Module III Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co-Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 3 and Step 7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Aug 7 09 Co-Occurring Service Array Psychiatric Evaluation Comprehensive Evaluation Medication Monitoring Medications Clinical Consultation Family Therapy.
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 6, 2010 Division of Service Support,
One Science = Early Childhood Pathway for Healthy Child Development Sentinel Outcomes ALL CHILDREN ARE BORN HEALTHY measured by: rate of infant mortality.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
WELCOME Good Morning Good Morning and Welcome. Introduction to Washington State’s Recommended Process for the Screening and Assessment of Persons with.
2010 Special Education Hearing Officers and Mediator Training (San Diego) The Nexus Between the DSM & IDEA: Social Maladjustment v. Emotional Disturbance.
A joint Australian, State and Territory Government Initiative Rater and Clinical Utility Training Older Persons “Sharing Information to Improve Outcomes”
WELCOME Good Morning and Welcome. Introduction to Washington State’s Process for the Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co-Occurring Disorders.
The context:  Increase in joint planning between Alberta Health, Alberta Health Services and Human Services  Focus on children/youth involved with Child.
Comprehensive Children’s Mental Health Act
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition – DSM-5 Substance Use Disorders and American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM)
Healthy Inclusion: Caring for Children with Special Needs in Child Care © The National Training Institute for Child Care Health Consultants,
Dimensional Assessment for Co-Occurring Disorders 8 th Annual Prevention and Recovery Conference Todd Crawford, LPC, LADC Director, Residential Services.
1 Module 3 Understanding Mental Disorders, Treatment, and Recovery.
8/5/ Health Issues for Children in Foster Care Abraham Rice, M.D. Foster Care Clinic Medical Director Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Ab.
1 Co-occurring Alcohol and Other Drug and Mental Health Conditions in Alcohol and other Drug Treatment Settings Session 3: Identifying Comorbidity.
Page of 11 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program308: Adult Psychopathology: Bipolar Disorder 1 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program.
CHILD PSYCHIATRY Fatima Al-Haidar Professor, child & adolescent psychiatrist College of medicine - KSU.
Lori L. Phelps California Association for Alcohol/Drug Educators,
Chapter 2 The Problem of Dual Diagnosis. Dual Diagnosis and Comorbidity Dual diagnosis – Describes individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for a mental.
Mental Health Cindy Dawson CYC (Cert.) r. Mental Health Centralized Intake for CHEO/ROMHC Youth Program Any referrals for services at CHEO or the Royal.
Youth Empowerment Services (YES) A Medicaid Waiver Program for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbances Clinical Eligibility Determination Texas Department.
Module IV Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co- Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 8 though Step 12 and Case Study.
Assertive Case Management & Feedback as a Clinical Intervention Linda May, PhD, MFT – Case Manager Rachel Loewy, PhD – Clinical Director.
ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH Children’s Behavioral Health.
The identification and treatment of physical and sexual violence among adolescents in a healthcare setting: The Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center By.
A Conceptual Framework for Co- Occurring Disorders within a Behavioral Health Care System Reference: National Dialogue on Co-occurring Mental Health and.
Janice Berry Edwards, PhD, LICSW, LCSW-C, BCD, ACSW
Module III Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co- Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 3 and Step 7.
Inside or Outside our Circle: Do Mental Health Concerns Affect our Outcomes? CityMatCH Expedition 2004 Conference September 13, 2004.
Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June.
Treatment 101 Substance Abuse Basics West Coast Consulting Wanda King
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
Module II Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co- Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 1 and Step 2.
© Copyright, The Joint Commission Integration: Behavioral and Primary Physical Health Care FAADA/FCMHC August, 2013 Diana Murray, RN, MSN Regional Account.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 32Clients with a Dual Diagnosis.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Module IV Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co- Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 8 though Step 12 and Case Study.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
ADOLESCENTS IN CRISIS: WHEN TO ADMIT FOR SELF-HARM OR AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR Kristin Calvert.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Adult Ambulatory.
Assessment. General Points re: Assessment 1. Screening is different than assessment. Identifies whether further attention is warranted. Appendix H Identifies.
SCREENING BRIEF INTERVENTION AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) 1.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
RNSG 1163 Summer Qe8cR4Jl10.
Depression Management Presentation 1 of 3 Documented diagnosis PHQ tool Depression care assessment.
StagesOf Assessment Stages Of Assessment. The Stages of Assessment for the Single Assessment Process §Publishing information about services. §Completing.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Justine Gonzalez Azusa Pacific University, School of Nursing GNRS 584 Mental Health Nursing.
Chapter 6 P RACTICE D IMENSION I: C LINICAL E VALUATION E LEMENTS : S CREENING & A SSESSMENT Contributor: Lori Phelps Lori L. Phelps California Association.
KITS V JUNE , 2014 BREAKING DOWN AND UNDERSTANDING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL : WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW CAN HURT YOU M. Connie Almeida, PhD, LSSP, Licensed Psychologist.
Depression and Suicide Chapter 4.3. Health Stats What relationship is there between risk of depression and how connected teens feel to their school? What.
Mental Health Assessment of Children and Adolescents Chapter 24.
EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN COUNTY JAILS/DENTENTION CENTERS.
NSFT Integrated Delivery Teams
Advocacy Using Assessment of FASD in Schools
Screening and Referral
Quality Case Practice Improvement
School-Based Behavioral and Mental Health Supports and Services
Bruce Waslick, MD Medical Director UMass / Baystate MCPAP Team
Treating Alcohol Abuse
The Employee Advisory Service
MORES Mobile Outreach Response Engagement Stabilization Service
Treatment of Clients Experiencing Anxiety
Addressing Crisis and Suicide Intervention
Understanding and Using ASAM Criteria
Assertive community treatment webinar
Toronto Child & Youth Advocacy Centre (CYAC)
Presentation transcript:

Module III Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co-Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 3 and Step 7

Module III Objectives Review Step 3: Screen for and Detect Co-Occurring Disorders Review Step 4: Determine Quadrant and Locus of Responsibility Review Step 5: Determine Level of Care Review Step 6: Determine Diagnosis Review Step 7: Determine Disability and Functional Impairment Case Studies

Review of Module II Reactions, questions or comments from the readiness to change and motivational survey answers from Module I Reactions, questions or comments from Module I

Review of Assignments Review the text box on page 67— Advice to the Counselor: Do’s and Don’ts of Assessment for COD. Continue reading TIP 42 Chapter 4

Major Aims of the Assessment Process To obtain a more detailed chronological history of past mental symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and impairment, particularly before the onset of substance abuse, and during periods of extended abstinence.

To obtain a more detailed description of current strengths, supports, limitations, skill deficits, and cultural barriers related to following the recommended treatment regimen for any disorder or problem. To determine stage of change for each problem, and identify external contingencies that might help to promote treatment adherence.

Activity – TIP ZIP Test You will have five (5) minutes to complete the test. You may NOT use the TIP during test At the end you can check with your neighbor and change your responses if you wish. But not the TIP

Step 3: Screen for and Detect Co-Occurring Disorders Acute safety risk Past and present mental health symptoms/disorders Past and present substance abuse disorders Cognitive and learning deficits Past and present victimization and trauma

Safety Screening Safety screening requires that early in the interview the clinician directly ask the client (and anyone else providing information) if the client has any immediate impulse to engage in violent or self-injurious behavior or is in any immediate danger from others.

If the answer is yes, the clinician should obtain more detailed information about the nature and severity of the danger, and any other information relevant to safety. If the client appears to be at some immediate risk, the clinician should arrange for a more in-depth risk assessment by a qualified clinician, and the client should not be left alone or unsupervised.

Who in your agency is qualified to provide suicide risk assessments? What are their qualifications? When are suicide risk assessments completed and how often? When and how is staff trained in providing suicide risk assessments? How is this suicide risk assessment documented?

Knowing what questions to ask does not automatically make one qualified to provide a mental health, substance abuse, or suicide risk assessments.

Quick TIP Exercise Christine in Appendix What if Christine was obviously high and furious, and blaming her parents for revealing the results of his drug test to her probation officer who was making recommendations about treatment

Screening for Past and Present Mental Disorders in a Substance Abuse Setting To understand a client’s history. If the history is positive for a mental disorder, this will alert the counselor and treatment team to the types of symptoms that might reappear so that the counselor, client, and staff can be vigilant about the emergence of any such symptoms.

To identify clients who might have a current mental disorder and need both an assessment to determine the nature of the disorder and an evaluation to plan for its treatment. 3. For clients with a current COD, to determine the nature of the symptoms that might wax and wane so that the client can monitor the symptoms. Special attention is given to how the symptoms improve or worsen in response to medications, “slips” (i.e., substance use), and treatment interventions.

Screening for Past and Present Substance Use Disorder Screening for substance use problems begins with inquiry about past and present substance use and substance-related problems and disorders. If the client answers yes to having problems and/or a disorder, further assessment is warranted

Trauma Screening To screen, it is important to limit questioning to very brief and general questions such as, “Have you ever experienced childhood physical abuse? Sexual abuse? A serious accident? Violence or the threat of it?”

Determine Quadrant and Locus of Responsibility To ask participants to what extent they are familiar with the 4 Quadrants of Care? Review the text box at the bottom of page 82 in TIP 42.

Substance abuse system More severe mental disorder/ more severe High Severity III Less severe mental disorder/ more severe substance abuse disorder Locus of care: Substance abuse system IV More severe mental disorder/ more severe substance abuse disorder Locus of care: State hospitals, jails/prisons, emergency rooms, etc. Alcohol and other drug abuse I Less severe mental disorder/ substance abuse disorder Locus of care: Primary health care settings II More severe mental disorder/ less severe substance abuse disorder Locus of care: Mental health system Low Severity High Severity Mental Illness

LOW - HIGH HIGH - HIGH LOW - LOW HIGH - LOW TABLE OF CO-OCCURRING PSYCHIATRIC AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE RELATED DISORDERS IN ADULTS Washington State LOW - HIGH Collaboration between systems Eligible for public alcohol/drug services but not mental health services Low to Moderate Psychiatric Symptoms/Disorders And High Severity Substance Issues/Disorders Services provided in outpatient and inpatient chemical dependency system HIGH - HIGH Integration of services Eligible for public alcohol/drug and mental health services High Severity Psychiatric Symptoms/Disorders And High Severity Substance Issues/Disorders Services provided in specialized treatment programs with cross-trained staff or multidisciplinary teams LOW - LOW HIGH - LOW Collaboration between systems Eligible for public mental health services but not alcohol/drug services High Severity Psychiatric Symptoms/Disorders And Low to Moderate Severity Substance Issues/Disorders Services provided in outpatient and inpatient mental health system Consultation between systems Generally not eligible for public alcohol/drug or mental health services Low to Moderate Psychiatric Symptoms/Disorders And Low to Moderate Severity Substance Issues/Disorders Services provided in outpatient chemical dependency or mental health system

Special Note on C-GAS Score Special Note on C-GAS Score: A concern has been expressed about using the C-GAS score to inform placement for COD clients in the substance abuse system. The concern is that a low C-GAS score would mean an automatic placement into the mental health system. These clients should be assessed based on ASAM-PPC 2 within the Emotional Behavioral Conditions and Complications and the question should be whether the client’s level of functioning is too impaired to be able to participate in substance abuse treatment. This may not be determined until after a client has completed withdrawal.

To determine SMI status start by finding out if the client is already receiving mental health priority services (e.g., Do you have a mental health case manager? Are you a client of Community/County Mental Health?). If the client is not already a mental health client, and their symptoms and behavior adversely affects their ability to function within the structure of the substance abuse agency, then it might be necessary to arrange for referral for a more comprehensive assessment.

Determination of Severity of Substance Use Disorders The presence of active or unstable substance dependence or serious substance abuse (e.g., recurrent substance-induced psychosis without meeting other criteria for dependence) would identify the client as being in which quadrant? (Quadrant III or IV)

The presence of less serious substance use disorder (mild to moderate substance abuse; substance dependence in full or partial remission) identifies the client as being in which quadrants? (Quadrant I or II)

Clients in Quadrant III who present in substance abuse treatment settings are often best managed by receiving care in the addiction treatment setting, with collaborative or consultative support from mental health providers.

Clients in Quadrant IV usually require intensive intervention to stabilize and determination of eligibility for mental health services and appropriate locus of continuing care.

Developmental Context For adolescents this onset and offset information must be placed in developmental context. A careful developmental history is a routine part of a mental health interview and is designed to assess not only impact of symptoms on functioning throughout childhood but also to assess the impact of developmental delays on assessment of current functioning. Treatment planning for adolescents includes educational placements and the tailoring of treatment materials to developmental level so it is critical to assess the following domains: This information is best gathered from the client and a caregiver. In the absence of parents a caseworker or probation counselor may be the primary informant. School records can also yield valuable information about the client’s mental health history prior to the onset of substance use.

Developmental Domains (non-exhaustive) Birth Adulthood Physical Cognitive Social Emotional Behavioral

Developmental Domains Physical Teratogens Growth, head circumference ØStress Chronic Illness Nutrition/ Weight ØHormones/ Puberty

Developmental Domains Cognitive Ø Synaptic Growth and Pruning Ø Speech and Language Ø Reasoning Ability Ø Internal Working Models Ø Attributional Styles

Developmental Domains Social Ø Attachment/ Bonding Ø Parent-child interaction Ø Sibling Relationships Peer Relationships Social Skills Ø Perspective-taking Morals/ Rules

Developmental Domains Emotional Ø Temperament Ø Bonding/ Attachment Ø Self-soothing Ø Emotional Regulation Ø Emotion Identification

Developmental Domains Behavioral Ø Behavioral Inhibition Ø Stimulus-response learning Ø Instrumental Learning Ø Social Learning Ø Self-instruction, Self-Talk Contingency Management

Developmental Timeline 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Note: Birth complications Developmental milestones Early Aggression School adjustment Peer relationships Traumatic events Family life events Onset of problem behaviors Onset of legal/criminal problems Protective factors, strengths

Importance of Client History Case 2 Christine has methamphetamine dependence and bipolar disorder stabilized with lithium. She reports that when She uses meth she has mood swings, but that these go away when she stops using for a while, as long as she takes her medication. At the initial visit Christine. states she has not used for a week and has been taking her medication regularly. She displays no significant symptoms of mania or depression and appears reasonably calm. The counselor should not conclude that because Christine has no current symptoms the diagnosis of bipolar disorder is incorrect, or that all the mood swings are due to methamphetamine dependence. At initial contact, the presumption should be that the diagnosis of bipolar disorder is accurate, and lithium needs to be maintained.

TIP Exercise – Application to Case Examples Why is it prudent for a clinician to assume Christine’s existing diagnosis is accurate? What if you, the clinician, suspect that Christine’s bipolar diagnosis is inaccurate? What action should you take?

If a client comes into the clinician’s office under the influence of alcohol, it is reasonable to suspect alcohol dependence, but what is the only diagnosis that can be made based on that evidence?

(Alcohol intoxication)

If a client comes into the clinician’s office and says she hears voices, regardless of whether or not the client is sober currently, what diagnosis should be made on that basis?

(No diagnosis should be made on that basis alone.)

Documenting Prior Diagnoses Diagnoses established by history should not be changed at the point of initial assessment. Issues related to diagnosis should be raised by the counselor with the clinical supervisor or at a team meeting.

If the clinician suspects a long-established diagnosis may be invalid, before recommending diagnostic re-evaluation it is important that the clinician take the time to: Gather additional information Consult with collaterals Get more careful and detailed history Develop a better relationship with the client

Linking Mental Symptoms to Specific Periods The mental disorder and substance use history have in the past been collected separately and independently. As a result, the opportunity to evaluate interaction between mental symptoms and periods of abstinence, which is the most important diagnostic information beyond the history, has been lost routinely. Newer and more detailed assessment tools overcome these divisions.

The substance abuse treatment counselor can proceed in two ways: 1. Inquire whether any mental symptoms or treatments identified in the screening process were present: during periods of 30 days of abstinence or longer before onset of substance use.

2. More reliable information may result by defining with the client specific time periods where the substance use disorder was in remission, and then getting detailed information about mental symptoms, diagnoses, impairments, and treatments during those periods of time.

Step 7: Determine Disability and Functional Impairment How is disability and functional impairment determined in your programs? How do you use this information?

Determining the Need for “Capable” or “Enhanced” Level Services A specific tool to assess the need for “capable” or “enhanced” level services for persons with COD currently is not available. The consensus panel recommends a process of “practical assessment” that seeks to match the client’s assessment (mental health, substance abuse, level of impairment) to the type of services needed.

Wrap up Any questions?