Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO DAYS SEMINAR BY THE JTI/GHANA NEWS LINK FOR JOURNALIST.
Advertisements

Hierarchy of Courts.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 20 FRENCH LEGAL PROFESSION Feb. 25, 2002.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 34 FRENCH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCEDURE April 10, 2002.
The Supreme Court. Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the highest Victorian Court. The Supreme Court is presided over by a judge referred to as ‘Justice’.
The Belgian judicial system
Intro to the courts & Magistrates’ Court Jurisdiction
MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF VICTORIA Jurisdiction Jurisdiction the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria is the bottom tier of Victoria’s court hierarchy, and is established.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
Supreme Court Of Canada
Chapter 4 THE COURT SYSTEM
Judicial Branch.
Chapter 18 – The Judicial Branch
Business Law Unit 1 Law, Justice, and You
December Duality of the Justice system Judicial stream Administrative stream Court of conflicts.
Topic 7 The courts system: criminal courts Criminal courts.
Victorian Court Hierarchy
Judges and Courts Article V of the Texas Constitution describes the judiciary. This branch makes up the state’s court system. The Texas courts decide.
Refresher on structures and processes of the Scottish Courts.
+ The Criminal Court System. + Today... Criminal courts are complex administrative organizations. They oversee the entire process of prosecuting criminal.
1.   Three Judicial Systems  England and Wales  Scotland  Northern Ireland  The Law  Criminal- Actions against the law and punishable  Civil-
Chapter 8 The Courts in New Zealand. District Court High Court Court of Appeal Privy Council Family Court Disputes Tribunal Other Specialist Courts Finis.
NCTJ Seminar Introduction to the law. Sources of Law COMMON LAW  Laws laid down over centuries by the Courts, often following custom and practice. Called.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 23 FRENCH COURT STRUCTURE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS March 11, 2002.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 10 FRENCH LEGAL PROFESSION Feb. 20, 2003.
The Federal Court System
© 2011 South-Western | Cengage Learning GOALS LESSON 1.1 LAW, JUSTICE, AND ETHICS Recognize the difference between law and justice Apply ethics to personal.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 20, 2003.
The Texas Judiciary. Criminal Cases Burden of Proof: legal obligation of one party in a lawsuit to prove its position to a court ---- In a criminal case,
Comparative Law Spring 2006 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 7 FRENCH LEGAL PROFESSION AND TRAINING Jan. 31, 2006.
UIA FLORENCE October 31st, 2014 LITIGATION COMMITTEE THE ROLE OF LAYMEN Marie-Christine Cimadevilla CIMADEVILLA LAW
Comparative Law Spring 2003 The Last Class! English Criminal Procedure Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 13 FRENCH COURT STRUCTURE ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISCELLANEOUSCOURTS March 13, 2003.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 10 FRENCH LEGAL PROFESSION Feb. 20, 2003.
The Judicial Branch.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 32 FRENCH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE April 5, 2002.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 21 FRENCH LEGAL PROFESSION II Feb. 27, 2002.
29K: Discuss the American criminal justice system to include due process of law and functions of Grand and Petite Juries.
COMPARATIVE LAW 2003 CLASS 12 FRENCH LEGAL TRAINING CONT’D FRENCH COURT STRUCTURE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS Feb. 27, 2003.
JUDGES AND LAYPERSONS Civil Law System: France. Judicial Training & Qualification Ordinary Judiciary Four years of university Entrance exam to ENM l’admission.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 28 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE II March 25, 2002.
In the Courtroom.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCEDURE March 27, 2003.
Comparative Law Spring 2001 Class 38 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April 21, 2002.
Federal Courts There are two separate court systems in the United States: 1) Federal and 2) State *Most cases heard in court are heard in State courts.
Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder’s American Government The Federal Court System.
What is the Law? Courts Service Pilot: Lesson 4. Learning Outcomes O To be able to work with your partner to formulate a definition of the law. O To understand.
It’s Complex.  The Framers created the national judiciary in Article III of the Constitution.  The Constitution created the Supreme Court and left Congress.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 27 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE March 22, 2002.
The Courts What reporters need to know. Civil and criminal  Criminal law covers harms done against the people.  Examples: Murder, theft, reckless driving.
 Write down as many words associated with courts and trials as you possibly can? BELL RINGER.
Types of Federal Courts The Constitution created only the Supreme Court, giving Congress the power to create any lower, or “inferior,” courts as needed.
Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences INTRODUCTION TO LAW MAN 206 LECTURE 5 Gulay Suleymanoglu L.L.B(Hons), L.L.M(International and European Law)
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 11:30-12:30 Session 5.
Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 18 The Federal Court System.
Criminal Law Lecture 3 Cyprus Judicial System  Supreme Court  District Court  Assize Court  Family Court  Rent Control Tribunals  Industrial Tribunals.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 11 FRENCH LEGAL PROFESSION AND TRAINING Feb. 25, 2003.
Section 1.2 The Court System and Trial Procedures.
The Criminal Court System Chapter 7. In this chapter we will look at… The Criminal Court Structure The Criminal Court Structure The Participants The Participants.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH ADMINISTRATIVE/MISCELLANEOUS COURTS FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 18, 2003.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 30 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 27, 2002.
Georgia’s Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch Consists of the state’s courts Supreme Court Magistrate Court Probate Court Municipal Court Juvenile CourtState.
2Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART A Dual Court System.
A Day in a Criminal Court Unit 10. Criminal law Criminal law the part of law concerned with the punishment of offences defined as crimes by the law. Offences.
Criminal Courts and Civil Courts Recap Session. Criminal Courts Summary offences – magistrates court. E.g. Driving without insurance. Taking a vehicle.
Victorian Court Hierarchy
Canada’s Court System CLN4U – Mr. Andrez.
Government Governments are created to provide safety, order, and to serve the people. They depend on citizens taking active, responsible roles.
Chief Justice – the judge presiding over the Supreme Court 
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 24 FRENCH COURT STRUCTURE ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISCELLANEOUSCOURTS March 13, 2002

Wrap-up: French Court Structure There is a separation between ordinary and administrative courts in France, based on the idea of separation of powers. The TGI is the civil court of general jurisdiction There are also a number of civil courts with limited jurisdiction: Industrial tribunal, Social Security Tribunal, Commercial Court, Agricultural Land Court, TI

Criminal Courts Not all criminal cases go directly to trial The most serious or complex (crimes or délits) are examined by a pretrial investigatory court (jurisdiction d’instruction) We’ll talk about these in the context of criminal procedure Cases are tried by jurisdictions de jugement, which deliver either a conviction or acquittal Like civil system, there are courts of general jurisdiction and courts of limited jurisdiction

Criminal Courts What are the French criminal courts of general jurisdiction?

Criminal First Instance Courts of General Jurisdiction Tribunal de police (Police Court) Tribunal correctionel Cour d’assises (Court of Assizes) Which first instance court hears a particular criminal case depends on the seriousness of the offence (infraction)

Tribunal de Police Limited to minor offenses (conrtraventions) publishable by small fine not exceeding 1500 EUR Lowest criminal court of general jurisdiction It is the Tribunal d’instance sitting as a criminal court Judge sits alone. Usually a specialist criminal judge though sometimes a judge that deals with both civil and criminal cases There is a prosecutor – procureur de la République of the TGI

Tribunal correctional The Tribunal Correctionel hears slightly more serious offences (délits) This is the TGI exercising its criminal jurisdiction Usually 3 judges, but some offenses like check fraud, assault, criminal damage, or reckless driving (if D not in custody) can be adjudicated by a single judge (around 0% of total offenses) Jurisdiction is limited to délits committed within its territorial jurisdiction – more serious offenses like theft that publishable by sentence of imprisonment of up to 10 years and/or larger fines.

Cour d’assises Tries crimes (most serious crimes like murder carrying terms of imprisonment of 10 or more years) One per département; sits at least 1 of every 3 months Not just professional judges, but also a jury of 9 lay judges les jurés– so court is called the juridiction populaire (the people’s court) 3 judges (President (Cour d’Appel judge)and 2 assessors) Just sits once every quarter unless more hearings are needed Can’t be appealed to Court of Appeal – just Cour deCassation. In contrast, appeal lies against decisions of Tribunals Correctionels as well as more serious cases in Tribunal de Police

Criminal Courts With Limited Jurisdiction Cours d’assises spéciales: crimes against National security Juvenile courts (juge des enfants, tribunal des enfants, court d’assises des mineurs) – in camera proceedings Military courts Haute Cour de Justice – can try President of Republic/ministers for high treason or serious crimes. No appeal against its decisions.

Courts of Appeal 35 of these All disputes except minor civil disputes and criminal cases tried in the Cour d’Assises can be appealed to the Cour d’Appel Appeals are by way of rehearing of the case, and questions of law and of fact will be newly dealt with. Remember that you need to hire an avoué to represent you before the Cour d’Appel. You also need an avocat.

Courts of Appeal Judges (conseillers) are experienced career judges Each Cour d’Appel has at least 3 judges (2 conseillers and 1 President) but may have more; if so, divided into Chambres – usually Criminal, Civil, maybe Social, Commercial

Cour de Cassation 135 judges appointed by President of the Republic (president, 6 divisional presidents, 85 conseillers, 43 auxiliary judges, 18 auditeurs (young judges) The Cour de Cassation is the highest judicial body. It decides appeals on points of law and procedure and can set aside or quash judgments and remit cases for rehearing to one of the 35 Courts of Appeal

Cour de Cassation Usually 5 judges hear the appeal in criminal cases unless president thinks case is straightforward and refers it to 3 judge bench If a civil case, normally heard by 3 judges unless appeal is complex – then it is referred to 5 judge bench Only avocats au Conseil d'Etat et à la Cour de cassation may plead before the Cour de Cassation

Administrative Courts Completely separate from civil and criminal courts What do administrative courts do? What is the highest administrative court?

Conseil d’Etat The Conseil d’Etat is the highest administrative court It was created under Napoleon and became a full-fledged autonomous court reviewing actministrative acts in 1872 How and why was the Conseil d’Etat reformed in 1953? How and why was it reformed in 1987?

Reforms for the Conseil d’Etat By 1953 there was a large backlog of cases for the Conseil d’Etat so it was reformed to reduce waiting times. Other first instance administrative courts were created: tribunaux administratifs But the amount of administrative litigation soared so that the backlog of cases was back up by 1987. A new intermediate tier of administrative courts, the Cours administratives d’appel, were created. Also a filter committee was created to weed out hopeless cases. Has the problem of delay been solved?

Conseil d’Etat How many members does the Conseil d’Etat have? How are they trained? How is the Conseil d’Etat organized?

Conseil d’Etat How many members does the Conseil d’Etat have? 300. Prime Minister is the president How are they trained? Usually at ENM. See http://www.justice.gouv.fr/anglais/minister/enm.htm#INFO How is the Conseil d’Etat organized? There are 6 Divisions, of which one is litigation and 5 are administrative. The litigation division has 10 sections. Each has a president. Members are part of both a litigation and an administrative divisions. This is controversial. Why?

European Court of Human Rights The ECHR found that Luxembourg’s Conseil d’Etat violates Art. 6(a) of the European Convention, which provides that there is a right to have cases heard by an impartial and independent court.

What does the Conseil d’Etat do?

What does the Conseil d’Etat do? Advisory functions – advises before decrees are adopted or ordonnances are made or government bills adopted by Cabinet (see 1958 Constitution Arts. 37-39). Also advises government more generally. Judicial function – review administrative acts. Generally acts as an appellate court on points of law, but hears a small number (3000) of cases at first (and last) instance like applications for judicial review of decrees of President/PM or ordonnance, litigation about regional elections, cases about senior civil servants. Also hears some appeals from Cours Administratifs d’Appel in limited areas.

Administrative Courts Tribunaux administratifs There are 35 of these courts of first instance, 27 in France. Each has a President and at least 3 judges (conseillers) Larger courts (like Paris) are divided into divisions Most cases were brought in Paris because of the jurisdictional principle that found jurisdiction where the authority being reviewed had its legal base, which was usually Paris. There have been efforts to decentralize by changing the jurisdictional rules

Administrative Courts How long is the average waiting period for an administrative case to be heard? Do the administrative courts do anything apart from adjudicating administrative litigation? How long is the average waiting period for an administrative case to be heard? 22 months Do the administrative courts do anything apart from adjudicating administrative litigation? Limited advisory role

Administrative Courts of Appeal Created in 1987. There are now 6 of these courts: in Bordeaux, Lyon, Marseilles, Nancy, Nantes, and Paris. President is generally a member of the Conseil d’Etat. Each court has 2-4 divisions. 5 judges will hear a case, although 7 judges may hear a more important case Hear most appeals on points of fact and law against decisions of the tribunaux administratifs. Small advisory role.