LINC -- A Shared ILS System President and Directors Meeting September 22, 2004 Jan Ison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consortia Costs Carol Dawe Library Integrated Network Consortium Paul Mills Prairie Area Library System March 8, 2006.
Advertisements

OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Cataloging Update Connexion client 1.50 & more OCLC CJK Users Group Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA April 8,
The Future of the Catalog Shelley Hostetler Product Manager, Voyager Endeavor Information Systems.
LINC Directors Group May 21, 2008 Lincoln Trail Libraries System.
LINC Directors Group September 21, 2005 Lincoln Trail Libraries System.
LINC Policy Council July 13, 2005 Lincoln Trail Libraries System.
LINC Directors Group December 2, 2009 Lincoln Trail Libraries System.
THE VIRTUAL ILLINOIS CATALOG (VIC) Jan Ison Lincoln Trail Libraries System OCLC Advisory Committee for Public Libraries June 6, 2000.
Reshaping Digital Library Services at National Level – Why, How, When? Kristiina Hormia-Poutanen, Director of Library Network Services, Finland Liber annual.
Library Automation Overview of Results January 24 th 2006 Jomo Kenyatta Memorial Library.
Introduction to Integrated Library Systems
ICOLC October 4, 2001 OCLC Services. Purpose Libraries’ web-based information portal needs –Maximize consortia’s role in their members’ use of database.
How can a library consortia help your library? Some thoughts on the development of library consortia Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University.
CARLI: The Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Illinois Cathy Salika October 15, 2007.
Moving libraries to Web scale Matt Goldner Product & Technology Advocate 14 June 2011.
Integrated Library Management System
AMICUS and the National Union Catalogue Transition to OCLC Briefing NUC User Round Table.
POSTECH Library New Challenge As a Member of IUG library.postech.ac.kr JiYeon Han.
Library integrated system -Aleph Fang Peng Stony Brook University.
Introduction to Integrated Library Systems
Maintain and Modify By: Sahar Aftab (1253 ) and Mehboob Nazim (1085) Central Library.
Michigan eLibrary (MeL) Growing Pains and Gains 21 st Annual Computers in Libraries March 23, 2006.
Impact of Open Source Library Automation System on Public Library Users Barbara Albee Hsin-liang Chen SLIS, Indiana University.
Libraries Australia Annual Report 2006/2007 Tony Boston Assistant Director-General Resource Sharing National Library of Australia.
AGent Demonstration Multi-Tier Solution Presented by Auto-Graphics Pomona, CA December 8-9, 2003 Version 2.0.
The National Library of New Zealand (Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa) & OCLC established a Partnering Agreement for the supply of bibliographic services.
New ILS Directions: Open Source Options and Consortial Implementaion The Orbis Cascade Alliance Implementation of Ex Libris’ Alma and Primo Susan Hinken,
ILS & Technology Services Potential Budget Impacts.
OCLC Research Libraries Partners 10 June 2011 Robin Murray Vice President, Global Product Management OCLC Collaboratively Building Web-Scale with Libraries.
Michigan’s eLibrary Today the “New MEL” Spring 2002 Becky Cawley, Statewide Databases Administrator Library of Michigan.
AGent 2.0 Cataloging AGCat –Replaces WindowsCat/FullCat UDMM Interactive authority control Subject heading translation Bibliographic resources Cataloging.
Why Open-Source? No Vendor-Locking In a proprietary software --- Your supports lock with it. freedom to customize and improvements in software needs,
OCLC Online Computer Library Center CONTENTdm ® Digital Collection Management Software Ron Gardner, OCLC Digital Services Consultant ICOLC Meeting April.
Megan Drake Pacific University Al Cornish Orbis Cascade Alliance Migrating to a Shared ILS Using Alma and Primo May 1, 2014.
Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament of Australia Finding and implementing the perfect e-book model: the Parliamentary Library’s experience.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Resource Sharing Update Sam Sayre OCLC Western Service Center Cassie Maringer WCCLS.
Thai Higher Education Library Consortium and Resource Sharing
NORTH BAY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SYSTEM An Automated Resource Sharing System NW ILL September 2007.
Copy cataloguing in Finland Juha Hakala The National Library of Finland
Cataloging and Metadata at the University Library.
ALCME: OAI at OCLC Jeffrey A. Young OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
Plagiarism What is it? Any time a student represents work done by someone else as his or her own, that student has committed an act of plagiarism.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Kathy Kie December 2007 OCLC Cataloging & Metadata Services an introduction.
Estonian overview Anneli Sepp Database Manager of ELNET Consortium.
WorldCat Local & World Cat Quick Start a new way to search your library’s resources and the world beyond.
The Information Challenge Exponential growth of resources New researchers with new needs Multiple communication options New expectations and opportunities.
Mortenson Center Associates Library Cooperation & LTLS Orientation Lincoln Trail Libraries System Jan Ison and Joe Sciacca September 25, 2007.
2006/2007 Annual Report Working together to advance research and learning... through innovative, collaborative information access.
2nd Annual NAUUG Meeting SUNYConnect Implementation Planning for a Consortium.
Extending Access To Information Resource Discovery Service William E. Moen, Ph.D. Kathleen R. Murray, Ph.D. School of Library and Information Sciences.
9/26/2007OCLC Orientation & Services1 What is OCLC?
WALDO Consortium’s Koha Development Project John Garino Asst. Director of Library Systems St. John’s University, New York ALA - Chicago July 12, 2009.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Union List Users Group Meeting Cathy Kellum Product Manager, WorldCat Resource Sharing Services ALA Chicago June.
Colorado Virtual Library & Open SiteSearch Brenda Bailey-Hainer Director, Networking and Resource Sharing Colorado State Library January 2002.
The OhioLINK Library System Ohio Library and Information Network.
ZILLANE Study Preliminary Findings Dr. William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library and Information Sciences University of North.
Theses record exchange: developments in the Australian National Union Catalogue Roxanne Missingham and Margaret Kennedy, Director, National Library of.
I. Understanding Record Loading and EDIS II. Database Statistics & Top 10 Search III. Problem with merging records IV. Pseudo Tag (Special 035 Tag ) V.
NC Shared ILS (Integrated Library System) Library Cooperation Summit Boone, NC August 12, 2009.
Types of Information Systems Dr. D. Bilal IS 582 Spring 2007.
Bibliographic Record Description of a book or other library material.
Delivers local and global resources in a single search The first, easy step toward the first cooperative library service on the Web WorldCat Local “quick.
Consortia in the USA Past, Present, Future A Presentation by: Antoinette Paris Greider Association Dean, Research and Education University of Kentucky.
Iowa’s Shared Library Automation System Information Session June 18, 2008.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF LIBRARY AUTOMATION USING KOHA (Open Source Software) AT BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, PERAMBALUR R.VENUS MLISc- Final.
The Koha Experience: An Academic Library Perspective
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
Systems librarian roles & responsibilities
OCLC, WorldCat and Connexion
AUC’s Role In Facilitating Access To Knowledge In The Arab World
Presentation transcript:

LINC -- A Shared ILS System President and Directors Meeting September 22, 2004 Jan Ison

LINC Background Shared Services Collaboration Results Whats Next

The Background LTLS Board voted to automate the circulation for the LTLS collection LTLS Board voted to allow member libraries to participate in the circulation system to create an online union catalog Grant received to automate 8 libraries Lakeland College Library -- a multitype consortium from the beginning Georgetown Public (Currently serves 3700 people with a $37,000 budget) Grant to automate 2nd group of 8 libraries

The Background Grant for 5 libraries to utilize microcomputers to circulate via batch process Libraries voted to store full Marc records Libraries voted to use OCLC as the sole source for new bibliographic records (The First) Grant to convert bibliographic records to MARC LTLS Cataloging Center founded to serve libraries that could not meet the cataloging criteria 1992 & Changed vendors

The Background New hardware/software Began patron initiated ILL for all libraries and was the first multitype library system to provide the service (The First) Implemented a gateway module to be the first system to provide FirstSearch through the online catalog (The First) Libraries voted to implement Authority Control on the database (The First) Our first web catalog Implemented Client Server Software

Why A Shared System? To make every librarys collection available to the users of every other library, enhancing the sharing of library resources and extending the scope of materials available far beyond those owned by the local libraries LINC enables –Automation of local library procedures –Expansion of local patron services –Cooperation in resource sharing –Sharing the cost of an ILS

Collaboration Matters Principles of Cooperation –Roles and responsibilities defined Key Agreements –Bibliographic data –Resource sharing –Costs Governance Structure

Shared LINC Services Resource Sharing Library Catalog Circulation Community Resources Cataloging Serials Acquisitions Reserve Room Homebound Technology Administration Security Inventory Backup Circulation

Central Services Technical Support Operations Management Planning and Development Consortium Management (Governance) Contract Negotiation and Management Cataloging Center Authority Control -- Library Technologies Inc. PAC Look and Feel Training

New Additions Syndetics -- enriched content for the librarys OPAC Web Reporter -- web based statistical access to library data WebFeat -- a meta search engine to search multiple resources at the same time

OCLC Sole Source for Bibliographic Records 1989 Libraries agreed to have a MARC database A year of research and discussion Libraries voted to use OCLC as sole source for cataloging records (Key reason was the ability to avoid duplicate bib records) Only allow qualified libraries to enter new records--via OCLC (4 libraries)

How are Costs Shared? LINC Central Site –Access Points –Circulation –Holdings Cataloging Center –Percentage of all libraries materials budgets less periodicals Authority Control –Same as Central Site Web Resources –Divided Equally

LINC Shared Cost History

Cataloging Center Shared Costs

How Much Do Individual Libraries Pay $810 Annually --.23% (LINC, Cataloging Center, Authority Control, Web Resources) $43, % for LINC, Authority Control, Web Resources A bargain

Growth of OnLine Libraries LSCA Live and Learn Automation Grants Local Funding

Why the tremendous Growth? In the past -- the single biggest factor -- Grants –Live and Learn Automation Grants –Only $10,000 per library but the amount was a major incentive Growth now -- slower -- but libraries want to participate –3 libraries currently are doing this on their own Ogden Rose Public Library $29,000 serving 743 –Saint Thomas More HS (a donation made this possible) –Krannert Art Museum Library

LINC Members by Type Academic -- 2 Libraries Public Libraries School Libraries Special -- 4 Libraries

LINC by the Numbers Total Circulation -- 3,878,948 Holds Placed in the library ,945 Remote Holds ,130 Bibliographic Records ,648 Holdings -- 1,977,060 Patrons ,795 LINC Scheduled Hours Annually 8756 LINC Hours Available (includes time not available during migration) Training Classes; 650 participants; over 2500 contact hours

The Use

Remote use of LINC

What does it look like now? The LINC Catalog The Kids Catalog WebReporter WebFeat

The Future More content More linking to other resources Utilizing commercial search engines to get to library content -- Google, Yahoo SearchGoogleYahoo Search Digitization MORE MEMBERS

Contact Jan Ison Pat Boze