IFTA Fraud Prepared by: Georges Sansfaçon Revenu Quebec Inspector IFTA LEC Member Mesa, Sept. 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE TRAINING PROGRAMME Section 49 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT STEPHEN WILSON MAGISTRATENORTHAM 19 TH June 2009.
Advertisements

Stormwater Illicit Discharge Inspector Training Workshop April 24, 2013 Tabletop Group Exercise.
Michael Perley, Director Ontario Campaign for Action on Tobacco.
ADVISE SUSPECT OF ARTICLE 31 -
1 Motor Carrier Registration Motor Fuels Tax Division Rev. 08/09.
KC Transportation Inc. v. Dep’t. of Treasury, 2013 Mich. App. LEXIS 1197 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013) By: Sukanya Mukherjee Comptroller of Maryland.
How to Use OTC Reports & Resources
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 10, 2009 Joy Prenger – Missouri Ron Hester - Ontario.
INTERNATIONAL FUEL TAX AGREEMENT Celebrating 30 Years of Cooperation and Trust IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS 2013 Annual IFTA Business Meeting.
Local Automated Enforcement of Red Light Violations Presented by Tom Drage County Attorney.
Motor Carrier Registration Excise Tax Division 1 July 2014.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc.
IFTA/IRP Joint Session Encouraging Cooperation Between IRP and IFTA Processes Joy Prenger, Missouri Mary Jo Pointer, Missouri.
Citation Audits – Nevada’s Answer to Non-compliant Carriers Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles Dawn Lietz Supervising Auditor II.
REGIONAL ISSUES. Overview: An opportunity to breakout into geographic regions to: An opportunity to breakout into geographic regions to: Meet sit down.
Levels of Police in Canada Law 120 Mr. Denton. Policing in Canada The most expensive component of justice system in Canada is policing. The most expensive.
City Commission Meeting June 16, WORKSHOP DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED CIVIL CITATION PROCESS.
Determining Prior Period Tax Exposure for Veterinary Businesses Do you owe Illinois Sales Taxes for Prior Periods?
1 Registered Tax Return Preparers Frequently Asked Questions A presentation of the North Carolina Society of Enrolled Agents.
INTRODUCTION The organization of excise department is structured to facilitate collection of indirect taxes. The apex body in-charge of administration.
1 Treasury Offset Program NASC PRESENTATION. 2 What is TOP? TOP = Treasury Offset Program A centralized process that intercepts federal payments of payees.
IRP Update IFTA 2006 Managers Workshop and Law Enforcement Seminar.
2007 IFTA BALLOTS & A CONCESUS BOARD INTERPRETATION.
Program Compliance Review Overview IFTA Annual Business Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada July 21-22, 2006 Presented by Dick Beckner Debora Meise Jay Starling.
REGIONAL ISSUES 2009 Discussions including 2007 & 2008 Findings and Issues.
TPR I MICHAEL A. NEALS #4213 INSTRUCTOR. Work Zone Safety Work Zone Safety History NJ DOT Response NJSP Construction Unit Dedicated Unit Advantages Unit.
IFTA Manager’s and Law Enforcement Seminar September 20-22, 2006 Fifth Annual.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc.
Notices to Comply (NTC) and Notices of Violation (NOV) March 22, 2006 Peter Moore Yorke Engineering, LLC x24
1. Department of Finance Revenue and Taxation Division 2 Exempt Status of Natives / First Nations.
Red Light Bill June, Red Light Bill Allows for the use of Local Hearing Officers to conduct hearings for Notices of Violations. Counties and cities.
IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING JULY 20-21, 2007 JURISDICTION ONLY SESSIONS AN AUDIT MANAGER’S PERSPECTIVE.
AUDIT, RECOVERY PROCEDURES & PENALTIES UNDER SALES TAX ACT, 1990 AND FEDERAL EXCISE ACT 2005 BY MUNIR QURESHI CHIEF COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (SOUTH)
NAFTA Teamwork At Its Finest. Team Members Border State Representatives – Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas – Both IFTA and IRP US Department of.
ANNUAL IFTA BUSINESS MEETING JULY 18-19, 2012 GRAND RAPIDS, MI Agreement Procedures Committee (APC)
May 2011 Cost Savings October Reduce staff by a total of 1,200 Reduce facilities by 135 Reduce fleet equipment by 740 pieces Outsource when needed.
IFTA Law Enforcement Committee Fuel Tax Enforcement Managers’ and Law Enfoncement Seminar Durham N.C. Septembre 2009.
IFTA Law Enforcement Committee Fuel Tax Enforcement (IFTA) Managers’ and Law Enforcement Workshop Mesa, Arizona October, 2011.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
Consumer Taxation Program Branch IFTA Fraud Part 1 - Administrative Focus September 22, 2005.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc. TOWN HALL MEETING 2011 Annual IFTA Business Meeting August 17, 2011 Virginia Beach, VA.
International Fuel Tax Agreement Presented by Ghyslaine Lepage (QC) Debora K. Meise (IFTA, Inc.) Lonette L. Turner (IFTA, Inc.) Andrew Markle (ON) IFTA.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 19, 2008 Meg Cronk – New York Ron Hester - Ontario.
1 IFTA Managers Workshop/ Law Enforcement Seminar.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 20-22, 2006 Ron Hester Ontario Ministry of Finance.
6 th Annual Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar Are you in Compliance Presented by: Bill Kron, Deborah Brown and Debbie Meise.
IFTA BEST PRACTICES LAW ENFORCEMENT GUIDE BY IFTA LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE.
International Fuel Tax Agreement An Overview. What is IFTA? Fuel Tax Collection Agreement between the 48 contiguous states. Non- IFTA = Yukon Territory,
Clark Snelson Assistant Attorney General State of Utah (With thanks and recognition to Ted Spangler, Assistant Attorney general, Idaho, retired) For presentation.
IFTA Law Enforcement Committee Fuel Tax Enforcement Managers’ and Law Enforcement Workshop Mesa, Arizona September 2010.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 12-14, 2007 Ron Hester Ontario Ministry of Revenue.
Legal framework Look at the legal compliance and framework a business is subject to.
C U S T O M E R D R I V E N. B U S I N E S S M I N D E D. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Bureau of Construction Codes Keith E. Lambert, P.S.,
IRP Update IFTA 2006 Annual Business Meeting Las Vegas, NV Dave Saddler Presented by: Dave Saddler Executive Director IRP, Inc.
UNITS 4:3-4:4 Patients’ Rights and Legal Directives for Health Care.
NAPA COUNTY Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart Building Code Violations 1 COMPLAINT Written complaint (form, letter,
[Presenter and presentation information to go here]
IT’S TIME FOR THE TOWN HALL!
REGIONAL ISSUES 2008 Discussions including 2007 Findings and Issues
8.1 Levels of Police in Canada/Starting a Police Investigation
IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Workshop October 2011
Arrest: Citizen and Police Rights
THE REAL INTERSTATE DRIVER'S EQUITY ACT
REGIONAL ISSUES WRAP-UP
NYTDA The NY Trucking & Delivery Association
Powers and Enforcement
POLITICAL PARTY FUNDING BILL Presentation to Ad Hoc Committee on the Funding of Political Parties (NCOP) Date:
New Commissioners’ Meeting IFTA BASICS
Clearinghouse Access Agreements
New tasks of the National Labour Inspectorate in Poland related to inspections of legality of employment.
Presentation transcript:

IFTA Fraud Prepared by: Georges Sansfaçon Revenu Quebec Inspector IFTA LEC Member Mesa, Sept. 2005

IFTA Fraud IFTA Fraud Topics of discussion; -Joint Canadian / USA fuel tax compliance initiative, -Dyed fuel abuses, -Illegal use of Ifta permits, -Types of violations, -Repeated offenders, -Revenue or taxes losses, -Cases or examples,

Let’s dive into the subject !

JOINT CANADIAN / USA MOTOR FUEL TAX COMPLIANCE INITIATIVE Overview Governmental agencies in the northern and eastern regions (Canadian provinces and American state representatives) participating in joint compliance activities Governmental agencies in the northern and eastern regions (Canadian provinces and American state representatives) participating in joint compliance activities On the American side - Federal (IRS) and State Revenue Agents assisted by D.O.T. agents, Customs Officials & State Police On the American side - Federal (IRS) and State Revenue Agents assisted by D.O.T. agents, Customs Officials & State Police On the Canadian Side - Provincial Revenue Inspectors, D.O.T. Agents, Customs Officials, RCMP, Provincial Police. On the Canadian Side - Provincial Revenue Inspectors, D.O.T. Agents, Customs Officials, RCMP, Provincial Police. Members from different agencies perform road side inspection at determined sites Members from different agencies perform road side inspection at determined sites Focused on: Focused on: fuel activity in general and with relation to IFTA fuel activity in general and with relation to IFTA Visibility; support the efforts and respect of the Fuel Tax Laws; and Visibility; support the efforts and respect of the Fuel Tax Laws; and Public awareness: information given to carriers in regards to fuel tax laws, Public awareness: information given to carriers in regards to fuel tax laws, Always held at specific period of time, during 1 week in September Always held at specific period of time, during 1 week in September ( The time period is flexible)

Results – 2003/04 Enforcement Type Total vehicles inspected? 3,8943,590 Average 2290 non- compliance What is this? 82%N/A Total fuel sample inspections 3,8943,590 Total Dyed Fuel violations 615 Suspected “bleached fuel” samples 11N/R IFTA Citations issued 5754 (33 missing an IFTA decal, permit or licence, on board the vehicle) Fuel Tax Violations Quebec : 22

Dyed Fuel Abuse (Specific Examples) A small carrier from a neighbouring jurisdiction, during the2004 Cranberry Project phase II, was caught using dyed fuel. First, he was fined for illegal use of coloured fuel and the through Ifta understanding had a surprise after an assessment. A small carrier from a neighbouring jurisdiction, during the2004 Cranberry Project phase II, was caught using dyed fuel. First, he was fined for illegal use of coloured fuel and the through Ifta understanding had a surprise after an assessment. $ A carrier, not registered in his base jurisdiction, but should have been is caught in a neighbouring jurisdiction using dyed fuel. First, the company was cited for Ifta, by using a prescribed vehicle, and not detaining a temporary permit or being registered. A carrier, not registered in his base jurisdiction, but should have been is caught in a neighbouring jurisdiction using dyed fuel. First, the company was cited for Ifta, by using a prescribed vehicle, and not detaining a temporary permit or being registered. Secondly, was fined for the illegal use of dyed fuel. Once the information shared, the provincial inspectors went back to the company. Once the information shared, the provincial inspectors went back to the company. Another truck was caught in the company’s yard during the friendly follow-up mission. Surprisingly, this company is not at their first dyed fuel offence. Surprisingly, this company is not at their first dyed fuel offence. This time, the fines started at $1,000. The file has now been transferred to the audit dept. and the company is under assessment. The audit should generate some tax dollars “$$$” with all the information received by the inspectors. Note;I know for a fact that another company using the same M.O. describe her above, was recently assessed for $89, The company was caught within a short period of time, but at two separate locations and with 2 different units (truck). What a deal!

Dyed Fuel Abuse (Specific Examples) A truck belonging to a construction company was stopped for inspection. It was found to have coloured fuel in the running tank and a ticket for $440 was issued to the company. Because of the number of vehicles, it was assigned to the field audit section. An assessment of $160,000 was raised against this company. This offence was found because of cooperation of enforcement agencies in a blitz scenario. A truck belonging to a construction company was stopped for inspection. It was found to have coloured fuel in the running tank and a ticket for $440 was issued to the company. Because of the number of vehicles, it was assigned to the field audit section. An assessment of $160,000 was raised against this company. This offence was found because of cooperation of enforcement agencies in a blitz scenario An inter jurisdictional company located in New York State, crossing An inter jurisdictional company located in New York State, crossing in to Ontario on a frequent basis, but fail to register with IFTA. This company was observed 14 times, and instead of issuing an offence notice for $440, the inspector chose to lay information before the court. This meant the company had to appear before the court and allowed for an increase of penalty. in to Ontario on a frequent basis, but fail to register with IFTA. This company was observed 14 times, and instead of issuing an offence notice for $440, the inspector chose to lay information before the court. This meant the company had to appear before the court and allowed for an increase of penalty. The magistrate was so un-impressed with this company and their refusal to comply; they were fined $2,500 for each charge, for a grand total of $35, A pick-up truck, with a coloured fuel skid tank in the back, belonging to a landscaping company was stopped in a routine check by an inspector. The running tank of the vehicle was found to contain coloured fuel. An assessment of $200,000 was raised on the tax owing on the fuel used. Additional penalties were added for subsequent offences, but were overturned on appeal. This company now complies and uses tax paid fuel in all on-road vehicles A pick-up truck, with a coloured fuel skid tank in the back, belonging to a landscaping company was stopped in a routine check by an inspector. The running tank of the vehicle was found to contain coloured fuel. An assessment of $200,000 was raised on the tax owing on the fuel used. Additional penalties were added for subsequent offences, but were overturned on appeal. This company now complies and uses tax paid fuel in all on-road vehicles.

Repeated offenders; Yes they exist ! I cannot reveal the methods that we all utilize to catch these offenders. We have different tools available to us while performing our inspection duties. You will get the odd case, where a total “Non” compliance will occur. Call them: HOT Shots or what ever! It may be different, once the company receives a large assessment from his; Provincial or State, Revenue agency. It is not a guaranty that the company will comply eventually. SOLUTIONS: Let us not forget the possibilities of; SuspendingRevoking and even Cancelling, their Ifta licenses. their Ifta licenses. Flagging their account until the situation is cleared or payment has been received!

OUT THERE!

Repeated offenders; -continued- Road side enforcement personnel must be informed of these types of offenders. Sharing information threw IFTA channels can improve such special cases. Does it work? Yes you can be sure it does. I have mentioned several examples and given some actual cases. I’m confidant that you could all supply me with some similar cases. We are out there in the field and see all kinds of situations. Our main goal is to have companies and/or carriers respect the laws and regulations. What is that ; “famous saying”? The pen is mightier than the sword! Write reports and collect data. Advise your fellow workers, management, Ifta personnel and the auditing staff of your findings. Do follow ups. You will be surprised of the long term results. (Better tax returns!) $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$ END. $ END. $

That’s all Folks !