Craig L. Williams UFAS Liaison Market Interface Manager ECC Cost Benefit Analysis Review July 17-19, 2013 Standing Committees Joint Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Draft of proposed metrics for the WEQ BPS to conduct analysis and evaluation of the Parallel Flow Visualization pilot project. (PFV Pilot)
Advertisements

Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements NERC ORS Meeting Toronto, Ontario September 23-24, 2009 Jim.
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 2, 2010.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report Robin Chung October 24, 2013 Anaheim, CA.
Modeling Tres-Amigas Modeling Work Group Meeting August 27, 2009 WECC Staff.
WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE June 18, 2009 Salt Lake City, UT Base Case Coordination System (BCCS) Request For Information.
North American Energy Standards Board Upadate Presented by Bob Harshbarger.
Overview Seams Coordination Process. 2 Introduction Midwest ISO Non-profit organization that manages the reliable flow of electricity across much of the.
Primary Objectives of WIT
Modeling Tres-Amigas Update Modeling Work Group Meeting February 10, 2011 WECC Staff.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator Task Force Report
WECC Operating Committee Report WECC Member Meeting April 20, 2006.
Standards Update WECC Board of Directors Technical Session December 5, 2007 Albuquerque, New Mexico Steve Rueckert Director of Standards.
1 ColumbiaGrid Activities Supporting Integration of Renewable Generation Presentation to the Market Interface Committee At the October 30, 2008 Meeting.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report David Lemmons March 27, 2013 Salt Lake City, UT.
Unscheduled Flow What direction for the Future
ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI)
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Status of NERC Standards Activity WECC PCC Meeting March 6-7, 2008.
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
Brenda Ambrosi Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair e-Tag Denial Issue Referred to Joint Guidance Committee.
USF Path 66 Analysis Update January 31, 2013 Robin Chung UFAS Chair.
Addition Facts
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
1 Bradley Nickell Director of Transmission Planning 10-Year Regional Transmission Plan WECC Overview September 2011.
Gas-Electric Coordination Update JGC Meeting August 23-24, 2012.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
Spoofing State Estimation
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
Reliability Subcommittee Report Vishal C. Patel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee March 2014.
MIC RBC Task Force Report Raj Hundal Feb 1, 2013.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Task Force Joint Guidance Committee Presentation and Motion to the OC & MIC Standing Committee Meetings March 27-29,
Study Results Common Case Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the results of the 2022 Common Case.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Al McBride MANAGER, AREA TRANSMISSION PLANNING Existing Import Interfaces: Transmission Transfer Capabilities and The Calculation of Tie Benefits DECEMBER.
RPG: September 24, Approach for ERCOT Independent Review of the 2013 Houston Import Project Jeff Billo, Manager, Transmission Planning September.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Jeremy West Sr. Operations Engineer.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report for ISAS Robin Chung January 28, 2015 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator
UFMP methodology changes in the updated webSAS February 2015 A video presentation reviewing the webSAS UFMP methodology changes going into effect March.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report for ISAS Robin Chung August 20, 2014 Salt Lake City, UT.
RAWG Agenda Item LAR Data WECC Staff. Data Elements Generator information – Existing – Changes Monthly Peak Demand and Energy (actual year and.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report Robin Chung October 8, 2014 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee ISAS Report Pete Heiman April 20, 2016 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
1 Parallel Flow Visualization Goals NAESB BPS Meeting September 15-16, 2010.
Kenneth Silver Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
Brett Wangen Director of Engineering, Peak Reliability
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee MIC/OC Report
Doug Reese, USFEATF Chair
Kenneth Silver Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
Mgr. Interconnection Reliability Initiatives
Mgr. Interconnection Reliability Initiatives
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Pushing the Button / Relief Duration Design Areas
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC)
Path Operator Task Force Kickoff April 3, 2013 Webinar
Doug Reese, USFEATF Chair
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report
UFMP methodology changes in the updated webSAS
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee ISAS Report
Path Operator Task Force Kickoff April 3, 2013 Webinar
NERC Congestion Management
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report for MIC
Jeremy West Sr. Operations Engineer
RC Transition and Tools (WIT, ECC) Update
Presentation transcript:

Craig L. Williams UFAS Liaison Market Interface Manager ECC Cost Benefit Analysis Review July 17-19, 2013 Standing Committees Joint Session

2 WECC currently utilizes a congestion management protocol that has at its core a software program called webSAS that calculates the magnitude of unscheduled flows and assigns relief obligations accordingly. Review of Current Status

3 However, it has also long been known that the webSAS calculations are not complete and therefore it does not provide correct estimations of the magnitude of unscheduled flows, and does not assign relief obligations accurately. Review of Current Status

4 The Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) is a project that would create a next generation software program that would correct deficiencies in the webSAS program and add additional capabilities to provide broader tools for congestion management in the Western Interconnection. Review of Current Status

5 As part of the cost justification for the Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC), the WECC RC in conjunction with the ECC Advisory Committee identified four (4) major deficiencies currently in the webSAS program and methodologies for the RC to estimate the costs associated with these issues. Review of Current Status

6 This analysis quantifies the costs of the known significant webSAS issues. This analysis does not quantify the additional interconnection benefits that will result from the ability of the ECC to manage congestion on any defined element, and not just the Qualified Paths. Review of Current Status

7 The assumptions used in this analysis were reviewed against interconnection interchange data from WIT, load data supplied by the WECC RC, and utilized the total webSAS curtailment numbers on COI from Review of Current Status

8 The analysis estimated the amount of inaccurate curtailments that result from each webSAS error over a period of a year. The analysis then multiplies that total against a cost per MW of $20.67, that was determined by the MIC RBC Task Force. Review of Current Status

9 Costs due to webSAS deficiencies webSAS Calculation Deficiency ExplanationCost Per Year Lack of Real-Time Transmission Topology webSAS uses Transmission Distribution Factors (TDFs) that are calculated twice a year assuming that all lines are in service. The error associated with this assumption varies day- to-day but distorts the calculated flows and relief obligations. $535,619

10 Costs due to webSAS deficiencies webSAS Calculation Deficiency ExplanationCost Per Year Does not account for non-tagged uses of the Transmission System. Approximately 40% of the energy flowing on the transmission system in the Western Interconnection is not tagged and webSAS does not account for these uses of the system. $481,652

11 Costs due to webSAS deficiencies webSAS Calculation Deficiency ExplanationCost Per Year Lack of Real-Time Generation Outage Topology webSAS does not account for generation outages in real-time or in its base calculations. The difference between the base case calculations and the actual generation profiles in the interconnection result in additional error. $101,727

12 Costs due to webSAS deficiencies webSAS Calculation Deficiency ExplanationCost Per Year Lack of POR/POD Granularity for e-Tag Evaluation webSAS utilizes a series of large zones for estimating the transmission distribution of flows on the system. The ECC would correct and enhance this calculation to bring it to the POR/POD level consistent with the e-tag. $111,900

13 Real-Time Transmission Topology $535,619 Untagged Uses of the System $481,652 Real-Time Generation Topology $101,727 Lack of POR/POD Granularity $111,900 _____________________ TOTAL$1,230,898 Total Estimated Costs per Year

Craig L. Williams UFAS Liaison Market Interface Manager Questions?