1 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Research and Statistics Ken Thompson, Director January 20, 2011 Understanding The Mississippi Growth Model.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Understanding Individual Student WESTEST 2 Growth & Achievement Report Office of Assessment and Accountability.

Advertisements

Understanding Grade Level and School Growth Reports Office of Assessment and Accountability.

AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.

Comparing Growth in Student Performance David Stern, UC Berkeley Career Academy Support Network Presentation to Educating for Careers/ California Partnership.

1 Effective Use of Benchmark Test and Item Statistics and Considerations When Setting Performance Levels California Educational Research Association Anaheim,

2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.

PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.

WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.

1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.

99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.

JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

Vertical Scale Scores.

Common Core State Standards & Current Legislation.

California Standards Test and CAHSEE Correlation Use of Student Data for Targeted Preemptive Intervention November 1, 2006 Dr. Janis Fries-Martinez, Principal.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 Review of the ABCs Standards SBE Issues Session March 2, 2005.

Using Data to Make Decisions Regarding Professional and Personalized Learning: WV General Summative Assessment – Part 1 County Chief Instructional Leadership.

Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.

ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.

Welcome to the TAYLOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Introduction to MCAS.

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?

Understanding Your Child’s FSA Score

Welcome to the TAYLOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Introduction to MCAS.

1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.

Growth. Growth Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student achievement and equity. Objectives.

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.

Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.

The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.

2015 State PARCC Results A webinar for school and district leaders Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator Wally McKenzie Edwin Analytics.

Georgia Milestone EOG information

PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.

Provincial Assessment Results Anglophone West School District November 26, 2015.

1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.

2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.

Milestones EOG Assessments Information Scroll down past FAQs for Lovinggood Data on GA Milestones.

AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.

Copyright © 2003, N. Ahbel Residuals. Copyright © 2003, N. Ahbel Predicted Actual Actual – Predicted = Error Source:

September 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Research and Statistics District Test.

1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.

PARCC Information Night February 24, 2015 Washington Township High School.

KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.

November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Research and Statistics Mississippi.

TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)

1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.

Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.

Provincial Assessment Results

Smarter Balanced Performance Levels and Scale Scores

Advanced Placement & PARCC Results

Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016

Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools

PA School Performance Profile

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

WIDA Standards for ELLs

Student Growth Measurements and Accountability

76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income

Advanced Placement & PARCC Results

Growth Models Oklahoma

Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System

Academic Growth Model Indicator Update

Understanding Learning Gains

Muncy School District November 9, 2015

Cardinal Convo April &

SGP What is it and where did it come from?.

CAASPP Results 2015 to 2016 Santa Clara Assessment and Accountability Network May 26, 2017 Eric E, Zilbert Administrator, Psychometrics, Evaluation.

Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning

2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director

English Learner Accountability Component

Spring 2019 MCAS Grade 10 Annotated Parent/Guardian Reports

Presentation transcript:

1 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Research and Statistics Ken Thompson, Director January 20, 2011 Understanding The Mississippi Growth Model

2 State Accountability Model The State Accountability Model consists of three components: 1.Achievement 2.Growth 3.High School Completion

What is the QDI? The Quality of Distribution Index (QDI) is a measurement of student performance on a particular day QDI doesn’t consider past performance. QDI measures how well schools are moving students between proficiency levels (i.e. “crossing the bar”.) 33

What is the QDI? 44 The formula for the Quality of Distribution (QDI) is: QDI = % Basic + (2 X % Proficient) + (3 X % Advanced) The QDI can range from a low of “0” to a high of “300”

What is Growth? Growth is a measurement of whether a student scored as well as predicted. Growth doesn’t look at how students are moving between proficiency levels (“crossing the bar”). Growth describes changes in scores rather than proficiency levels. 55

Most Asked Questions by Schools How can my QDI go up, but I still didn’t meet growth? How can my QDI go down, but I met growth? How do I compute growth? 66

QDI Measures how many are crossing the bar? November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 77

Growth measures how much higher and not necessarily measure if you cross the bar November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 88

Think of the size of the arrow as relative growth November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 99

Translate that to students… 10 StudentLA SS LA Prof Level MTH SSMTH Prof Level Alg I SSAlg I Prof Level #1133Minimum152Proficient652Proficient #2150Proficient147Basic657Proficient #3139Basic143Basic648Basic #4136Basic148Basic648Basic #5150Basic147Proficient655Proficient 10

8 th Grade QDI Minimum = 1/10 = 10% = 10 x 0 = 0 Basic = 6/10 = 60% = 60 x 1 = 60 Proficient = 3/10 = 30% = 30 x 2 = 60 Advanced= 0/10 = 0% = 0 x 3 = 0 QDI = StudentLA Prof Level MTH Prof Level #1MinimumProficient #2ProficientBasic #3Basic #4Basic #5BasicProficient 11 Proficiency LevelCountPercent Minimum10% Basic660% Proficient330% Advanced00% Total Scores10100% QDI = % Basic + (2 X % Proficient) + (3 X % Advanced)

Algebra I QDI Minimum = 0/5 = 0% = 0 x 0 = 0 Basic = 2/5 = 40% = 40 x 1 = 40 Proficient = 3/5 = 60% = 60 x 2 = 120 Advanced= 0/5 = 0% = 0 x 3 = 0 QDI = 160 QDI increase of StudentAlgebra I Prof Level #1Proficient #2Proficient #3Basic #4Basic #5Proficient 12 QDI = % Basic + (2 X % Proficient) + (3 X % Advanced) Proficiency LevelCountPercent Minimum00% Basic260% Proficient330% Advanced00% Total Scores5100%

How about growth… 13 While QDI uses proficiency levels to measure performance on one administration of the assessment … Growth uses scale scores to compare student performance with expected student performance. 13

Calculating Growth 14 Student8 th Grade Language Arts Scale Score 8 th Grade Mathematics Scale Score # # # # # As with QDI, Growth has a formula. To calculate growth, substitute the scale scores into the growth formula.

Positive QDI Change with Negative Growth 15 StudentLA SS MTH SS # # # # # Predicted Alg 1 SS Actual Alg 1 SS Difference (Residual) Overall Residual: QDI Change:

Questions or Comments 16