U. S. Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project 18096_1 HLW Project Status Bryan Bower, DOE WVDP Denis Koutsandreas, DOE EM HQ Ron Farchmin,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
Advertisements

Garfield graphics are copyrighted and reproduced with kind permission of PAWS Inc. All rights reserved Nuclear Power – Safety (Part 1)
A2 – nuclear power Garfield Graphic with kind permission from PAWS Inc – All rights reserved.
1 KRB-A (Grundremmingen, Germany). 2 Type:Boiling Water Reactor Power: 250 MW(e) Started in 1966, shut down in 1977 First commercial power reactor in.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.3. Waste management.
Liquid Waste Organization
1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Progress on Cleanup of the INL Site for the INL Retired Employees Association Bob Iotti, President and CEO September 2008.
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
At 4620 square miles, Lane County, Oregon is nearly as large as the State of Connecticut and is home to some 336,000 residents. Short Mountain Landfill,
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC , the State of Michigan.
N O L UTI O NS OI ZS LLC An EnergySolutions Company Zion Status Update for Zion Community Advisory Panel November 25, 2013 Patrick Daly.
The Behavior of Radionuclides and RCRA Elements in Tank Backfill Grouts Mark Fuhrmann, Jeffrey Gillow, and John Heiser Environmental Sciences Department.
1 Ray Geimer CH2M HILL B&W West Valley, LLC. Quarterly Public Meeting August 27, 2014 CHBWV Project Update
Chapter 16 Nuclear Energy.
Legacy Waste Retrieval And Treatment Processing Methods At RSRL Harwell Site Author : Marc Rigby Presented by : Malcolm Adam 28 th May 2009.
The Yucca Mountain Repository for Nuclear Waste April 23, 2007 Edward F. Sproat III Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department.
Safety  performance  cleanup  closure M E Environmental Management National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Role in DOE’s Transformation Barb Beller, Project.
1 Successful decommissioning of a nuclear plant Evelyn Hooft Bart Thieren 20 june 2008.
MERIT Equipment Disposal Van Graves MERIT Video Conference September 1, 2010.
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it? David J. Diamond Energy Sciences & Technology Department February 2009.
Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Background Before a company decides to close it’s power reactors the facility must be put in to a state that no longer.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
CHEMISTRY TASIA MILLER. Nuclear: operated or powered by atomic energy Waste: to destroy or consume gradually Disposal: a disposing of or getting rid of.
1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT (PART 4) A RAHMAN RWE NUKEM Ltd (UK) Name, company and chapter.
Remote manipulations / diagnostics in radioactive areas and handling of radioactive material Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland 6 th May 2013 THE REPLACEMENT.
Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Disposition Discussion Meeting of the National Governors’ Association April 12, 2001 U. S. Department of Energy.
Capabilities & Competencies An Introduction to EnergySolutions September 19, 2007 Scott Baskett Erik Vogeley.
N O L UTI O NS OI ZS LLC An EnergySolutions Company Zion Status Update for Zion Community Advisory Panel. Gerard van Noordennen September 29, 2014.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
Material Disposition Planning Olga Ligeti Radiation Protection Department MARCH 24, 2009.
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Dr. Okan Zabunoğlu Hacettepe University Department of Nuclear Engineering.
One Project. One Team. One Goal.
The environment is everything that isn’t me. Albert Einstein Albert Einstein.
MANAGEMENT OF DAMAGED SNF HANDLING OPERATIONS AT PAKS NPP Е.А. Zvir, V.P. Smirnov Research and Development Company “Sosny”, Moscow, Russian Federation.
INL Calcine Disposition Jim Beck Calcine Disposition Clean/Close INTEC.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
National Cleanup Workshop Managing Large Capital Projects Ken Picha Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material.
West Valley Demonstration Project Environmental Characterization Services Contract Update November 14, 2012 Zintars Z. Zadins, Ph.d. U.S.
1 Construction of Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Charting the Course for Major EM Successes in September 29, 2015 Frank.
EM Budget--- Past/Present/Future Mark W. Frei U.S. Department of Energy October 14, 2005.
Repatriation of Vinča RA Reactor Spent Fuel The 15th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials PATRAM
PARTNERS MAINT COMPANY LTD International Nuclear Forum "BULGARIAN NUCLEAR ENERGY - NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND WORLD ENERGY SAFETY “, Varna, 2-4 June 2011.
1 2001: WTP Construction Began. 2 WTP in 2015 Pretreatment Facility High-Level Waste Facility Low-Activity Waste Facility Analytical Lab.
1 Homes take DUSEL NSF Preliminary Baseline Review - April 13-15, 2010 Bob Altes Engineer- ISE Water Shield Engineering Figure Courtesy PDG and LBNL Homestake.
Phase I Decommissioning Project Update West Valley Demonstration Project Presented by: Bryan Bower, Department of Energy November 14, 2012.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
E GNV Orange County Solid Waste Management Facility Southern Expansion Site Project.
1 West Valley Demonstration Project FY 2014 Budget Briefing Bryan C. Bower May 22, 2013.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
US-DPRK Next Steps Workshop January 27, 2003Washington, D.C. Yongbyon Spent Fuel Experience Presented by Mark Mohr
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
The Yucca Mountain Repository for Nuclear Waste June Edward F. Sproat III Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department.
The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF
AQA A2 Physics A Nuclear Physics Section 15 Fission.
Rail Shipments July 2004.Page number1 Rail Shipments of Radioactive Waste from Rocky Flats to Envirocare in Utah August 2004.
LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
John Christian President, Logistics, Processing and Disposal
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
Management of Radioactive Waste
Waste Management’s Role in Safely Consolidating, Accelerating, and Delivering the Idaho Cleanup Project Core Mission Bruno Zovi, AMWTP LLW/MLLW Program.
West Valley Demonstration Project Status Update
A2 – nuclear power Garfield Graphic with kind permission from PAWS Inc – All rights reserved.
Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it?
Renee Echols Firewater Associates, LLC WMW Group Chair June 4, 2019
Presentation transcript:

U. S. Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project 18096_1 HLW Project Status Bryan Bower, DOE WVDP Denis Koutsandreas, DOE EM HQ Ron Farchmin, WVNSCO Bryan Bower, DOE WVDP Denis Koutsandreas, DOE EM HQ Ron Farchmin, WVNSCO April 15, 2005

18096_2 Overview u Achievements u Selected HLW canistered production data u Dismantlement status u Preparation for large equipment D&D u Large equipment D&D and removal u Safe storage of removed components

18096_3 Vitrification Facts u Achievements u Approximately 600 tons of glass produced; 24 million curies u More than 80 months of safe, successful radioactive operations One of the test canisters before hot opsInside the Vitrification (Vit) Cell before system startup

18096_4 Vitrification Facts u Achievements u Additional flushing with non-radioactive glass before melter was shut down on Sept. 5, 2002 u 2200 kg (88%) of material removed from melter using evacuated canisters u 275 high-level waste canisters filled and safely stored in former reprocessing facility u No future use for Vitrification cell/facility Evacuated canister used to remove remaining material HLW canisters in storage in one of the cells that was formerly used for spent fuel reprocessing

18096_5 Dismantlement Status u Dismantlement began Oct —Continued progress on cleanup of the WVDP —Could be accomplished with available funding —Use the talents and experience of people working on site today u Work Scope —Remove and package expended equipment and material —Ship Class A low-level waste off-site for disposal; Stage Class B & C for shipment —Package some waste for future processing —Vacuum Cell floor —Complete dismantlement by Dec. 2004

18096_6 Selected HLW Canistered Production Data u Avg. mass: 2,045+/-10kg. u Avg. wattage: 239w; max. calculated 362w u Avg. Curies: 3.68 x 10E+4 u Mean Predicted PCT —Boron: 2.89 mg/l; High 3.08 —Lithium: 2.90 mg/l; High 3.05 —Sodium: 2.81 mg/l; High 2.98 u Canister Surface Dose Rate —Nominal Gamma: 4,226 R/hr.; High 6,362 R/hr. —Nominal Neutron: 0.33 R/hr.; High 0.88 R/hr.

18096_7 Dismantlement Status u Cell dimensions —70’ long —43’ wide —46’ tall u Nine major components u 1900 linear feet of utility and process piping u General area dose rates 5 – 50 R/hr u High contamination levels >100MM dpm/100 cm2 beta gamma u All dismantlement requires remote tooling Inside the Vit Cell before dismantlement began

18096_8 Preparing for Remote Dismantlement u Tools adapted for processing and handling Floor mounted manipulator (Brokk ® ) modified for full remote operations 50-ton shielded fork lift for moving waste packages

18096_9 Remote Processing Tooling Robotics Arm Three Existing in-cell Manipulators

18096_10 Remote Dismantlement Operations Floor mounted manipulator (Brokk ® ) modified for full remote operations

18096_11 Major Accomplishments to Date u Over 98 of the expected 120 expended materials waste containers have been removed u Nine major components were removed and packaged, including the: —Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank (CFMT) —Melter Feed Hold Tank (MFHT) —54-ton Melter u Concentrating on final cleanup and cell vacuuming —Project completion by June 2005

18096_12 Large Equipment D&D Major challenge was large vessel removal u Additional flushing performed after Vit system was shut down u Vessels were sprayed with fixative u Components placed in highly robust containers with 3-5 inch carbon-steel walls u Low-density grout added to provide additional stabilization for storage and transport u Dose rates for the two packaged containers range from less than 1 mrem/hr to ~30 mrem/hr on contact Packaged WeightsCFMT ~ 175 tons MFHT ~ 145 tons Melter ~ 200 tons 19-axle trailer required to transport melter container

18096_13 Large Equipment D&D Treatment From upper left: 1. Spray-on fixative is applied to the CFMT 2. The CFMT is tipped 3. The CFMT is drawn in to the staged container 4. A containment shelter is used for contamination control 5. The loaded MFHT container is grouted

18096_14 Melter D&D And Interim Storage u The Melter —Melter removed from Vit Cell using rail and roller system —Melter moved freely until it reached a ramp —Sweep on front rollers contacted rails on the ramp, causing the rear wheels to lose contact with the track —Recovery efforts necessitated the design of an engineered method to move melter back on track —Recovery was completed on November 13; melter is now packaged for storage Brokk ® is instrumental in melter recovery process Packaged melter prepared for storage

18096_15 On Site Interim Waste Storage Large component storage area Temporary shielded storage for debris requiring further processing u Large equipment or components are safely stored on site