STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAO instrument specifications and sensitivities
Advertisements

1 ATST Imager and Slit Viewer Optics Ming Liang. 2 Optical layout of the telescope, relay optics, beam reducer and imager. Optical Layouts.
C. Beichman, Dimitra Touli, Gautam Vasisht, Roger Smith Tom Greene
990901EIS_Opt.1 The Instrument: Optical Design Dr. John T. Mariska Data Coordination Scientist Naval Research Laboratory
Observational techniques meeting #7. Detectors CMOS (active pixel arrays) Arrays of pixels, each composed on a photodetector (photodiode), amplifier,
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
7. Beer’s Law and It’s Implications for Instrument Construction.
Alt.Aperturer 0 (m)FWHM(")  0 (")  0 (sec) 4 kmCFHT 3.8m km2.4 m~ ~600~5 35km10 m~ ~600~5 h (km)P (mbars)T (K)  (gm m.
The Green Bank Telescope a powerful instrument for enhancing ALMA science Unblocked Aperture Low sidelobes gives high dynamic range Resistance to Interference.
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
AURA New Initiatives Office S.C. Barden, M. Liang, K.H. Hinkle, C.F.W. Harmer, R.R. Joyce (NOAO/NIO) September 17, 2001 Instrumentation Concepts for the.
Wide-field, triple spectrograph with R=5000 for a fast 22 m telescope Roger Angel, Steward Observatory 1 st draft, December 4, 2002 Summary This wide-field,
PalSpec Status Review1 PalSpec Status Review WITH NOTES RE KECK APPLICATION Terry Herter, Chuck Henderson (Cornell) John Wilson, Mike Skrutskie.
MMT Magellan Infrared Spectrograph ( MMIRS ) P.I. Brian McLeod Warren R. Brown SAO/CfA.
Astronomical Instrumentation Often, astronomers use additional optics between the telescope optics and their detectors. This is called the instrumentation.
Science Specification of SOLAR-C payload SOLAR-C Working Group 2012 July 23.
1 Korean Activities in IR Space Missions - Past, Current and Future - Woong-Seob Jeong 1 on behalf of Korean Infrared Astronomy Group 1 KASI, Korea Ramada.
Space Infrared Astronomy in Japan 2009 UN BSS & IHY Workshop, September 22, 2009 MATSUMOTO, Toshio Seoul National University, ISAS/JAXA.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
The LSST Exposure Time Calculator was developed to model the effects of LSST design changes on signal-to-noise ratio and survey depth. The ETC utilizes.
Thermal Infrared Multispectral Mapper Computer Model of the Experiment It is a model of the EXPERIMENT, it is not a model of the DEVICE Special models.
MIRHES (Mid-IR high-resolution echelle spectrometer) MIRHES team.
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Spectroscopic Observations (Massey & Hanson 2011, arXiv v2.pdf) Examples of Spectrographs Spectroscopy with CCDs Data Reduction and Calibration.
Current Status of SPICA Focal Plane Instruments October 19, 2009 Hideo Matsuhara (ISAS/JAXA) & FPI team.
18 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Mid-InfRAred Camera wo LEns (MIRACLE) for SPICA Takehiko Wada and team MIRACLE.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
ASTRO-F Survey as an Input Catalogue for FIRST Takao Nakagawa (ISAS, Japan) & ASTRO-F Team.
NORDFORSK Summer School, La Palma, June-July 2006 NOT: Telescope and Instrumentation Michal I. Andersen & Heidi Korhonen Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam.
ASTR 3010 Lecture 18 Textbook N/A
DRM1 design description SDT 5/17/12 1. WFIRST DRM candidate design summary At SDT6 2/2-3/2012 consensus for full-up mission, aka “DRM1” was: 1.3m aperture,
MIRI Optical System CDR, 6 th & 7 th December 2006 Mid InfraRed Instrument 07-1 Optical System Critical Design Review (CDR) TIPS Presentation: Margaret.
KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?
WFIRST IFU -- Preliminary “existence proof” Qian Gong & Dave Content GSFC optics branch, Code 551.
Specification of the Focal- Plane instruments for SPICA 2009/03/13.
Dae-Hee Lee 1, Woong-Seob Jeong 1, Toshio Matsumoto 2,3, Hyung Mok Lee 2, Myungshin Im 2, Bon-Chul Koo 2, Masateru Ishiguro 2, Jonghak Woo 2, Myung Gyoon.
Current Status of SPICA FPI Mechanical I/F & resources April 6 th 2010 Hideo Matsuhara (ISAS/JAXA) & FPI team.
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Scientific/Performance Requirements1 PACS Science and Performance Requirements A. Poglitsch.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
Overview, Spectrometer Products and Processing Philosophy Phil Appleton on Behalf of PACS Team PACS IFU Spectrometer.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Observations of Near Infrared Extragalactic Background (NIREBL) ISAS/JAXAT. Matsumoto Dec.2-5, 2003 Japan/Italy seminar at Niigata Univ.
GMT’s Near IR Multiple Object Spectrograph - NIRMOS Daniel Fabricant Center for Astrophysics.
The High Altitude Observatory (HAO) at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y APS Formation Sensor.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
1 Near-Earth objects – a threat for Earth? Or: NEOs for engineers and physicists Lecture 2 – From observations to measurements Dr. D. Koschny (ESA) Prof.
G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team Emittance meeting 04/11/2015.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Astronomy 920 Commissioning of the Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Near-infrared Imaging Spectrometer for NEXTSat-1
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Observational Prospect of NIREBL
Infrared Instrumentation for Small Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)

Concept of FPC FPC consists of two instruments FPC-G: Focal plane guiding camera FPC-S: Near infrared camera for scientific observation FPC-S has a back up function of FPC-G FPC-G and S must have a same FOV and pixel scale with same detector. 1K x 1K InSb array (25  m pixel) ROIC developed for MIRI/JWST by Raytheon 5 arc-minutes FOV for 1 frame 0.3 arc-second FOV for 1 pixel (~diffraction limit at 5  m)

Detector proposed by Raytheon Format: 1024 x 1024 active (plus two columns of reference pixels) Pixel Pitch: 25 μm Input Circuit: SFD (source follower per detector) Active Fill Factor: > 98% Spectral Response: μm Average Quantum Efficiency: > 90% (1 - 5 μm) Typical Response Uniformity: ≤ 5% (1σ) Average Dark Current: ≤ 0.02 e-/sec at 30 K Read Noise: 25 ~ 30 e - for single CDS (~20 e - for 0.4 Hz eadout) Power Dissipation: 0.5 mW (0.4 Hz readout), 1.2 mW ( 1Hz readout) Well Capacity: 2x10 5 e- Outputs: 4 Reset Modes Global Reset or reset by Row pair Operating temperature>10 K

Optical design of FPC-G Optical axes of lens group are shifted to improve off axis image 7 lenses with 4 aspherical surfaces Lens materials are ordinary used ones Spot size ( I and z band) is typically 10  m. Maximum size is ~35  m at a far end from the telescope axis Distortion effect can be corrected by interpolation formula.

Structure of FPC-G Cross sectional view of FPC-G Weight ~ 4kg (Support structure and FPA are not included)

Performance of FPC-G Required accuracy of the determination of centroid: 0.05 arcsec Wavelength band: I band (0.8  m) Detection limit: 18.6 mag (1Hz read out, 25  ) Number of stars in 1 frame: ~12 stars (GSCII Catalog) FPC-G can achieve required accuracy Power dissipation 1.2 mW (1 Hz readout), 0.5 mW (0.4 Hz readout)

Optical design of FPC-S FPC-S covers wavelength range from 0.5  m to 5 m  one more optical element a little longer than previous design (520 mm)

Spot diagram for white light (0.8-5  m) Typical spot size 24  m Max spot size31  m For monochromatic light 2-5  m max spot size ~34  m  m max spot size ~42  m Distortion effect can be corrected by interpolation formula. Error of centroid for 4’x4’ field is average:0.03”, Max 0.06” Error of centroid for 5’x5’ field is average:0.07”, Max 0.37”

Structure of FPC-S Weight ~ 6kg (Support structure and FPA are not included) Filter wheel10 positions (blank, diffuser, 8 filters)

New mode: LVF Spectroscopy Three LVFs (Linear Variable Filter) are installed on the filter wheel cf , , LVF has transmission depending on the physical position (scanning direction). Wavelength coverage is factor 2 Wavelength resolution is ~ Slit less spectroscopy at the wavelength range from 0.8 to 5  m Combined with slow scan, surface spectroscopy can be done efficiently for diffuse extended source Scan direction ↓ ← 5 arc-minute →LVF 0.8  m 1.6  m

Expected performance of FPC-S Assumed parameters Telescope3-m aperture (7m 2 ) Efficiency0.5 (Optical + quantum efficiency) Read out noise20 e - image size4 pixels 3  detection limit for point sources (100 sec integration, R~5) 26.3mag(AB) for all bands Vega magnitude J(1.25  m)H(1.6  m)K(2.2  m)L(3.5  m)M(5.0  m) Photon noise becomes dominant for integration time lon ger than 100 sec 3  detection limit for surface brightness (100sec integration, R~5) 81 nW.m -2.sr -1 3  detection limit fro LVF mode, R~50, integration time ~t Point sources, F 3.4x t -1 W.m -2.  m -1 Extended source,.F 8.1x t -1 nW.m -2.sr -1 Line intensity for point source6.84x t -1 W.m -2 Line intensity for extended source1.62x t -1 nW.m -2.sr -1

Comparison with JWST Larger field of view JWST2.2x4.4 arcmin FPC-SPICA5x5 arcmin Much larger throughput x 20 of JWST Capability of surface spectroscopy New science that can not be done with JWST will be possible