat movement tracking systems but they are valuable. These programs provide much more useful trace back data than exists for cattle not located in brand states and not monitored via private ID systems.

MN Tested choices SFID +Animal ID = Unique individual number

History of Scrapie Mandatory ID

NAIS Movement Reporting (recommendations cont.) Individual ID and movement recording mandated only when sheep commingle, – move in commerce – exhibited intra- and interstate – Sale of breeding stock and cull sheep Group ID lambs in feeding channels Group ID sheep moving intra and interstate for management purposes w/o change of ownership (green indicates proposed NAIS changes)

Tracking reported when …. change of ownership, interstate movement, multiple owners commingling their animals

NAIS Recommendations The sheep industry recognizes that exhibitions are currently a high-risk activity for disease transmission. Such events should immediately begin enforcing compliance regarding ID and tracking (health certificates).

Recommendations to NAIS staff and State Veterinarians by SWG in Fall 2005 Todays scrapie program w/appropriate group/lot identification will work The Scrapie Programs Flock ID number plus the animal ID number, as currently used in the NSEP, is a unique number in the US Our industry has more premises and animals identified than others (114,907 sheep and goat premises as of 7/06)

NSEP overlap with NAIS Continue with current scrapie numbering system - on all tags for sheep and goats inclusive of RFID tags. Numbering changes when NAIS becomes mandatory.

NAIS Tag numbering system The 840 numbering system is a 15-digit numbering system providing unique individual animal identification – Designed solely for electronic reading. – Potentially makes visual reading of scrapie tags more error prone – SWG opposes this change mandated by NAIS standards from official visual sheep ID at this time.

NAIS AIN – 15 digits intended for electronic reading only

Search for perfect RFID tag: retention, low reactivity, ease of application, functional life

Recommendations (cont.) Once electronic identification and tracking technology is proven to work in the sheep industry, it must also be economically feasible for industry. Electronic ID has proven merit for disease control programs.

Range and Feeders It is imperative that the range flock and feeder segments of the industry be able to move animals via group-lot format. To tag or read individual animals in conditions common in these segments are such that it will be very difficult and costly to do so. Compliance will be poor, thus negatively affecting program strength.

Group/Lot ID 15-character GIN – NAIS Premises alphanumeric ID (7) + – Date (MMDDYY) + – Lot assembled that day (01) Number generated & reported by producer

GIN application Multiple shipments from the same premises on same day – A – A Tracing backwards or forwards would involve ALL groups from the same premises.

Feeding Channels Once a group enters feeding channels, normal practices and records will keep track of the group to the extent practical. When animals leave the feeding facility they get a new GIN. This approach is scientifically sound for sheep.

Auction markets, slaughter plants, feedlots Auction markets, slaughter plants, feedlots can not rely upon EID reading systems that read < 100% of the animals at speed of commerce. All systems presently fail this test. Therefore the current system of counting/accounting must be maintained - forcing the EID system to be an expensive time-consuming add-on to a situation in which throughput is critical.

Requested USDA conduct an economic analysis of cost-benefit of EID methods and tracking for the sheep industry. A cost/benefit analysis needed for risk posed by the sheep industry in the event of a disease outbreak. The only likely disease that would be addressed by a national sheep/goat tracking system is foot and mouth disease. Industry considers the information from this proposed analysis to be valuable but nothing has been initiated.

The Real Challenges Producers continually question the need for national ID program relative to the cost of administering and participating. Will the NAIS really shorten the time that farms, etc. are quarantined if a FAD is diagnosed? Sheep specific as sheep are not small cows! Challenges….

Prediction on Mandatory Scrapie ID Do we need a transition plan from NSEP to NAIS? Assumption – electronic ID & tracking will become cheap and functional (cell phone based) Answer - Scrapie eradication will benefit from individual tracking of breeding ewes. Industry will need a functional marriage of electronic devices with farm useful ID. When necessary it shouldnt be painful to change from scrapie flock ID number to NAIS PIN. Continue with the scrapie numbering system - on all tags for sheep and goats inclusive of RFID tags.

Where oh where has my little lamb gone…… Thanks to the Sheep Working Group!