B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOLD Imaging at 7T Mark Elliott CfN Symposium 4/9/2008.
Advertisements

MRI Acquisition Methods for Brain Morphometry
Imaging Sequences part I
Chapter 7: Gradient Echo Imaging Methods
Richard Wise FMRI Director +44(0)
M R I Pulse Sequences Jerry Allison Ph.D..
Six-week project Lauren Villemaire MBP 3970Z Department of Medical Biophysics University of Western Ontario.
MR Sequences and Techniques
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Clinical Evaluation of Fast T2-Corrected MR Spectroscopy Compared to Multi-Point 3D Dixon for Hepatic Lipid and Iron Quantification Puneet Sharma 1, Xiaodong.
Parameters and Trade-offs
Topics spatial encoding - part 2. Slice Selection  z y x 0 imaging plane    z gradient.
Comparative Analysis of Continuous Table and Fixed table Acquisition Methods: Effects on Fat Suppression and Time Efficiency for Single-Shot T2-weighted.
Basic Principles MRI related to Neuroimaging Xiaoping Hu Department of Biomedical Engineering Emory University/Georgia Tech
All Hands Meeting 2005 MRI Calibration Update Morphometry BIRN.
Realigning and Unwarping MfD
Bruce Fischl MGH ATHINOULA A. MARTINOS CENTER Harvard Medical School MIT CSAIL/HST some open issues in functional MRI (thanks to Larry Wald for almost.
fMRI introduction Michael Firbank
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 18: Physical practicalities Digression: analysis ICE9: Example for WA8 Safety limits –dB/dt –SAR –Acoustic.
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 10: The Dreaded Drop-out Spin echo review Field maps Through-slice dephasing © Melissa Tillery
Volumetric Analysis of Brain Structures Using MR Imaging Lilach Shay, Shira Nehemia Bio-Medical Engineering Dr. Alon Friedman and Dr. Akiva Feintuch Department.
Multimodal Visualization for neurosurgical planning CMPS 261 June 8 th 2010 Uliana Popov.
Arterial Spin Labeling at 7T - Double Edged Sword
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 7: Gradients and k-space FFT examples –Sampling and aliasing Gradient Gradient echo K-space
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 12: Signal-to-Noise Ratio Things that determine signal strength –voxel size –RF coil Things that determine.
Radiofrequency Pulse Shapes and Functions
Imaging Sequences part II
The comparison of MRI imaging In 3.0 T & 1.5T By a.r.shoaie.
Medical Imaging Systems: MRI Image Formation
Reduction of Metal Artefacts in MRI of Hip Arthroplasty
Pulse sequences.
Pulse Sequences Types of Pulse Sequences: Functional Techniques
RT 4912 Review (A) Rex T. Christensen MHA RT (R) (MR) (CT) (ARRT) CIIP.
Contrast Mechanism and Pulse Sequences Allen W. Song Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University.
ASNR 2015 Poster# EP-19 Effect of Chemotherapy on Brain Structure and Cognition in Older Women with Breast Cancer: a Brain MRI Study 1 Bihong T. Chen MD.
Topics in Magnetic Resonance Angiography Research and Some Potential New Directions Dennis L. Parker et al.
MRI image validation using MRI simulation Emily Koch CIS II April 10, 2001.
Brian Welch MR Clinical Science 7T Phase Stability November 18, T Phase Stability and Sparse Spokes.
Contrast Mechanism and Pulse Sequences
March 22, 2011 Issac Yang Supervisor: Charles McKenzie, PhD
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PROPELLER Acquisition on the Philips Achieva
Conclusions Simulated fMRI phantoms with real motion and realistic susceptibility artifacts have been generated and tested using SPM2. Image distortion.
Declaration of Relevant Financial Interests or Relationships David Atkinson: I have no relevant financial interest or relationship to disclose with regard.
MRI: Contrast Mechanisms and Pulse Sequences
Magnetic Resonance Learning Objectives
Brain lesions: Can 3D FLAIR imaging replace 2D FLAIR at 3T? Shingo Kakeda1, Yasuhiro Hiai2, Norihiro Ohnari1, Toru Sato1, Yukunori Korogi1 1) Department.
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering Allen W. Song Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University.
DTI Acquisition Guide Donald Brien February 2016.
Real time shimming (RTS) for compensation of respiratory induced field changes P van Gelderen, JA de Zwart, P Starewicz, RS Hinks, JH Duyn Introduction.
Chapter 5 Mark D. Herbst, M.D., Ph.D.. The MR Imaging Process Two major functions –Acquisition of RF signals –Reconstruction of images.
Parameters which can be “optimized” Functional Contrast Image signal to noise Hemodynamic Specificity Image quality (warping, dropout) Speed Resolution.
Imaging of Small Vessels in the Brain using MRI
CT Multi-Slice CT.
FMRI data acquisition.
Samy Abo Seada, Joseph V Hajnal and Shaihan J Malik
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Bioengineering 280A Principles of Biomedical Imaging Fall Quarter 2005 MRI Lecture 5 Thomas Liu, BE280A, UCSD, Fall 2005.
ریشه لغوی MRI مخفف کلمات Magnetic Resonance Imaging به معنی تصویر برداری تشدید مغناطیسی می‌باشد. به این روش NMR نیز اطلاق می‌شود که مخفف کلمات Nuclear.
Slice thickness: 5–6mm Slice gap: 20% of slice thickness (!1–1.2mm or factor 1.2) Matrix: 512 FOV: 220–240mm Saturation slab: parallel to the slices,
3T-versus-7T DTI with 36 diffusion-encoding directions at b = 3000 s/mm2 and 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm isotropic voxel resolution. 3T-versus-7T DTI with 36 diffusion-encoding.
Technical implementation of VW-MR imaging.
Basics of fMRI and fMRI experiment design
Fig. 4 DMI visualizes the Warburg effect in a patient with GBM after oral [6,6′-2H2]glucose intake. DMI visualizes the Warburg effect in a patient with.
The echo time (TE) The echo time (TE) refers to the time between the application of the radiofrequency excitation pulse and the peak of the signal induced.
7T SWI of a patient with MS
MIP of a 7T susceptibility-weighted image of the brain of a healthy volunteer revealing tiny venules in the cortex. MIP of a 7T susceptibility-weighted.
Presentation transcript:

B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity variations can be corrected by post-processing, improved contrast uniformity will require improvements in B1 and/or flip angle uniformity achieved by RF pulse sequence design (e.g. sparse spokes) or parallel transmit/rf shimming (Multix). and same time it has served as a basis for more specific sequence sets targeted at individual anatomic regions or types of pathology (see posters … showing hippocampal anatomy, melanoma metastases, and T1 parametric imaging) Exam Card v2 for Anatomic Imaging of Human Brian at 7T JL Creasy 1, EB Welch 2,3, RG Avison 2, AW Anderson 2, JC Gore 2, MJ Avison 2 1 Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 2 Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville Tennessee, MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION RESULTS / DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION REFERENCESREFERENCES The increased signal to noise ratio (SNR) available with ultra-high field MRI (≥7T) offers the potential for significant improvements in spatial resolution and/or reduced scan times in clinical neuroimaging. However the increased B0 and B1 (RF) inhomogeneities, field-dependence of tissue T1, T2 and T2* values, and significantly increased RF power deposition demand parameter and sequence modifications before this SNR advantage can be realized. Here we report on our ongoing development of a general purpose 7T neuroimaging protocol. Our goal was to implement a bundle of high resolution MRI sequences providing familiar (T1, T2, T2* etc), as well as new (susceptibility weighted imaging, SWI) tissue contrast types. To ensure broad utility in a clinical population, total study duration with whole brain coverage was designed to be no longer than 50 minutes. The increased signal to noise ratio (SNR) available with ultra-high field MRI (≥7T) offers the potential for significant improvements in spatial resolution and/or reduced scan times in clinical neuroimaging. However the increased B0 and B1 (RF) inhomogeneities, field-dependence of tissue T1, T2 and T2* values, and significantly increased RF power deposition demand parameter and sequence modifications before this SNR advantage can be realized. Here we report on our ongoing development of a general purpose 7T neuroimaging protocol. Our goal was to implement a bundle of high resolution MRI sequences providing familiar (T1, T2, T2* etc), as well as new (susceptibility weighted imaging, SWI) tissue contrast types. To ensure broad utility in a clinical population, total study duration with whole brain coverage was designed to be no longer than 50 minutes. RF power deposition and B1 inhomogeneities remain the most important factors influencing pulse sequence design at ultrahigh field, although distortion and signal dropout associated with B0 inhomogeneities in low bandwidth imaging sequences may be problematic. Migration of low flip angle, gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences to 7T is relatively simple, as the absence of refocusing pulses drastically reduces the SAR. Also, there is less flip angle sensitivity with GRE, and pixel bandwidths tend to be high, particularly for 3D sequences. B1 issues are more problematic for thin slice 2D (high peak B1), 2D spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity), turbo spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity, SAR), and FLAIR (B1 inhomogeneity of inversion) sequences. The choice of specific scan parameters and sequences in the ExamCard (Table 1) reflects these influences. For example, for T2 weighting at 7T GRASE is preferred over TSE because of the lower SAR and reduced sensitivity to B1 inhomogeneity. Creasy et al. RSNA, 2007, Chicago Il Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science VUIIS Building, Medical Center North st Ave, South Nashville, TN Tel: (615) Fax: (615) URL: T2* SAG – reveals tiny venous structures (zoom) Studies were performed on a 7T Achieva whole body MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems) using a 16 channel head coil (Nova Medical). Subjects were recruited under protocols approved by the Vanderbilt University IRB, and consisted of young healthy volunteers, and patients scheduled for 3T neuroimaging as part of their clinical care. Scan parameters were refined in an iterative fashion, beginning with the sequences and parameter sets developed in our first round of protocol development (ExamCard v1) [Creasy et al, 2007]. The ExamCard v1 protocol consisted of a SmartScout, SENSE reference scan, T1 3D TFE, T2* 2D FFE, SWI, T2 2D GRASE, 3D SWI (7 echo), T2*/T1 3D TFE, B0 and B1 mapping scans, and a multiple flip angle 3D SPGR sequence for T1 parametric imaging. For ExamCard v2, further refinements included: 1) Addition of a TOF MRA sequence 2) Conversion of multiecho SWI sequence from 7 echo with no gradient “fly-back” to 5 echo with “fly-back” 3) Incorporation of full 3D flow compensation in SWI 4) Incorporation of a refocusing flip angle sweep in the FLAIR GRASE sequence to reduce SAR and mitigate B1 inhomogeneities 5) Incorporation of RF spoiling in the reference scan Specialized ExamCards were developed as extensions of ExamCard v2 for imaging specific anatomical regions (e.g. hippocampus) or pathologies (demyelinating disease, metastatic disease, and primary brain tumors). Studies were performed on a 7T Achieva whole body MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems) using a 16 channel head coil (Nova Medical). Subjects were recruited under protocols approved by the Vanderbilt University IRB, and consisted of young healthy volunteers, and patients scheduled for 3T neuroimaging as part of their clinical care. Scan parameters were refined in an iterative fashion, beginning with the sequences and parameter sets developed in our first round of protocol development (ExamCard v1) [Creasy et al, 2007]. The ExamCard v1 protocol consisted of a SmartScout, SENSE reference scan, T1 3D TFE, T2* 2D FFE, SWI, T2 2D GRASE, 3D SWI (7 echo), T2*/T1 3D TFE, B0 and B1 mapping scans, and a multiple flip angle 3D SPGR sequence for T1 parametric imaging. For ExamCard v2, further refinements included: 1) Addition of a TOF MRA sequence 2) Conversion of multiecho SWI sequence from 7 echo with no gradient “fly-back” to 5 echo with “fly-back” 3) Incorporation of full 3D flow compensation in SWI 4) Incorporation of a refocusing flip angle sweep in the FLAIR GRASE sequence to reduce SAR and mitigate B1 inhomogeneities 5) Incorporation of RF spoiling in the reference scan Specialized ExamCards were developed as extensions of ExamCard v2 for imaging specific anatomical regions (e.g. hippocampus) or pathologies (demyelinating disease, metastatic disease, and primary brain tumors). Table 1: 7T Clinical Exam Card v2.0 NameTRTEFAVoxel SizeSENSE Scan Time SmartScout x 2.23 x 2.2-1:29 REF x 4.0 x 4.0-1:55 T1 3D TFE x 0.7 x (RL)8:58 2D FFE x 0.5 x (RL)4:54 SWI x 0.5 x (RL)4:03 T2 GRASE x 0.64 x (RL)5:36 T2 FLAIR GRASE x 0.64 x (RL)6:30 SWI 5 echo (  =3) x 1.00 x (RL)5:12 3D T2* Sag x 0.33 x (RL)4:20 3D T1 “Thick” x 0.5 x (RL)3:27 B1 MAP30/ x 3.0 x 5.0-6:51 MFA SPGR x 1.0 x (RL)5:09 TOF MRA x 0.45 x (RL)8:03 T2 GRASE 3D TOF MRA SWI minIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding: NIH/NIBIB BRP; Vanderbilt U. Dept. of Radiology T1W 3D TFE 2D FFE3D T1W “Thick” B1 Map 5 echo SWI with “flyback” gradient T1 Map (B1 corrected) T 1 [sec] T2W FLAIR GRASE