Application Training: Round I August 22, 2013 1.  AZ CSP Training: August 22, 2013  Application Due Date: November 14, 2013  Evaluation Due Date: February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
Advertisements

Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Application Training: Round II November 7,
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
November 8, 2007 So you want to start a charter school?
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 “…will allow students … to get a vision of what can be achieved, what they can do in technical.
For West Virginia Department of Education DISCLAIMER This PowerPoint presentation serves only as a snapshot of purchasing regulations. Please visit the.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Bureau of Rehabilitation Services (BRS) Department of Rehabilitation Services (DORS) Understanding the State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation and Supported.
NH CHARTER SCHOOL PROGRAM OBJECTIVES & EXPLANATIONS Roberta Tenney, Administrator DOE.
Awarded School GME Training March 28, 2013 AZ CSP FY
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
PROFESSIONAL ORGAINIZATIONS LEADERSHIP FORUM AUGUST 6-7, 2013 NYSACTE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS.
South Carolina Public Charter School District Performance Framework Dana C. Reed, Assistant Superintendent of Performance Standards Courtney Mills, Director.
OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Monitoring and Reporting 2009 CSP Grant OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Monitoring.
Compliance Considerations Keeping Up in an Age of Accountability Presented by Jean E. Taraskiewicz.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.
Charles Pack Jr. WorkKeys and KeyTrain Help Make The Academy of Careers and Technology A West Virginia Exemplary School.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
NEW START-UP APPLICATION  Deadline to submit application is October 1 year prior to implementation  If proposal is ed, submit cover page.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Documents posted at QRIS 2011 Program Quality Improvement Grant RFP Bidder’s Conferences February & March 2011 Wendy Valentine Director,
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.
National Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities (NCITSPSD) NCITSPSD Technical Assistance Workshop Orientation.
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
Program Compliance Session VI.  Review what is compliance monitoring.  How monitoring occurs in Washington State.  Review monitoring components and.
Innovative Career and Technical Education Curriculum Grant February 18, 2014.
1. 2 Department of Education Public Charter School Program  PURPOSE: To expand the number of high- quality charter schools by providing financial assistance.
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance 2009 CSP Grant OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Application Training October 21,  AZ CSP Training: October 21, 2015  Application Due Date: December 4, 2015  Evaluation Due Date: December.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Reimagining Professional Learning Innovation Grant Deadline: March 23, 2016.
STEM Innovation Grant (RFP) Adaptive Math Learning Pilots April 6, 2016.
Application Tips School Leadership Program U. S. Department of Education 2005.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Green Capacity Building Grants Green Capacity Building Grants Prospective Applicant Webinar for SGA/DFA PY Posted July 10, 2009 at 3:00 PM ET.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program (CTEIG)
Need More Money? Grant Writing 101
End of Year Report and Renewal Process
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
ApprenticeshipNC Regional Collaboration and Expansion Project
The CSP Grant in North Carolina
Funding for State-level Activities under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 June 27, 2018 Good morning This presentation is in response to.
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Application Training: Round I August 22,

 AZ CSP Training: August 22, 2013  Application Due Date: November 14, 2013  Evaluation Due Date: February 24, 2014  CSP Award to Procurement: December 27, 2013  State Board of Ed Award: January 27, 2014  Awardees GME Training: January 30,

The CSP provides support for planning, program design, and initial implementation of charter schools. The intent of the program is to expand the number of high quality charter schools and to give students more educational opportunities, resulting in higher student achievement. 3

 Increase the number of high quality charter schools in Arizona, particularly those serving students most at risk in rural and urban settings;  Improve student achievement to high academic standards in AZ CSP schools; and,  Improve high school graduation rates in AZ CSP schools and prepare students for higher education or career readiness. 4

 The Arizona Charter Schools Program (AZ CSP) is a competitive, discretionary grant which offers financial incentives to new charter entities that can demonstrate the knowledge, skill and capacity to create and implement challenging curriculum, engaging instruction and rigorous assessment. 5

 Exemplars of challenging curriculum include, but are not limited to, the following: Advanced Placement International Baccalaureate ACT Quality Core School-developed curriculum with enhanced standards that can be assessed post-10 th grade AIMS and serve as predictors of college, technical school and career readiness. 6

 AZ CSP charter schools serving high school students will demonstrate a graduation rate higher than the state average for charter schools serving similar student demographics.  80% of AZ CSP charter high school students will meet or exceed challenging Arizona Academic Standards on each content area of AIMS. ◦ Awarded schools will align their practice with new Common Core Standards 7

 AZ CSP charter high school students will exceed the state average on the ACT or SAT.  AZ CSP charter schools serving high school students will have more students enrolled in Advanced Placement courses or academic courses of equal rigor. 8

 Planning and Program Design (max 18 months) occurs prior to opening of the charter school.  Implementation (max 24 months) occurs after the school opens for students. 9

 Eligible expenses are those incurred from the date of the grant award. Pre-award costs related to project outcomes incurred between the time of the grant training and the grant award are ineligible and cannot be reimbursed.  State and federal regulation do not permit Planning or Implementation Grant funds to be used for vehicles, renovation projects, construction and non institutional furniture. Moreover, establishment of petty cash funds or purchases of food and entertainment are strictly prohibited. 10

 According to Section 5204 (f)(3)(A) of the Federal CSP statute, an eligible applicant receiving a Charter Schools Program sub-grant may use the sub-grant funds only for post-award planning and design of the educational program, which may include the following: Refinement of the desired educational results and the methods for measuring progress toward achieving those results; Professional development of teachers and other staff who will work in the charter school. 11

 Planning funds can also be used for the following: Development of a marketing plan to advertise the school in the community prior to its opening. Employing staff necessary to plan the school such as a planning principal, a registrar, a secretary. Funding contracts with vendors to provide specific services for the planning of the school. Recruitment and training of teachers. Teacher training may be supported by stipends to teachers from grant funds. 12

 Planning funds may NOT be used for the following: The renovation or improvement of facilities. Facilities infrastructure. To support a CMO or vendor without a specific contract for services provided. Any other charter entity even if the entity is in the same location as the awarded entity. Salaries for school personnel that are covered by state funds once the school commences. 13

 Implementation grants are twenty-four months in length and will terminate from the date they are awarded.  Implementation begins once the entity has an approved facility and is ready to open.  Approved facility means that the school has a Certificate of Occupancy for educational use from its municipal Building Services Department and approval from the State Fire Marshall.  AHERA (asbestos) is regulated by the EPA and is beyond sponsor and AZ CSP purview. 14

 According to Section 5204 (f)(3)(B) of the Federal CSP statute, an eligible applicant receiving a Charter Schools Program grant or sub-grant may use the grant or sub-grant funds only for: informing the community about the school; acquiring necessary equipment and educational materials and supplies; acquiring or developing curriculum materials; and other initial operational costs that cannot be met from State or local sources. 15

 2013 is the last award year sponsored by the US Department of Education Charter Schools Program.  AZ CSP reserves the right to reduce the overall amount of the award and/or the number of Project Years from 3 to 2. 16

 1. Contact AZ CSP to receive the official application.  2. Do not use the application at the AZ CSP website. It is a model but not the actual application form.  3. Gather all information necessary for the Federal Financial Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA – see application).  4. Determine your corporation and school name and structure. 17

 1. This AZ CSP application is not speculative. A clear design of the school should be evident in the application.  2. The school design presented in the AZ CSP application must align with the charter application submitted for authorization.  3. Failure to align will result in subsequent cancelation of the award. 18

 You could lose your grant award from any of the following events:  1. The school leader identified in the application is no longer the school leader.  2. You fail to submit your charter application to an Arizona authorizer by July 1,  3. Your charter application fails to meet administrative completeness review.  4. Your charter application fails to become authorized by January 12,

 Deadline: November 14, 2013, 11:59 pm  How: Submit by with attachments to  Format: The application must be submitted in PDF format.  Caveat: Before submitting in PDF format, review to make sure all pages have a white background. AZ CSP will reject applications submitted with a blue page background. 20

 1. When you submit your application to your respective authorizer, you must notify them that you are applying for the AZ CSP grant.  2. a copy of that notice to 21

 End of Part I 22

 Prepare to use the following:  Application  Evaluation rubric 23

 Preliminary Section  Narrative Component Section Section B - Executive Summary Section C - Governance Section D - Leadership Section E - Academic Accountability Section F - Budget Alignment (Budget Form) Section G - ESEA 5203 Compliances 24

 1. FFATA  2. School Operation Schedule  3. School Description  4. LEA Autonomy 25

 The bolded words highlight the criteria used by application reviewers to assess and score each Narrative Component.  Note: AZ CSP monitoring is directly aligned with application components. 26

Deputy Associate Superintendent Charter Schools Program: Dr. Mark S. Francis Education Program Specialist: Jane Smoudi Program Specialist: Sheri Partridge