Www.irstea.fr Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea Thomas Bourdier, Thomas Cordonnier, Georges Kunstler & Benoit Courbaud 9th IUFRO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU INTAS SILVICS Project Pushchino Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Mathematical Problems in Biology (Pushchino.
Advertisements

Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea Resilience and vulnerability from a stochastic controlled dynamical system perspective.
Forest Management and forestry methods in France Forest Management and forestry methods in France (UE)
What is Close-to-Nature Silviculture in a Changing World? Kevin L. O’Hara University of California - Berkeley.
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Forest Biome Forest Climate Forest Plants Forest Animals.
Reserves and Density of Organic Carbon in Russian Forests Anatoly Utkin, Dmitry Zamolodchikov, Georgy Korovin and Olga Chestnykh 4. C phytomass and forest-forming.
Uneven-aged beech stand, Germany. Uneven-aged mixed-hardwood stand, Michigan.
Uneven-aged management options to promote forest resilience:
Can partial harvesting in boreal mixedwoods maintain processes and fungal communities associated with coarse woody debris? Manuella Struckelj Hedi Kebli.
Can knowledge on plentering be used to generate a general concept of forest heterogeneity? Jean-Philippe Schütz IUFRO Conference on uneven-aged silviculture.
Gembloux Agricultural University Ministry of Walloon Region.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
Comparison of structural attributes between old-growth and adjacent managed forests in Bosnia and Herzegovina Srdjan Keren Renzo Motta Dusan Rozenbergar.
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
BOGFOR RESEARCH PROGRAMME Florence Renou, Project Manager and E.P. Farrell, Project Leader Forest Ecosystem Research Group, University College Dublin CUTAWAY.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
FNR 407 Forest Economics William L. (Bill) Hoover Professor of Forestry
Climatic and biophysical controls on conifer species distributions in mountains of Washington State, USA D. McKenzie, D. W. Peterson, D.L. Peterson USDA.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Forest simulation models in Netherlands: main developments and challenges WG1 Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Koen Kramer, MartJan Schelhaas, Isabel vd Wyngaert, Geerten.
Sustainable Forest Management on the Yakama Reservation.
Comparison of FVS projection of oak decline on the Mark Twain National Forest to actual growth and mortality as measured over three FIA inventory cycles.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
Caleb Benson, Senior Vegetation Ecology Summer 2013 CU Mountain Research Station.
Ph. Wipfler and G.Deckmyn Kranzberg Forest Experiment : upscaling to the forest. From the empirical approach to the mechanistic simulation of ozone effects.
Site Index Modeling in Poland: Its History and Current Directions Michał Zasada 1,2 and Chris J. Cieszewski 1 1 Warnell School of Forest Resources, University.
The potential for hardwood business in the South Baltic Region Edgar Kastenholz European Network of Forest Entrepreneurs (ENFE)
Tended intimate mixtures (tending stands or individual spruce) Advantages –Nursing effects are evenly distributed (better protection from radiation frost.
Is It True? At What Scale? What Is The Mechanism? Can It Be Managed? 150 Is The New 80: Continuing Carbon Storage In Aging Great Lakes Forests UMBS Forest.
Modeling Forest Management Scenarios Under a Changing Climate in Northern Minnesota Matthew J. Duveneck, Robert M. Scheller, Mark A. White Stephen Handler.
Coupling deer and forest models in capsis: why and how? Tanguy Daufresne INRA Toulouse Laboratoire de Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage (Behaviour.
Structure And Biodiversity In Managed And Unmanaged Mixed Beech Forests: A Comparison Based On The Strict Forest Reserves Network In France.
International Seminar
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
Changes to Populations
Chapter 10: Forest and Mineral Resources Note: WE ARE NOT COVERING MINERAL RESOURCES.
SIMULATION OF GROUND VEGETATION DIVERSITY IN BOREAL FORESTS Larisa Khanina 1, Maxim Bobrovsky 2, Alexander Komarov 2, Alex Mikhajlov 2 1 Institute of Mathematical.
Do shade tolerant species out-grow intolerant trees in low light? Dr. MB Walters Michigan State University.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Thinning as a tool of close to nature forestry Igor Štefančík Forest Research Institute, Zvolen Slovakia.
Feedbacks Between Tropical Forests, Climate, and Earth’s Carbon Budget Jacob Eisenberg Advised by David Medvigy, Geosciences.
Lecture 10 FORE 3218 Forest Mensuration II Lectures 10 Site Productivity Avery and Burkhart, Chapter 15.
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
Economic impacts of changes in fish population dynamics: the role of the fishermen’s behavior Dipl.-Geogr. Peter Michael Link, BA Research Unit Sustainability.
PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF FOREST ECOSYSTEM CARBON IN RUSSIA AND PROBLEMS OF ITS IMPROVING by Vladislav Alexeyev Maxim Markov Boris Rybinin Michael Tarasov Pavel.
Forest Ecosystem.
Effects of Intensive Fertilization on the Growth of Interior Spruce Presentation to: Interior Fertilization Working Group February 5/13 (revised March.
1 4.6 Utilization of Forest Resources By Lester Green Smallwood Academy Gambo.
Wood Harvesting Techniques Mr. Distasio. Leave nothing but limbs & branches behind. Works best for large stands with few species of similar ages whose.
Stand Development. Site Capability The ability of a forest to grow is related directly to physical site factors. Favourable physical factors create better.
Goreaud F. 1, Lhuillier C. 1, de Coligny F. 2 CAPSIS Meeting, 28/06/ Montpellier Simulating mixed virtual stands with the "spatial" library in CAPSIS.
Silvicultural Prescription Rob Lusk. B All Species PlotTPATPA SD Basal Area BA SD Average Stand Diameter Average Stand Diameter SD Mean Quadratic Diameter.
Stand Growth. To practice good forest management, woodlot owners must be able to identify the tree species on their woodlot, understand how they grow,
Aurors: Kinga Kozak i Łukasz Majcherczyk. A forest is a large area of land covered with trees or other woody vegetation. Forests are the dominant terrestrial.
Silvicultural Systems for Mixedwood Management Phil Comeau Dept. of Renewable Resources University of Alberta.
Changes to Populations. 4 factors that effect the size of a population Increase Population – 1) Birth – 2) Immigration (entering a population) Decrease.
Tree light capture and spatial variability of understory light increase with species mixing and tree size heterogeneity Gauthier Ligot 1, Aitor Ameztegui.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
Structure and Dynamics of forest stands Intro to Spatial Analyses
Presentation Outline What is an irregular shelterwood system?
Sustainable forest management
Biodiversity Variety of life
Biodiversity Variety of life
Temporal and spatial variability in stand structure and individual-tree growth for 10 years following commercial thinning in spruce-fir forests of northern.
Figure 1. Comparisons across evergreen coniferous (green bars), deciduous broadleaf (blue bars) and tropical forests (red bars), regarding (A) NEP in proportion.
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Forestry Clipboard Tables
Presentation transcript:

Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea Thomas Bourdier, Thomas Cordonnier, Georges Kunstler & Benoit Courbaud 9th IUFRO International Conference on Uneven ‐ aged Silviculture June 19 th 2014 Size inequality reduces productivity in pure forest stands

2 Context Growing interest in understanding the links between forest structure and ecosystem services (Gamfeldt et al. 2013) Ecosysteme services = the benefits people obtain from ecosystems (MEA,2005) Link with forest management: Which structures and species mixing should we favour to maintain high level of ecosystem services? Production: ecosystem service with high economic value (France) Revenue: 40 billions € and jobs Total: 58 Mm 3 / year: Timber wood 22 Mm 3 / year Wood for industry 12 Mm 3 / year Energy wood 24 Mm 3 / year 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

3 Background EFFECT OF STRUCTURE ON PRODUCTION Effect of species diversity Increased production : when low productivity (Belote et al. 2011, Paquette & Messier 2011, Toigot in prep.) Mixing of trees with different functional characteristics (Kelty 1992, Pretzch 2005, Zhang et al. 2012, Vilà et al. 2013) No effect or decreased production In mature forests (Long & Shaw 2010, Hardiman et al. 2011) Stands dominated by beech (Jacob et al. 2010) Effect of size diversity More ambiguous: some postive effects (Hardiman et al. 2011, Lei et al. 2009) and no effect (Long & Shaw, 2010) 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

4 Aim of the study Quantify the marginal effect of size heterogeneity on the production of forest stands with regard to the functional characteristics of the species Better qualify and quantify the effect of size heterogeneity in pure forest stands of various species Determinate if species functional characteristics have an effect on stand production 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

5 Shade tolerant species Light demanding species Pure stands Uneven-agedEven-aged same density and mean diameter 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014 Hypotheses EFFECT OF SIZE HETEROGENEITY ON PRODUCTION Negative effect of size heterogeneity on stand production? Effect decreases with shade tolerance?

6 Material & methods THE FRENCH NATIONAL FOREST INVENTORY Data from 2006 to plots available Dendrometric and ecological data Georeferenced: climatic data can enhanced the plot information Pure stands >80% pure (basal area) 10 species studied Stand descriptionFlora inventory Soil characteristicsTree measurement Species Scots pine sessile oak Peduncul ate oak maritime pine Beech Downy oak Silver fir Aleppo pine Norway Spruce Larch Nb plots th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

7 Material & methods SIZE HETEROGENEITY INDEX: THE GINI COEFFICIENT Index derived from the economy Used in ecology since the 80’s (Weiner 1985, Geber 1989, Knox et al. 1989) Better performance than other indices (Lexerod and Eid 2006, Valbuena et al. 2011) Increasingly used : (Duduman, 2011; Klopcic and Boncina, 2011, Valbuena et al. 2011) Can be used with several species and in all forest stands Range from 0 perfect equality to 1 maximum theoritical inequality In practice 0,1 to 0,7 Gini = 2 x 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

8 GINI Gini=0.2 Gini=0.35 Gini=0.55 Gini=0.7

9 Material & methods SHADE TOLERANCE INDEXES Shade tolerance = capacity for growth in the shade (Niinemets & Valladares, 2006) We tested 2 indices: Ellenberg’s indicator values (1991) From 3 to 9 for woody species Developped for central Europe Characterize species’ potential to grow in the understory Niinemets & Valladares (2006): Index confined between 1 (very intolerant) and 5 (very tolerant) Available for many species (806 worldwide) Differences between deciduous and evergreen species? (Lusk et al. 2008) 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

10 Material & methods STAND PRODUCTIVITY: MODEL SELECTION 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

11 Effect of size heterogeneity on the production of pure forest stands Significant negative effect for 7 out of the 10 species studied 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

12 Interaction between shade tolerance and size heterogeneity No clear interaction between species shade tolerance and Gini effect No difference between deciduous and conifer trees 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

13 Effect of size heterogeneity on the production of pure forest stands For most species, stands with low size heterogeneity are more productive than stands with high size heterogeneity Effect of size heterogeneity could not be related to shade tolerance No effect of other traits (wood density, SLA) 2 Hypothetical mecanisms investigated: Light interception efficiency reduced by heterogeneity? Conversion efficiency reduced for largest trees? 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

14 Experiments with a forest dynamics model SAMSARA 2 3 species: Norway spruce Silver fir European beech FNI plots Growth modelled for 10 years Variables: Production Light interception Light conversion rate= plot production / plot intercepted light Courbaud et al. submitted 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

15 Simulation results 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

16 Conclusion and perspectives Convergence between empirical results and simulations An increase of size heterogeneity decreases: Efficiency in stand light interception Efficiency in light conversion in growth No clear differences between species Static results: forest dynamic may affect our results Size heterogeneity effect is influenced by ground slope? Effect on volume instead of basal area? 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014

17 Thank you for your attention Questions??

18 Effect of slope on the effect of Gini

19 Model selection

20 Thank you for your attention Questions??

21 Shade tolerant species Light demanding species Pure stands Mixed stands Uneven-agedEven-aged same density and mean diameter -- 9th IUFRO Conference June 19 th 2014 Hypotheses EFFECT OF SIZE HETEROGENEITY ON PRODUCTION