Principal Professional Development Summer 2005 Getting Ready for School Improvement Planning Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Pennsylvania Department of Education Get R. Pennsylvania Department of Education Presented By: June Tran, IRF Kirkbride School December 6, 2010.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
SIG Year Two Application Process
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Principal Professional Development Summer 2006 Getting Ready for SIP: Identifying “Root Causes” Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Curriculum & Alignment Institute Susan McCauley, Ph.D.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Elementary Teaching & Learning Moving Forward with Literacy Plymouth Church.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
California Common Core State Standards… General Information Original Presentation to the Governing Board November 8, 2011 E. Hardcastle, J. Hayhurst,
North Side Elementary School Dr. Mary Nardo, Principal North Side is making AYP. In addition to making Adequate Yearly Progress for the year, North.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards October, 2012.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
To make the best use of this supplementary material, set your PowerPoint view to Normal and make sure that you can see the notes window. Please let a facilitator.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE River Edge School District December 16, 2015.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Special Education Plan Feedback Sessions. Agenda Welcome and Introductions Department of Student Services Purpose Why are we updating the Special Education.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
Smarter Balanced Assessments Student Reports and Instructional Implications.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning October 2011.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Presentation transcript:

Principal Professional Development Summer 2005 Getting Ready for School Improvement Planning Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability, Assessment, & Intervention

Goals Participants will gain skills for their use of the Getting Results! frameworks. Participants will: become familiar with the differences and similarities between the 2004 and 2005 PSSA reporting categories become familiar with the differences and similarities between the 2004 and 2005 PSSA reporting categories practice analyzing data and synthesizing findings from multiple sources using their own data practice analyzing data and synthesizing findings from multiple sources using their own data engage in discussion of “root causes” engage in discussion of “root causes”

What is Getting Results! ? framework for school improvement planning developed by PDE that the School District of Philadelphia has adapted framework for school improvement planning developed by PDE that the School District of Philadelphia has adapted

What’s Different? What are the Implications? AYP - Grades 3 through 8 and 11 AYP - Grades 3 through 8 and 11 Reported Results - Assessment Anchors Reported Results - Assessment Anchors Parent Involvement Action Sequence New SIP Format Review of SIPs PDE Review of SIPs Science will be introduced in next year’s SIP Science will be introduced in next year’s SIP

New PSSA Reading Reporting Categories

Reporting Category Standard A. Numbers & Operations2.1 Numbers 2.2 Computation B. Measurement2.3 Measurement C. Geometry2.9 Geometry 2.10 Trigonometry D. Algebraic Concepts2.8 Algebra E. Data Analysis & Probability 2.6 Statistics & Data 2.7 Probability Standards assessed over the five reporting categories 2.4 Mathematical Reasoning 2.5 Problem Solving Not Assessed/Integrated in others2.11 Concepts of Calculus New PSSA Mathematics Reporting Categories

Getting Results! School District of Philadelphia School Improvement Planning Process School District of Philadelphia School Improvement Planning Process PD Calendar Milestones of Progress Executive Summary PD Calendar Milestones of Progress Executive Summary Step 2: Design Step 2: Design Step 4: Development of People Step 4: Development of People Step 3: Delivery Step 3: Delivery Summary of Shared Values Prioritize Improvement Targets Prioritize Improvement Targets Step 1: Summarize Data Identify Root Causes Step 1: Summarize Data Identify Root Causes Step 5: Documentation Step 5: Documentation A 5 Step Process

1. READING At least 54% of all students will be proficient in Reading, as measured by the annual state-wide PSSA assessments. 2. MATHEMATICS At least 45% of all students will be proficient in Mathematics, as measured by the annual state-wide PSSA assessments. 3. STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN STATE ASSESSMENTS At least 95% of eligible students will participate in required state-wide assessments. 4. STUDENT ATTENDANCE Student attendance in school will improve continuously (to an average of at least 90% by 2014). 5. FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION RATE (high schools only) The 4-year graduation rate for high school students will increase consistently (to at least 80% by 2014) Student Achievement Improvement Targets * * If your school has already met these targets for all students and student groups, consider setting your own challenging, ‘stretch’ targets that will ensure continuous improvement of instructional practices and student achievement. Every school improvement plan must address the following areas of student success:

Achievement School Profile SAT Team Walk Through Student Performance Goals Strategies & Interventions Monitoring Of Evidence Evaluating Task Reporting Professional Development Getting Results Process Flow DATA SOURCES Data Summary Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Repeat Steps 1 through 5 for each component of the SIP. TARGETSACTION SEQUENCES DOCUMENTATION

Summarize the Shared Values Summary includes the shared values, mission, core beliefs, and vision of the school community Summary includes the shared values, mission, core beliefs, and vision of the school community

Data Collect, Synthesize, Prioritize and Summarize Data Collect, Synthesize, Prioritize and Summarize analyze student data identify most significant weaknesses/gaps prioritize weaknesses/gaps

Data Analysis Guide Worksheets to Assist in Analysis of Multiple Data Sources for School Improvement Planning

General Questions to Guide the Analysis of School Data Think about the following questions/issues/trends as you analyze data. We will end this guide by revisiting these questions. Separately consider the following for Reading and Mathematics: What does the data tell you about your school’s performance on the PSSA in terms of:  Trends across time?  Performance with regard to progress: i.e., percentage of students scoring Advanced & Proficient and Basic & Below Basic?  Performance across grade levels, if your school has more than one tested grade (i.e.,this year grades 3, 5, 8, 11; next year grades 3 through 8 and 11)?  Performance of relevant student groups (i.e.,any gaps between groups or with respect to the annual target)?  Performance by PSSA Reporting Category and Assessment Anchors?

PSSA Data Analysis Section B - Instructional Priorities Section C - Open-Ended Task Data Section D - Other Reading Assessment Data

TerraNova / Supera Analysis Worksheet - Reading Purpose: This document is designed to help you look at several years of TerraNova data by analyzing trends in preparation for identifying target areas for your School Improvement Plan. (Please remember this is one of multiple sources of data that you will use.) The information needed to complete the following two charts can be found in the School Profile on the District’s Website. Reading Grade% At/ Above National Average% in Bottom Quartile Fall 2002Spring 2003 Total

The information needed to complete this chart is located on the TerraNova Assessment Anchors Report for Reading (CRST 3).Gr.____Gr.____Gr.____Gr.____ Reading Analysis Questions What % of your students mastered Comprehension/Reading Skills? R.A. 1 F iction Texts What % of your students mastered Vocabulary Word Recognition? What % of your students mastered Inferences and Conclusions? What % of your students mastered Other Comprehension Skills? R.A. 2 N onfiction Text What % of your students mastered Vocabulary Word Recognition? What % of your students mastered Inferences and Conclusions? What % of your students mastered Other Comprehension Skills? R.B. 1.1, 1.2,1.3 A nalyze Fiction/Nonfic tion

Benchmark Test Data Analysis Cumulative Benchmark Test Results – October 2004 – June 2005  What do the data show about the school average percentage of items correct compared to the district average? For each Reading Standard, circle the grade level(s) where the average percentage of items correct was low( below 60%) and/or substantially lower( 5-10% point difference) that the average for the District: Grade Level: Learning to Read Independently Read Critically in All Content Areas Reading, Analyzing and Interpreting Literature Characteristics and Functions of the English Language Research Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________

Data Analysis Activity Do you notice a difference across years? What about across grades? Are there discrepancies between Reading and Language? What are the instructional implications for your school? Turn to a partner and share your findings.

Benchmark Data Analysis Activity

Root Causes Introduction & Exercises

Root Causes A Root Cause is the deepest underlying cause or causes of positive or negative symptoms within any process, which if removed, would result in elimination, or substantial reduction, of the symptom.

Why Root Cause Analysis ? Root Cause Analysis: helps to eliminate the problem, not just the symptom conserves scarce resources promotes discussion and reflection provides rationale for strategy selection

Determining Root Causes Will correcting or eliminating this root cause result in success? If yes, then it is a root cause. If no, then it is a contributing factor.

Possible Root Cause If teacher content knowledge improves greatly, then student achievement will increase. Is this necessarily true?

A Guide for Identifying Root Causes “We can talk or dream about the glorious schools of the future or we can create them.” Marilyn Ferguson

Dimensions of School Improvement SUPPORTING REALM parents governance personnel ENABLING REALM materials schedules professional development organizational structures CORE REALM instruction curriculum assessments school leadership monitoring staff accountability for performance others identified by the school funding student readiness to learn others identified by the school

Checking for Understanding What are your questions about analyzing data and identifying root causes?

Step 1: Data Where are we now? Step 1: Data Where are we now? Summary – includes highlights of the analyses of student data Summary – includes highlights of the analyses of student data Identification of root causes that prevent or promote student achievement Identification of root causes that prevent or promote student achievement

Step 2: Design Where do we want to go next? Step 2: Design Where do we want to go next? Select research based, high leverage strategies that address the root causes Select research based, high leverage strategies that address the root causes Action sequence for reading and mathematics is required Action sequence for reading and mathematics is required Thematic schools may select a strategy to support their theme Thematic schools may select a strategy to support their theme

Step 3: Delivery How are we going to get there? Step 3: Delivery How are we going to get there? Same process Same process Importance of building capacity of staff Importance of building capacity of staff Maximum use of resources (human and financial) Maximum use of resources (human and financial)

Step 4: Development of People What additional skills do we need? Step 4: Development of People What additional skills do we need? Determine training and skills needed by staff Determine training and skills needed by staff Professional development calendar aligns to address root causes/student needs Professional development calendar aligns to address root causes/student needs

Step 5: Documentation How do we track our progress? Step 5: Documentation How do we track our progress? Effectiveness of strategies Effectiveness of strategies Documentation process (time intervals) Documentation process (time intervals)

Milestones of Progress Quality of Teaching Quality of Teaching Quality Leadership Quality Leadership Artful Use of Infrastructure Artful Use of Infrastructure Continuous Learning Ethic Continuous Learning Ethic

Checking for Understanding What are your questions about the action sequence?

What can you expect for September?