 2.6 The Correlation between the Oral and Written Tests Test FormatsCorrelation (r) Oral Pre-test vs. Written Test.862** Oral Post-test vs. Written Test.974**

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Design It is a Quasi-Experimental Design using the symbolic design: OX,O. A single group is pretested (O), exposed to a treatment (X), and post.
Advertisements

The Five Main Components of Reading Instruction
CAUSAL-COMPARATIVE RESEARCH LIYANA BT AHMAD AFIP
Functional Illiteracy 22% of the adult U.K population is functionally illiterate Costing the U.K £81billion annually Highest cost of any European Nation.
Welcome to Ridge House Letters and Sounds Presentation
Presented by: English Program NYTC rev. 02/26/13 Overview.
Chapter 5 presentation Sight words New Words New Concepts New Meaning.
Phonics Jillian Marshall February 5, Phonics: Cracking the Code “At one magical instant in your early childhood— that string of confused, alien.
Grade 1: Phonics and Word Study
Words Their Way… Word Study for Phonics, Vocabulary and Spelling Instruction.
DEE BERLINGHOFF, PH.D. MOUNT SAINT MARY COLLEGE The Literacy Quality Indicators: Using Explicit Instruction.
Cathy Mrla Jen Mahan-Deitte
Post-Test Data Analysis Workshop. Agenda I. Analyze 2014 TerraNova Results II. Comparative Data Analysis: TerraNova & Explore Test Results III. Using.
VALIDITY.
A Review of Instructional Methods in Reading (Based on the NRP Report summary by Shanahan) Shanahan, T (2005). The National Reading Panel Report: Practical.
THE IMPACT OF APPLYING TWO OF THE CONCEPT MAPPING TECHNIQUES AS A FORM OF PRE-TASK ON EFL LEARNERS’ USE OF TENSES In Oral Accuracy BY: ZOHREH SAADATI.
Phonics. Phonics Instruction “Phonics instruction teaches children the relationship between the letters of written language and the individual sounds.
EMERGENT LITERACY R. Grant Emergent Literacy.  Alphabetic Principle-English is an alphabetic language based on the alphabetic principle: each speech.
Article Summary – EDU 215 Dr. Megan J. Scranton 1.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
The Link Between Language and Literacy EDU 280 Fall 2014.
1 Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 1 Report September 22, 2009 HIGHLIGHTS Research and Policy Support Group FOR PRESS OFFICE.
4 6.1 Analysis of Students’ Accurate Responses toward Single Vowel Letters 6.2 Analysis of Students’ Accurate Responses toward Vowel Digraphs 6.3 Analysis.
A study on the effects of phonics instruction on the decoding and encoding performances of junior high school EFL students in Taiwan Advisor: 鍾榮富教授 Author:
Fluency in the Foundation Skills ACADEMY OF READING®
ABC’S By: Cathryn Cobb. Table of Contents TEKS What Students Will Learn Students Learn By Classroom Pictures Capital Letters Lower Case Letters Vowels.
Presenter: 黃琬斐. Motivation In elementary school English teaching, listening and speaking are emphasized, but individual oral reading skill is neglected.
Kanchana Prapphal, Chulalongkorn University Statistics for Language Teachers Kanchana prapphal May 23, 2002 Kasetsart University.
Chapter 18 Some Other (Important) Statistical Procedures You Should Know About Part IV Significantly Different: Using Inferential Statistics.
指 導 教 授:鍾榮富教授 研 究 生:吳佩真 報告人:林淑珍(Na2c0023). PHONICS Introduction 2. Purposes of the Study 4. Research Questions 3. Significance of the Study 1. Background.
Who?  English Language Learners  Learners of English  Students scoring below the 40 percentile on standardized tests  Students with language based.
Chap. 2 Principles of Language Assessment
Chapter 5 Informal Assessment: Progress Monitoring.
 METHODOLOGY 1. Subjects 2. Instruments 3. Procedures 4. Data Analysis 4. Data Analysis The Questionnaire The Oral Production Testing Material The Written.
Kindergarten Math By: Lauren Baevich. § English Language Arts and Reading, Kindergarten. (7) Reading/letter-sound relationships. The student uses.
EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL INCENTIVES ON INTRINSIC MOTIVATION OF STUDENTS An Action Research Project by Cassandra Caceres Spring T.
A Study on the Effects of Phonics Instruction on the Decoding and Encoding Performances of Junior High School EFL Students In Taiwan researcher: 吳佩真 reporter:
Educational Research Chapter 13 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10 th Edition.
EXPERIMENT VS. CORRELATIONAL STUDY. EXPERIMENT Researcher controls all conditions Experimental group – 1 or more groups of subjects Control group – controlled.
Diagnostic Testing David E. Meltzer University of Washington.
Essential Question Why is the Alphabet important? Why do we need to know how to write each letter?. Unit Question Can you show me how to write each letter.
An Action Research Project Chevonne Byas EDUC 7021 T Fall 2010 Overeating and Underachieving: The Effects of Physical Fitness on the Academic Achievement.
By Sana Tibi, Ph.D. EGRA Workshop Washington, DC March 12 th, 2008.
1 A Study On The Effects Of Phonics Instruction On the Decoding And Encoding Performances Of Junior High School EFL Students In Taiwan Researcher: Pei-chen.
A Primer on Reading Terminology. AUTOMATICITY Readers construct meaning through recognition of words and passages (strings of words). Proficient readers.
Characteristics of Effective Teachers presented by Paul R. Vaughn, Associate Dean UMC College of Agriculture.
ANALYZING READING BELIEFS By: Dereque Falls. Reading Methods  Evaluating Reading Beliefs- An Interview  Breaking Down Written Language  Continuum of.
FOUNDATIONAL SKILLS FOR OLDER READERS A GOVERNOR’S TEACHING NETWORK PROJECT SHARON HOPPER VANCE COUNTY SCHOOLS
English Learning Motivations for Students in the College of Foreign Languages and Engineering F She-mei Wang F Yu-lin Her F Pei-an.
Tips and Guidelines. Chapter Four: Results Assessments Questionnaires/SurveysTest Scores/Report Card Data Rationale Why study is needed?What results will.
There is a small but significant difference in course grades and final exam scores for males & females Consistent with Tai & Sadler (2001): males perform.
Table of Contents  Research Design  Threats to Internal Validity  Threats to External Validity  Proposed Data  Pre-Test Post-Test Data Results 
Phonics and Word Study Literary Links Phonics Instruction Teaches children the relationship between the letters (graphemes) of written language.
¿What's The Best Way To Teach Children To Read? According To The National Reading Panel.
Why Wilson? The Wilson Reading System directly and systematically teaches students how to fluently and accurately decode. It is unlike traditional phonics.
CHAPTER 4: HOW PSYCHOLOGISTS USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
The Alphabet and Beyond Jael Penn Burnett Elementary.
REWARDS Multisyllabic Word Strategy
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Chapter 11 t-tests: means of dependent groups
Reading Essentials.
Phonics Information session for parents
The Building Blocks of Literacy
Phonics Information session for parents
Five Essential Elements of Reading Instruction
Bivariate Association: Introduction and Basic Concepts
A Linguistic Perspective on Phonics 6
The Academic Writing of Teacher Candidates: Connecting Speaking and Writing The objective of this mixed methods study was to investigate the effects.
EXPERIMENT VS. CORRELATIONAL STUDY
Phonics Information session for parents
Presentation transcript:

 2.6 The Correlation between the Oral and Written Tests Test FormatsCorrelation (r) Oral Pre-test vs. Written Test.862** Oral Post-test vs. Written Test.974** Summary of the Correlation Coefficients between the Oral Tests and the Written Test (r=.862**, p<.01) (r=.974**, p<.01) **Correlation is significant at the o.o1 level (2-tailed) Table 10 Students’ “decoding” (speaking) abilities were closely related to their “encoding” (spelling) abilities

 1. Gender 2. Learning Period 3. Country (teacher) IPG 4. Oral 5. Oral & Written  4

3.1 The Effects of Genders on the Oral and Written Tests Written Test No Oral Post-test Oral Pre-test Genders had no significant effect on subjects’ performance ( p >.05)

3.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Pre-test among Students with Different English-learning periods No Table 14

Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Post-test among Students with Different English-learning periods No 3.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests Table 15

3.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Written-test among Students with Different English-learning periods No Table 16

3.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Pre-test among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 17

3.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Post-test among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 18

3.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the written among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 19

3.4 A Comparison of the Oral Pre- and Post-tests Scores Comparison of the Accuracy Frequency of the Stressed Vowels of the Multi-syllabic Items in the Oral Pre- and Post-tests No Note. The highest frequency=29. Table 20

3.5 Relationship Between the Oral and Written Tests Summary of the Correlation Coefficients between the Oral Tests and the Written Test No *. p<.0 5 Table 21

 1)The factors in the subjects’ background information had no significant effect on their oral and written test scores in the IPG. 2)The students in the IPG had no clear concept of stress. 3)A significant correlation was only found between the oral post-test and the written test in the IPG.

 1. Gender 2. Learning Period 3. Country (teacher) HPG 4. Oral  5. Oral & Written  4

4.1 The Effects of Genders on the Oral and Written Tests Written Test Oral Post-test Oral Pre-test No

4.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Pre-test among Students with Different English-learning periods No Table 25

Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Post-test among Students with Different English-learning periods 4.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests No Table 26

4.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Written-test among Students with Different English-learning periods No Table 27

4.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Pre-test among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 28

4.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Post-test among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 29

4.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the written among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 30

4.4 A Comparison of the Oral Pre- and Post-tests Scores Comparison of the Accuracy Frequency of the Stressed Vowels of the Multi-syllabic Items in the Oral Pre- and Post-tests Note. The highest frequency=15. Table 31

4.5 Relationship Between the Oral and Written Tests Summary of the Correlation Coefficients between the Oral Tests and the Written Test *. p<.05 Table 32

 1)The factors in the subjects’ background information had no significant effect on their oral and written test scores in the HPG. 2)The students in the HPG had some concept of stress and syllable division. 3)Subjects’ decoding abilities are associated with their encoding abilities. 4)Learners could decode or encode unfamiliar words through prediction depended on their linguistic competence and their understanding of the letter-sound correspondence.

 1. Gender 2. Learning Period 3. Country (teacher) LPG 4. Oral 5. Oral & Written  4

5.1 The Effects of Genders on the Oral and Written Tests Written Test Oral Post-test Oral Post-test No

5.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Pre-test among Students with Different English-learning periods No Table 36

Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Post-test among Students with Different English-learning periods 5.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests No Table 37

5.2 The Effects of Learning Periods on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Written-test among Students with Different English-learning periods No Table 38

5.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Pre-test among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 39

5.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the Oral Post-test among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 40

5.3 The Effects of Phonics Teachers’ Nationality on the Oral and Written Tests Comparison of the Scores of the written among Students’ Phonics Teachers from Different Countries No Table 41

5.4 A Comparison of the Oral Pre- and Post-tests Scores Comparison of the Accuracy Frequency of the Stressed Vowels of the Multi-syllabic Items in the Oral Pre- and Post-tests Note. The highest frequency=16. No Table 42

5.5 Relationship Between the Oral and Written Tests Summary of the Correlation Coefficients between the Oral Tests and the Written Test *. p<.05 No Table 43