Load Responsibility in the NWPP Footprint

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRITF Update ISAS Vegas January 11, Action Items -Work on items that need tag identification under both existing MORC and ORSTF proposal -Define.
Advertisements

NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
Operating Reserves --- Again A Discussion Primer
© 2009 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ______________ WECC November 12, 2012.
Dynamic Schedule e-tagging Requirements Criterion WECC-087 (formerly INT-008) ISAS Report January 2012.
Primary Objectives of WIT
WECC BAL-STD-002 Workshop February 6, 2008
WECC Response to BAL-002-WECC-1 Remand Order December 10, 2010 WECC Board of Directors Meeting Steve Rueckert Director of Standards.
OC ORSTF Position WECC Board Meeting December 8, 2006.
Interchange Authority Recommendations Board of Directors Meeting December 7, 2007.
Contingency Reserve Standard Drafting Team Presentation before the WECC Board Technical Conference David Lemmons Standard Drafting Team Chair December.
Open Access Technology International, Inc.
BAL-002-WECC-1 Contingency Reserves
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update October 2008 Gary Nolan ISAS Vice-Chair.
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
WECC-098 Gov Droop DT May 29, BAL Requirements R1. Each Frequency Response Sharing Group (FRSG) or Balancing Authority that is not a member.
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
MARKET INTERFACE COMMITTEE OC and PCC Approval Items March 6-7, 2008 Albuquerque, New Mexico.
INT Rewrite Projects Presented by Bob Harshbarger January 2012.
ISAS Update August 2, 2011 Market Issues Subcommittee.
WECC Reliability Management System Tagging Requirements Before the WECC MIS Meeting November 13, 2009 By David Lemmons.
IWG Update April 2014 ISAS Danielle Johnson. WIAB Test – Still looking for other volunteers for the WIAB Fall 2014 – Volunteer as of Today WAPA Rocky.
Standards Update Steve Rueckert Director of Standards W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Reporting GHG Emissions from Power Purchases CPUC/CEC Workshop on Load-Based Reporting Mike McCormick, Policy Director April 13, 2007.
FEBRUARY 27, 2013 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS Parallel Flow Visualization Overview 1.
FINANCIAL REPORTING OF INTERESTS IN JOINT VENTURES
Sheryl Welch, ATFWG Chair August 20, 2014 Portland, OR.
BAL Reserve Sharing Group
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
Recallable Tag Discussion Bud Freeman When are they used? What are the implications?
11 Why BPA Transmission Customers Aggregate Reservations Feb. 20, 2013.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup BY LOU MIRANDA BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
Reserves Issue For years there has been disagreement over reserves issues and what constitutes firm power. We’ve been able to function as a market, despite.
NAESB WEQ UPDATE Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Meeting Salt Lake, UT August 26, 2015 Bob Harshbarger Puget Sound Energy.
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
Calculation of Net Energy for Load COPS. 2 2 Outline  Definition of Net Energy for Load  How Net Energy for Load is calculated in ERCOT.
NAESB WHOLESALE ELECTRIC QUADRANT BUSINESS PRACTICES SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES UPDATE TO JOINT ELECTRIC SCHEDULING SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 2012 BY ED SKIBA.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N June 2011 Non-Treaty Storage Agreement non-Binding Terms for Storage Accounts.
NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz– IDCWG Chair January 5 th, 2016.
Utility Responsibility to Maintaining Load Reliability Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
RAWG Agenda Item LAR Data WECC Staff. Data Elements Generator information – Existing – Changes Monthly Peak Demand and Energy (actual year and.
WSPP Webinar Proposed Service Schedules Operating Reserve Service (D) Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (E) February 4, 2010.
Parking Lot Item 19. BPS Bert Bressers 10/31/2011 Firm rights of resources that have a Firm priority to what load (Sink area granularity)
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez May 4, 2007.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee ISAS Report Pete Heiman April 20, 2016 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
EIM AWG July 5, Guiding Principles The intent of the group is to work collaboratively to better understand the WECC EIM costs and benefits analyses.
CMTF Tariff Language Clarification 1. Parking Lot Question Is the Planning Reserve Margin requirement meant to be maintained throughout the whole calendar.
Clarification of the Resident Load Definition
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report
WECC-0118 Removal of Interchange Authority
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Rich Hydzik, Avista NWPP RSGC Vice-Chair
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee ISAS Report
Steve Rueckert – Director of Standards
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards WSC Meeting Overview
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
NERC Congestion Management
WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

Load Responsibility in the NWPP Footprint Brenda Anderson Bonneville Power Administration

What is Load Responsibility? WECC Standard BAL-STD-002-0, Operating Reserves, refers to “Load Responsibility”. http://www.wecc.biz/Standards/Approved%20Standards/BAL-STD-002-0.pdf (b) The sum of five percent of the load responsibility served by hydro generation and seven percent of the load responsibility served by thermal generation.

Current WECC Load Responsibility definition: A control area’s firm load demand plus those firm sales minus those firm purchases for which reserve capacity is provided by the supplier. Due to the confusion as to what is meant by “Load Responsibility”, the WECC Board of Directors documented a WECC Interpretation. http://www.wecc.biz/Standards/Interpretations/Interpretation%20of%20Load%20Responsibility.pdf

WECC Interpretation of Load Responsibility: A Balancing Authority’s (BA) Load Responsibility is the algebraic sum of the BA Area’s: Net Generation Minus (-) Net Actual Interchange (NAI) (- or +) NAI Exports are positive (+), NAI Imports are negative (-) Minus (-) loads that can be interrupted in 10 minutes or less by contractual agreement. Plus (+) Interchange Schedule exports where the BA is identified as retaining Contingency Reserve responsibility through the e-Tag process. Contingency Reserve responsibility is identified as required by INTBPS-014-0 Identification of Contingency Reserve Responsibilities in the e-Tag Minus (-) Interchange Schedule imports where another BA is identified as having Contingency Reserve responsibility through the e-Tag process. Contingency Reserve responsibility is identified as required by INT-BPS-014-0 Identification of Contingency Reserve Responsibilities in the e-Tag

Prior to WECC’s interpretation, most parties assumed the generator Balancing Authority was responsible for maintaining Contingency Reserves for Firm Transactions. Statements from the WECC Board Interpretation showed it was optional as to which BA carried the Contingency Reserves. 5. The current WECC Contingency Reserve requirement represents a holistic approach to carrying Contingency Reserves for the entire Western Interconnection. The Load Responsibility calculation is used to “transfer” Contingency Reserve responsibility between BAs. Energy with associated Contingency Reserve can be exported and imported between Balancing Authority Areas. However, if Contingency Reserve is associated by agreement with the energy transaction, the responsibility for the Contingency Reserve obligation will remain with the Source BA. In other words, the BA exporting energy that has associated Contingency Reserve would increase its “Load Responsibility” by the amount of the energy being exported. The BA importing the energy has the ability to reduce its “Load Responsibility” by the same amount. This has the effect of maintaining the appropriate amount of Contingency Reserve on a Western Interconnection wide basis.

The NWPP responded to the WECC Interpretation. The NWPP RSG’s longstanding interpretation was that the “source” Balancing Authority was required to include its exports in the calculation of its Load Responsibility (the only exception being interruptible exports). With WECC’s new interpretation of Load Responsibility, either the “source” or “sink” Balancing Authorities may include a transaction in its Load Responsibility.

NWPP Written Response to WECC Members NWPP RSG members (for which they are the source) will not retain Contingency Reserve responsibility associated with exports out of the NWPP area, unless the etag indicates otherwise. NWPP RSG members will agree with the WECC assumption that transactions between BAs that are unit contingent (firm contingent energy code) will be treated the same as transactions with generating units residing inside the sink BA for Contingency Reserve purposes. NWPP RSG members (for which they are the sink) will retain Contingency Reserve responsibility for all imports into the NWPP area, unless the etag indicates otherwise. Within operating hour schedule cuts of non-interruptible energy imports or exports, in or out of the NWPP RSG area, will not be initiated nor accepted by NWPP RSG members, except: 1) For reliability purposes or 2) if mutually agreed to by the source and sink balancing authorities or 3) if it is a unit contingent (firm contingent energy code) transaction. A single generator contingency is not an acceptable reason for cutting a firm transaction, unless it is a unit contingent (firm contingent energy code).

INT-014-WECC-CRT-1 Identification of Contingency Reserve Responsibilities in the e-Tag Int-014 was created to assure Contingency Reserves were being carried for transactions within WECC. WR1. When both the Source and Sink Balancing Authorities (BAs) are within the Western Interconnection, e-Tag Authors will identify the Balancing Authority (BA) or Reserve Sharing Group (RSG) member responsible for including the transaction in their calculation of Contingency Reserve requirements. This entity will be referred to as the “Responsible Entity”. Only one selection can be made.

Questions?