Kansas Tobacco Prevention Workgroup for Specific Populations May 17 and 18, 2007 Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Becky Tuttle,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Attacking the #1 Cause of Preventable Death and Disease: Using CDCs Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Best Practices for Comprehensive.
Advertisements

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.
1 OA Action Alliance Physical Activity Workgroup July 7, 2011.
CONNECTICUT SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY 2013 PLANNING NINA ROVINELLI HELLER PH.D. UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT.
Results Introduction Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in Wisconsin and the United States. Given the risk of smoking initiation during.
Board Goals. Goals for Presentation Restate Board Goals (short) Why Long-Range Planning is Essential Nancy et al on details of planning (processes, resources,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Tobacco Control: A Winnable Battle U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control.
Natasha M. Jamison, MPH, CHES Health Scientist, Epidemiology Branch Office on Smoking and Health TM Utility of Key Outcome Indicators: Future Directions.
Office of Health Promotion Tobacco Use Prevention Program The Kansas Tobacco Use Prevention Program provides resources, technical assistance and education.
Texas Tobacco Laws. Senate Bill Texas Legislature Tobacco-Free Schools Sec TOBACCO ON SCHOOL PROPERTY The Board of Trustees of a school.
Program Evaluation in Public Health California’s Efforts to Reduce Tobacco Use David Hopkins Terry Pechacek.
The Sparrow Project Presented by: the Robeson County Health Department, a Member of the South Central Public Health Partnership Niakeya Jones, Health Education.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
The Use of Commercial Tobacco Among Minority Populations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health Sydney Lee.
Kansas Tobacco-Related Data Resources and Performance Measures Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Session 7—Presentation and Panel Discussion International Quitline Institute 2011 Conference October 11, 2011 Seattle, Washington National Center for Chronic.
Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
Washington Communities for Tobacco Prevention Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health September 27, 2012.
Edward Anselm, MD Medical Director Public Health Perspectives of Accountable Care: Opportunities for Alignment.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
Integration of 5 Public Health Programs Jan Norman, RD, CDE Chronic Disease Prevention Unit Washington State Department of Health.
Why Policy, Systems and Environmental Change? New Jersey ‘s Mission: Develop and implement the Blueprint for Healthy Aging in New Jersey By Roslyn Council,
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
CDC’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Jerelyn Jordan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health.
Healthy Kansans 2010 Workgroup: Early Disease Prevention, Risk Identification and Intervention for Women, Children and Adolescents Deb Williams Facilitator.
TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM Mike Maples, Assistant Commissioner Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Tobacco Evaluation and Data Planning Process: Meeting 2 September 5, 2007 Becky Tuttle, MA, BS Quitline Manager.
Working to Create Comprehensive Tobacco-Related Policies at Hospitals in New York City and Boston Marie P. Bresnahan, MPH 1 ; Jenna Mandel-Ricci, MPA,
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Governor Pat Quinn B UDGETING FOR R ESULTS Budgeting for Results Funding Priorities, Improving Outcomes March
Asthma Disparities – A Focused Examination of Race and Ethnicity on the Health of Massachusetts Residents Jean Zotter, JD Director, Asthma Prevention and.
Potential Alcohol Strategies March 20, 2008 Sheila Nesbitt.
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) Minnesota Department of Health Cara McNulty, MS SHIP Manager
“Maryland’s Fight Against Cancer: A Cigarette Restitution Fund Update” “Maryland’s Fight Against Cancer: A Cigarette Restitution Fund Update” THE MARYLAND.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
“THE” Policy Group Matt Barry (unofficial spokesperson … for the “herd”)
Why Indicators Matter Using Outcome Indicators to Plan and Evaluate Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Todd Rogers, PhD California Tobacco Control.
Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.
PUTTING PREVENTION RESEARCH TO PRACTICE Prepared by: DMHAS Prevention, Intervention & Training Unit, 9/27/96 Karen Ohrenberger, Director Dianne Harnad,
TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B ASSIST Evaluation.
A Comprehensive Approach for Reducing Illegal Tobacco Sales to Youth Kevin A. Alvarnaz, Cessation Program Manager Bureau of Chronic Diseases & Injury Prevention.
Citizens of Harvestland Against Tobacco (CHAT) Coalition Harvestland, Missouri Teaming Up To End Tobacco Use.
Tobacco 101. Evolution of Tobacco Evolution of Tobacco.
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
Utilizing Community Indicators To Link Process Measures To Program Outcomes T.M. Hinman, M.P.H., H.R. Juster, Ph.D., A.M. Beigel, M.F.A. New York State.
CDC Recommendations for Comprehensive Programs. Comprehensive Programs CDC, Office on Smoking and Health.
Maine Learning Community: Day 2 Selecting Strategies and Implementation March 26, 2007 Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA) Northeast Center for Application.
Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.
Outcome-based Planning and Evaluation Gloria Latimer, Ed.S, Director of Community Programs Jason Vahling, M.P.H., Community Program Specialist.
Shifting Social Climate of Tobacco Control in Mississippi, 2000 to 2004 Robert McMillen SSRC Social Science Research Center Mississippi State University.
Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.
Changing Clinical Norms: Tobacco Intervention in Pediatric Care Settings Shann Hauck Wyoming Department of Health Substance Abuse Division 2003 National.
Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
What’s the Law Got to Do With It? How and When to Work with Lawyers for Policy Change National Conference on Tobacco or Health San Francisco 11/20/02.
Tobacco Disparities: Issues of Inequity & Social Injustice
Implementing & Sustaining A Focus on Specific Populations Through Systems Change K Moore, J Brandes, B Skidmore, J Hunter, C Satzler, G Park, C Cramer,
A Program of the Health Education Council Ayanna L. Kiburi, MPH Consultant.
CDC’s Investments in Community Initiatives Division of Adult and Community Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Lynda.
BUILDING TEAMS: A TOBACCO EVALUATION AND MONITORING SYSTEM Leah Ranney, PhD: Tobacco Prevention Evaluation Program, UNC School of Medicine Leigh Welper.
South Dakota Department of Health
Components of a National Action Plan Ala Alwan Assistant Director-General World Health Organization 1.
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
The Arizona Chronic Disease Plan:
Goal Area 1: Preventing Initiation of Tobacco Use Among Young People
Presentation transcript:

Kansas Tobacco Prevention Workgroup for Specific Populations May 17 and 18, 2007 Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Becky Tuttle, MA KDHE, Tobacco Use Prevention Program Quitline Manager

Goals of a Comprehensive Tobacco Control Program To reduce disease, disability, and death related to tobacco use… Preventing the initiation of tobacco use among young people Promoting quitting among young people and adults Eliminating nonsmokers’ exposure to environmental tobacco smoke Identifying and eliminating the disparities related to tobacco use and its effects among different population groups Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Efficacy of Tobacco Control Programs – CA and MA Evidence supporting the programmatic recommendations in this guidance include: Evidence-based guidelines Efficacy of the large-scale and sustained efforts of two states from excise taxes Tobacco industry quote, “the California campaign and those like it represent a very real threat to the industry in the intermediate term…” Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Best Practices…The Details Released in August 1999 CDC prepared to help States assess options for comprehensive tobacco control programs and to evaluate their local funding priorities after MSA funds available 9 components that must work together to produce a synergistic effect Funding levels (upper and lower) recommended for each component based on population of state Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Community Programs Chronic Disease Programs School Programs Enforcement Statewide Programs Counter-Marketing Cessation Programs Surveillance and Evaluation Administration and Management Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Provided For Each Component Justification for the program element Budget estimates for successful implementation Core resources to assist implementation References to scientific literature Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Community Programs Increase the number of organizations and individuals involved in the planning and conducting community-level education and training programs Use State and local counter-marketing campaigns to place pro- health messages that inform, educate, and support local tobacco control initiatives and policies Promote the adoption of public and private tobacco control policies Measure outcomes using surveillance and evaluation techniques Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Chronic Disease Programs Interventions should be implemented to alleviate existing burden of disease from tobacco, which will remain even if tobacco use if reduced among future generations Incorporation of tobacco prevention and cessation messages into broader public health activities to ensure wider dissemination The reduction of risk factors for tobacco-related diseases other than tobacco use reduces the disease impact of tobacco use (PANT – heart disease) Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

School Programs Develop and enforce a school policy on tobacco use. Provide instruction about the short and long term negative physiological and social consequences of tobacco use, social influences on tobacco use, and peer norms regarding tobacco use, and refusal skills. Provide tobacco use prevention education in kindergarten through 12 th grade; this instruction should be especially intensive in junior high or middle school and should be reinforced in high school. Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

School Program - Continued Provide program-specific training for teachers. Involve parents or family members in support of school- based programs to prevent tobacco use. Support cessation efforts among students and all school staff who use tobacco. (1-866-KAN-STOP) Evaluate the tobacco use prevention program at regular intervals. Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Enforcement Minor’s Access to tobacco Retailer compliance checks (4 per outlet per year) Graduated series of civil penalties on the retailer Eliminating tobacco vending machines and self-service displays in stores accessible to youth Clean Indoor Air Establishing and publicizing telephone hotlines for reporting violations of CIA ordinances Reporting violations noted by state officials performing health, environmental, and other routine inspections Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Statewide Programs Sponsoring multicultural organizations and networks to collect data and develop and implement culturally appropriate interventions Sponsoring local, regional, and statewide training, conferences, and technical assistance based on Best Practices for effective tobacco use prevention and cessation programs Supporting innovative demonstration and research projects to support the four goal areas Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Counter-Marketing Combine messages on prevention, cessation, and protection from ETS; target both youth and adults; address both individual behaviors and public policies Include grassroots promotion, local media advocacy, event sponsorship, and other community tie-ins to support and reinforce the statewide campaign Maximize the number, variety, and novelty of messages and production styles rather than communicate a few messages repeatedly Use nonauthoritarian appeals that avoid direct exhortations not to smoke and do not highlight a single theme, tagline, identifier, and sponsor Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Cessation Programs Establishing population-based counseling and treatment programs, such as cessation helplines (1-866-KAN-STOP) Covering treatment for tobacco use under both public and private insurance Eliminating cost barriers to treatment for under- served populations, particularly the uninsured Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Surveillance and Evaluation Accountability for state policy makers and fiscal oversight Surveillance is the monitoring of tobacco-related behaviors, attitudes, and health outcomes at regular intervals of time Evaluation should be able to track to the progress of each program element in statewide objectives Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

CDC Recommended Comprehensive Program *Recommended Program Element Budgets per year… Community Programs$2.7 M Chronic Disease Programs$2.8 M School Programs$2.5 M Enforcement$1.3 M Statewide Programs$1.0 M Counter-Marketing$2.6 M Cessation$2.5 M Surveillance and Evaluation$1.6 M Administration and Management$0.8 m TOTAL:$18.1 M *Based on lower-level estimates

Comprehensive Level Funding Means a Healthier Kansas According to the Centers for Disease Control’s “Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs”, a spending level of $18 million to $44 million per year for 10 years is projected to reduce tobacco use in Kansas by 50%. Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP

Questions??? CONTACT INFORMATION: Becky Tuttle, MA Quitline Manager Tobacco Use Prevention Program Kansas Department of Health and Environment 130 South Market, Suite 6050 Wichita, KS Kansas Tobacco Quitline KAN-STOP