sUAS Aviation Rulemaking Committee System Certification Working Group Meeting #1 Andrew Roberts June 26, 2008

Admin Evacuation Bathrooms BAERI Support – Mark Sittloh Drinks, food and lunch Will take minutes for the CWG NASA ASP Support – Randy Albertson Venue arrangements BAERI Support Dinner?

Agenda 0830 Opening Remarks and Introductions – Andrew Roberts 0845 Discuss ARC and CWG scope – Andrew Roberts 0900 FAA discussion – Rich Posey 0930 Resources and current external standards ASTM – Dan Schulz RTCA – Bryan Hudson 1015 Break 1030 NASA/DOD Example Airworthiness Process LARC/WFF - Mike Logan / Jeff Bland DFRC – Brad Flick / Mike Marston Navy/USMC sUAS Cert effort – Steve Cook 1140 CWG Structure and Schedules/Telecoms and assignments– All 1200 Lunch (working lunch - CS will need to account for on Travel)

AGENDA 1300 Establish Subcommittee’s 1315 Breakout Sessions for (establish leadership, meeting/telecom schedules, assignments) - Working Group Coordinating Committee - Initial Airworthiness and Vehicle Certification Subcommittee - Continued Certification and Airworthiness Subcommittee - sUAS Registration Subcommittee 1430 Reports from Breakouts (15 minutes) - Working Group Coordinating Committee - Initial Airworthiness and Vehicle Certification Subcommittee - Continued Certification and Airworthiness Subcommittee - sUAS Registration Subcommittee 1530 Break 1545 Review Tasks End

Introduction of Working Group Members

6 Advisory Circular (June 9, 1981) Model Aircraft Operating Standards Covers “model” aircraft –Intended only for recreation or competition No enforcement - no regulatory basis “Encourages voluntary compliance” –≤ 400 feet –Advise ATC if within 3 miles of airport – “Full scale” aircraft have right- of-way Does not limit weight and speed Misapplied to small UAS Intended only for recreation and hobbyist Effective in conjunction with Academy of Model Aeronautics Safety Code

Identifies alternate methods of compliance with the applicable regulations of 14 CFR parts 61 and 91when evaluating proposed UAS operations Applies to civil (special airworthiness certificate) and public operators (COA) Concern is safe UAS operations among all users of the NAS –Non-cooperative aircraft and other airborne operations not reliably identifiable by radar (i.e., balloons, gliders, parachutists, etc) Applicants must make a safety case for alternate means of compliance to be considered –Sufficient data –Safety study must include a hazard analysis, risk assessment, and other appropriate documentation that support an “extremely improbable” determination Interim Operational Approval Guidance UAS Operations in the NAS – March 13,

ARC Formation Process Start Project is approved by Rulemaking Management Council FAA forms the ARC ARC provides recommendation to the FAA FAA takes appropriate actions Done ARCs are chartered by the administrator, managed by the office of primary responsibility (SBS) and tasked by the FAA ARC charters generally expire 2 years after their formation, they can be re- chartered if necessary

9 NPRM Development Preliminary System Description Preliminary System Description Aviation Rule-Making Committee Safety Review Team SRMD Recommendations FAA Project Team NPRM June ‘08 May ‘08 FAA OST OMB FAA Gov’t Personal Industry Stakeholders

ARC ARC Charter/Mission/General Goals/ARC Specifics Presented by Mr. Doug Davis –Committee is starting a baseline that doesn’t exist in this country. –Suggested a goal of the ARC to provide a formal recommendation within nine months. He recognized that this is a very aggressive goal. –Requested that the ARC members understand the sensibility of issues being discussed. Information should remain within the ARC. –The ARC is tasked to address those operations within visual line of sight, VFR conditions, during daylight hours.

ARC Objectives Propose regulatory language that allows for the maximum safe operations supported by the current technologies, while harmonizing with current manned aviation. Provide consensus recommendations to the FAA on best way to proceed with UAS rulemaking activities.

ARC Schedule 1 st Meeting – May nd Meeting – July rd Meeting – Aug th Meeting – Oct (1 st Draft Due) Committee discussed notional times for actions/due dates a. Work to be done by October 1st, 2008 b. Final Document due by December 15th, 2008 c. Final Meeting by January 20-22nd, 2009 d. SFAR due date: February 28th, 2009

ARC Working Groups Flight CrewPaul McDuffee System CertificationAndrew Roberts OperationsAndrew Latcher SpectrumFred Marks ModelRichard Hanson SFAR SupportDoug Marshall

Systems Certification Working Group (CWG) Scope The small UAS Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) has established limiting our process to vehicles that are only operated –in visual line-of-sight –daylight only –no more than 400 feet in class C, D and E airspace. –no higher than 1200 feet in class G airspace. –These limits may be reduced further as we develop the rules and run the safety analysis. The scope of this working group encompasses the development of regulations pertaining to the small UAS’s in the following areas. –Initial Certification and Airworthiness –Continued Certification and Airworthiness –Registration For each of these areas we will have two or three types of class of UAS to develop regulations for. These classes will be for simpler systems, medium systems and complex systems, the ARC will need to establish the parameters and values that will apply to separate these two or three classes.

System Certification WG CWG – Coord. Committee Chair – Andrew Roberts Co-Chair – Frank Jones Secretary – Mark Sittloh FAA Rep – Richard Posey Rulemaking Coord – Doug Marshall Initial Certification & Airworthiness Chair Co-Chair ARC Rep – Dan Schulz Registration Chair Co-Chair ARC Rep – Doug Marshall Continued Certification & Airworthiness Chair Co-Chair ARC Rep – Fred Marks

CWG Ground Rules Those not participating will be removed Will not be very willing to add new members to the CWG –You can have folks support you but they will not be invited to our CWG meetings –Subgroup leads will run their own subgroup participation

Work Assignment Break into three subgroups (ASTM folks split into the three groups) –Initial Certification and Airworthiness –Continuing Certification and Airworthiness –Registration Work assignment –To Report at 1430 Leadership – Chair, Co-Chair, Other positions if any Meeting Schedule Telecon Schedule How the subgroup plans to build the regulation Outline –To have ready at our next meeting – August 7, 2008 Regulation Outline – Titles and subsection Titles (first group to complete can select venue for follow-on meeting - $5K max) –1 st draft ready at our following meeting – Sept 18-19, 2008 –Follow-on work will be TBD based on ARC review