Phonetics & Phonology William Barry

What is phonetics The observation of how people say things. The description of spoken language at the level of "pronunciation" The measurement of pronunciation events The modeling of pronunciation behaviour The explanation of the communicative contribution of pronunciation patterns.

Areas of phonetics Speech production (what do the speech organs do?) Speech acoustics (what does the resulting speech signal look like?) Speech perception (What are the acoustic properties that cause us to hear what we hear?)

Speech production [levels] Respiration (sub-glottal activity) How do we control our breathing to help our speech communication? Phonation (glottal/laryngeal activity) How do we control our vocal-folds to help our speech communication? Articulation (supra-glottal activity) How do we control our articulators to help our speech communication?

Speech production [analysis] We make recordings (of course  ) - we choose the type of speech - we choose the type of speaker - we choose the type of signal These choices determine our analysis: - speech type (basic sound types, precise vs. casual speech; monologue vs. dialogue behaviour) - speaker type (e.g., regional vs."standard" speakers; ……) - signal type (acoustic = microphone; physiological; electro-myographic; neurological .......) Signal type dictates the experimental set-up: - Only the acoustic signal allows „natural" recordings

A standard text ..... The North Wind and the Sun The North Wind and the Sun were disputing which was the stronger, when a traveler came along wrapped in a warm cloak. They agreed that the one who first succeeded in making the traveler take his cloak off should be considered stronger than the other. Then the North Wind blew as hard as he could, but the more he blew the more closely did the traveler fold his cloak around him; and at last the North Wind gave up the attempt. Then the Sun shined out warmly, and immediately the traveler took off his cloak. And so the North Wind was obliged to confess that the Sun was the stronger of the two. (see www.coli.uni-saarland.de/elaut for other languages)

For signal analysis Popular analysis packages: Praat (www.praat.org) (by Paul Boersma & David Weenink, Phonetics Amsterdam) Wavesurfer (www.speech.kth.se/wavesurfer/) (by scientists at Stokholm Technical University - KTH) Goldwave (www.goldwave.de) (commercial program, but available free for trial use)

Speech production [Speech Sounds] E.g. What are the vowels of English and German like? The cat sat on the mat: SBE: ??; US: ?? German: ?? The computer is broken. SBE: ??; US: ?? German: ?? Can you hear the differences? Can you describe the differences? Can you say why there are differences?

Vowel quality and symbols German English i y Y I U u o e E (E)  O  a/a   u U ?i I eI U / / Br US  US Br ?e (E) To remind you of what was explained last week: 1. The quality of vowels in a particular language are only approximately the same as the qualities defined for the „universal descriptive framework“ (Cardinal Vowels). 2. The choice of symbols is determined by the proximity of the quality to the Cardinal (reference) Vowel quality. 3. That means that the same symbols may be used in different languages for different vowel qualities. This underlines the need to listen for and learn the particular quality of the vowels, NOT just to learn the symbol that is used to represent it. Notice that there are many areas of vowel quality that are used in English but are NOT used in German! These are bound to cause problems. As you grow sensitive to vowel quality and have become accustomed to the standard vowel qualities of a language, you will notice that there are countless regional (and idiosyncratic) variants.  US Br  A US Br A ?

Speech production [Speech Sounds] E.g. What are the consonants of English and German like? The cat sat on the mat: SBE: ??; US: ?? German: ?? The computer is broken. SBE: ??; US: ?? German: ?? Can you hear the differences? Can you describe the differences? Can you say why there are differences?

Speech production [symbols & sounds] Consonant articulation Place lips (labial) teeth (dental) alveolar ridge (alveolar) hard palate (palatal) soft palate (velar) uvula (uvular) pharynx (pharyngeal) larynx/glottis (glottal) Manner stop/plosive fricative nasal lateral glide/approximant trill tap/flap

Speech production [symbols again] IPA table

Speech production [Intonation] (Intonation can have a syntactic or pragmatic function) Statement – Question (sentence modality) Scotland beat France at rugby. Scotland beats France at rugby? Request – Command (pragmatic function) Could you come to my office?

So what‘s "Phonology“? The systematic use of sound segments and prosody in a specific language Examples: German has vowels a, b, c, d, f ..... English has a, c, e, ..... German has final devoicing of obstruents The 'voicing' of English plural & genitive {s} and past tense {d} follows the preceding sound Stress falls on the first element in compound words in German (in English the second element is often stressed) – Compare English vs. German: (Eng.) Buckingham Palace, Albert Hall, National Gallery

and Perception? Interesting facts: We don‘t identify the individual sounds as they reach our ears. The syllable: (cons) + vowel + (cons) is probably the smallest unit of perception. The consonants by themselves contribute less than the vowels by themselves to our understanding of a spoken utterance (because they don‘t form syllables!). (but they contribute more to the understanding of an utterance if there is one unchanging vowel than the vowels do with one unchanging consonant!) And what about written consonants and vowels?

Consonants vs. vowels [1] __e _ea_e_ _o_e_a__ _o_ _o_o__o_: _a__e_ __ou_y i_ __e _o__i__ _i__ a _e_ _u__y __e___ i_ __e a__e__oo_.

Consonants vs. vowels [2] Th_ w _th_r f_r_c_st f_r t_m_rr_w: r_th_r cl __d_ _n th_ m_rn_ng w_th _ f_w s_nn_ sp_lls _n th_ _ft_rn__n.

Consonants vs. vowels [3] The weather forecast for tommorow: rather cloudy in the morning with a few sunny spells in the afternoon.

Consonants vs. vowels [4] The weather forecast for tommorow: rather cloudy in the morning with a few sunny spells in the afternoon. speech versions only consonants only vowels original

Consonants vs. vowels [5] The vowel information is greater, but we need the temporal pattern (the rhythm) of the utterance (a product of the syllable structure (cons+ vowels) and the duration/weight/prominance of the vowels. only vowels – without silences only vowels – with silences only vowels – monotonous

So we perceive in chunks The syllables are the (more prominent) vowels with the (less prominent) consonants around them The sentences are the chains of syllables, with the more prominent words (the lexical or content words) giving the content and the less prominent words (grammatical or function words) grouped around them, showing the relation between them The melody (intonation pattern) helps to make the important words more prominent.

Connected speech "The president will be elected for a period of four years." Natural connected speech as chain of isolated words (no reductions) Natural with silences between words as chain of isolated without silences Comparison of isolated vs. connected function words

Connected speech (summary) "The president will be elected for a period of four years." The content words are longer, louder, unreduced, comprehensible when excised. The grammatical words are shorter, less loud, strongly reduced, incomprehensible when excised. The “production effort“ we invest reflects the importance of the words (longer + louder + unreduced = more care and effort). Our perception strategies follow this unequal distribution of effort. We concentrate on the prominent words. (BUT: Careful! This is a strategy associated with certain types of languages “stress-timed languages“. Not all languages do this. So-called “syllable-timed languages“ are less stress oriented.)

So, what applications are there? We don‘t normally think about pronunciation. So understanding the mechanisms of speech is invaluable in: foreign language teaching/learning pronunciation dictionaries speech pathology forensic phonetics speech technology

Let‘s look briefly at speech synthesis Commercial systems use "concatenative" methods (they stick recorded bits of speech together) They don‘t need very much phonetic knowledge (but they need to have good selection strategies) and the same approach can be applied to many different languages. The systems are good in limited domains, and using a neutral speaking style. They are bad on wide-ranging topics and more expressive speech. Research systems, such as "articulatory synthesis" require a lot of knowledge, and are used to find out more about speech production. They are potentially very flexible (so the developer has to know how to constrain the system just to produce what is natural) They are much more complex, and have to be programmed for each new language on the basis of knowledge acquired about that language.

Speech synthesis "Mary": http://mary.dfki.de A locally developed product (and research platform): "Mary": http://mary.dfki.de Now a (staged) example of how unexpressive synthesis in an inflexible dialogue system can go wrong (German railway timetable inquiry system): Synthesis + Recognition = Dialogue? (or chaos?)