Mark Perlic Welfare Rights Service. Welcome Going to the Commissioners - rules of engagement and good practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part of the Judicial Branch
Advertisements

Chapter 12: Supreme Court Decision Making
UNIT 6 – THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Power point 2 – The Supreme Court and Special Courts.
1 FIFTH ANNUAL COAT CONFERENCE NSW CHAPTER DEALING WITH DIFFICULTIES IN THE ABSENCE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION The Hearing Process In the Absence of Legal.
Delivering local determinations and setting sanctions Speakers: Simon Bird Deputy President The Adjudication Panel for England Mark Jones Principal Legal.
The 10 Golden Rules in Managing Complaints & Discipline.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Actuaries.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DISCOVER A PARTY HAS BEEN LYING?
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
STANDARD(S) ADDRESSED: 12.4 Students analyze the unique roles and responsibilities of the 3 branches of government. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT 1.Define.
Applying for Citizenship in Ireland by naturalisation. Presentation by Brian Killoran Information and Referral Service Coordinator Immigrant Council of.
Attorney-Client Privilege in International Disputes “Groundhog Day – Episode III” Ian Meredith Partner, International Arbitration Practice Group Co-ordinator,
AS LAW: ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM CIVIL COURTS - APPEALS.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 7.
THE SUPREME COURT AT WORK PROCEDURES, HOW CASES REACH THE COURT & STEPS IN DECIDING CASES.
The Supreme Court at Work
UNRWA Dispute Tribunal Professionalized Transparent Independent & Impartial Judge –Selection of Judge by Internal Justice Committee comprised of staff.
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 3
Democracy: accountability & administrative law ACMA Legal Branch International Training Program Melbourne, 4 September 2006.
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER Webinar Exclusions from schools – an update Richard Freeth Browne Jacobson Download the slides at
LVT PRACTICE & PROCEDURE Liz Gibbons Community Housing Cymru Group Leaseholder Network Meeting 19 th May
The Aarhus Convention and Access to Justice in Ireland Where are we now? Michael Ewing Coordinator of the Environmental Pillar
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Stages of an Arbitration Arbitration Week in Palestine Session #4 December 9,
Appeals to the Upper Tribunal Against a Traffic Commissioner’s decision (Goods Vehicle Operator’s Licence) Jared Dunbar BSc, MA, LLB Associate, Dyne Solicitors.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
The Judicial Branch The Supreme Court Decision Making.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Legal Framework.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
PRESENTATION BY THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CORRECTIONAL SERVICES PRESENTER: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SIRAJ DESAI DATE: 4 NOVEMBER 2009.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
Mock Supreme Court Assignment, Discussion & Activity with 8.3 & 8.4.
Section 1: The Supreme Court at Work Section 2: Shaping Public Policy Section 3: Influencing Court Decisions.
Code of Conduct Complaints Local Assessment Framework (08 May 2008 – 30 June 2009)
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
 We use the Adversary system of trial.  HOWEVER, the Coroner’s Court, Family Court, Children’s Cases Program, some tribunals and some alternative methods.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
The Supreme Court At Work Chapter 12 Section 1. The Court’s Procedures Since 1979, the Supreme Court has been in continuous session, taking only periodic.
Why do I Have Miners’ Rights? 4 The Act gives miners and their representatives many rights because Congress wanted to encourage them to take an active,
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Essential Question How does the Supreme Court function?
INVESTIGATION KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
Law 12 MUNDY  Purpose of appeal is to have a trial or a portion of a trial reviewed by a higher court  First established in 1923  BC Court of.
Revision and Supersession DLA/AA and PIP. The statutory structure – DLA/AA Where a decision made under s.8 SSA 1998 awarding benefit, the recipient is.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
Teachers and The Law 7 th Chapter 3 How Secure Is My Employment? Fischer, Schimmel, Stellman PowerPoint Presentation Gerri Spinella Ed.D. Elizabeth McDonald.
THE COURT’S PROCEDURES Washington, DC The Supreme Court meets about nine months out of the year. The Court traditionally convenes on the first Monday.
Privilege, Privacy, Waiver & Ethical Considerations.
The Supreme Court. Judicial Review: Power to consider the constitutionality of and act of government (legislative, Executive or Judicial) This power rests.
CLB, NCLT & NCLAT Adv. Prachi Manekar-Wazalwar Corporate Lawyer Workshop on Appearing before Tribunals ICAI-WIRC 25 th July 2015 Please provide your inputs.
Intro to the Appellate Process When a party loses at trial they have the right to appeal the decision. An appeal is always about whether the law was correctly.
The Supreme Court. Jurisdiction Original—first to hear a case 1.State vs. US. (New York vs. Clinton) 2.Ambassador/public minister 3.Issues between states.
“Court Review of Arbitral Awards for excès de pouvoir” June 4, 2010 Dirk Pulkowski - Legal Counsel -
Arizona City Attorneys Association Conference, May 19, 2016 Update on Ethics Rules for Government Lawyers Geoffrey Sturr Osborn Maledon, P.A.
GETTING STARTED: Notices of appeal & the initial appellate documents.
Chapter 5: The Court System
SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Judicial Branch.
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 3
Appeals.
Key Knowledge The purposes and appropriateness of consumer affairs Victoria in resolving civil disputes Key Skills Discuss and justify the appropriateness.
Bell Ringer Vocabulary activity: Due Process
Evidence - tends to prove a fact by proving other events or circumstances which afford a basis for a reasonable inference of the occurrence of the fact.
Presentation transcript:

Mark Perlic Welfare Rights Service

Welcome Going to the Commissioners - rules of engagement and good practice

Making appeals work … Appeals Conference (June 2006) Event for representatives (November 2007)

appealing to Commissioners What is the one thing you need to make an appeal to the Commissioners?

balls

conviction

OSSC1

full statement of reasons

error of law

leave to appeal

error of law leave to appeal

tribunal’s decision (+ record of proceedings)

set aside reg 57 ‘appears just’ on grounds: - document relating to proceedings - not sent or not received by party to proceedings; or - party to the proceedings was not present (not if no request for oral hearing)   s13 (leave to appeal) - ‘may set aside’ error of law/’shall set aside’ error of law and principal parties agree reg 57 Social Security & Child Support (Decision and Appeals) Regulations 1999 s13 Social Security Act 1998

error of law - leave to appeal

leave to appeal   tribunal chairman (full-time chairman)   granted - OSSC 1 form to Commissioners   refused - OSSC 1 form request leave from Commissioner directly   Commissioner grant or refuse leave

error of law - case law R(A)1/72 R(I)14/75 CIS/3299/1997 R(Iran) - Court of Appeal (must be material error of law)

Error of law? 1.decision contains a false proposition of law 2.no evidence (direct/by reasonable inference) to support findings 3.facts found - no reasonable tribunal applying law correctly could not have reached same decision 4.tribunal took into account irrelevant matters or failed to take into account relevant matters

Error of law? 5. 5.breach rules of natural justice 6. 6.breach of duty to act inquisitorially 7. 7.breach of procedure 8. 8.failure to give adequate reasons

leave to appeal because…   decision contains false proposition of law (why/where?)   tribunal held that assistance with walking not relevant – walking mobility need not bodily function need   decision contained false proposition of law because tribunal held walking not bodily function R(Iran) - Court of Appeal (material error)

Commissioners appeal outcome:   Commissioner find no error of law   Commissioner find error of law set decision aside substitute own decision   Commissioner refer to new tribunal complete rehearing

tribunal’s job   examine evidence   make findings of fact   apply facts to law   give reasons for decision

the Commissioners  Commissioner Bano  Commissioner Levenson

since 1948 stood the test of time

£ - How much district chairman - arm and a leg Commissioner - several body parts - and well worth it

£ - How much district chairman - £96,500 pa Commissioner - £131,000 pa

there is no love at the Commissioners only the law

OSSC1 - tips   neat handwriting a good start   state error of law + how it affected outcome of case in question   ‘my client’ vs Mr Smith (personal)   PCA 15pts needed - blatant error but only get to 10pts no error (material error)   150 million errors - list chief ones only   less is more

OSSC1 - tips   find something different - ‘not same old rubbish’ - something that is ‘interesting/ stimulating’ something to ‘spark the imagination’   do not take Commissioners for a fool

how it works… cases randomly divided up 100 per week per Commissioner (ave) occasionally get case better suited to another Commissioner (due to expertise/ interest) then do swap

oral hearing discretion of Commissioner either party can ask for an oral hearing Commissioner may direct an oral hearing oral hearing held anywhere video conferencing possible address Commissioner not other party

case law no rule of law that one Commissioner bound by another (comity - courtesy/ considerate behaviour towards others) first to get it - precedent would perpetuate error (conflict: Tribunal of Commissioners) no certainty of law - development of law

study the wording

‘ if I want to know what my fellow Commissioners think I will ask them’

how long to write-up a decision?

  quality of product which matters   ¾ of day   5 days (£2,700 ish)

get your free CD PowerPoint slides May conference report November conference report going to the Commissioners guide leave to appeal template example one example two

DLA/AA Case Law Pack   Derbyshire County Council, Welfare Rights Service - DLA/AA Case Law Pack   January 2008   Telephone:

any questions?

thank you Mark Perlic