Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, 2005 System Size and Energy Dependence of Elliptical Flow Richard Bindel University of Maryland For.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Oldenburg Probing QCD with High Energy Nuclear Collisions, Hirschegg, Austria, January Directed Flow in Au+Au Collisions Markus D. Oldenburg.
Advertisements

PID v2 and v4 from Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC
Gunther Roland - MITPHOBOS ISMD’05 3 Remarks on Fluctuations in Hadron Production at RHIC Gunther Roland Massachusetts Institute of Technology New Results.
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
S.A. Voloshin Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, San Diego, March 11-18, 2006page1 Sergei A. Voloshin Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan Toward.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Helen Caines Yale University SQM – L.A.– March 2006 Using strange hadron yields as probes of dense matter. Outline Can we use thermal models to describe.
Identified and Inclusive Charged Hadron Spectra from PHENIX Carla M Vale Iowa State University for the PHENIX Collaboration WWND, March
12-17 February 2007 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR identified particle measurements at large transverse momenta in Cu+Cu collisions at RHIC Richard.
High p T identified hadron anisotropic flow and Deuteron production in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook The PHENIX Flow Data: Current Status Justin Frantz (for T.Todoroki) Ohio University WWND 15 Keystone, CO 1 (Filling in For Takahito.
High p T identified charged hadron v 2 and v 4 in 200GeV AuAu collisions by the PHENIX experiment Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Two particle correlations with respect to higher harmonic plane in Au+Au 200 GeV collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Takahito Todoroki for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Hydrodynamics, flow, and flow fluctuations Jean-Yves Ollitrault IPhT-Saclay Hirschegg 2010: Strongly Interacting Matter under Extreme Conditions International.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
May, 20, 2010Exotics from Heavy Ion Collisions KE T and Quark Number Scaling of v 2 Maya Shimomura University of Tsukuba Collaborated with Yoshimasa Ikeda,
QM2006 Shanghai, China 1 High-p T Identified Hadron Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Masahiro Konno (Univ. of Tsukuba) for the PHENIX.
Thermal Production of particles at RHIC (Test of Chemical Freeze-out at RHIC) Jun Takahashi for the STAR collaboration SQM2008, Beijing, China.
Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.
QM’05 Budapest, HungaryHiroshi Masui (Univ. of Tsukuba) 1 Anisotropic Flow in  s NN = 200 GeV Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at RHIC - PHENIX Hiroshi Masui.
Partonic Collectivity at RHIC ShuSu Shi for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Central China Normal University.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model LongGang Pang 1, Victor Roy 1,, Guang-You Qin 1, & Xin-Nian.
20 Nov 2006, Quark Matter, Shanghai, ChinaShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Rapporteur 3 Bulk Properties and Collective Phenomena ShinIchi Esumi Univ.
Higher moments of net-charge multiplicity distributions at RHIC energies in STAR Nihar R. Sahoo, VECC, India (for the STAR collaboration) 1 Nihar R. Sahoo,
M. Oldenburg Strange Quark Matter 2006 — March 26–31, Los Angeles, California 1 Centrality Dependence of Azimuthal Anisotropy of Strange Hadrons in 200.
Hydrodynamics, together with geometric fluctuations of the Glauber model make specific predictions for a dipole and triangle terms in the observed azimuthal.
S.A. Voloshin STAR QM’06: Energy and system size dependence of elliptic flow and v 2 /  scaling page1 Sergei A. Voloshin Wayne State University, Detroit,
1 Effect of Eccentricity Fluctuations on Elliptic Flow Art Poskanzer Color by Roberta Weir Exploring the secrets of the universe The Berkeley School 2010.
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Energy Dependence of ϕ -meson Production and Elliptic Flow in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Md. Nasim (for the STAR collaboration) NISER, Bhubaneswar, India.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.
System size dependence of freeze-out properties at RHIC Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai-China Nov System size dependence of freeze-out properties.
Incident-energy and system-size dependence of directed flow Gang Wang (UCLA) for STAR Collaboration  Introduction to directed flow  Detectors: ZDC-SMD,
Latest Charmonium Results from the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC Alexandre Lebedev (Iowa State University) For the PHENIX Collaboration Lake Louise Winter.
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
1 1 Rachid Nouicer - BNL PHOBOS QM Energy and Centrality Dependence of Directed and Elliptic Flow in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at RHIC Energies.
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
Elliptic flow and shear viscosity in a parton cascade approach G. Ferini INFN-LNS, Catania P. Castorina, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, V. Greco.
July 16th-19th, 2007 McGill University AM 1 July 16th-19th, 2007 McGill University, Montréal, Canada July 2007 Early Time Dynamics Montreal AM for the.
Masashi Kaneta, LBL Hadron Spectra in Au+Au Collisions by STAR Experiment at RHIC Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration LBNL.
1 Charged hadron production at large transverse momentum in d+Au and Au+Au collisions at  s=200 GeV Abstract. The suppression of hadron yields with high.
21 st June 2007 RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting Recent RHIC Results on Bulk Properties Richard Hollis.
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.
Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.
1 Effect of Eccentricity Fluctuations and Nonflow on Elliptic Flow Methods Jean-Yves Ollitrault, Art Poskanzer, and Sergei Voloshin QM09.
Systematic Study of Elliptic Flow at RHIC Maya SHIMOMURA University of Tsukuba ATHIC 2008 University of Tsukuba, Japan October 13-15, 2008.
Measurement of Azimuthal Anisotropy for High p T Charged Hadrons at RHIC-PHENIX The azimuthal anisotropy of particle production in non-central collisions.
For the Collaboration Adam Trzupek The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Kraków, Poland The 2007 Europhysics.
24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.
S.A. Voloshin STAR ICHEP 2006, Moscow, RUSSIA, July 26 – August 2, 2006page1 Sergei A. Voloshin Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan for the STAR.
Alexander Milov ICHEP06: Global observables at RHIC July 27, Global Observables at RHIC Alexander Milov ICHEP Moscow July 27, 2006.
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2003 Fall Meeting of the Division of Nuclear Physics (2003/10/31) 1 KANETA, Masashi for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN-BNL Research.
V 2 and v 4 centrality, p t and particle-type dependence in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Yuting Bai for the STAR Collaboration.
Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.
Yuting Bai (for the Collaboration) Anisotropic Flow and Ideal Hydrodynamic Limit International Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter 2008 Oct ,
PHENIX. Motivation Collaboration PHENIX Roy A. Lacey (SUNY Stony Brook) PHENIX Collaboration I N T E R N A T I O N A L W O R K S H O P O N T H E P H.
Multiplicity, average transverse momentum and azimuthal anisotropy in U+U at √s NN = 200 GeV using AMPT model Md. Rihan Haque 1 Zi-Wei Lin 2 Bedangadas.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
HBT results from a rescattering model Tom Humanic Ohio State University WPCF 2005 August 17, 2005.
High-pT Identified Hadron Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions
Analisi del flow con il metodo dei coefficienti di Fourier
The Study of Elliptic Flow for PID Hadron at RHIC-PHENIX
Anisotropic RHIC Hiroshi Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba Mar/03/2007 Heavy Ion Cafe.
Flow Measurement in PHENIX
A simulation study of fluctuation effect on harmonic flow
System Size and Energy Dependence of -meson Production at RHIC
ShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba
Hiroshi Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba
Presentation transcript:

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, 2005 System Size and Energy Dependence of Elliptical Flow Richard Bindel University of Maryland For the collaboration Division of Nuclear Physics, Maui September 19th, 2005

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Collaboration (Aug 2005)

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Motivation For Studying Flow Reaction plane x z y M. Kaneta Flow probes the very early thermalization of the system Elliptic flow as a function of: Energy Centrality Pseudorapidity Momentum Can be used to constrain theory.

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Two Flow Measurement Methods Hit Based MethodTrack Based Method

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Motivation for Comparing Species Mid-central AuAu collision Central CuCu collision Two similar system sizes! roughly same number of participants

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Cu+Cu Preliminary 3-6%, N part = 100 Au+Au 35-40%, N part = 99 Some observables scale with number of participants Similar dN/d  Motivation for Comparing Species Mid-central AuAu collision Central CuCu collision Two similar system sizes! 200 GeV roughly same number of participants

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Cu+Cu Preliminary 3-6%, N part = 100 Au+Au 35-40%, N part = GeV Some observables scale with number of participants Similar dN/d  Motivation for Comparing Species Mid-central AuAu collision Central CuCu collision Two similar system sizes! We expect flow to depend on geometry! Two similar system sizes! roughly same number of participants

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Cu+Cu Preliminary 3-6%, N part = 100 Au+Au 35-40%, N part = GeV Some observables scale with number of participants Similar dN/d  Motivation for Comparing Species Mid-central AuAu collision Central CuCu collision Two similar system sizes! We expect flow to depend on geometry! Two similar system sizes! roughly same number of participants Elliptical Circular Using two species lets us change the geometry while holding the number of participants constant

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Eccentricity: A measure of “Geometry” Mid-central AuAu collision Central CuCu collision Elliptical Circular We need a way to quantify the geometry of the participating nucleons The shape is characterized by the eccentricity (  )

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Eccentricity: A measure of “Geometry” Nucleus A Nucleus B Participant Nucleons A model of a AuAu collision:

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Eccentricity: A measure of “Geometry” Nucleus A Nucleus B Participant Nucleons A model of a AuAu collision: b Using the impact parameter as the x-axis, we define the standard eccentricity using the widths of the distribution in the x and y directions

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Eccentricity: A measure of “Geometry” Nucleus A Nucleus B Participant Nucleons A model of a AuAu collision: b Using the impact parameter as the x-axis, we define the standard eccentricity using the widths of the distribution in the x and y directions y2y2 x2x2

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Au+Au 19.6 GeV62.4 GeV130 GeV 200 GeV Cu+Cu 0.05 Au+Au: PRL (2005) preliminary PHOBOS Sizable v 2 for Cu+Cu The Phobos Elliptic Flow Data Set from 0% to 40% centrality

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, preliminary PHOBOS 200 GeV h ± Statistical errors only Cu+Cu preliminary Au+Au PHOBOS 200 GeV Hit Based Statistical errors only The Data: Something’s Amiss… Elliptic flow is high even for the most central bin in Cu+Cu How does it relate to the eccentricity? |  | < 1

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, preliminary PHOBOS 200 GeV h ± Statistical errors only Cu+Cu preliminary Au+Au PHOBOS 200 GeV Hit Based Statistical errors only For CuCu, the eccentricity drops to zero by N Part of 100 The Data: Something’s Amiss… |  | < 1

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, preliminary PHOBOS 200 Gave h ± Statistical errors only Cu+Cu preliminary Au+Au PHOBOS 200 GeV Statistical errors only v 2 near mid-rapidity The Data: Something’s Amiss… Cu+Cu preliminary Au+Au PHOBOS 200 GeV Dividing by the eccentricity shows no connection between the two species. |  | < 1

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, The Data: Something’s Amiss… What went wrong? We reexamine our definition of eccentricity

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Reexamining Eccentricity Eccentricity is not directly measurable We use a Glauber model to relate eccentricity to our N Part bins. What goes into making this plot…?

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Glauber collisions are modeled over a range of impact parameters and are sorted by the number of participants. Reexamining Eccentricity An eccentricity distribution is built up for each N Part The black line shows the average eccentricity AuAu AuAu collisions with same N Part

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Reexamining Eccentricity Au-Au Cu-Cu When we examine the eccentricity distribution for CuCu, it looks much broader than AuAu Also, notice that there are many more events with negative eccentricity.

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Meaning of Negative Eccentricity b y2y2 x2x2 Here we revisit the standard definition of eccentricity applied to a Gluaber model.

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Meaning of Negative Eccentricity b y2y2 x2x2 Here we revisit the standard definition of eccentricity applied to a Gluaber model. Negative eccentricity results when  x 2 >  y 2, apparently due to fluctuations in the positions of the nucleons. Because of its smaller size, CuCu is more susceptible to fluctuations

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Redefining Eccentricity Nucleus 1 Nucleus 2 Participant Region x y b One reasonable method is to realign the coordinate system to maximize the ellipsoidal shape (a principal axis transformation) “Participant” eccentricity Opposed to “standard” eccentricity

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Standard and Participant Eccentricity Au-Au Cu-Cu Mean eccentricity shown in black Standard Eccentricity Participant Eccentricity

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Fluctuations in eccentricity are important for the Cu-Cu system. Must use care in doing Au-Au to Cu-Cu flow comparisons. Eccentricity scaling depends on definition of eccentricity. Impact of Eccentricity Fluctuations

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Elliptic Flow Puzzle Solved? Standard Eccentricity Cu+Cu preliminary Au+Au PHOBOS 200 GeV “Participant Eccentricity” allows v 2 scaling from Cu+Cu to Au+Au Participant Eccentricity PHOBOS 200 GeV Au+Au Cu+Cu preliminary

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Participant Eccentricity Cu+Cu Au+Au Standard Eccentricity Cu+Cu Au+Au / scaling: STAR, PRC (2002) Voloshin, Poskanzer, PLB (2000) Heiselberg, Levy, PRC , (1999) / scaling Overlap Area Caveat: dN ch /d  corrected to dN ch /dy

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Conclusions Phobos has continued to expand its extensive flow data set using two techniques Studying CuCu compared to AuAu allows us to vary the geometry while holding N part constant The expectation that elliptic flow scales with eccentricity continues to seem reasonable Careful consideration is needed when using eccentricity

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, 2005 Back-up Slides

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Limiting Fragmentation (Au+Au) 19.6 GeV62.4 GeV130 GeV200 GeV PHOBOS preliminary “Extended Longitudinal Scaling” of all longitudinal distributions  - y beam preliminary PHOBOS Au+Au 0-6% Au+Au 0-40% Au+Au 0-40% 200GeV 130GeV 62.4 GeV (prel) 19.6 GeV

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Limiting Fragmentation (Cu+Cu) preliminary PHOBOS 62.4 GeV200 GeV ‘Extended Longitudinal Scaling’ also seen in Cu+Cu Persists from p+p to Au+Au over large range in  ′ preliminary PHOBOS  - y beam Cu+Cu 0-6% 200GeV 62.4GeV Cu+Cu 0-40%

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, Cu-Cu more like Hydro than JAM hadron string cascade model Here JAM uses a 1 fm/c formation time. Hydro (160) has kinetic freezeout temperature at 160 MeV preliminary 200 GeV Cu-Cu preliminary 200 GeV 15-25% Cu-Cu Statistical errors only Compared to JAM Model

Richard Bindel, UMDDivision of Nuclear Physics, Maui, PHOBOS preliminary Cu-Cu, h ± Hit based 62.4 GeV PHOBOS preliminary Cu-Cu, h ± Hit based 200 GeV Track based 200 GeV Two Flow Measurement Methods Good agreement between methods |  | < 1