1 TSS Report PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 26-27, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2004 NERC, NPCC & New England Compliance Programs John Norden Manager, Operations Training, Documentation & Compliance August 31, 2003 RC Meeting.
Advertisements

Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 11, 2006 ASTM Training Session Bob Morgan Brynn Iwanowski.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Symposia, Workshops and Publications September 2013 ASTM.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES September.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Membership & Roster Maintenance September 2013 ASTM Officers.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Membership & Roster Maintenance Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Kevin Shanahan 1.
1 Standards Development: An Overview Discovery to Delivery Topic Committee Meeting October 30, 2007 Karen A. Wetzel NISO Standards Program Manager
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
GSMP Local Community Network Enhanced Process Meeting Sept. 13, 2007.
WECC Board of Directors April 21-23, 2004 Seattle, Washington WECC Procedure for Reporting of System Events Disturbance Reports Rod Maslowski OC Vice Chairperson.
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
Standards Development and Approval Process Steve Rueckert Director of Standards Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake.
WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE June 18, 2009 Salt Lake City, UT Base Case Coordination System (BCCS) Request For Information.
Base Case Coordination System RFP David Franklin BCCS System Review Group/Planning Tool Subcommittee (PTS) Pre-Bid Conference Salt Lake City, Utah.
Report of the Planning Coordination Committee December 2006 WECC BOD Meeting Cabo Del Sol, Los Cabos.
Model Specification Requirements MSRATF Meeting – Mar 11, 2013 Stephanie Lu, MVWG Chair Seattle City Light.
1 MSRATF Update to TSS (Modeling SPS and RAS Ad Hoc Task Force) Scope of Work Approval January 25, 2013 Joe Seabrook Puget Sound Energy.
Process for Developing and Approving WECC Regional Criteria Preschedule Process Regional Criteria Drafting Team Meeting Conference Call - Webinar October.
WECC TEPPC – March 25, 2010 Proposed Revisions to PCC Regional Planning Document 1 Proposed Revisions to Overview of Policies and Procedures for Regional.
WECC Response to BAL-002-WECC-1 Remand Order December 10, 2010 WECC Board of Directors Meeting Steve Rueckert Director of Standards.
Document Categorization Steve Ashbaker Director of Operations Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake City, UT May 6-7,
WECC Operating Committee Report WECC Member Meeting April 20, 2006.
1 Compliance Report WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 7-8, 2006 Steve Rueckert Director, Standards and Compliance.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Standards WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 7-8, 2006.
Bulk Electric System Definition Task Force Update Reliability Policy Issues Committee March 4, 2010 Brian Theaker BESDTF Chair.
WECC TEPPC – March 14, 2008 PCC – TEPPC Coordination Roles & Responsibilities – RE Kondziolka 1 PCC – TEPPC Coordinating Roles and Responsibilities WECC.
VGS-Planning Work Group (PWG) Activity Update to PCC Ann Finley PWG Liaison to PCC Metropolitan Water District of So. California June 9-11, 2010.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
Harmonized implementation of CDM Accreditation CDM-Accreditation Panel.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
1 ICOTS What weve learned since October 6, GETTING STARTED.
2 HOME DELIVERED MEALS Waiver Workshop Presented by: Regional and Local Services (RLS) Access and Intake /Area Agency on Aging (A&I/AAA) May 27-28, 2009.
Making the System Operational
The UEA House of Delegates Directing YOUR Association through the democratic process. 1.
Configuration management
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
ABC Technology Project
VOORBLAD.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Jerry Rust Chair - Underfrequency Load Shedding Criterion Team
WECC Planning Coordinating Committee Brian K. Keel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee June, 2010 WECC Reliability Subcommittee Report.
Marv Landauer Report to TSS on Annual Study Program Report Review Task Force April 2012 TSS Meeting Salt Lake City.
NERC PC Issues Update WECC PCC Meeting John Simpson, RRI Energy Planning Coordination Committee Seattle, WA June , 2010.
SRWG Activity Report (as presented) March 21-23, 2012 TSS Meeting #160 WECC Offices Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Graham, SRWG Chair/David Franklin TSS.
CUG Meeting June 3 – 5 Salt Lake City, UT
W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes Results Based Drafting 2013.
Functional Areas & Positions
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response Update for Texas RE RSC
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
PSSA Preparation.
African Aviation Training Organization
Tracy Rolstad TSS Chair TSS Chair Report October 2014 Salt Lake City, UT 1.
George Zhou, VGITF Chair October 14, 2015 Salt Lake City, Utah Variable Generation Interconnection Task Force Update to PCC.
Tracy Rolstad TSS Chair TSS Chair Report July 2014 Salt Lake City, UT 1.
Andrew Christensen, SRWG Chair
System Review Work Group Update to TSS
Standards Development Process
Presentation transcript:

1 TSS Report PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 26-27, 2006

2 Approval Item Generation Testing Implementation Plan

3 Status Reports MVWG WECC Dynamic Modeling Procedure Load Model Wind Generation Model Wind Generation Task Force Reactive Reserve Work Group Progress Reports Projects Progressing in Three-Phase Rating Process SRWG (David Franklin – Chair)

4 Generation Testing Implementation Plan Responding to a PCC assignment of TSS/MVWG, Generator Testing Task Force (GTTF) prepared a Generation Testing Implementation Plan (GTIP) GTIP includes: transition plan for the new Generation Testing Policy Clarification on the treatment of identical units within the same power plnt

5 Generation Testing Implementation Plan – Issue 1 Issue 1: Generator Owners who did not perform baseline testing in accordance with the original requirements are non-compliant with the Policy. Issue 1 Response/Implementation: Generator Owners that are non-compliant with the baseline test requirement (as defined in section B.1.2 of the Policy) shall provide to WECC staff, by December 31, 2006, a schedule to perform baseline testing and model validation. The Generator Owner should coordinate the schedule with the appropriate Transmission Planner (s). The Generator Owner will be considered non- compliant with the Policy until the baseline testing and model validation is completed.

6 Generation Testing Implementation Plan – Issue 2 Issue 2: A large number of Generator Owners, who complied with the original baseline test requirement, are required to perform model re-validation. Spread generator re-validation over a five-year period. Coordinate the re-validation efforts with the respective replacement programs, as well as maintenance cycles. WECC should have the authority to accept or reject the re-validation schedule proposed by the Generator Owners.

7 Generation Testing Implementation Plan – Issue 2 (continued) Issue 2 Response/Implementation : Generator Owners that have complied with the baseline test requirements (as defined in section B.1.2 of the Policy) shall provide to WECC staff, by December 31, 2006, a schedule to perform model re-validation (as defined in section B.1.3 of the Policy). The Generator Owner should coordinate the schedule with its the appropriate Transmission Planner(s). The Generator Owner will be considered compliant with the Policy as long as the initial model re-validation is completed within 5 years from December 31, or from when the baseline test and model validation was first completed; whichever comes first. Subsequent model re-validation should be done every 5 years.

8 Generation Testing Implementation Plan – Issue 3 Issue 3: Baseline testing and model validation of the sister units in the same Generating Facility. Issue 3 Response/Implementation: In case of multiple identical generating units at the same Generating Facility, baseline testing (as defined in section B.1.2 of the Policy) shall be performed on at least one of the representative units. Model data validation (as defined in section B.1.3 of the Policy) shall be performed for all generating units.

9 Generation Testing Implementation Plan – Issue 4 Issue 4: Wind Farm Model Validation Issue 4 Response/Implementation: The technical guidelines developed in conjunction with the Policy, as well as existing WECC generator testing guidelines, apply to conventional generating units. Similar guidelines will be developed to address model data and model validation requirements for wind power plants. Those guidelines will go through the WECC approval process.

10 Proposed Motion TSS Requests PCC Approval of the Generation Testing Implementation Plan

11 WECC Dynamic Modeling Procedure Purpose Establish procedure for development and maintenance of models, and for the submittal of data to WECC. Improve the quality of the WECC Master Dynamic Data File Assist WECC staff in managing submittals of models Clarify modeling procedure for WECC members Improve interaction with program developers Identify need for new models and improvement to existing models Identify and report compatibility and conversion issues

12 WECC Dynamic Modeling Procedure (continued) MVWG is the WECC group responsible for assuring the model database is kept up to date. Any models added to the WECC master dynamic model library require acceptance from MVWG. This Procedure will formalize the process for MVWG acceptance. The Dynamic Model library will be posted on WECC website.

13 Load Modeling Development Status WECC-CIEE/PIER MOU approved by BOD Air-conditioner testing and modeling Load composition analysis (component data base) Load monitoring (white paper) Load data uncertainty analysis Finalized specification for Composite Load Model Architecture and Prototype Load Model Data Tool under development Going Forward Implement composite load model in PSLF Version 1.0 (without single phase motor model) Solicit bids and contract for load model data tool Load model validation (some validation base cases created)

14 1.Basic Research 2.Load Model Prototype 3.Sensitivity Studies 4.Fill in Research Gaps 5.Composite Load Model Structure 6.Load Model Data Tool 7.Load Model Databases 8.Load Model Validation / Sensitivity Studies 9.Load Monitoring 10.System Performance Studies 11.Advanced - Load Composition Model Now FY07 Done FY08 Load Modeling Development

15 Wind Generator Model Development Status Nearing completion standard Type 3 model implementation in PSLF and PSSE Obtained additional $45K from WECC for implementation of three remaining models Collaboration with wide range of stakeholders continues Going Forward Continue development of Type 1, 2 and 4 standard models Prepare guide on steady-state modeling of wind power plants Independent of dynamic models Target date: December 2006 Draft Proposal to CIEE/PIER for follow-up work NREL leading effort; WGTF, WGMG will be technical advisors Scope of work includes near-term needs such as monitoring, dynamic model validation, wind power plant equivalencing, best practices for modeling wind power plants in WECC

Modeling Workshop Logistics November (Tue-Wed) 2006, Las Vegas, NV Coordinated with annual SRWG workshop per TSS request Major Topics NERC/WECC Modeling Standards Generator Testing and Model Validation Wind Modeling Load Modeling System Monitoring and Applications

17 Wind Generation Task Force Working with RS on development of a Voltage Ride- through Standard Cover low voltage and high voltage periods after clearing a system fault Going Forward Coordination with existing NERC/FERC/IEEE/IEC requirements FERC power factor range (+/- 0.95, only if TP can demonstrate the need through technical studies) may conflict with WECC MORC voltage control requirement Reactive and Voltage Control Reactive capability at low generation levels Dynamic performance for voltage control and or/reactive compensation Off-Nominal Frequency Verification of wind turbine frequency trip settings with the WECC Off-Nominal Frequency Standard.

18 Reactive Reserve Work Group Distributed a Survey Implementation of Planning Standards I.D: Voltage Support and Reactive Power Directed to use the Guide to WECC/NERC Planning Standards I.D: Voltage Support and Reactive Power to help you complete survey Completed survey due to WECC Staff by November 17, 2006.

19 Progress Reports Member Systems reporting significant facilities in the 2006 Annual Progress reports to WECC from which, as of October 13, 2006 no report has been received: None Member Systems reporting significant facilities in the WECC Transmission Database from which, as of October 13, 2006, no report has been received: None

20 Significant facilities reported in the WECC Transmission Database as of October 17, 2006, which were not included in Annual Progress Reports submitted:

21 Three Phase Rating Status – Phase 1 * Initiated Regional Planning Process. Has not yet requested a Project Review Group or submitted a Comprehensive Progress Report

22 Three Phase Rating Status – Phase 2

23 Three Phase Rating Status – Phase 3

24 Three Phase Rating Status – Expedited

25 SRWG Report – WECC Base Case Data Preparation Process David Franklin, SRWG Chair to present