Economic Effects of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination Dr. Les Anderson Beef Extension Specialist University of Kentucky Dr. Les Anderson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reproduction on the Ranch Clay Lents 1, Kraig Peel 2, George Seidel Jr. 1,and Gordon Niswender 1 Colorado State University 1 Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.
Advertisements

Replacement Heifer Management: A coordinated management concept
R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D Agricultural & Applied Economics UGA-Tifton ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COW CULLING VS. REPLACEMENT HEIFERS.
Animal Breeding Systems
Technology: Price Tag and Profit 2004 Beef Improvement Federation Barry H. Dunn, Ph.D. Executive Director and Endowed Chair King Ranch Institute for Ranch.
Cropland and Livestock Leasing in Montana
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
HOW IRRATIONAL IS $2,000? Scott Clawson NE Area Ag Econ Specialist $2,500? $3,000? $3,500?
Can You Breed a “Good Breeder” Kristi M. Cammack Department of Animal Science University of Wyoming.
BEEF COW CALF & SEEDSTOCK INDUSTRY By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Take it to the Bank: Keys for Financial Success Keys for Financial Success Barry H. Dunn, Ph.D. Animal and Range Sciences Dept. South Dakota State University.
Sexed Semen and Beef Cattle UW Extension Livestock Team Spring 2010.
2014 Protocol Sheets/Estrus Synchronization Planner.
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IS AI FOR YOU? PUREBRED COMMERCIAL.
Value Difference of Feeder Cattle
Economic Tools to Evaluate Culling Decisions for Breeding Cattle and Replacements.
Reproductive Management of the Cow Herd
Beef Cow-Calf Profitability, CREC, Steve Metzger Farm Business Management Carrington Research Extension Center Carrington, ND.
Cow-Calf Operations Makenna Ramos April 10, 2012 Animal Science.
Economic Feasibility of Adopting Genomic Selection in Beef Cattle Kenneth Poon & Getu Hailu University of Guelph CAES 2010, Niagara Falls June 18 th, 2010.
Reproductive cycles and how they relate to breeding systems.
Animal Management Objective 5.03: Exemplify reproductive management practices.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
Maximizing Reproductive Performance in Beef Cows Keith VanderVelde Livestock Agent Marquette Co. UWEX Spring 2004 Cow Calf Programs Mauston-March 6 Plover-March.
Breeds of Cattle.
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell. Goal 1.Explain purpose of partial budgets 2.Illustrate their structure and use 3.Give some examples.
Swine Production. Swine Production in the US THE UNITED STATES is the world's third- largest pork producer after China and the EU. It is a major player.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Producers breed for improved genetics Produce all breeding stock (Bulls and Heifers) Raise purebred or registered cattle Pay close attention to EPD’s.
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Beef & Dairy Production. How to decide?? Type of production varies greatly. Depends on: type of animals Location Facilities overall producer goals In.
Sperm are sorted. “X” sperm are saved “Y” sperm and “undetermined” sperm are discarded.
Limousin Heifers Class 1 Rank these heifers as replacements for a purebred operation in which the primary product is terminal bulls for the commercial.
Expected Progeny Differences Cattle Selection Using Genetic Data Nick Nelson Blue Mountain Community College.
Improving Beef Cattle Reproductive Rates Through Management Part 1 Dr. Tom R. Troxel Professor and Associate Department Head – Animal Science.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
B EEF C OW P ROTOCOLS H EAT D ETECTION F IXED-TIME AI (TAI)* Cystorelin ®, Factrel ®, Fertagyl ®, OvaCyst ® GnRH PG estroPLAN ®, Estrumate ®, In-Synch.
Continuous Calving: Are Economic Incentives Large Enough to Eliminate the Traditional Practice? by D. Doye and M. Popp INTRODUCTION Why, despite expert.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Denise Schwab ISU Extension Beef Program Specialist 2013 Beef Production SPA Lab 2013 Beef Production SPA Lab
Beef Cattle Production
GRAZING ECONOMICS: YEAH, BUT WILL IT MAKE MONEY? Dr. Curt Lacy Agricultural Economists University of Georgia.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
AA22 ANIMAL SCIENCE II UNIT C ANIMAL MANAGEMENT Essential Standard 5.00: Understand management of agriculture animals. Objective 5.03 Exemplify Reproductive.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Challenges with Heifer Selection – HOW MANY Should I Breed, and What are they worth? Dr. Ron Lemenager Beef Extension Specialist
Jeopardy Feeding & Management of the Cow-Calf Herd Unit 15 Animal Science 1.
Sunshine Farms P O Box 1777 Clanton, AL Using Ultrasound Data in a Seedstock Production Program.
University of Minnesota Beef Improvement Federation
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
Selection Decision Tools Revisited Economically Relevant Traits vs. Indicator Traits B. L. Golden California Polytechnic State University, SLO.
ECONOMICS OF IMPROVED GRAZING SYSTEMS Dr. Tommie Shepherd, Dr. John McKissick and Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock University of Georgia.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis.
Beef Marketing Update Kenny Burdine UK Agricultural Economics Economics.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Utilizing Enterprise Budgets in Beef Cattle Operations
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Exploring the Beef Industry
Sound Financial Management: Working With Cattlemen
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
Farm Business Analysis
Quiz for Beef Cattle EPDs.ppt
IRM Farm Program Dr. Les Anderson.
From Conception to Carcass
Livestock Enterprise Information
Presentation transcript:

Economic Effects of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination Dr. Les Anderson Beef Extension Specialist University of Kentucky Dr. Les Anderson Beef Extension Specialist University of Kentucky

Why Not AI? Fewer than 10% of beef producers currently use estrus synchronization and AI (ESAI). Why? –Beef production systems are extensive –Limited by facilities –Not important enough –Intimidated? Fewer than 10% of beef producers currently use estrus synchronization and AI (ESAI). Why? –Beef production systems are extensive –Limited by facilities –Not important enough –Intimidated?

Summary Cost per pregnancy of natural service versus AI Short-term return on investment of ESAI Long-term return on investment of ESAI Cost per pregnancy of natural service versus AI Short-term return on investment of ESAI Long-term return on investment of ESAI

Cost per Pregnancy Costs associated with getting a cow pregnant (Sandy Johnson and coworkers, Kansas State University) Factors: –Bull costs or service costs –Bull:cow ratio –Bull maintenance costs –Pregnancy rate Costs associated with getting a cow pregnant (Sandy Johnson and coworkers, Kansas State University) Factors: –Bull costs or service costs –Bull:cow ratio –Bull maintenance costs –Pregnancy rate

Factors Affecting Costs of Pregnancy - ESAI Cost of service –Semen, technician, labor, etc. Pregnancy rate Herd size Estrus synchronization system used Cost of service –Semen, technician, labor, etc. Pregnancy rate Herd size Estrus synchronization system used

Select Synch Heat and AI Heat and AI Day of Treatment GnRH PG

Summary Cost per pregnancy varies dramatically even in natural service breeding systems Cost per pregnancy is approximately similar between ESAI and natural service if calculated on an equivalent production basis. Cost per pregnancy varies dramatically even in natural service breeding systems Cost per pregnancy is approximately similar between ESAI and natural service if calculated on an equivalent production basis.

Is Estrus Synchronization and AI Profitable? Trial on Western Kentucky Farm –Commercial cows 351 mature cows and first-calf heifers –Two-thirds were subjected to heat synchronization and AI (n = 251) and rest were exposed to a bull (n = 100). –All costs were determined. Trial on Western Kentucky Farm –Commercial cows 351 mature cows and first-calf heifers –Two-thirds were subjected to heat synchronization and AI (n = 251) and rest were exposed to a bull (n = 100). –All costs were determined.

CO-Synch Day of Treatment GnRH + AI GnRH + AI GnRH PG

Comparisons Synchronized –Overall: 85% calved in first 30 days 90% calving rate Natural breeding –Overall 62% calved in the first 30 days 81% calving rate Synchronized –Overall: 85% calved in first 30 days 90% calving rate Natural breeding –Overall 62% calved in the first 30 days 81% calving rate

AI Partial Budget

Long-term Effects of ESAI? Trial –Approximately 45 cows/heifers. –Charolais/Angus cross cows –Two-breed rotation; change breeds every 4 years or so. –Last ten years average percent calf crop weaned = 74.5%. –Average weaning weight = approx. 500 lbs. Trial –Approximately 45 cows/heifers. –Charolais/Angus cross cows –Two-breed rotation; change breeds every 4 years or so. –Last ten years average percent calf crop weaned = 74.5%. –Average weaning weight = approx. 500 lbs.

Trial Change breeding program –AI-terminal system Synchronize all cows and heifers for timed insemination. Inseminate to maternally-oriented breeds (Hereford and Angus). White cows bred to Angus bulls, black cows bred to Hereford bulls. Replacement heifers are kept from AI- inseminated cows. Clean-up with terminal sire. All calves from clean-up bulls are sold. Change breeding program –AI-terminal system Synchronize all cows and heifers for timed insemination. Inseminate to maternally-oriented breeds (Hereford and Angus). White cows bred to Angus bulls, black cows bred to Hereford bulls. Replacement heifers are kept from AI- inseminated cows. Clean-up with terminal sire. All calves from clean-up bulls are sold.

Trial Data –CHAPS and SPA analysis –Control data (financial/production records) were collected from –Treatment data (financial/production records) were collected Data –CHAPS and SPA analysis –Control data (financial/production records) were collected from –Treatment data (financial/production records) were collected

Trial Item Diff Avg Sale weight - steers lbs - heifers lbs Market Price (per cwt)$87$88$1 Pregnancy Rate (%)789517% Percent Calf Crop Weaned709121% Lbs Calf Weaned/Cow Exp lbs Cost per cow $6.68 Net Profit

Summary ESAI is a profitable enterprise both in the short- and long-term Returns could be greatly increased if producers take advantage of added value of their product –Key: Identify your target and breed to hit that target ESAI is a profitable enterprise both in the short- and long-term Returns could be greatly increased if producers take advantage of added value of their product –Key: Identify your target and breed to hit that target

So……. Are you interested in becoming a more efficient beef producer? Do you want to make more money? Is it worth the effort? Are you interested in becoming a more efficient beef producer? Do you want to make more money? Is it worth the effort?