NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 28, 2008.
Advertisements

NCLB and Title I School Improvement
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
- 0 - Update: Recommended school interventions in response to loss of enrollment, academic under-performance, and NCLB Oakland Unified School District.
Accountability Reporting Webinar: Parent/Guardian Communications, NCLB School Choice and SES August 23, :00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Kenneth Klau.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Pershing Pershing Annual Meeting Title I AYP/School Improvement.
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
SANDBURG MIDDLE SCHOOL Report on Program Improvement Year 1 Parent Information Night Thanks for being here! February 13, 2014 Scott Bell, Principal 1.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting NAME OF SCHOOL DATE.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, Title 1 Part A and the Oakland Unified School District Presented By Wilhelmena Sims, Director Department of State and.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Differentiated Accountability Title I Conference Daytona, Florida April 29, 2009.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Presentation transcript:

NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007

About School Intervention Assistance Team (SAIT)… Chipmans efforts pays off! School made Academic Performance Index (API) growth targets two years in a row No longer state monitored school CONGRATULATIONS TO CHIPMAN!

Federal Accountability NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement is determined by not meeting AYP two consecutive years in ELA and/or Math or the same indicator like API with any subgroup. Meeting AYP is determined using 4 indicators: Percent proficient or above in English Language Arts and Mathematics – Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Participation Rate API (CSTs, CAPA, and CAHSEE) Graduation rate-only for high schools

Identified Program Improvement Schools in California As of : 5,887 Title I Schools in California 2,208 schools are in Program Improvement (38% of Title I schools) 427 in Year in Year in Year in Year in Year 5 To exit PI, school must meet AYP two years in a row

Chipman Middle School Program Improvement (PI) Year 2 Of the 4 areas, Chipman did not meet AYP two years in a row in the same content areas of ELA and Math AMO-ELA for African American subgroup AMO-Math for African American & Latino subgroups

Program Improvement Requirements Year 2 Parent notification of the option of school choice to a non-program improvement school District will provide transportation costs Parent notification of supplemental educational services (SES) by state approved tutorial services Set aside Title I funds (up to 20% of total allocation) for choice, SES, & transportation costs Revise single school plan to NCLB requirements

Program Improvement Year 1 School Improvement Year 2 School Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action Year 4 Restructuring Year 5 Restructuring School Choice Transportation Set aside Title I funds Revise SSP Same as Year 1 Supplemental Services Same as Year 1 & 2 Select one of the following: Replace school staff New curriculum Appoint outside expert Extend school year/school day Restructure organizational structure of school Parents & Public informed of corrective action & allows comment Same as Year 1-3 Plan for restructuring governance of school Examples: Close school & reopen as charter Replace all or most of staff Contract with private management to operate school Other major reform State takeover Same as Year 1-4 Implement plan for restructuring governance of school

Collaborative work to meet requirements… Parent notification sent early September for school choice Worked with all middle schools to strategize enrollment possibilities Designed SES contract Met with state approved SES providers; of the 55 approved providers, 12 signed a contract with AUSD Parent letter & brochure being finalized & translated Parent notification will be sent November 1 st for SES Set aside District Title I 20% Eligibility of SES is based on low income & FBB/BB priority order Each student would receive up to $1,000 worth of SES, which equates to approximately 16 one hour sessions Offer services after Thanksgiving through April

Status of School Choice Requests Wood Middle School was determined to be in the best situation to accept new students As of October 12 th, there were 7 requests Only 5 students chose choice As required, the choice option is a part of the enrollment packet, so new students will have choice

School Choice Transfers to Wood Middle School GradeGenderEthnicityProgramBus PassInter- district 6 th MaleAfrican American YesNo 6 th *Enrolled 10/10/07 FemaleWhiteYesNo 7 th Female Vietnamese ELNo 7 th FemaleWhiteYesNo 8 th MaleFilipinoYesNo

Continuous Improvement for Chipman Middle School Implementing the Nine Essential Components for Effective schools… Ongoing benchmark assessments Appropriate reading placement: intensive, strategic, benchmark & advanced Appropriate math placement: intervention, benchmark and advanced Literacy and Math coaches to support teaching Focused teacher collaboration on student work SIM content enhancement routines implementation Literacy Workshop-Fusion for strategic readers After school tutoring everyday After school homework assistance everyday Before school math computer lab will begin Research focus group support for African American/Latino students; staff development for teachers

Looking ahead… Secondary educational options task force work will also focus on future options for Chipman