Source localization MfD 2010, 17th Feb 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EEG-MEG source reconstruction
Advertisements

Dynamic causal Modelling for evoked responses Stefan Kiebel Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL.
VBM Voxel-based morphometry
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION
The Event-Related Potential (ERP) Embedded in the EEG signal is the small electrical response due to specific events such as stimulus or task onsets, motor.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs Valentina Doria Georg Kaegi Methods for Dummies 19/03/2008.
M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium.
MEG/EEG Inverse problem and solutions In a Bayesian Framework EEG/MEG SPM course, Bruxelles, 2011 Jérémie Mattout Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre ? ?
1 Tiferet Gazit – MIT Medical Vision GroupFocal Epilepsy Source Localization A Flexible Framework for Non-Invasive Source Localization in Pediatric Focal.
Electrophysiology. Electroencephalography Electrical potential is usually measured at many sites on the head surface More is sometimes better.
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
Overview Contrast in fMRI v contrast in MEG 2D interpolation 1 st level 2 nd level Which buttons? Other clever things with SPM for MEG Things to bear in.
MEG Experiments Stimulation and Recording Setup Educational Seminar Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis February 8th, 2005.
Electrophysiology.
Neurophysiological significance of the inverse problem its relation to present “source estimate” methodologies and to future developments E. Tognoli Discussion.
Bioelectric Source Model and Brain Imaging Dezhong Yao School of Life Sci & Tech,UESTC.
Cortical Source Localization of Human Scalp EEG Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center.
We can estimate the time course of the source power from locations which show high activity by applying the beamformer calculated according to (2) or (4).
The M/EEG inverse problem
Subdural Grid Intracranial electrodes typically cannot be used in human studies It is possible to record from the cortical surface Subdural grid on surface.
Electroencephalography The field generated by a patch of cortex can be modeled as a single equivalent dipolar current source with some orientation (assumed.
Electroencephalography and the Event-Related Potential
The Event-Related Potential (ERP) We have an ERP waveform for every electrode.
Electroencephalography Electrical potential is usually measured at many sites on the head surface.
Brain Electrical Source Analysis This is most likely location of dipole Project “Forward Solution” Compare to actual data.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Source Localization for EEG/MEG Stavroula Kousta Martin Chadwick Methods for Dummies 2007.
The M/EEG inverse problem and solutions Gareth R. Barnes.
The M/EEG inverse problem and solutions Gareth R. Barnes.
Magnetoencephalography (MEG)
Source localization for EEG and MEG Methods for Dummies 2006 FIL Bahador Bahrami.
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data Jason Taylor MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (CBU) Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience.
SENSOR LEVEL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION in M/EEG METHODS FOR DUMMIES Mrudul Bhatt & Wenjun Bai.
Generative Models of M/EEG: Group inversion and MEG+EEG+fMRI multimodal integration Rik Henson (with much input from Karl Friston)
Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling (HBM) in EEG and MEG source analysis Carsten Wolters Institut für Biomagnetismus und Biosignalanalyse, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität.
Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
DCM for ERPs/EFPs Clare Palmer & Elina Jacobs Expert: Dimitris Pinotsis.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation SPM Course – Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging – Oct ? ? Jérémie Mattout, Christophe Phillips Jean Daunizeau Guillaume.
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Himn Sabir 1. Topics 1 st level analysis 2 nd level analysis Space-Time SPMs Time-frequency analysis Conclusion 2.
NIMH MEG Core Facility Magnetoencephalography Imaging Resource, IRP, NIMH / NINDS Comparison of temporal and spatial resolution for various neuroimaging.
Integrating QDEC with Slicer3 Click to add subtitle.
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
SPM Pre-Processing Oli Gearing + Jack Kelly Methods for Dummies
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
MfD EEG/MEG Source Localization 4 th Feb 2009 Maro Machizawa Himn Sabir Expert: Vladimir Litvak.
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in MEG/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Multimodal Brain Imaging Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London Guillaume Flandin, CEA, Paris Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, CNC,
Brain (Tech) NCRR Overview Magnetic Leadfields and Superquadric Glyphs.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
MfD Co-registration and Normalisation in SPM
Magnetoencephalography Matt Martin 09/17/2004 APPM 4380.
M/EEG: Statistical analysis and source localisation Expert: Vladimir Litvak Mathilde De Kerangal & Anne Löffler Methods for Dummies, March 2, 2016.
MEG Analysis in SPM Rik Henson (MRC CBU, Cambridge) Jeremie Mattout, Christophe Phillips, Stefan Kiebel, Olivier David, Vladimir Litvak,... & Karl Friston.
Depth and Surface EEG: Generation and Propagation
Electrophysiology. Neurons are Electrical Remember that Neurons have electrically charged membranes they also rapidly discharge and recharge those membranes.
1 Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 23 / 10 / 2009 EEG-MEG source reconstruction.
Methods for Dummies M/EEG Analysis: Contrasts, Inferences and Source Localisation Diana Omigie Stjepana Kovac.
Imaging Source Reconstruction in the Bayesian Framework
Finite Element Modelling of the dipole source in EEG
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
M/EEG Analysis in SPM Rik Henson (MRC CBU, Cambridge)
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in M/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
Comparison of imaging techniques
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Anatomical Measures John Ashburner
DCM Demo – Model Specification, Inversion and 2nd Level Inference
Presentation transcript:

Source localization MfD 2010, 17th Feb 2010 Diana Omigie and Stjepana Kovac

Source localization: I. Aim / Application II. Theory Source localization: I Aim / Application II Theory a) What is recorded (EEG / MEG) b) Forward problem Forward solutions c) Inverse problem Inverse solutions d) Inverse solutions: discrete vs. distributed III The buttons in SPM

I Aim To find a focus of brain activity by analysing the electrical activity recorded from surface electrodes (EEG) or SQUID (Superconductive Quantum Interference Device; MEG)

I Application: - focal epilepsy: spikes seizures - evoked potentials: auditory evoked potentials somatosensory evoked potentials cognitive event related potentials -

- IIa What is recorded EPSP Layer IV radial tangential Lopez daSilva, 2004

IIb Forward problem Forward solution How to model the surfaces i.e. the area between recording electrode and cortical generator? Skin, CSF, skull, brain Realistic shape – (BEM isotropic, FEM anisotropic) Plummer, 2008

IIc Inverse problem Inverse solutions Discrete: Equivalent current dipole Distributed (differ in side constraint): Minimum norm (Halmalainen & Ilmoniemi 1984) LORETA (Pascual-Marqui, 1994) MSP – multiple sparse priors (Friston, 2008) ........... + -

IIc Inverse problem Inverse solutions Discrete source analysis Distributed source analysis Current dipole represents an extended brain area Each current dipole represents one small brain segment Number of sources < number of sensors Number of sources >> number of sensors The leadfieldmatrix has more rows (number of sensors) than colums (number of sources) The leadfieldmatrix has more colums than rows Result: Source model and source waveforms 3D Volume image for each timepoint

SPM source analysis Two aspects of source analysis are original in SPM: Based on Bayesian formalism: generic inversion it can incorporate and estimate the relevance of multiple constraints (data driven relevance estimation – Baysian model comparison) The subjects specific anatomy incorporated in the generative model of the data

III The buttons in SPM : Graphical user interface for 3D source localisation

III EEG/MEG imaging pipeline 0) Load the file Source space modeling Data co-registration Forward computation Inverse reconstruction Summarizing the results of the inverse reconstruction as an image

0) Load the file

1) Source space modeling MRI – individual head meshes (boundaries of different head compartments) based on the subject’s structural scan Template – SPM’s template head model based on the MNI brain MRI template

1) Source space modeling Select mesh size: - coarse normal fine

2) Data co-registration Co-register Fiducials – landmark based coregistration Surface matching

2) Data co-registration Methods to co-register “select” from default locations “type” MNI coordinates directory “click” manually each fiducial point from MRI images

3) Forward computation Recommendation: Forward Model Recommendation: Single shell for MEG BEM for EEG

3) Forward computation

4) Inverse reconstruction Invert Imaging VB-ECD Beamforming

4) Inverse reconstruction Default – click “Standard”: “MSP” method will be used. MSP : Multiple Sparse Priors (Friston et al. 2008a) Alternatives: GS (greedy search: default): iteratively add constraints (priors) ARD (automatic relevance determination): iteratively remove irrelevant constraints COH (coherence): LORETA-like smooth prior …

4) Inverse reconstruction TIME Time course of the region with maximal activity SPACE Maximal intensity projection (MIP)

5) Summarizing the results of inverse reconstruction as an image ? Timewindow of interest (ms peri-stimulus time) ? Frequency band of interest (default 0) ? Evoked/ induced inversion applied either to each trial (induced) and then averaged or inversion applied to the averaged trials (evoked) Window

5) Summarizing the results of inverse reconstruction as an image 3D NIfTI images allow GLM based statistical analysis (Random field theory)

Sources indicated under figures - Stavroula Kousta / Martin Chadwick (2007, MfD) - Maro Machizawa / Himn Sabir (2008, MfD) - SPM 8 manual BESA tutorials (http://www.besa.de), M. Scherg