TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD WEBINAR APRIL 9, 2014 Outcomes-Based Formula Funding for Universities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Banks County High School
Advertisements

Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
Academic Scholars/Other Scholarships PHF Conference Center July 22, 2014 Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education.
1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.
Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Presentation G. Holmes Braddock Sr. High School Mrs. Gomez, Counselor.
TASFAA, Fall 2012 Jane Caldwell Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Jonathan H. Stroble, Senior Manager K-12 Student & School Services.
Act 606: Financial Aid Training 1-Hour. Academic Challenge Scholarship.
8 HB ELEMENTS FOR SETTING THE INITIAL FUNDING ALLOCATION OCTOBER 21, 2014 MODEL DESIGN Features/Mechanics.
BUDGET 2015 AND LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MAY 6, 2014.
HOPE Changes DOE Workshop. HOPE Scholarship Basic eligibility requirements: –Unchanged for current seniors College Prep Diploma – 3.0 GPA Career Tech.
State Programs Update & HOPE Changes PROBE Counselor Workshop Thomas Meunier K-12 Student and School Services.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Performance Based Funding Formula. SSI History SSI Overview University Formula Performance Changes OTC Funding Formula 2.
Outcomes-Based Funding: Design Principles and State Examples Outcomes-Based Funding: The Indiana Experience Teresa Lubbers, Indiana Commissioner for Higher.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents … © 2013 NASFAA Calculation of Federal Pell Grant and Iraq and Afghanistan Service.
Trends in Student Aid 2014For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2013 Dollars (in Millions), to.
PAUL TURCOTTE PROGRAM DIRECTOR TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD TO THE TASSCUBO BUDGET COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2013 Outcomes-Based Funding.
The Federal Pell Grant Cynthia Thornton Trevor Summers Training Officers Dallas Regional Office.
THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011.
Illinois Higher Education FY15 Performance Funding Recommendations IBHE Board Presentation February 4, 2014 Dr. Alan Phillips.
Graduation Attainment Efficiency
Strategic Plan Setting Retention and Graduation Targets Enrollment Management Advisory Council (EMAC) November 19, 2014.
Julie Eklund University TACRAO Meeting July 17, 2012.
By: Liz Diaz
Region VII College and Career Readiness Data AVATAR Initiatives.
IBHE Presentation 1 Proposed Four-Year University Performance Funding Model Performance Funding Steering Committee Meeting October 24, 2011 Dr. Alan Phillips.
New Admission Policies for Graduate Programs The Graduate College Outreach Program.
Total Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans Used to Finance Postsecondary Education Expenses in 2011 Dollars (in Millions), to SOURCE: The.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall 2012 Enrollment & Completion Update Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 15,
IBHE Presentation 1 Illinois Higher Education Performance Funding Model IBHE Board Meeting February 7, 2012 Dr. Alan Phillips.
ESC Region XI Module Two B Studying Local Data for Region XI Fort Worth Partners All AVATAR artifacts :
The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX /3/111 Financial Aid 101 Office of Student Financial Aid and Enrollment.
MOVE ON WHEN READY DUAL ENROLLMENT OPPORTUNITIES.
SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.
BISD Scholarship as told by Brittni Cockran
Trends in Student Aid 2015For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2014 Dollars (in Millions), to.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Dual Enrollment. First Time in College (FTIC) Board of Governors: Regulation FTIC freshmen are defined as students who have earned a standard high.
Dual Enrollment. First Time in College (FTIC) Board of Governors: Regulation FTIC freshmen are defined as students who have earned a standard high.
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
Staff Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature.
Faculty Salary Report (CBM008) Uses Average Budgeted Faculty Salaries Salaries reported on fall reports are: doubled, converted to full-time equivalent.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Major Policy Discussion Achieving the Goals of 60x30TX: College Readiness and Dual Credit April 28, 2016 College.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Higher Education Leadership Conference Rich Petrick, Vice Chancellor for Finance Ohio Board of Regents 6/12/2016.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
Welcome to Financial Aid Night An overview of financial aid and the application process. Presented by the Ascension Parish Career Coaches.
Draft Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature.
Summer Data Conference – June 6, (2008) National Completion Goals (Lumina’s Big Goal: 60% of those will have an Associate Degree or above.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Performance Incentive Funding
Outcomes-Based Funding
Joshua Garrison Director of Policy and Legislation
Florida Board of Governors Performance & Accountability Committee
TEXAS Grant Program Report
College and Career Guide
Pathways – an analytical structure & Transfer student graduation rates
Gabriela Borcoman MD, PhD Strategic Planning and Funding
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
Coordinating Board Updates
HESC UPDATE2018 June 2018.
Florida College System Performance Based Funding
Trends in Higher Education Series
Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2013 Dollars (in Millions), to
Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2014 Dollars (in Millions), to
Student Centered Funding Formula
Presentation transcript:

TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD WEBINAR APRIL 9, 2014 Outcomes-Based Formula Funding for Universities

Outcomes-Based Funding - Objective 2 Texas Education Code Section states that, “it is in state's highest public interest to evaluate student achievement at institutions of higher education and to develop higher education funding policy based on that evaluation.” It further charges the Coordinating Board, in consultation with institutions of higher education, to incorporate the consideration of undergraduate student success measures in developing recommendations for university formula funding.

GAIFAC Recommendation – Funding Totals 3 $235 million in outcomes-based funding pool OBF pool is equal to 10% of undergraduate formula funding, but: Is outside of and in addition to the I&O formula Fund I&O and Infrastructure at requested amounts first

GAIFAC Recommendation– Success Metrics Total Undergraduate Degrees Total number of Bachelor’s Degrees awarded by an institution in a given year. Total Undergraduate Degrees by Graduation Rate Total Bachelor’s Degrees multiplied by the school’s six- year graduation rate, to incent timely completion. Total Undergraduate Degrees per 100 FTSE Degrees divided by Full Time Student Equivalents (FTSEs) and multiplied by 100. This aggregate measure adjusts for part-time and transfer students, providing a common framework for comparing degree productivity. At-Risk Undergraduate Degrees Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion. Retention Metrics Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution, to incentivize the use of effective persistence policies. 4

GAIFAC Recommendation – Allocation 5 Allocate Funds based on:  Points earned on the 7 success metrics  The average of the three most recent years of data  Points scaled statewide  Points weighted by institutions  Phased-in over three biennia

GAIFAC Recommendation- Allocation Allocation based on each institution’s percent of statewide total points Points are based on an average of the three most recent years of performance data InstitutionTotal Points Percent of Total Points Funding (millions) A10025$58.75 B12531$72.85 C17544$103.4 Total400100$235 6

Outcomes-Based Funding - Average Use three-year rolling average Example FactorYear 1Year 2Year 3Average Total Undergraduate Degrees 5,3005,8006,3005,800 By Graduation Rate2,6003,200 3,000 Per 100 FTSE At-Risk Degrees3,2003,5003,8003,500 Retention to 307,0006,9007,1007,000 Retention to 603,9004,0004,1004,000 Retention to 901,8001,9002,0001,900 Total25,232 7

Outcomes-Based Funding - Scales 8 Scale the three-year average points using identical scales for all institutions Example – At-Risk 3-Year Average X Scale 3,500 X 7.0 = 24,500 Scaled Points FactorScale Total Undergraduate Degrees 1.0 By Graduation Rate7.0 Per 100 FTSE25.0 At-Risk Degrees7.0 Retention to Retention to Retention to 904.0

GAIFAC Recommendation- Point Scales 9 Scaling adjusts each metrics’ points to ensure comparability and significance in the model Factor Three- Year Average Percent of TotalScale Scaled Points (A) Percent of Total Total Undergraduate Degrees 5, %1 5,8007.2% By Graduation Rate 3, %7 21, % Per 100 FTSE 320.1% % At-Risk Degrees 3, %7 24, % Retention to 30 7, %1.5 10, % Retention to 60 4, %2.5 10, % Retention to 90 1,9007.5%4 7,6009.5% Total 25, % 80, %

GAIFAC Recommendation - Weights 10 Each institution decides how to weight its metrics from a predetermined set of options Each option is used once Each institution’s weights must total 100 percent Omit 1 metric – a weight of 0% Remain in place for 3 biennia 100%25% 20%15%10%5%0%Value Total Option WeightFactor 5% Total Undergraduate Degrees 25% By Graduation Rate 0%Per 100 FTSE 25%At-Risk Degrees 20%Retention to 30 15%Retention to 60 10%Retention to %Total

Factor Scaled Points (A) Percent of Total Weight (B) Scaled and Weighted Points (A*B) Percent of Total Total Undergraduate Degrees 5,8007.2%5% % By Graduation Rate 21, %25%5, % Per 100 FTSE %0%00.0% At-Risk Degrees 24, %25%6, % Retention to 30 10, %20%2, % Retention to 60 10, %15%1,5009.4% Retention to 90 7,6009.5%10%7604.7% Total 80, %100%16, % GAIFAC Recommendation - Weights Example Institution 11

Outcomes-Based Funding - Points Scale * Weight * Three-Year Average = Total Points Factor Scale (A) Weight (B) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Average (1+2+3) 3 Scaled and Weighted Points (A*B*Avg) Total Undergraduate Degrees 1.05%5,3005,8006,3005, By Graduation Rate 7.025%2,6003,200 3,0005,250 Per 100 FTSE25.00% At-Risk Degrees7.025%3,2003,5003,8003,5006,125 Retention to %7,0006,9007,1007,0002,100 Retention to %3,9004,0004,1004,0001,500 Retention to %1,8001,9002,0001, Total100%N/A 25,23216,025 12

GAIFAC Recommendation – Phase-in 13 The difference between an institution’s percent of statewide OBF funding and percent of statewide undergraduate I&O funding can vary no more than 0.5 percent for FY16-17 and 1 percent for FY18-19.

GAIFAC Recommendation– Phase-in 14

GAIFAC Recommendation – Point Distribution: Statewide 15

GAIFAC Example Point Distribution: Regional Institution 16 Statewide

GAIFAC Example Point Distribution: Research Institution 17 Statewide

GAIFAC Recommendation – Next Steps 18 Considered by full Coordinating Board on April 25 Request weights from each institution Conduct a study of the At-Risk Degrees measure Submit Initial Model to the LBB (November 1) Update with FY 2014 data Submit Final Model to the LBB (March 1)

Total Undergraduate Degrees Total number of Bachelor’s Degrees awarded by an institution in a given year. Accountability measure #10 Number of degrees reported on the CBM009 – Graduation Report for the fiscal year  Fiscal year 2012 includes fall 2011, spring 2012, and summer 2012 reports Multiple degrees earned by a single student are included Double Majors are counted as a single degree Degrees included  Baccalaureate  Associate of Applied Science (AAS) Excludes certificates 19

Total Undergraduate Degrees by 6- Year Graduation Rate Total Bachelor’s Degrees multiplied by the school’s six- year graduation rate To incent timely completion. 6-Year Graduation Rate – Accountability measure #9  First-time entering degree-seeking students who enrolled in an minimum of 12 semester credit hours their first fall semester who graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution after four, five, and six academic years. This metric includes Social Security Number changes submitted on the CBM00N. First-time determined by the first-time student flag on the CBM001. Sources: CBM001, CBM002, CBM009, CBM00N Same Fiscal Year as degrees reported  For fiscal year 2012, cohort started in fall 2006 Includes same and other institutions Upper-Level institutions use 3-Year Completion Rate  First-time junior level students transferring in who graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution after three academic years.  UT-Brownsville, TAMU-Texarkana, UH-Clear Lake, UH-Victoria, and Sul Ross Rio Grande. New institutions calculated with parent graduation rate  TAMU-Central Texas, TAMU-San Antonio, and UNT-Dallas. Example InstitutionDegreesRatePoints A9,00080%7,200 B20030%60 20

Total Undergraduate Degrees per 100 FTSE Degrees divided by Full-Time Student Equivalents (FTSEs) and multiplied by 100. This aggregate measure adjusts for part-time and transfer students, providing a common framework for comparing degree productivity among institutions with different missions and student bodies. Degrees same as the first factor Undergraduate Full-time student equivalents (FTSE) – Accountability measure #2  Number of semester credit hours (SCH) reported on the CBM004 – Class Report for the fall of the fiscal year  For fiscal year 2012, fall 2011 Includes state funded undergraduate semester credit hours Excludes non-state funded and graduate semester credit hours Undergraduate Semester Credit Hours divided by 15 to convert to FTSE Example DegreesSCH FTSE (SCH/15) Points (Degrees/(FTSE/100)) 4,930255,00017,

At-Risk Degrees Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion. Indicators are being a federal Pell Grant recipient, below average SAT/ACT score, part-time student, GED recipient, or entering higher education at age 20 or older. One point for each student awarded degrees in the first measure that meets one or more of the conditions 1. Reported by any institution as a “Pell Grant recipient” in the Financial Aid Database System (FADS) during the last 10 years 2. Earned an SAT or ACT score below the national average  Scores reported on the CBM00B – Admissions Report or by the College Board  National Averages posted on or 3. Part-Time (taking less than 12 hours) when reported as first- time in college on the CBM001 – Student Report 4. General Education Degree (GED) recipients for the last six years  Data provided by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) upon request or older by date of birth field on the CBM001 – Student Report when reported as first-time in college Student Received Pell Grant Earned a Below Average SAT or ACT Score First- Time in College and Attended less than 12 Received a GED First- Time in College and 20 or OlderPoints AYes 1 BNo YesNo 1 C 0 22

At-Risk – Data Elements Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion. Indicators are being a federal Pell Grant recipient, below average SAT/ACT score, part-time student, GED recipient, or entering higher education at age 20 or older. CBM009 - Graduation 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 6 - Date of Birth 7 - Degree Conferred 8 - Level of Degree or Certificate Conferred 9 - Major CBM001 – Student 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 5 - Classification 6 - Date of Birth 9 - Transfer Student or First-Time-in-College 10A - Semester Credit Hour Load, On-Campus 10 - B Semester Credit Hour Load, Off- Campus 13 - Semester 14 - Year 31 - Dual Credit Course Semester Credit Hours CBM00N – Student Number Change 2 - Institution Code 3 - Current Student Identification Number 4 - Current Date of Birth 6 - Prior Student Identification Number 7 - Prior Date of Birth FAD - Financial Aid Database 1B - FICE 1D - Student Social Security Number/ID Number 31A - Federal Pell CBM00B - Admissions 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 24 - Application Year 25 - ACT Composite Score 26 - SAT Combined Score TEA GED Data Student Identification Number GED Certification Date SAT and ACT National Averages

Retention to 30, 60, and 90 Hours Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution. To incentivize the use of effective persistence policies. One point awarded for students successfully completing 30, 60, or 90 hours at the institution as reported on the CBM00S – Student Schedule Report  Last five years – FY 2012 includes data from fall 2007 to summer 2012  Successful completion reported as A, B, C, D, or Credit/Passed in 24  Prior to summer 2011, students receiving a failing grade are included in counts All undergraduate students enrolled at the institution College-level hours earned at the institution currently enrolled  Exclude hours earned at other institutions  Exclude developmental education hours Examples Student Hours Earned at the Institution in prior Fiscal Years Hours Earned at the Institution in current Fiscal YearTotalPoints

Retention– Data Elements Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution. To incentivize the use of effective persistence policies. CBM001 – Student 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 5 - Classification 6 - Date of birth 18 - Semester CBM00N – Student Number change 2 - Institution Code 3 - Current Student Identification Number 4 - Current Date of Birth 6 - Prior Student Identification Number 7 - Prior Date of Birth Prior to summer 2011 CBM002 – Texas Success Initiative 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 4 - Reporting period 5 - Year 10A - Semester Credit Hours Completed Summer 2011 and after CBM00S – Student Schedule 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 10 - Semester Credit Hour Value 19 - Developmental Education Course/Intervention Level (value=0) 24 - Course Grade (value=1, 2, 3, 4, 8) 29 - Semester 25