Gas Injection D. Mueller January 26-28, 2010 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential Upgrades to the NBI System for NSTX-Upgrade SPG, TS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Advertisements

V. A. SOUKHANOVSKII, NSTX-U FACILITY ENHANCEMENT BRAINSTORMING, 7 February 2012 Proposed Facility Enhancements for NSTX Upgrade V. A. Soukhanovskii for.
NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
Summary of Presentations on Plasma Start-up and Progress on Small ST devices from STW2011 R. Raman University of Washington, Seattle, WA The Joint Meeting.
Langmuir Probe Peer Review Josh Kallman for the LLD Team February 13, 2009 NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics.
HWK NSTX PAC19, Feb , Reduced Recycling from Lithium Coatings: Recent Results and Future Plans Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman Final XP Review June 5, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
NSTX Status and Plans College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York.
PCS Navigation D. Mueller January 26-28, 2010 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS.
1Physics Operators Course, PCS Navigation, D.J. Battaglia, September 15, 2015 Devon Battaglia, Keith Erickson, Dennis Mueller, Stefan Gerhardt, Roger Raman,
Current status of high k scattering system J. Kim 1, Y. Ren 2, K-C. Lee 3 and R. Kaita 2 1) POSTECH 2) PPPL 3) UC Davis NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318,
1 Update on Run Schedule R. Raman NSTX Team Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 08 February, 2006 Work supported by DOE contract numbers DE-FG02-99ER54519 AM08,
RF Operations: Commissioning the RF systems and antenna conditioning J. Hosea et al. NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U.
Simple As Possible Plasmas (SAPP) on NSTX Adam McLean, ORNL Boundary TSG Session NSTX Research Forum Dec. 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado.
NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew.
College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
NSTX Team Meeting July 21,, 2011 NSTX TF Update NSTX Team Meeting July 21, 2011 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
NSTX Effects of NTSX Upgrades on DiagnosticsFebruary 8, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns.
Prototype Multi-Energy Soft X-ray Diagnostic for EAST Kevin Tritz Johns Hopkins University NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ June 25 th,
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
Second Switching Power Amplifier (SPA) Upgrade Physics Considerations Discussion S.A. Sabbagh 1, and the NSTX Research Team 1 Department of Applied Physics,
Absorber arc mitigation during CHI on NSTX D. Mueller, M.G. Bell, A.L. Roquemore, R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, T.R. Jarboe and the NSTX Research Team DPP09 Meeting.
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
XP817: Transient CHI – Solenoid free Plasma Startup and Coupling to Induction Office of Science R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
1 R Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller 1, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell 1, J. Menard 1, R. Maqueda 2 et al. University of Washington, Seattle 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Xp705: Multimode ion transport: TAE avalanches E D Fredrickson, N A Crocker, N N Gorelenkov, W W Heidbrink, S Kubota, F M Levinton, H Yuh, R E Bell NSTX.
Development of Improved Vertical Position Control S.P. Gerhardt, E. Kolemen ASC Session, NSTX 2011/12 Research Forum Location Date NSTX Supported by College.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle NSTX Run Usage 27 February – 5 May, 2006 NSTX Mid-Run Assessment PPPL, Princeton,
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Plasma break-down, ramp-up and flux consumption D. Mueller January 26-28, 2010 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Energy Confinement Scaling in the Low Aspect Ratio National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) S. M. Kaye, M.G. Bell, R.E. Bell, E.D. Fredrickson, B.P.
Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by Vacuum Pumping, Gauging and RGA Systems W. Blanchard Princeton Plasma.
NSTX Team Meeting February 7, 2007 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX H. Yuh (Nova Photonics) and the NSTX Group, PPPL Presented by S. Kaye 4 th T&C ITPA Meeting Culham Lab, UK March.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman XP Review - ASC Feb 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
Solenoid Free Plasma Startup Progress and Plans R. Raman, D. Mueller S.C. Jardin (Theory) for the NSTX Research Team NSTX PAC-29 PPPL B318 January 26-28,
NSTX Team Meeting December 21, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
Enhancement of edge stability with lithium wall coatings in NSTX Rajesh Maingi, Oak Ridge National Lab R.E. Bell, B.P. LeBlanc, R. Kaita, H.W. Kugel, J.
Effect of 3-D fields on edge power/particle fluxes between and during ELMs (XP1026) A. Loarte, J-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, and J.-K. Park and the.
NSTX-Upgrade Magnetics And Related Diagnostics SPG NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
First results of fast IR camera diagnostic J-W. Ahn and R. Maingi ORNL NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318, PPPL June 22, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTX NSTX LidsJuly 6, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar.
NSTX Team Meeting June 30, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
V. A. Soukhanovskii, NSTX FY2009 Mid-run assessment meeting, 17 June 2009, Princeton, NJ 1 of 9 NSTX Boundary Physics Topical Science Group Summary V.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL ITPA PPPL 5-7 Oct Confinement and Transport in NSTX: Lithiumized vs non-Lithiumized Plasmas Culham.
Planning for Toroidal Lithium Divertor Target for NSTX and Supporting Experiments on CDX-U/LTX R. Kaita Boundary Physics Science Focus Group Meeting July.
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
NSTX 2007 MHD XP Review – J. Menard 1 Optimization of RFA detection algorithms during dynamic error field correction Presented by: J.E. Menard, PPPL Final.
Presently Planned Vacuum-Side Diagnostics for the NSTX-Upgrade Center Column NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
XP-945: ELM Pacing via Vertical Position Jogs S.P. Gerhardt, J.M. Canik, D. Gates, R. Goldston, R. Hawryluk, R. Maingi, J. Menard, S. Sabbagh, A. Sontag.
Preliminary Results from XP1020 RFA Measurements J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA NSTX Monday Physics.
Raman, Dec051 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda.
V. A. Soukhanovskii, XP1002 Review, 9 June 2010, Princeton, NJ 1 of 9 XP 1002: Core impurity density and P rad reduction using divertor condition modifications.
Implementation of a 3D halo neutral model in the TRANSP code and application to projected NSTX-U plasmas S. S. Medley 1, D. Liu 2, M. V. Gorelenkova 1,
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting –Masa Ono August 15, 2014 NSTX-U Team Meeting August 15, 2014 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
1 Status of the 2008 ASC TSG Run plan Presented by D. A. Gates (J. Menard Deputy) At the NSTX Mid-run asessment PPPL April 16, 2008 Supported by Office.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle Update on the NSTX Run Plan PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 15 May, 2006 Supported by Office.
Monitoring impact of the LLD Adam McLean, ORNL T. Gray, R. Maingi Lithium, TSG group preliminary research forum PPPL, B252 Nov. 23, 2009 NSTX Supported.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Correlation between Electron Transport and Shear Alfven Activity in NSTX College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
XP-950: XP-950: Dependence of metallic impurity accumulation on I p and the outer gap in the presence of lithium deposition S. Paul, S. P. Gerhardt are.
NSTX NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design ReviewJune 22-24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Presentation transcript:

Gas Injection D. Mueller January 26-28, 2010 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew U Ioffe Inst RRC Kurchatov Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST POSTECH ASIPP ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep U Quebec College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Maryland U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin NSTX Supported by 1

NSTX NSTX-PAC-25 – Solenoid Free Start-up (Mueller)February 18-20, 2009 NSTX Gas Injector Locations 2 HFS gas Center Stack Shoulder LFS Bay J Upper LFS Bay J Lower LFS Bay K Top Lower Dome Branch 5 Supersonic Gas LFS (Low Field Side) Injectors are Piezo-electric valves with ~150 Tl/s Center Stack, Shoulder, Branch 5 and Lower Dome are all puff valves Supersonic Gas Injector (SGI) is a moveable high velocity (Mach 5) injector that uses a shaped nozzle to achieve the directional, high velocity flow NSTX fueling rates: Gas valves Tl/s NBI ~ 4 Tl/s SGI Tl/s Pumping speed Turbo pump ~3400 l/s, NB cryo-panels ~50,000 l/s Vessel volume 28,700 l, NB box volume ~ 50,000 l

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Piezo-electric Valves 3 3 piezo valves located on the Low Field side LFS of the vacuum vessel are used for –Prefill gas for breakdown 2 x Torr GP ~ 0.3 x D 2 ~.5 x10 20 e - in plasma at 10 ms ~ 100% –Fueling plasma, especially early in the discharge –Used to supply gas for GDC The valves are operated in a pulse-width modulation mode Avoids non reproducible flow vs voltage (max flow rate is more stable over a long time) Each valve is supplied gas from a plenum that is filled to about 1500 T between shots

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Example of LFS injection 4 The ion gauge used to measure the prefill pressure has a time response of ~ 50 ms this is too slow to use a standard PID feedback algorithm Instead the requested prefill pressure is used to estimate the amount of gas required and the flow rate of the piezo valve is used to determine how long to open the valve. 50 ms after the valve is closed the vessel pressure is checked against the request up to about t = -200 ms s 3e-5 Torr Ion Gauge Valve Voltage Micro-Ion Gauge Plenum Pressure 1680 Torr 1720 Torr 120 V 0 0 Reference Plenum pressure has PF and TF pickup

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Early LFS gas required to avoid MHD 5 Using the Prefill to supply enough gas to avoid early H-alpha spikes and MHD can result in discharge failing –Solution add early gas puff from LFS injectors –Use of Li increases the required gas puff value

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Puff valves are located on the High Field Side HFS of the vacuum vessel and the lower divertor region 6 Used for –Fueling after T0, typically ~ 90 ms – Improves access to H-Mode –Prefill for CHI (Branch5 provides a local gas source in lower gap) The valves are air-pressure- driven, solenoid-actuated fast valves that simply dump the contents of a pre-loaded plenum, there is a delay (~300 ms) from issuing the open command until the valve actually opens.

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Flow rate from Puff valves 7 The Lower Dome and Branch 5 valves are connected to their injection points inside the vacuum by large diameter tubes (~1.3 m, 3.5 cm I.D.) and have a short delay of ~16 ms and rapid pump out The Center Stack and Shoulder injectors are routed from the fast solenoid valves to their injection points by long thin tubing (~ 2 m long, cm I.D.) –The gas flow rate has a sharp increase to maximum and a long decay afterwards CS Plenum volume.040 l

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Supersonic Gas Injector has been used to replace the HFS gas for access to H-Mode 8 The SGI is comprised of -A de Laval converging-diverging graphite nozzle -A commercial piezoelectric gas valve -A diagnostic package (Langmuir probe, thermocouples and magnetic pick-up coils) -mounted on a movable probe at the midplane -flow rate up to 4.55e21 particles/s, Mach number of about 4. Vlad Soukhanovskii SOFE07

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Supersonic gas jet penetration mechanism is different than that of conventional gas injection 9  High density plasmoid blocks jet from deep penetration into magnetized plasma  Depth of penetration is ultimately determined by jet pressure and plasma kinetic and magnetic pressure  Desirable for fueling are molecular clustering and/or droplet formation in jet achieved at very high pressure and cryogenic temperatures Gas jet neutral density Plasmoid  Unlike conventional gas injection, penetration depth of supersonic gas jet cannot be described by single neutral particle ionization / charge exchange penetration model  Supersonic gas jet is a low divergence high pressure, high density gas stream with low ionization degree - bulk edge/SOL electrons do not fully penetrate gas jet BtBt References: Rozhansky et al. NF 46 (2006) 367 Lang et. al. PPCF 47 (2005) 1495

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Supersonic gas jet fueling efficiency is x 2-5 higher than that of conventional gas injection 10  Instantaneous fueling efficiency (FE) is calculated as dN e /dt *  -1  In ohmic plasmas, FE is a function of SGI-LCFS distance (SGI at  ~ 40 Torr l /s) in LSN configuration  FE in inner wall -limited plasmas higher than in diverted config.’s 0.75 MA Ohmic  FE in LSN H-mode plasmas (SGI at  ~ 65 Torr l /s ~ 4.2 x s -1 ). IW-limited L-mode target plasma for lithium experiments

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 SGI-U fueling favorably compares to conventional gas injection fueling 11  Three discharges with different fueling are compared: reduced HFS rate + LFS similar to SGI-U reduced HFS + SGI-U at R=1.57 m reduced HFS+SGI-U at R=1.98 m  In the SGI-U-fueled discharges divertor pressure lower divertor recycling lower midplane pressure lower  When SGI-U is closer to separatrix (R=1.57 m vs R=1.98 m) - higher plasma density is obtained  However, all fueling methods result in high divertor ionization source, and monotonic density rise : need active pumping for mitigation Vlad Soukhanovskii EPS08

NSTX Physics Operations Course Gas Injection (Mueller)Jan 26-28, 2010 Summary 12 Piezoelectric valves used in pulse-width modulation mode  Prefill  Early fueling  GDC Puff valves various locations and conductances  Fueling / H-Mode access  Chi start-up Supersonic Gas Injector  Fueling / H-mode access  More efficient fueling than normal valves