DATA REPORT: MCLEAN COUNTY COMMUNITY PERMANENCY ENHANCEMENT ACTION TEAM Jeannie Higdon Jacki Schuster.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Copyright 2013 aha! Process, Inc.  1 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2013 Annual Social and Economic Supplement.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Overview of Poverty and Unemployment in Lima and Bluffton.
  Shane’s Story.
Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
Arizona Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
Heidi Gulbrandson– Action Team Leader Hillary Millner Sunah Shin Champaign County Action Team.
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2013 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
The Characteristics of Employed Female Caregivers and their Work Experience History Sheri Sharareh Craig Alfred O. Gottschalck U.S. Census Bureau Housing.
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Demographics 14,583 people. 6,137 housing units The racial makeup 97.31% White, 0.23% African American, 2.03% Native American, 0.76% Asian,
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
How Does Ability to Speak English Affect Earnings?
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
California Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
Persistence in High School and College: What Does the Research Have to Say? Future of Children Conference Princeton University April 30, 2010.
CSWE Child Welfare Symposium Child Welfare Workforce Retention Research in New York State New York State Social Work Education Consortium.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Understanding Health Disparities in Texas Maureen Rubin, Ph.D., MSW Assistant Professor Department of Social Work University of Texas at San Antonio Nazrul.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
“Building an Inclusive Community” Presented by Dr. Mordean Taylor-Archer Vice Provost for Diversity and International Affairs 1 University of Louisville.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
Alaska Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Linkages Program Mark Twain Mark Twain.
So What do we look like. Who are the Poor? In 2010, 15.1 percent of all persons lived in poverty. Approximately 47 million or 1 in 7 In 2010, 15.1 percent.
Action Plan Update July 8, Where We Are Community meetings Community Conditions Survey Results Invite Community Leaders Last Action Plan Define.
Louisiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Indiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Michigan’s Child Welfare System Why is Overrepresentation a Critical Issue?
1 Sharing the Aid Awareness Challenge: How to Reach Diverse Groups in Urban and Rural Settings Jane Collins Cissy VanSickle Session 23.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Missouri Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Sara Pieper and Nikki Domico Swk /10/2008. Macon County Demographics 14% of Macon County is considered under the poverty line 82% of the population.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Pennsylvania Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Who’s Minding the Kids in the Summer? Child Care Arrangements for Summer 2006 Lynda Laughlin - U.S. Census Bureau Joseph Rukus - Cornell University Annual.
Texas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
U.S. Hispanic Population: Population Size and Composition.
Community Foundation of Collier County Our Mission: To improve the quality of life in Collier County by connecting donors to community needs and providing.
Kentucky Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Illinois Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Economic Challenges Chapter 13 Section 3 Poverty.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
New Hampshire Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Vermont Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Child Welfare Permanency and Racial Equity Efforts in Illinois Angela Baron-Jeffrey Center for Child Welfare and Education Child Welfare Advisory Council.
Advocates for Children of New Jersey Kids Count: Mercer County
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Advocates for Children of New Jersey Kids Count: Mercer County
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2015 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
Littleton, CO “Anything but little!”.
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Presentation transcript:

DATA REPORT: MCLEAN COUNTY COMMUNITY PERMANENCY ENHANCEMENT ACTION TEAM Jeannie Higdon Jacki Schuster

McLean County Action Team  The McLean County Action team consists of: The Juvenile Court Judge DCFS Supervisor, Jaime Ralph Karen Blum, The Baby Fold McLean County Health Department POS Agencies within the community (Catholic Charities, The Baby Fold, Children’s Home + Aid) Family Community Resource Center Assistant State’s Attorney’s Public Defenders Illinois State University Any interested community members willing to work towards and support the goals of the program.

 Project Goal: As a result of the presented data, the MCAT looked for ways to engage birth parents earlier, thereby decreasing the length of stay a child is in substitute care and increasing the chances for a successful reunification.

Our specific project  Through the Court Improvement Program, our team is in the process of completing a grant request for funds to support a parent mentor.  As students of the program, we sought ways to support the goal of the action team.

 The goal of the mentoring is for a birth parent who has successfully navigated their way through the court and child welfare system to share their experiences and guide the parents through their current case. They will be available to answer questions and offer support when parents most need it. The action team believes that by engaging parents immediately upon case opening that it will increase the family’s chances for a successful reunification in a shorter length of time.

COLLECTED DATA What did we find? The following slides are based on data collected from the Child and Family Research Center The data can be accessed at:

Although African American children consistently make up 9%- 11% of the total population under age of 18, they represent 36%- 48% of the total number of indicated reports from the year 2001 to 2007.

The number of children who have a substantiated report within 12 months of having an open intact family case.

With regards to children entering care following 12 months of intact family, there appears to be no consistent pattern. The numbers vary greatly year to year with the numbers scattered. % of Intact families who had children enter care within 12 months

These numbers would indicate that on average, African American children are moved more frequently while in care. Although the data does represent that the percentage of children has decreased since Percentage of children who moved more than two times within a year of removal

These numbers would indicate that previously fewer African American children were placed with relatives. However the percentage of kinship placements has increased since Number of children placed in kinship care when they first enter placement

Number of kids by placement by ethnic breakdown

 African American children are more consistently placed with kin.  Caucasian children are more likely to be placed in foster care.

 The median length of stay is longer for African American children.  Caucasian children have a shorter median length of stay than the average for all children.

Average of median length of stay by race African American months Hispanic13.2 months Other17.5 months Caucasian15.87 months All Children months

 Children placed with kin are more likely to be within 5 miles of home of origin.  African American children are more likely to be placed with kin, thus are more likely to be within 5 miles of home of origin.

 Caucasian children were consistent with the percentage of all children to attain permanence.  Hispanic children were more likely to achieve permanence.  African American children were less likely to achieve permanence.

 The percentage increased by about 20% over the years.  Hispanic children were less likely to achieve permanence than any other group with the exception of  African American and Caucasian children are consistent with the total children to achieve permanency.

 Children in the “other” category achieved at a much higher rate.  Hispanic children were less likely to achieve permanence than any other group from  African American children are consistent with the average, except in  Caucasian children were less likely to achieve permanence at this time.

U.S. Census Bureau Data The following slides represent the population in McLean County.

Median Income The median income in McLean country for all residents is $51,176. Caucasian residents: Average household income (1999): $48,152 Average family income (1999): $62,164 Income per capita: $22,970 African American residents: Average household income (1999): $30,578 Average family income (1999): $38,221 Income per capita: $15,544 Hispanic residents: Average household income (1999): $37,692 Average family income (1999): $42,868 Income per capita: $12,945

Income by Gender  Population 16 years and older male: $50,950female: $51, 263  Full time year round workers with earnings male: $28,650female: $21,211  Median earnings male: $48,506female: $36,547

Median Income by Household  Households: $47,021  Total: $61,073  Married-couple families: $67,355  Female householder, no husband present: $29,317  Non-family households: $26,416

Median earnings by educational attainment  Less than high school graduate male: $26,500female: $16,133  High school graduate male: $34,806female: $21,703  Some college or associate’s degree male: $40,672female: $26,653  Bachelor’s degree male: $50,037female: $36,221  Graduate or professional degree male: $65,533female: $44,177

Educational Attainment in McLean County  Less than 9 th grade: 2,631 (3.0%)  9 th to 12 th grade, no diploma: 5,464 (6.3%)  High school graduate: 24,622 (28.2%)  Some college, no degree: 17,897 (20.5%)  Associate degree: 5,060 (5.8%)  Bachelor’s degree: 21,986 (25.2%)  Graduate or professional degree: 9,560 (11.0%)

Educational Attainment by Ethnicity  Caucasian statistics: High school diploma: 72,544 Bachelor’s Degree or higher: 28,541  African American statistics: High school diploma: 3,366 Bachelor’s degree or higher: 1,279  Hispanic/Latino statistics: High school diploma: 1,188 Bachelor’s degree or higher: 382

Household Composition  Caucasian: Average household size: 2 Average family size: 3  African American: Average household size: 3 Average family size: 3  Hispanic/Latino: Average household size: 3 Average family size: 4

Poverty Line  Caucasian: Families living below the poverty line: 1,001 Individuals living below the poverty line: 10,565  African American: Families living below the poverty line: 377 Individuals living below the poverty line: 1,924  Hispanic/Latino: Families living below the poverty line: 102 Individuals living below the poverty line: 727

Kay Brown/ GAO study According to the GAO results, there were several key factors contributing to the proportion of African American Children in foster care. These included: 1. Higher rate of poverty 2. Challenges in Accessing support services (Parent Mentor) 3. Racial bias and distrust 4. Difficulties in finding appropriate adoptive homes (Kay Brown/ Government Accountability Office 2008)

 Most states surveyed reported using various strategies intended to address these issues. Some of the various strategies included; 1. Building community supports 2. Cultral competency training for caseworkers 3. Diligence with kinship care placements Significantly for this particular Government Accountability Study, it was emphasized the importance of “analyzing the data to address the proportion of African American children in care in order to better understand the issue and devise strategies to address it.” (Kay Brown/ Government Accountability Office 2008 pg 2)

What do we do with this information?  How do we meet the needs identified in the previously mentioned data?  What populations seem to have the highest representation with the lowest access to services?  How does the action team intend to address these concerns?

McLean County Project Description  Develop and submit a grant in attempts to obtain financial support for the project.  Planning for implementation of a biological parent support group  Help plan job responsibilities for parent mentor position  Write the job description  Write the preliminary application for the admittance to the support group  Help plan basic guidelines for participation

Why a support group?  The parent mentor leading the group will be a person that has been successful in reunification with their children. This mentor will then be in the position to provide support and assistance to families that are entering the juvenile court system. By having support, it is intended to help reduce the stress on the parent(s) and allow for a more timely reunification if possible.

Mentor Position  The parent mentor will be a paid position with about 10 hours a week of work.  The expectation is for the mentor to run a bi-weekly support group meeting, and allow for phone contact or meet by appointment with parents in the group.

The Next Step  The community action team is looking for more participation from community members, including inviting other involved agencies to participate on the team.  Continue to notify community members of when and where the meetings will happen. Continue to invite these members in hopes that they will become involved in the future.  The action team will continue to move forward with the grant in attempts to best serve the needs of the families within our communities.

Project Drawbacks Due to the time constraint of the fall semester, we were only able to participate in the initial planning of this support group. We were only able to attend two MCAT meetings aside from our individual meetings for interviews and project status meetings. Group members will have to move forward with the materials presented to them and finalize the grant process.

Final Summary In closing, we would like to thank not only our action team members, but those in the surrounding communities. Through this project we have learned that each action team is attempting to address the issue of minority overrepresentation within their communities served. Also that it is not a one person commitment, but that it takes a community to bring about change.

References  Government Accountability Office (2008, July). African American Children in Foster Care HHS and Congressional Actions Could Help Reduce Proportion in Care, Retrieved from