Brief Introduction to Review of Human Subjects Research in the Health Sciences Presentation to Primary Care Faculty Development Program Nichelle Cobb,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Introduction to Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. Debra Schneider IRB Administrator (313)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research Stacey Berg, M.D. Texas Children’s Cancer Center.
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Submitting IRB Applications (or “Do I have to do an IRB?”) Linda A. Detman, Ph.D. Research Associate Lawton & Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Andy Bertolatus MD 2/22/10 Preparing an IRB Application.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Conditional IRB Approval
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Introduction to IRB (Institutional Review Board)
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Conducting Human Subjects Research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Conducting Human Subjects Research
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Which Projects Do – and do Not – Require IRB Review?
Human Participants Research
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Brief Introduction to Review of Human Subjects Research in the Health Sciences Presentation to Primary Care Faculty Development Program Nichelle Cobb, PhD Director, Health Sciences IRBs November 2010

Definition of Human Subjects Research: A Refresher

Definition of human subjects research Research is defined by the Common Rule as, “a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.” A human subject is defined as “a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information.”

What is human subjects research? Covers a wide variety of activities, including studies of:  Human testing of drugs, devices, or products developed through research  Data from surveys, interviews, and observation  Employment information or records of earnings  Medical records  Bodily materials, such as cells, blood, urine, tissues, organs, hair, nail clippings, or DNA, when these are linked to specific individuals

QA, QI, & Program Evaluation Difficult to determine sometimes whether a project constitutes research rather than QI/QA or program evaluation May be research if:  There is an intent to publish  Procedures involve randomization  Standard of care is altered

Case Studies/Case Reports Case reports involving three (3) or fewer patients generally do not require review by a UW-Madison IRB because they are not viewed as meeting the definition of research under the Common Rule HIPAA Privacy Rule may apply

What an IRB Assesses Writing Your Application to Address These Issues

What Does the IRB Evaluate? IRBs review research to help ensure: it is as safe as possible for people to take part in the study if there are serious risks, they are as low as possible and the right kind of monitoring is in place to prevent adverse effects or identify adverse outcomes as soon as possible that the subject population is the appropriate population to answer the study question the study design is acceptable so that  the question posed can be answered by the research  the right number of people will be enrolled (not too many or too few) so that as few people are exposed to risk as possible the information given to potential research participants is sufficient to allow them to make an informed choice about whether they want to take part in the research study

Put Another Way (What the Common Rule Says) Risks to subjects are minimized Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result Selection of subjects is equitable Informed consent will be sought from each prospective subject or the subject's legally authorized representative (includes ensuring consent forms contain required elements of consent) – consent can be waived by IRB in some cases Informed consent will be appropriately documented – documentation of informed consent can be waived by IRB in some cases The research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects There are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data When some or all of the subjects are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, additional safeguards have been included in the study to protect the rights and welfare of these subjects

Submitting to an IRB

Which IRB? There are four campus IRBs Health Sciences IRB  Primarily reviews clinical trials/research protocols involving medical interventions Minimal Risk IRB  Primarily review medical records research, research database and tissue banking projects, survey and interview research, and exemption applications Social & Behavioral Sciences IRB  Reviews social, behavioral, and non-medical health research Education IRB  Concentrates on K-12 education research

Electronic IRB submission Implementation of ARROW, a system for electronic submission and tracking of IRB protocols, for all researchers as of November 17, 2010 Animal and biosafety committees expected to adopt this system as well Initial roll out began in 2010

Which Application Type? Initial Review Application: Full review Any study that presents more than minimal risk Minimal risk research that is not exempt or not a medical records review Some questionnaires, interviews, and survey studies (e.g., involving children, asking sensitive questions that are linked to identifiers)

Which Application Type? Initial Review Application: Non- Exempt Medical Records Review For studies of medical records or images (e.g., those that retain identifiers) May include some contact with patients for outcome information

Which Application Type? Initial Review Application: Exemption Must be minimal risk Some survey and interview studies Some evaluations of educational activities, curricula Use of existing data (e.g., medical records), specimens that are unidentifiable (e.g., residual tissue)

Exempt Research IRBs, not researchers, make the determination as to whether a research protocol is exempt Common examples of exempt research  Questionnaires, surveys, interviews that are anonymous or not sensitive  Chart review studies and no identifiers are recorded  Evaluations of educational techniques, curricula when the intent is to publish

Not Human Subjects Research IRB Office reviews to determine whether it meets the federal definition of “research” and/or of “human subject”  Once determination made no further interaction with IRB for project needed unless project begins to meet definition of research and/or includes human subjects Examples of not research  Program evaluation, quality assurance activities Examples of not involving human subjects  Use of coded data when researchers do not have access to the key to the code and entity holding code will not release link to researchers  Research on decedents

A Note on Identifiability An identifier includes any information that could be used to link research data with an individual subject.  E.g., initials, address, zip code, phone number, gender, age, birth date, occupation, employer, racial or ethnic group, type of biopsy performed, date sample taken, diagnosis, primary care physician, referring physician, and genealogy. Some of the identifiers listed above become less problematic if the sample size is large enough so that the potential identifiers could describe several individuals and thus cannot be linked to only one person. Data coded by numbers or letters that may be linked to identifiers are not anonymous or unidentifiable.

IRB Review Process

Overview of Submission and Review Process for Full Board Review (I) Electronic copy of application sent to the IRB Office first IRB Office will send to scientific review committee if needed If no scientific review required, the application will be forwarded to an IRB reviewer If scientific review required, IRB review does not proceed until the scientific review committee agrees the study can be forwarded to the IRB for review

Overview of Submission and Review Process for Full Board Review (II) If no scientific review needed or the scientific review committee approves, a staff reviewer will work with the study team to address any missing information, revisions needed to ensure the study complies with campus and federal policies and IRB review conventions 2 cycles of feedback are given by the staff reviewer Once the pre-review is complete, paper copies are then requested and the study is scheduled for review by the full IRB

Pre-Review Concentrates On… Completeness, accuracy of application Compliance with  institutional policy (e.g., PI qualifications, training requirements, COI issues)  State Law  federal regulations Common Rule FDA regulations, if applicable VA regulations, if applicable  other institutional precedents Spotting major issues that will be a challenge at the formal review stage

How to Contact the IRB

There are many ways to get information and help from the IRB…. View the WEBSITE at - contains policies, guidance, forms, news/updateswww.medicine.wisc.edu/irb CALL the HS-IRBs Office at we have nice, smart staff on call daily who can help you us at – general questions answered Make an APPOINTMENT for a consultation Questions about ARROW – or call Join our LIST-SERV – sign up to receive regular updates and newsletters from the IRB

Questions? (General or Project Specific)